you should be able to do that via the normal HTTP api. I think the value of the graph approach is the ease of querying via graph but you should be able to do a proxy layer on top of cosmos with APIM using the API's on this link as the backend learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/cosmos-db/get-a-document

thanks

im not sure what you mean?

thanks mate

you pay per hour for the sftp endpoint being enabled regardless of if you use it or not

This is the plan

Me too, I loved the use cases....i see Fabric as an emerging alternative to AIS (in a SaaS/lowcodish way) and not just as a data platform...Mike, that might be the reason that you don't see references to AIS in the architecture center. Thanks again for sharing your knowledge with us. Reza

thank you for your comment mate, glad you found it useful

Here is the video you asked for - kzbin.info/www/bejne/mniUgWN9qriSnKs The logic app definition is here if you want it github.com/michaelstephensonuk/CodeSnippets/blob/main/LogicApp-SFTP-Storage/LogicApp.json Hope this helps you sort it out.

If you check out this page there is an example of a service bus triggered scenario. You would be able to do a similar thing by updating data verse then checking the logic app got fired. In these scenarios we usually implement a pattern to seperate the trigger from the logic which makes the solution more testable. You can see more on this page www.integration-playbook.io/docs/how-do-i-test-with-a-service-bus-trigger

it depends on the usecase i think.. some usecases will have a higher direct cost in logic apps but ive also seen customers with the reverse scenario where someone wrote thousands of lines of code to do what could be done with 4 actions in a logic app. Right tool for the right job

i am not sure i still have this demo but at the time i was just doing an http call to the chatgpt API with a formatted message but i think they added some preview out of the box connectors so there is probably a simpler way to do it now a days

you can still use the cloud connectors.. just remember thou the cloud connectors dont live in the vnet with an ase thou

​@@mikestephenson8525 It seems that LA inside the ASE can use the cloud connector(using public IP) only when ASE was deployed externally. Is this correct? I'm evaluating the restrictions for LA development when ASE was created internally. It seems to have too many restrictions so far. 1. Not being able to check LA history from portal since not within the VNET, thus, have to create a jumpbox VM to just check the LA's run history? 2. Not being able to use cloud connector since those connector's are using public IP and therefore outside of VNET. Now, I'm wondering if hosting LA standard inside ASE internal may be too impractical when we have LA developers all over the world. If I add a security group to the ASE external, can still restrict access from internet and whitelist only those allowed specifically and allow public IPs being used by Azure Services. This seems to be way practical development environment. Can you please share your thoughts on this? ASE external vs internal for LA Standard development. Thanks!

thanks mate

its just a standard feature on an app service which gives you a stream of log info being published by the runtime. its often a handy place to look for any error info you might not otherwise be seeing if you get stuck and arent sure what the problem is. For logic app its sometimes handy too if you have deployed an invalid workflow that the runtime cant load up

thanks mate, good shout on the suggestion

Hi Gary, try this video it covers creating connections in terraform. You will need to workout the exact properties for each connector which is a bit of a pain to do and I found the easiest way is to just use the browser trace when creating or updating a connection then you would know the right settings for your terraform - Video link = kzbin.info/www/bejne/f36vc2aeZrlpopY

thank you, its great to hear your using it. would you be interested in a chat about what your doing? we have been thinking about doing more with this but didnt think there was that much interest

@@mikestephenson8525 Very happy to chat on this further, Mike.

@@mikestephenson8525 Of course! Happy to chat about how I customized and used it to manage interfaces.

@@W12ardOfOz drop me a message on linked in and we can connect - www.linkedin.com/in/michaelstephensonuk1/

thank you mate, what kind of things do you want to see us talk about?

thanks for the feedback, will look into that

thank you

hi, i have a viewsonic whiteboard TV screen that is common for teachers to use and there is some software that comes with that called my whiteboard. its pretty cool actually

Busy building an application hosted on Azure itself and this might be something that I need to think about.

@@Rolo732 thanks mate, what app are you building and hows it going?

@@mikestephenson8525 Appologies for the late reply. It is a booking system for a sport that I play. Currently running in azure as well as a production service.

thanks mate 🙂

hi, its slightly out dated but there is a sample here: github.com/michaelstephensonuk/IntegrationPlaybook-LogicApp-Standard-Testing-Example. Ill put on my backlog to do a video

Thanks for the sample Mike. Very helpful. Thank you

hi its part of my logic app ASE demo here: github.com/michaelstephensonuk/CodeSnippets/tree/main/LogicApp-ASE/Modules/AzureRm.Resource.PrivateEndpoint