21 күн бұрын
2 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
9 ай бұрын
9 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@everythingisfake7555 3 ай бұрын
The PCF is good to glance at to refer to what a functional silo should be covering, but it fails to communicate what bpm is all about = working cross functionally and there are no other resources APQC have (unless you are a member) that accounts for cross functional work
@everythingisfake7555 3 ай бұрын
It is called the PROCESS classification framework, not the Capability or Data classification framework, with respect to Moritz.
@everythingisfake7555 3 ай бұрын
Some really really great questions from the host, simple, honest and practical. I studied a lot of APQC material at the start of the year, still I find the content and the PCF itself hard to engage with and I personally couldn’t transition the theory into action. The PCF levels are not actually logically hierarchical, they are just logically grouped, meaning you could take out a Process Group from Category 1.0 and file it under Category 2.0 under the process you end up making and so on. Seeing how the PCF can be used to create End to End processes (the how) would be a big help to understanding how the PCF is actually used and how this translates inti physical tangible action, but the E2E content is behind an expensive membership paywall, you can’t even view one for a taste.
@KaidonSalter4Heisman 6 ай бұрын
I can't think of anything that could go wrong
@whatsyourbaseline 6 ай бұрын
Right??? 😅
@connordent9753 6 ай бұрын
Sure let's beg for less control over our lives, thats amazing
@whatsyourbaseline 6 ай бұрын
Roland here - i hear what you say, and feel the same way. But i also think that it is inevitable...
@CyndiLH 8 ай бұрын
Had to look up SIPOC ;)
@whatsyourbaseline 6 ай бұрын
:-)
@CyndiLH 8 ай бұрын
I'm with team EPC. I'm not a professional process mapper but recently had an experience with a professional process mapper who used BPMN and we ended up getting hung up on roles (e.g. receiver of the task or doer of the task etc)...it's a bit hard to explain and this was because we had the swimlanes and struggled because events can be described within the context of the doer. I can see why the IT community would prefer BPMN but for someone who uses PM for role clarity, conflict resolution, business analysis I think the EPC approach works much better.
@whatsyourbaseline 6 ай бұрын
Roland here -I think that ship has sailed. i don't see any client asking for anything else but BPMN.
@bennybumkins Жыл бұрын
Super informative video coming from two people with great industry knowledge. Thanks for the content, +1 new subscriber and will watch your back catalogue.
@RolandWoldt Жыл бұрын
Thank you :-)
@drtonyburns7321 Жыл бұрын
"Six Sigma Champions are con men" “All you have is smoke and mirrors” - Creator of Six Sigma, Mikel Harry 91 % of Six Sigma companies have trailed the S&P 500 (Qualpro survey). An 8 yr study at Ford showed an average of 1 in 5 parts defective AFTER improvement for “successful” Six Sigma projects. Six Sigma is a destructive scam based on pure farce. It started with Mr Bill Smith and his out-of-control molding process that happened to drift “as much as 1.5 sigma”. Smith buddy, con man Harry, “proved” Smith disaster happened for every process ... based on the height of a stack of discs! Most folk never bothered to check. “Neutron” Jack Welch at GE described Harry as a “madman” and said no one had any clue what he was talking about. Jack handed over $1B anyway. A scam was born! GE has now thrown the Six Sigma trash out. EVERY aspect of Six Sigma is worthless, from its normalization nonsense, to its irrelevant enumerative methods, to its paralytic DMAIC. Dr Wheeler, the world’s leading process statistician, calls Six Sigma “GOOFY” and the stuff of “the tooth fairy”.. CBS calls it the most stupid fad of all time. There is never justification to stray from the giants of Quality Dr Shewhart, Professor Ishikawa, Professor Lewis, Professor Deming, Dr Taguchi and Dr Wheeler, for the lunacy of Six Sigma’s con man. How the Six Sigma fraud was started: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zpy9k32CfbCSaq8 Lean was tacked on to prolong the Six Sigma Scam. 98% of LSS implementations FAIL (IW survey)
@JMErlendson Жыл бұрын
I'd love to have a longer conversation with you about this - but when I looked up the quote and stats, all I found was a history of you commenting this exact same comment on everything from professional websites to book reviews to personal achievement posts as far back as 2005! So let's chat. You clearly hate Six Sigma. Why? What about this methodology irks you so?
@jenniferserrano4738 2 жыл бұрын
𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓈𝓂
@elliotwood470 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the break down J-M and Roland, this is interesting. I have to say, I'm team Roland with BPMN. I'm new to the industry but it just seems to make more sense, especially when it comes to very complex models, as it can all stay nice and tidy.. I'm going to throw loads of questions at you both i hope you dont mind... Do you find that EPC will always come before BPMN, given it is focusing on executive level broader organisation topics, then you would utilise BPMN to understand specific processes within? Can you link/relate EPC diagrams and BPMN diagrams together, if circumstance calls for both being needed - Using VIsio or Lucid or Miro? I totally appreciate the point of keeping it simple for the client, especially as they dont know the difference between events, elements, sub processes etc... OR even really care how the sausage is made, they just want the outcomes delivered. BUT i really don't want to have to make a simple version on MS Powerpoint or miro etc..) So what would you do? Thanks a bunch guys, i will be making my way through your content, catch you later.
@whatsyourbaseline 2 жыл бұрын
Hey Elliot, this is Roland. Let me try to answer your questions: EPC was *the* standard for the 90s and 2000s (especially in the context of ERP implementations that happened a lot at these times), and people got used to it. Starting around 2010 BPMN took off and became the standard that it is today ... I wrote a lot about this at that time and you can find that on our website, for example here: www.whatsyourbaseline.com/2010/11/learning-bpmn-1-what-is-bpmn/ Back then EPC was seen as the "business notation" and BPMN as the technical notation, and was treated like this in approaches like "Model to Execute" from Software AG at the time. However, by now I think it is safe that you can use BPMN only (and J-M will disagree 🙂) . The one thing that I would recommend is to keep the symbol palette simple for business users and viewers to make it easy to follow the process flow - with or without swimlanes. Re: linkage - IMHO you should use a proper architecture tool instead of the tools you mention (have a look here for part 1 of 2 - www.whatsyourbaseline.com/2021/05/selecting-an-enterprise-architecture-tool-part-1/). In those tools you technically can connect both model types, even though they do it differently: EPC has a dedicated "process interface" symbol, while in BPMN you need to navigate using shared events (what I like to do is to change the config and allow assignments of other BPMN models to events in BPMNs, even though that is not 100% kosher from a method perspective, but makes things super convenient for users). Either way, I would standardize on one notation for the lower-level process notation and not mix both. Have a look at the three articles that I wrote about configuring the tool, especially the meta model part: www.whatsyourbaseline.com/2021/07/technical-governance-meta-model/. To make things simple, I typically reduce the available symbols by customizing the filter in the tool (ARIS in my case), so that there are just the minimum amount of symbols needed: pools, lanes, events, tasks, gateways, and then extend where needed. I have not seen anyone using the extended palette in reality if they were not geeks. Read more here: www.whatsyourbaseline.com/2011/03/235/. I hope this helps, and thanks for listening to/watching the What's Your Baseline Podcast :-)
@elliotwood470 2 жыл бұрын
@@whatsyourbaseline Thanks so much Roland, ill dig into all these goodies over the weekend. thanks :)