The only real reason I would get the F100 over this is that I can’t get the CR123 batteries to power the N80 where I live. The F100 takes AA batteries which are more readily available.
@RascalKyng4 сағат бұрын
So Pentax essentially made on of these... But charged $600?
@Anaxxo7 сағат бұрын
Thank you mate managed to improve a photo of my dad taken in 1978
@rossmansell587714 сағат бұрын
The canmera shown seems to have been misused to cause that many problems. I have had Zenith 80 since 1968 and it has no problems whatsoever. I have adapted 2 |Hassel backs to fit with no problem. It works flawlessly. You just have to treat her thing properly. If you just sling it into a bag and hump it around its going to suffer (mostcameras sooner or later will). Mine came with a solid leather should strap case...if you have a case for it..USE IT.
@gavinjenkins89916 сағат бұрын
I've used 1.5v batteries in like 25 different cameras for a long time, never "damaged" one. It may make the light meter out of perfect calibration, but all you have to do is just measure it against a trusted meter, figure out how far off it is, and then lie to the camera about the ISO of the film. If it is too optimistic (tells you you need 1 stop less light than you do" for example then when you shoot 200 ISO film, tell it you loaded 100, problem solved.
@Muldoonite18 сағат бұрын
Will you ever make an F6 video?
@DavidHancock17 сағат бұрын
@@Muldoonite if I ever get one, I'd like to finish the lineup, yes.
@Muldoonite5 сағат бұрын
@@DavidHancock Cool! It's the only film camera Nikon will still take in to do service/repairs on, fingers crossed they will continue to support it for years to come.
@elizabeth.manessКүн бұрын
When looking into the viewfinder in full program mode, what does it mean when the green P is blinking, versus not blinking?
@AppalachianMotorsКүн бұрын
I bought one of these on a whim because I thought it looked like a vintage car. I couldn't be happier with the camera it is absolutely on par with the Nikon f.
@deepsouthinceptionКүн бұрын
Thnk you for this video!
@dovydaskaminskas4227Күн бұрын
It's not all. I do similar test to calculate development time. That can be useful if you experiment, or for example use strange not standard film, or adjust film chemistry, or work not standard temp, or suspect that the developer maybe going bad. You cut a small peace of film, put half of it in developer and measure time until the wet peace starts to darken and gets to similar shade as the dry peace. The time may be anywhere from 10s to couple of minutes. To get development time multiply your measured time by 17.5. And I trust this method more than any other recommendation of development time. For example, recently I tried out D-19 on old expired fogged film. Every source on internet, even the Cookbook recommended 6min. Mine test showed 3mins. Then did the other test with small peacess that was developed from 2 to 8 minutes, and found out that after ~3minutes of development, the film reach its max density. Developed for 3mins, it came out perfect.
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
@@dovydaskaminskas4227 thank you!
@robwhite461Күн бұрын
Looks ok but don’t see the rewind lever advancing each time you fire the shutter.
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
@@robwhite461 the film was probably just loose inside the cassette. That roll of film has been in about 200 videos now and it's pretty beat up.
@robwhite461Күн бұрын
@@DavidHancock Haha, just like me. One thing that confuses me a little and nobody seems to explain it. Is the correct use of the manual-auto switch on the lense, when your using the light meter, do you have it in the manual or auto setting ? Or dose it not matter what it’s in, what is the switch actually for. I’ve learned a lot watching your videos, thank you for your channel, I returned to film after a 30 year absence, I had an old Pentax MG it was easy to operate. I have Aquired from a friend an SP it operates perfectly, light meter seem reasonably accurate, I have put three rolls of film through it and all shots are good. I bought an SPF from a camera store, it seems ok, and light meter functions, I’ve yet to load and shoot with it. I’m lucky we have a good technician only a train ride away who can CLA them for me. I really love these cameras, and look forward to using them for a long time. Film seems to be having a resurgence, I’m hoping this continues and film comes down a bit in price. The only negative to it all is the processing, in Australia most of the labs closed when digital was born. And it’s a bit of a drive to the only processor I can get to. I’ve been tossing us weather it’s worth getting the gear and learning to develop and print myself. Anyhow, enough wasting your time. Thanks for you lovely tutorials. Rob…
@DixonLuКүн бұрын
I think of multiple exposure as photography's version of cubism.
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
You know, that's a good analog. Double exposures definitely allow for a combination of viewpoints and that's a good way to use them.
@Andrus198524Күн бұрын
Thank you for this detailed rewiev, Got one question: can I use rechargeble bataries instead of regular ones, because they font leak.
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
@@Andrus198524 thank you and yes you can. I only use rechargeable batteries if possible.
@julzpoud.8670Күн бұрын
I'm completely new to film photography. Do you have any good recommendations on videos I can watch to help me learn how to take proper pictures? Thank you for this video! It's so in depth!
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
Not a specific video, but look for videos on things like the exposure triangle, how to take a properly exposed photo, and also videos that explain shutter speed and aperture.
@kurtiscobain3224Күн бұрын
So do I have to go through a whole roll of film before taking it out or can I switch mid roll and go back to it?
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
It's best to use a whole roll at once. If you want to switch rolls, you need to rewind the one you're using, remember where you were, make sure to leave a leader so that you can reload it, and then when you put it back in be sure to advance to the correct frame while keeping the front of the lens completely covered to prevent any light from reaching the film and damaging the images. And if you didn't go through the entire roll that you put in after you removed the first, you have to do the exact same thing with that second roll when you go to use it again. It's honestly not worth the hassle.
@kurtiscobain3224Күн бұрын
I feel like the imperfections add to the photos. The horizontal lines and the red spots make it look more natural and old. I don’t know might just be me
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
For some uses, certainly they do.
@lilypower2 күн бұрын
Awesome video! Have had mine for a couple years but haven't digged in the munes until now when i got a hold of a bunch of lenses, this is awesome, thanks!
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
Thank you!
@NaritaDerks2 күн бұрын
Very helpful video, thank you so much! I’m pretty new to analog photography, but I do have a question (and I hope it’s not silly). Is it possible to rewind one or two frames and then take a double exposure on a shot you’ve taken a while ago, for example because you know that photo would ‘go better’ with what you’re about to layer on top of it than your current photo?
@DavidHancockКүн бұрын
Thank you! In theory, yes. I forget if the La Sardina clicks as the film advances. If yes, then count the clicks when advancing the film and rewind the same number. Alternatively, make sure that the film rewind is tight and there's no slack in the film before advancing, not the film rewind position before advancing, and after you advance, rewind the film until the rewind is in that position.
@trotomas3 күн бұрын
Would be interesting a comparison between the om 28mm f2 and Pentax m 28mm f2. Since the Pentax should be considered the successor
@DavidHancock2 күн бұрын
If I get my hands on the Pentax, that would be a fun video.
@dutchbeef89203 күн бұрын
After shots really show the quality of the optics here
@dutchbeef89203 күн бұрын
I quite like the outdoor film shots with fungus
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
Definitely. They're a unique image look that I don't know another way to achieve without extensive photo editing.
@atruceforbruce53883 күн бұрын
Tape is cheaper than film per square inch.
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
@@atruceforbruce5388 that sounds about right.
@autistYuki3 күн бұрын
I'm having a really difficult time trying to understand this, I still don't get it or know how to read it. Please someone help and put it in dummy words for me please, make it as painful as it could be and call me dumb.
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
You're not dumb for not getting this right away. This is an older way of lenses communicating and it's a different language than we speak photographically today. If you have a lens with markings like this lens has, what I want you to do is set the aperture to 16. Then adjust the infinity focus so that it is above a 16 on your lens. That infinity focus mark is over a focusing scale -- the mirrored aperture numbers on the lens that do not move. When your lens is set to f/16 and the infinity focus is over a 16, everything in terms of distance from your lens that is between the 16s will be in focus. The markings in this video are how the lens communicates the depth of field it will deliver at various apertures.
@autistYuki3 күн бұрын
@@DavidHancock Ohh, alright. I think I got it now, sorry I don't know why it was so hard for me to process. I am a digital photography and kinda new to film, so thank you so much! 🙏
@lehemikus74133 күн бұрын
Great video man! I really want to try it with my Minolta X-700, however, how do I calculate the exposure?
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
Thank you and that s the same as you would with this one. Exposure is based on film speed, light, and lens selection.
@LessliDuernberger3 күн бұрын
Again, Thank you.
@LessliDuernberger3 күн бұрын
Steinbech said ... "No" Thank you for this. Looking forward to learning with your course. (Brand new photography student @ RMCAD)
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
Thank you and that's fantastic!
@mickyyygc3 күн бұрын
Do you have a video about how lenses work? I’m a beginner and I didn’t quite understand what the “f” that you mentioned before the numbers on the lenses is.
@DavidHancock3 күн бұрын
I will soon. That's a great idea. I wrote a script last night and hope to record and upload it in the next couple of days.
@user-xv2zo7cy1d4 күн бұрын
Hi it's 2024 yaay lol I have always wanted to be I to photography my bf bought me this canon rebel xt a few yes ago it sat in a box...I want to use it!! Ty so much for your videos!! How can I put it on a timer with a burst??? Like set it up, hit the button and have it take multiple shots at once??? Do I need a remote attachment???
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
Hi and I can't recall if that's exactly possible (it's been a long time since I made this video now.) You could use a remote for this and set it in burst mode and then use a time on your watch, perhaps.
@Spade37254 күн бұрын
So all I have to do is buy some 120 film and a 620 spool, and then in complete darkness, unroll the 120 film off of the 120 spool and then roll it on the 620 spool?
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
Essentially yes. Be sure to use the 620 paper, not the 120 paper
@Spade37254 күн бұрын
What is the paper?
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
@@Spade3725 the paper backing that comes with the film spool. 620 paper is a different width than 120.
@cr4p0tt34 күн бұрын
Gotta love the digital cameras from the noughties, around 2010, things started to shift towards futile fluff and bloat. I used to have a modern mirrorless, the EOS M6, and even though it was an objectively excellent camera and I liked its lightweight and compact nature (especially with the pancake 22 mm f/2, a great lens), it wasn’t a camera I looked forward shooting with. So, when I recently had the opportunity to grab a 5D Mark II with the ubiquitous nifty-fifty for an obscenely low price, I bit the bullet and sold the M6. Still a fairly modern camera, but it feels like an old Mercedes - comfy, reassuring, special ; where the M6 felt like a Tesla - objectively superior spec-wise, but bland. Also had the chance to try out a D30 (first DSLR made entirely by Canon), and I was floored by how good the ergonomics already were and by the quality of the pictures despite being only 3.1 MP… would love to grab one, but these are hard to find nowadays.
@geovannyr6764 күн бұрын
Does the camera need a battery to recharge the film?
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
The battery is needed to operate everything on the camera. What do you mean by recharge the film, though?
@mcmoose644 күн бұрын
This was my first "serious" digital camera. The only thing i didnt like was the the way you had hold down the av button to adjust settings in manual mode . I still have several large prints hung in my house from this camera. 8mp was enough back in the day.
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
I agree about the AV button interface. I always found that to be a fiddly aspect of the Rebel cameras.
@xxicywindxx4 күн бұрын
My frame count window is not moving past S. Everything else is working just as it should, loaded the film and followed your steps in the video. I don’t want to ruin my film and open it back up, is my counter just broken or is my film not being loaded properly?
@DavidHancock4 күн бұрын
For your film loading, if the film rewind knob rotates opposite the direction of the arrow on it when you advance the film, then your film is loaded correctly.
@xxicywindxx4 күн бұрын
@@DavidHancock Thank you so much for the quick answer! It does spin just as you said. This is my first SLR and I got a trip planned in two days so I wanted to make sure I had it ready by then. Your video was super informative and much appreciated by somebody that’s trying to learn more about film photography and cameras. Thanks for replying to my other comment aswell
@xxicywindxx4 күн бұрын
My frame count window is not moving past S. Everything else is working just as it should, loaded the film and followed your steps in the 2nd part video. I don’t want to ruin my film and open it back up, is my counter just broken or is my film not being loaded properly?