Did you say ubi lol?

Take a look at CrashCourse, it's pretty awesome

Naked Economics is a good book to start with

+M0j0S0D0pe420 What is your cat's name, I am convinced it knows more than Bernie or Trump. I will write him in on the ballet.

+Elephant #feelthebern

+scabies Pretty sure thats the scabies on your ass my friend

+Elephant There's nothing wrong with Bernie. He's simply proposing to move the spending from military and other things to college? So it isn't really him being stupid. Simply diverting the opportunity cost.

+KiwiGaming Ahhhh but you missed the basic point of this. Go watch it again. That "basics" mentioned here are during peacetime. While it may seem so, but China and Russia are advancing, while here We have many, many ways to get college tuition other then federal gov't. So yes there is EVERYTHING wrong with Bernie as He isn't telling you the global threats that are real...

+usaalways Did you really need to add that "aahh"? It just made you seem condescending. You could have gotten your point across without it.

+VinentPlayz lol

+Tenzin Dakpa yeah I feel like a punk rock song or some dubstep would really get people into the topic XD

me too

Raymundo Garza LOOOL

Saying that something is discredited is not what makes something valid or invalid, nor is comparing something to a discredited concept comprise of an actual argument.

Considering that much of Rands extrapolations are dirivative of Aristotles philosophy it is interesting to note that none of the people making this argument ever have the balls to directly attack the source with the same tactics. For some reason when he holds the same position he is expousing uncontraversial wisdom, but if Rand paraphrases it, its sociopathy. The common denominator though that I find betwen those that make these arguments often through the patterns by which they speak of the topic leak their inability to cognizantly understand the philosophy of either one of them. Beyond that, could you point out what part of this argument has anything to do with Rand?

Money will always exist! Money can be defined as anything of value. A lemon can be used as money. A coupon can be used as money. A piece of stick can be used as money. Ayn Rand "if money money is the root to all evil then what is the root to money"! People like you are special and always dreaming you think the world can be prefect your way! Got news buddy nothing will ever be perfect very simple fact every common person knows today!

***** shut up capitalist bastard ı hate peoples like you money worshipper blinded by american idiocracy your world ending !

my nick beatiful than your Abc123131 are you learning alphabet and numbers ?

Your life essence is Money your are pathetic weakling go eat trees paper from tree money from paper and your western idiocracy ends here...

siriüs alpha Associating money with happiness is stupid but saying it's the root of all evil is just as bad. You like clothing, having a place to live, maybe a pet, eating every day? Well, either you gotta go off the grid and be a homesteader and try your luck at a bartering life with as many survival skills as you've accrued over the years or you need money for trading. You can't eat money or apply it to your wounds but treat it like salt or chocolate or butter for instance - I trade this unit of money for that unit of not being homeless, hungry or sick. I call that happiness.

You might smile too if you could make a good living regurgitating flimflam.

+lily economics is in direct correlation with everything, especially politics

@GravitySmashify It's a summary of basic economic theory by primarily Hazlett. You sound absolutely ridiculous. I think my former micro and macro economics professors would agree... Keynesian/contemporary economic theory is NOT the whole of the subject. You have a very narrow view of the subject it seems to me.

@GravitySmashify My philosophy professors for example, would NOT explain it every day when they argue from a position that they did not create and don't necessarily agree with. They would only explain that to the stupid students who somehow think that the teacher has adopted the view. The agenda of the video is to spread a summarized version of Hazlitt's work based on his own interpretation... What is the fuckin' issue with that?? Plus between you people, ya cant figure out whether its the maker of the video you want to critique or Hazlett himself.

@GravitySmashify No man.... Just no.... If people are smart enough to understand economics of any school, they are smart enough to discover that this is about Henry Hazlitt's BOOK by that title and this is " - A basic lesson" concerning HH's book (or whatever it said in the title)...

@GravitySmashify Hazlett's book is titled "Economics in one lesson". Know what you're criticizing, my fellow 'Smasher'.

Thanks for sharing this. I'm set to get mine this April (2019)... Not much has changed. Almost all the macro economics classes focus their teaching on a Keynesian approach. I never heard of Hayek, Mises, and hardly even Freidman until I got a job, and a colleague at work recommended Milton's work "free to choose". In my final macro course there was a mention that Keynesian economics is now being rejected, and a more "bottom-up" approach is being used in macroeconomic academia... But from the courses I've had this year it seems keynsian school of through still dominates. A friend of mine took a political science course "theories of democracy", the course text featured essays from both hayak and Friedman on the ideas of "protective democracy", but they didn't cover that material...

BRAVO! Samuelson was a Communist.

This true, basic, wise approach makes perfect sense. Bastiat was the foundational work for me 25 years ago. This economic concept of liberty to innovate, but with ethics and wisdom... is so necessary to correct the destructive trajectory our nation has been on.