Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@davidbowman9917 12 сағат бұрын
Can this even lift itself when facing down and full of ore?
@roberthayes-ji3gd 17 сағат бұрын
as set up from video its pullin stuff ingots from base when attached and dumping it
@Srcsqwrn 14 күн бұрын
Lil bit rambly at the end, but overall appreciate the video! Also, I like learning the camera controls like that. Might be worth making it, its own short video~ c:
@DanSher 14 күн бұрын
Yeah I definitely should make more shorter videos explaining a specific topic instead of going over the whole construction process
@nikkotan2840 19 күн бұрын
My only question is why the interior of the ship was affected by the Fog isn't Spaceships supposed to be sealed from the inside-out?
@kahwigulum 19 күн бұрын
you've described a for loop for each port, determine if there is room to store something it starts at the top (the preferred port of the assembler) and works it's way down makes sense that the assemblers preferred port would be on top and the refinery's would be on the bottom the biggest revelation from this test is that if the next adjacent block is not inventory-compatible (like the O2H2), then it is skipped entirely. the sorting algo doesnt waste operations searching further than that when other ports are available, which is exactly how you'd expect a programmer to design it
@19LG99 26 күн бұрын
The trick you showed, copy-pasting the ship onto the projector is genious. How have i never thought of this myself ❤
@ericseidel4940 27 күн бұрын
Yo I don't follow you on adding more complexity to the base principles would make a better game. Instead I would develop things like: Multigrid (example proper guiding rails with carts, proper driving for them, stronger and bigger rotating links, in order to make usable legs and of course a special automaton bloc to drive legs). Wheels : they don't work. I mean because you cant introduce Ackerman compensation (in a turn, interior wheel should turn a bigger angle than outer wheel in order for both to follow the rover trajectory. In SE if you set grip to 100% your rover just stops when you turn or bounce everywhere depending on its mass) Because they are weak compared to rover mass you must use plenty of wheels and then it is a mess. At least half of the wheels are moving sideways and slowing the rover in a turn. OF COURSE mission content and general life in SE. I would happily get rid of all ore chunks and small blocs flying everywhere AND klang mecanic altogether to spare server CPU and get real life in SE. A mission tree like Empyrion and some serious NPC to challenge.
@DanSher 27 күн бұрын
You're proposing adding solutions for problems that don't exist, that's why we need complex gameplay with problems to solve first
@Venomous51 28 күн бұрын
I hate the people who made the strong unknown signal or SUS for short
@meyatetana2973 Ай бұрын
Love your design here but it has a broken thruster or two, spot light damaged and cockpit is too also some random blocks but isn't an issue in survival just noticed it in creative :)
@DanSher Ай бұрын
Huh, weird, will check the blueprint next time I play, maybe it got saved with damage states, though the question then is how did it get damaged in the first place
@kubel83 Ай бұрын
Really nailed that industrial feel. I really like it😊
@Cloakdasasin0 Ай бұрын
Another nice design man, I was always quite impressed with what you could do without any DLC but some of the DLC blocks are just soooo nice. I own all of them and have been using a lot of modded blocks too lately, endless creative potential. P.S. Also mad respect for the Asymmetry.
@mangon1 Ай бұрын
Your "shaky cam" is really annoying, learn to sit still for a bit so we can see whats going on
@DanSher Ай бұрын
I will try to move less and speak in a way that requires less cuts in the future videos, got it
@billrich9722 Ай бұрын
I think my ADD got worse after watching this.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
I moved too much and did too many cuts, I'll try to move less and speak in larger chunks that require less cuts in the future videos
@billrich9722 Ай бұрын
@@DanSher Do what you enjoy. I'm just some YT asshole.
@hobbesz9199 Ай бұрын
Be good! Instead of be bad.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
I'm always saying this
@cypress1337 Ай бұрын
Why not small connectors (for ejecting)?
@DanSher Ай бұрын
Same reason as why not small ejectors, small inventory makes them eject at a slower rate
@TubeTAG Ай бұрын
Good content. I really like the whole progression of building up the ship from the core onwards. However, with the constant cuts in the video jumping around, it started to honestly give me a bit of a headache. I'd be looking at one part of the ship and suddenly the video would cut. I can appreciate wanting to edit your commentary down but if you do so, I would encourage you to do the video and commentary separate and then combine them afterwards.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
Separately recording video and audio would be a bit annoying, I'll just try to move less so the cuts aren't as jumpy and get better at speaking so there are less cuts that need to be made
@TubeTAG Ай бұрын
@@DanSher Fair enough. I appreciate you taking it into consideration, however you hope to improve.
@stefanx0 Ай бұрын
ze instead the 🗿
@DanSher Ай бұрын
So true bestie
@madcat247 Ай бұрын
Interesting video, main issue is the camera is moving around way too much. Makes it very hard to actually see parts used and how you put them in.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
You can get the blueprint and look at it as much as you need, it's linked in the description Pausing is also an option
@dimesio Ай бұрын
@@DanSher Watching someone else's videos is also an option. Don't be an ass.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
@@dimesio find me that someone else who can provide niche tips like I can, barely any competition means I can be as huge of an ass ass I want! :P
@billrich9722 Ай бұрын
@@dimesio God forbid somebody have an opinion. Don't be an ass.
@gaatjegeenrukaangek6 19 күн бұрын
@@DanSher the shaking of the camera makes it an absolute pain to watch your videos. bad forbuisiness.
@Toughbeard Ай бұрын
While horizontal ships are fun, I find them useful only in space. For planets I started building my miners vertical (in the direction of the gravity) and I have never built a horizontal miner since. Just give it a try... For miners that will work both in space and planets I create a vertical ship but have multiple cockpits. So the ship will have equally strong reverse and up lift.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
The ores are distributed horizontally in the deposit, you can easily dig out a vertical hole while you're empty, but you need to mine the deposit horizontally, unless your miner is large enough to mine it in a single vertical hole
@themoss7115 Ай бұрын
Horizontal miner can also save some components and power. Most vertical miners need enough thrusters to lift full load on 2 directions (upwards and backwards). More thrusters = more weight = even more thrusters = more power consumption = more batteries = more bulk (+ lots of drills and "ugliness"). Also, vertical miners needs to drill through a lot of dirt and stone just to mine a thin layer of ore. And if you want to mine more, you need another hole through that junk again. It's better to drill one hole to the right depth and then mine the vein horizontally. You can absolutely make wonderful vertical miner with two cockpits or remote control to achieve same thrust:cargo ratio, but horizontal miners are more convenient.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
@@themoss7115 yeah, generally you want to have a single main thrust direction (upwards in pretty much all cases) and have only enough thrust in other directions for smaller velocity adjustments while performing larger maneuvers by rotating the ship
@Toughbeard Ай бұрын
@@themoss7115 I think I understand. If I am to stay only on the planet it is better to have a horizantal miner because of the way the veins are. Thin but large diameter cylinder vs the asteroids where they are Cylindrical in shape smaller diameter but longer in length. And when in Space the vertical and horizantal really means nothing :) This is quite a different approach from how I play and its exciting... This is exactly why I love Space Engineers so much. Change just variable and its a whole new game...
@mauriziomartini3973 Ай бұрын
Pretty cool ship, only gripe i have is it seems to have lacking braking thrust
@DanSher Ай бұрын
It has plenty of backwards thrust and if you need even more, you can always just pitch up and use the spare upward thrust, more efficient and fun that way
@alexs6746 Ай бұрын
Really hard to follow with the constant cuts. I can’t just follow alone, I have to keep pausing trying to figure out what you placed. If you are making a tutorial please don’t cut crucial parts
@DanSher Ай бұрын
Got it, I'll try to explain better in the future
@elvispedersen5006 Ай бұрын
It's always a good thing to take a break from space engineers to recharge the batteries 🙂
@antediluvianatheist5262 Ай бұрын
S E is a great game engine. Still waiting for someone to use it to make a game.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
You can get moving block grids and voxel terrain from Unreal, also it's going to support multiplayer better and be more stable in general
@matyusferenc1632 Ай бұрын
They look like they from starbase.
@byronontop Ай бұрын
do you honestly think theyve abandoned the game?
@DanSher Ай бұрын
Well, the "updates" seem to be aimed at milking the existing players by releasing paid cosmetic DLCs while not really adding any new gameplay
@charleshughes2683 Ай бұрын
I always thought they could've diversified the types of grid available. Such as triangular, hexagonal or any type that would deviate from the cube nature of them. It would be great if there were 'alien' grids or blocks which could be part of an improved pve experience or 'goal'. Although it's a sandbox game it needs more of a narrative, just like how Minecraft does
@WolfmenLP Ай бұрын
@@DanSher They didnt, theyre simply focusing on VRAGE3 and SE2 now. SE is Keens only major project as far as i know, they wouldnt simply abandon it. Also "asset flip" is a bit harsh. I do agree that the gameplay is basically nonexistent, is just a sandbox with bunch of blocks to connect.
@DanSher Ай бұрын
I called Empyrion an asset flip, which it is. Also SE2 is just speculation and a poor excuse at this point, all you get if you search for it is a bunch of clickbait and no official dev updates, I'll believe it when I see it, and a better engine won't fix the lack of gameplay anyway.
@byronontop Ай бұрын
@@DanSher yea but i mean do you think theyre gonna stop updating and shit because this is my favorite game and im running out of content now that ive gotten so much resources
@ParGellen 3 ай бұрын
I cannot for the life of me get the grid to paste onto the projector. I feel like a very important step is missing from the video.
@DanSher 4 ай бұрын
E
@firebird_5282 4 ай бұрын
Well, that is the reason why I never built with mods, should definetaly try some of these games
@conflictZ0NE 5 ай бұрын
Se2 needs to overhaul survival mode
@maxwellfujs6124 5 ай бұрын
That was an amazing landing! Also awesome ship.
@jackblack_2001 5 ай бұрын
"The insaaane amount of dlc's SE was.." ETS players: "im I a joke to you?"
@AnonNopleb 5 ай бұрын
I 100% agree with the point about DLC blocks. Although most of them are not pay-to-win, some do have a slight advantage over the vanilla alternative. For workshop items, there should at least be a decent build-in converter that manages to replace certain DLC blocks with vanilla counterparts or armor so the ships at least work when pasted in. I know this is possible with blueprint editing using notepad or SE toolbox to some extend, but that is not possible with every block. Did you notice that the warfare thrusters are completely messed up in terms of their block orientation when compared to vanilla and sci-fi ion thrusters? How did this go unnoticed even after release of the DLC?
@erinas 5 ай бұрын
Na he is right, I already don't bother to go survival if plan to play SE every few years. For me ist just testing the new DLCs while building something epicly big and after that the game is dead to me for another 2-3 years. Cuz there is not much to do. Survival had become very boring very fast. And althou space is a empty place does not mean the game has to feel empty. But sadly in SE that is the case. If i want physics i go cerbal space program, if i want content i can go No Man Sky which has every big content update for free. Or whatever new stuff is out there and he already mentioned better building related games so the only thing which lets me keep starting SE now and then is nostalgia. Imo SE was good to kick that particular genre forward and after all the other devs realized that these kinds of game can make decent money SEs job was done. Btw i hate the lighting mechanics in SE which make big builds very difficult. So yea i think he summerized it pretty accurate.
@shadowforge 5 ай бұрын
It concerns me that KSH still has this much of a fan base after what they pulled with Medieval Engineers, you know the only reason that game even got the "community update" was because of the video "Who killed Medieval Engineers?" right?
@SoftBreadSoft 5 ай бұрын
Why would they continue putting most of their resources into a game that is losing money while Space Engineers was continuing to profit? The game got the community update because Gwin had been working on it for over a year before the "Who killed Medieval Engineers" video existed. I don't know where you get your ideas but it's not reality lol
@ForgottenGames 5 ай бұрын
Completely lost interest in SE (and all friends with me) - when planetside landing arrived,.
@daraphairphire 5 ай бұрын
Space Engineer's strengths are the versatile engine with probably one of the best moding ui and api. Their planets are good but need more better stitching and crafting. The few missions they offer are great, but i wish they were more closely integrated into eachother and the main survival. They have bugs and wolfs, and even the ai within different missions or outposts, but I think they need to add more pve. Sure, there is a lot of dlc, but each one of those also mark a major update to the base game. be it the new ai logic, new planets, game mode, combat overhaul(sure it's not ballanced, but they are working on other aspects of the game too.) Each dlc is for players to help keep the devs employed and working on the game, which they are, something you can't say for most games.
@KemPeck1701 5 ай бұрын
most people mis-understand SE... KSH has stated many times that it is "Lego Technic in space".. when you 'play' with lego, you build your play enviroment using the blocks provided you may even include items that are not lego (i know R2-D2 was involved in some on my lego plays) it states on the load up of SE that it is a sand box its the PUREST sand box you can load onto a PC (and Keen have announced that the next DLC/update will include improvements to PVE)
@grayfaux_ 18 күн бұрын
It is the SE that misunderstand the players. We hear what Keen is saying, but does Keen here what we are saying? Once you build your lego ship there is nothing to do with it. If they spent a fraction of the time on survival and the world as they do on microtransactions the game would be a 10/10.
@KemPeck1701 18 күн бұрын
@@grayfaux_ ok.. you have some good points.. but.. i have to ask... why do you think they opened up the game for modding then.. as EARLY as they did?... one answer would be so YOU can create the game play of YOUR choice.. as if you are playing with lego and adding toys from another set/genre etc.. you get to create your own play through, your way.. as for the DLC argument.. i'm sorry.. but i dont think you get that either.. they released the game on console, to increase the playability of the game (always a good thing.. dont you think?).. which dont have a mods system.. and from what i can see, will never be able to have one because of the way consoles work.. so since then, KSH has been actively talking to the original mod authors to include a veriant of the mod to the base game.. (it is now possible to make, for example, a working hover bike that works exactly like the hover mod block.. i know.. my friend is about to release it on the workshop.. 100% vanilla) because they have included (for free) the ability to do so.. the dlc might, some would argue, have slightly different functionality but are primarily cosmetic, so dont really change game play.. but anything that DOES change game play comes free.. you DONT have to buy the dlc to even interact with the dlc blocks.. you just cant place them.. all they do is ASK if you want to buy some new looking blocks to compesate their work.. they ARE a business you know.. the bills do have to be paid to me your mind set comes from the time where KSH DID make some bad mistakes.. but.. they most definately have upped their game since.. i know.. i have 4000+ hours playing.. and have watch far far more hours of youtube vids by many content creators
@oKaylf 5 ай бұрын
W face reveal, IxBLUExI btw
@DanSher 5 ай бұрын
Blast from the past, come over to the Discord server (if you aren't there already and just have another name)
@AdamSchadow 5 ай бұрын
If you want pve or coop gameplay you can download a load of mods and even edit them to do what you want. The thing that makes SE so good is it has the combination of things like sure if you just take 1 aspect of any game there is another game that does it better but very few games have so much stuff. Your weird obsession with hating the dlcs is so irrational like you can play perfectly fine without them and ignore their existence there the most op dlc blocks make your ship like 0.1% better in the incredibly niche pvp.
@user-kr5eq3dw9m 5 ай бұрын
на Андроиде подерживается ?
@Arcanidge 6 ай бұрын
A great design, simple but capable, nicely executed and well documented. 10/10 keep it up
@bf109h 6 ай бұрын
Hey did you ever encountered a situation where SEToolbox says "Invalid location specified" when launched for the first time? I selected the exact location where my SE .exe is located but SEToolbox still doesn't accept it. I have the latest version of SEToolbox installed. Do you have any ideas how to walk around this problem?
@InfinitiumDracovenataVladenkai 28 күн бұрын
*BUMPY* Having the issue Myself, here in 2024... :'c
@madcapmagician3130 7 ай бұрын
Stumbled over this by accident, stayed for the cookies. Stubbed and licked, or words to that effect.
@naimanpunk 7 ай бұрын
Its a nice RP ship, a lot of unnecessary weight which hinder with the ship performance. other than that, ship looks good
@cgemende 7 ай бұрын
is this ship in the workshop? nerver saw it
@DanSher 7 ай бұрын
No and probably won't be, ran into some fundamental problems with making a modular system many times before and this time was no exception
@V1acl 7 ай бұрын
Hi I tried to do same thing but had a problem of rotor turn power kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWW6YZ5ua8lnmJI
@roymcfreely9569 7 ай бұрын
I dunno about "efficient" waaayyyy to much thrust and almost no fuel capacity
@DanSher 7 ай бұрын
Not enough thrust in fact, only barely enough to fly in 1g with the container filled with ore, I'll have 4 large upward thrusters per large cargo container on the future ships, and supplying them all with a single large fuel tank will not be a problem, that's still 15 minutes at full thrust, and you shouldn't be at full thrust all the time
@roymcfreely9569 7 ай бұрын
But then ur refueling after every flight😬 But I assumed it was a void cargo ship lol in atmo yea the thrust is probably enough. But it looks great! I rlly like the bridge/cockpit design 👍 might even steal it lol
@AC-sv4yc 7 ай бұрын
Never thought of it but good info to know
@kazimir8086 7 ай бұрын
How did you get those clouds
@maycontainnuts3127 7 ай бұрын
this script looks like its going to make incredibly lightweight and fuel efficient vehicles from now on, especially with the new atmo thrusters added recently