IB Philospohy
4:41
13 жыл бұрын
Humes attack on rationalism.wmv
4:02
14 жыл бұрын
Hume 's attack on rationalism.wmv
3:29
Locke's simple ideas.wmv
1:34
14 жыл бұрын
Locke's 'Tabula Rasa'.wmv
0:57
14 жыл бұрын
Descartes example of the wax.wmv
1:56
Leibniz defence of rationalism.wmv
1:35
Plato's Meno_0001.wmv
3:48
14 жыл бұрын
Berkeleys Idealism
1:45
14 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@johncracker5217
@johncracker5217 11 ай бұрын
What’s the documentary?
@kcufsulpgelgoog8621
@kcufsulpgelgoog8621 Жыл бұрын
God I hate it when they say Socrates was a teacher when he himself !in this dialogue aside he was no teacher and that there was no teachers
@camdesscan6227
@camdesscan6227 3 жыл бұрын
This is inspirational ☄️🤌🏽
@camdesscan6227
@camdesscan6227 3 жыл бұрын
Wow this video is incredible
@PringlesOriginal445
@PringlesOriginal445 3 жыл бұрын
What documentary is this?
@steph1213
@steph1213 6 жыл бұрын
what is the full documentary by the way?
@makeadifference4all
@makeadifference4all 4 жыл бұрын
This is from a 1998 philosophy documentary series called "The Examined Life." This excerpt is from vol. 12, "Is Reason the Source of Knowledge?"
@kingnevermore25
@kingnevermore25 6 жыл бұрын
If matter doesn exist then how can we hurt our head if we hit a wall for example? Something needs to exist physically in order for us to hurt our head while punching the wall... The proof for that is that we will eventually die if we continue beating our head against the wall. So the cause of our death will be the wall (physical matter). Someone please explain this.
@jgerrard23
@jgerrard23 8 жыл бұрын
which documentary is this a part of?
@makeadifference4all
@makeadifference4all 4 жыл бұрын
This is from a 1998 philosophy documentary series called "The Examined Life." This excerpt is from vol. 12, "Is Reason the Source of Knowledge?"
@Nerdbasher11
@Nerdbasher11 8 жыл бұрын
Lol Descartes making me go crazy!
@alannajadevibes
@alannajadevibes 9 жыл бұрын
Nice night-cap! lol
@mozonelaya
@mozonelaya 9 жыл бұрын
Alanna Johnson 0:53 lol i burst out laughing too :D
@joe60405
@joe60405 9 жыл бұрын
求翻譯~~~~~~~~
@Iconicvids
@Iconicvids 10 жыл бұрын
This proofs so ludicrous its funny, and how the man believes it really works, anyone can clearly see socrates just spoon fed the boy the answers, if he trully had innate knowledge why would it need explaining to him
@socrates5806
@socrates5806 5 жыл бұрын
how about you read and infer rather then get your info watching a random video?
@angelohieronymous2692
@angelohieronymous2692 3 жыл бұрын
Pls read John Locke, he expounds your view mucg clearer.
@ludwigfeuerbach
@ludwigfeuerbach 2 жыл бұрын
You miss the point completely. Even if Socrates was spoon-feeding him, the point where the slave understands Socrates's questions is precisely the point where the slave "sees" or gets the answer. Getting the answer does not come from Socrates's words, but rather from the slave's being able to explain why they are correct, which is an internal judgment Socrates maintains originates from prior contact with the realm of he true (i.e. innate ideas). Thus, I cannot make you understand anything (even my comment) - you have to actively understand it yourself, which means from within yourself under your own power. Thus learning is not being externally taught, but instead a process of self-discovery (in the Socratic sense of "know thyself (gnothi seauton)."
@tesla904
@tesla904 10 жыл бұрын
whats the full documentary?
@makeadifference4all
@makeadifference4all 4 жыл бұрын
This is from a 1998 philosophy documentary series called "The Examined Life." This excerpt is from vol. 12, "Is Reason the Source of Knowledge?"
@shaneisinthehouse
@shaneisinthehouse 10 жыл бұрын
haha richard dawkins
@thedarkangelvicky
@thedarkangelvicky 10 жыл бұрын
hahahaahahah I love this video tbh.
@markbeyerauthor
@markbeyerauthor 11 жыл бұрын
Good work, Tony. I'm reading "The Story of Philosophy" (Durant) right now, and find myself wondering often if philosophers have mostly been disenheartened men who needed to create their own version of the world based on 1) negating all that came before them, or 2) needing recognition for their depressing and often skewed view of said world (for being outcastes, petty officials or lowly teachers, excommunicants, etc.). I offer Voltaire as a unique exception.
@lbeetlejuiceklein3101
@lbeetlejuiceklein3101 11 жыл бұрын
Its all about THE FLUXCAPATAMORE
@hummurabi2010
@hummurabi2010 11 жыл бұрын
Not bad. I get it. I really could have used this response a year ago.lol
@Silvaleader101
@Silvaleader101 11 жыл бұрын
if justice is virtue it is simply said that virtue is virtue. This leads to the belief of a Circularity Definition. To live with virtue is to live virtuously, which again is not acceptable. We cannot define something by using the word as its definition.
@ludwigfeuerbach
@ludwigfeuerbach 2 жыл бұрын
Virtue is the genus under which justice (a virtue) is found. Not circular.
@7146533
@7146533 12 жыл бұрын
great
@mercury1321
@mercury1321 12 жыл бұрын
Three minute plagiarism?
@TheApollo81
@TheApollo81 12 жыл бұрын
You can either go with Descartes on the answer of the wax or you can go with George Berkeley when it comes to the apple. Make your choice carefully.
@Hellokitty0300125
@Hellokitty0300125 12 жыл бұрын
whoaa...my last name 0_0
@aeroscope
@aeroscope 12 жыл бұрын
excellent
@fredt2010
@fredt2010 12 жыл бұрын
helpful
@Redneckstomp294
@Redneckstomp294 13 жыл бұрын
great!
@hummurabi2010
@hummurabi2010 13 жыл бұрын
Im trying to write a paper on menos and socrates relation to justice in virtue... still walking around blind.
@lambda113
@lambda113 2 жыл бұрын
do u still need a response?