God loves England.

1776.

Too much words actually dilutes the true meaning

Justice Jackson "he" or "she" it isn't clear.

What lawyer?? pharma poparus disabled prosecutor ADA title ll Access to the court account mizell vr Hernandez x3 appeal

ADA title ll technical policy's constitutional laws ADATITLE2TORTCLAIMS access ♿ to the court account mizell vr Hamilton mizell vr neuss mizell vr Hernandez x3 appeal pharma poparus disabled prosecutor prose Marshalls 5 thcrcrt of TX

writ is the issue, with conflicting international languages, and criticisms about false statements and unlawful writing ,is a need for clarification, review and examination for a true fact with evidence and proof of intent.

Fast idiots LOL nice section title 😂

Thanks for sharing. I always enjoyed reading your well-written opinions.

There have been good and bad legal writers, good writers also are good readers, good analogy and reference and plain spoken, a good thought and decision process, how you reach a result, it is very clear, a crisp diction, good clarity is good, clerks learn from judges, you develop as a writer when you read, if you read stuff that is badly written then you are writing not that well, it is important to read good writing to be a good writer, good writing has good English, make sure opinions are well written. A well written brief is a good argument. Chief Justice gives advice on writing that is about as complicated as a 7th grade writing class. Give a clear explanation? Impressive. A well written brief is clearer? That is some off the charts insight. Some briefs are better than others? Hey Justice Roberts can you give this lecture to my Fourth grade class? Welcome to the practice of law, also known as the emperor's new clothes. You have to be prepared to ask questions to decide the case with a dialogue? Wow. You should know what you have to find out? Opinions state what the law is? Actually let's do this to my second grade class.

Chief Justice gives advice on writing that is about as complicated as a 7th grade writing class. Give a clear explanation? Impressive. A well written brief is clearer? That is some off the charts insight. Some briefs are better than others? Hey Justice Roberts can you give this lecture to my Fourth grade class? Welcome to the practice of law, also known as the emperor's new clothes. You have to be prepared to ask questions to decide the case with a dialogue? Wow. You should know what you have to find out? Opinions state what the law is? Actually let's do this to my second grade class.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hprdlaygYr6XqdU Supreme court of India proceeding must watch

7:52 - best teacher's of writing

로버츠 미 대법원장님 지구에서 출중 뛰어나시고 휼륭하신 대법원장님 산하 대법관님들 화이팅!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

I got the same diatribe from law lecturers towards those who write "poorly". To me this is just an attack by type A personalities against type B personalities. Well here's what we type Bs think of that argument your honour. Saying that when you find a case from the 1870s that's "poorly written" and you throw your hands up in the air and go find something else shows the weakness in type As. They can't handle adversity. Everything has to be perfect for them to be successful. When things don't go well they fall apart. We type Bs would wrestle through the chaos of that case and find the treasures in it while you would have missed that chance because you gave up since you couldn't handle it. Not everybody writes well. Not everybody does everything well. But the poorly written brief or opinion may have valuable gems that you may miss because you are unwilling to get your hands dirty and dig through it. Albert Einstien was a perfect example of a highly successful type B.

CIA front man & TV-Journalist/Cue Card reader, Sean Hannity, has no problem putting child molester Alan Dershewitz on his news program to show us all how fair & balance he is! Everything out of this cue card readers mouth has to be approved at Langley. If you want the official WashingtonDC lie of the day, smug Sean is your man!

1:58 min ... sounds like dating or a relationship tiff. A hug sounds good.

This Judge is a good man 👍

06:41

This guy is a piece of crap.

He is correct. Briefs are way, way more important than oral arguments. Oral argument is a piece of cake for most experienced lawyers on the appellate level if one have their position fully thought out when writing the briefs.

Traitor. Blackmail is not a justice make.

Thank you great information to educate also the public .

Only two kinds of people follow the Supreme Court: lawyers and craaaaaaaaaaazzzzziiiieeeeeeesssss.

WHAT a charismatic person.I am in love)))

It's surprising to me that an interview with the leader of one of our three branches has 39 comments 12 years after it was released.

Roberts now considers himself an Obozo Judge!!!! LOL!!!

So, this is the turd who gave Americans obozocare?

Been watching SC justice interviews for the last year....finally someone asking sharp,concise questions

Where are his oral arguments t be found?

He said the language is the tool of his trade. Guess he is right, you have to be able to lie like this POS both verbal and in writing. This is another gift that the Bush liberals gave. Yes you have to write very carefully to be able to make a lie seem like the truth

This audio is SHIT professor. Please don't make us watch boring videos with terrible audio. That's just inhuman.

HE DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING !

excellent

So how much did it take to buy your vote this time ? How do you sleep at night knowing you sold out on America! Writing in the legal profession? Manipulating the legal profession for personal gain would be closer to the truth !

This man has obviously been the victim of blackmail. When whatever he was caught doing finally becomes public he will be resigning from the court. I would guess he has been involved in a homosexual affair.

whose here because of school

Language truly is the "Tool of our trade." If one is unable to express their thoughts and opinions, then it is unlikely they can convince a court.

what in the hell does the Chief Justice or anyone's sexuality ( or lack of it ) have to do with the issue at hand, which is good or bad legal brief writing ( and by inference the ability to write consisely in general, which is a skill that is disappearing in this texting culture ) ? muck muck needs to get his head out the muck and should be ashamed of himself if he had any shame which he probably doesn't have any concept of.

I'm not shocked at all by how incredibly asinine most of these comments are. I'm sure there is some organized public forum somewhere for you to bash any and all things politician. I used this video as a tool for learning. Maybe you folks should do the same thing.

I will not say that he did anything except go against the American people. I have no idea what his thought processes are. The supreme court and the Federal Judges should be elected not appointed. That is the only way that these people, will have to answer to the American people. I am all for Terms and limits on them. If the President has a term limit then the other 2 branches should have term limits also. I would say 2 terms . 8 years is enough.

John Roberts is a good lawyer who stood and understood more the constitutionality of Obamacare than any other idiot Conservative....he is Republican and has a wife and 2 kids.....he is great

There's no proof John Roberts is gay, or that he was blackmailed. You're perpetuating falsehoods, and should be ashamed.

Too bad comments weren't disabled. What a sewer.

Checked out your recent activity feed. I think you might be obsessed with homosexuality for some reason. Might want to get that checked out, LOL

UP YOUR Roberts-Right Now the Biggest Criminal in History is Chief Crook Justice John Roberts, Free Americans won’t rest until that Obamacare Moron is driven from SCOTUS and jailed next to Major Hussain where all Traitors should be.

Ton of respect for Chief Justice Roberts. He's an example for the rest of us!

I'm not a fan of Chief Justice Roberts's ideology, however he is spot on in regards to the significance of legal writing. In my opinion, he is the strongest writer on the SCOTUS and it's good to hear his perspective on writing briefs. I am a 2L, and my writing improved after reading an article written by Roberts about legal writing. Now I write clear, concise and simple.

Thank you for posting this, courtpoint.

Thanks for posting this. I do examinations on applications literally every day of the week and rendering a legal opinion with a high degree of precision is an art form. Three hundred cases later, I am still learning. Thanks for posting this ditty with Chief Justice Roberts. This interview is refreshing in light of all the bad writing negatively reinforced through today's casual participation on line, on the Internet, and every other wired and wireless medium.