You are welcome 🤗

You are welcome 🤗

You are welcome 🤗

You are welcome 🤗

Teacher is Teacher.

You are welcome 🤗

Sorry, I wouldn't agree with your point of view. If my text doesn't contain some text about shortcomings how would it become part of summary?

Hahahha 😜 concept clear hwa ? English gulabi hai

@researchworld8320 Yo man thanks!

Which version of MS word do you have?

@@researchworld8320 Thanks for replying. I found I could do it on a Windows pc but not on Mac, so, I'm good.

You are welcome 🤗

Thank you 👍🙏

Check my other videos on this topic. Hopefully you will like it..

You can download it from Google for free.

Try different browsers

Actually this technique help you evaluate your articles. You will know what are the shortcomings in your article.

You are welcome 🤗

Thank you 😊

Where are you from?

@researchworld8320 Kolkata

Share your topic

@@researchworld8320 Your whatsapp number please?

Thank you 🙏

Thank you 💞

You are welcome 🤗

Thank you 🙏

Thank you brother 🙏

Thank you 💕

What's your topic?

I will try to improve it.

I will try to improve it.

Thank you for your kind words 💕. In the context of physical education, both research-based practices and evaluation-based practices serve important roles, but they differ in focus. **Research-based practices** emphasize the application of findings from scientific studies to inform teaching methods, curricula, and interventions. This approach helps ensure that practices are grounded in evidence, improving their effectiveness and supporting student outcomes. **Evaluation-based practices**, on the other hand, focus on assessing the effectiveness of specific programs or practices within your own context. This approach involves collecting data on student performance and outcomes to inform decisions and improve practices based on local needs. Ultimately, the choice depends on your goals. If you aim to implement proven strategies, research-based practices may be more beneficial. However, if you want to assess and refine your specific programs, evaluation-based practices might be the way to go. Balancing both approaches can also provide a comprehensive understanding and enhance your practice in physical education.

Thank you for your kind words 🙏. Evaluation can be part of the research process, but it is also often an independent process with its own distinct goals and methods. Here's a breakdown: ### **Evaluation as Part of Research**: - In some cases, **evaluation** is embedded within a larger **research** project. For example, in **applied research**, an evaluation might be conducted to assess the effectiveness of an intervention, policy, or program. This type of evaluation is focused on generating new knowledge about what works and why, and it may contribute to broader theoretical understanding. - In **formative research**, evaluation can be used to assess a program’s progress while it’s being implemented, helping researchers adjust their strategies in real time. ### **Evaluation as an Independent Process**: - Evaluation is more commonly viewed as its own **independent process**. The primary goal of evaluation is to determine the **value or impact** of a specific program, policy, or initiative, typically for decision-making purposes. While it may use similar methods as research (like data collection and analysis), the intention is usually practical rather than theoretical. - Evaluation often focuses on accountability, improvement, and the effectiveness of a particular intervention within a set context, rather than contributing to broader scientific knowledge or generalization. ### Summary: - **Research** seeks to answer open-ended questions, generate new knowledge, and contribute to theory. - **Evaluation** is more focused on assessing the effectiveness or value of something in a specific context, often for the purpose of making decisions. Thus, evaluation can be part of the research process when aimed at understanding the effectiveness of interventions within a research context, but it is frequently an independent process in its own right.

Thank you so much for your valuable comments on research vs evaluation. ❤️

Thank you for your great and kind words 🙏. Here are some interesting differences between research and evaluation: 1. **Purpose**: - **Research** is typically conducted to generate new knowledge, test theories, or understand phenomena. - **Evaluation** focuses on assessing the value or effectiveness of a specific program, project, or policy to make informed decisions. 2. **Generalization vs. Specificity**: - **Research** often aims to create findings that can be generalized to broader populations or contexts. - **Evaluation** is usually specific to the context, program, or organization being studied and not intended to be widely generalizable. 3. **Questions Asked**: - **Research** poses broad, open-ended questions that explore the "why" or "how" behind certain phenomena. - **Evaluation** asks more targeted questions like "Is this program effective?" or "Did it achieve its intended outcomes?" 4. **Timeframe**: - **Research** can span long periods, as it may require extensive data collection and analysis to explore theoretical frameworks. - **Evaluation** tends to be more time-bound, focusing on a project or program's current or past performance within a set timeframe. 5. **Methods Used**: - **Research** uses diverse methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) depending on the research question. - **Evaluation** may use similar methods but is more likely to involve practical tools such as logic models, key performance indicators, or cost-benefit analysis to assess impact. 6. **End Audience**: - **Research** is usually directed towards an academic or scientific audience, contributing to scholarly knowledge. - **Evaluation** is meant for stakeholders (e.g., funders, program managers) who need the findings to improve or make decisions about a specific program or intervention. 7. **Ethics and Bias**: - **Research** strives to remain objective, reducing bias through peer review and rigorous methodology. - **Evaluation** may involve stakeholders with vested interests, leading to a need for transparency in addressing potential biases in the evaluation process. 8. **Flexibility in Design**: - **Research** follows a structured design based on hypotheses or research questions. - **Evaluation** may adapt more flexibly based on the needs of the program or stakeholders during the process. These differences highlight that while both research and evaluation use similar methods, their goals, applications, and audiences distinguish them significantly.

You are always welcome 🤗

Select blank space carefully, it will work.

Dear the answer has been explained in very detail in this video.

You are welcome 🤗

Sorry?

Sorry?

Welcome 🤗

Thank you 🙏

Stay tuned. I will upload more lectures.

Welcome brother ❤️

No, they are totally different things.

Wish you best luck 🙏

Wish you best of luck 🤞

Thank you 🙏

Critically analyze the research article.

Wish you best of luck 🙏

Need prayers 🤲. Share channel with your friends.