Жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@RelzFN 11 күн бұрын
This is a brilliant video and analysis and this video has really helped me understand the first few chapters of the book. Can you make videos about other chapters? Thank you
@tomrhodes1629 Ай бұрын
The biblical prophet Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies: If Nietzsche would have known what the biblical "satan" is, he would have known that he was a satanist. Neither Socrates nor Jesus Christ had any power in his estimation, because that which Nietzsche considered "power" is actually insanity, Truth be known; the "power" of satan: the selfish human EGO.
@PatrickBoening 2 ай бұрын
Bull Shit Explanation. It clearly means controling women with force if neccessary. The oroginal says: "Wenn Du zum Weibe gehst, vergiss die Peitsche nicht!". For a German speaker it leaves no space for interpretation. Misogyny !
@biva_art_school 3 ай бұрын
We love ❤️ ❤️
@biva_art_school 3 ай бұрын
I always deeply found myself ❤❤on this channel
@samibabar 3 ай бұрын
The best explanation!!
@syedyounisphilosophe 6 ай бұрын
Celie from the Colour Purple advises the metaphorical whip to Harpo, the old woman who meets Zarathustra agrees with Celie. Women have always hated women because they understand each other, they walk in each others' skin. Zarathustra proclaims his ignorance when it comes to women psyche... But women know how women could be put on the keel... That's one of the probable interpretations...
@user-kf7is2go4i 6 ай бұрын
Superb overview toward the Overman and self surpassing. Thank you.
@Sanchez.Basado 6 ай бұрын
Still based Nietzsche
@jerrydepp279 7 ай бұрын
New subscriber 😉
@cannibalholocaust3015 8 ай бұрын
What I got from This. Every minute of your life counts, once it’s over it’s over. So go balls to the wall in everything you do to maximise your experience and potential.
@yamadakaito764 8 ай бұрын
Actually, Attridge, Aberdein, and Inglis did a follow-up study to their study at 1:00. They concluded "Our results suggest that it is possible to teach logical thinking, given a certain degree of exposure."
@powfoot4946 8 ай бұрын
With Zarathustra's descent down from the mountain, it could be a reference from the republic by Plato where Socrates descends into the town to witness the festival. Plato had this idea that philosophers were at the highest point in society or something
@EdT.-xt6yv 8 ай бұрын
Bach was subordinate of kings & bishops which takes his music to realms between stoicism and asceticism?
@al-hassan9200 8 ай бұрын
It's simple people are OVERWHELMINGLY DUMB.
@JohnEpto-ng6ml 9 ай бұрын
4
@derekfreud 9 ай бұрын
Need a better microphone
@keox1405 9 ай бұрын
I will reflect on the thoughts you put forward in this video and atleast try to reduce the noise I am subjecting myself too. I hope it will help me I think this maybe be a video that is truly only self help and the best closure I could imagine. I will not unsubscribe but I will take a hard look at al the other chanels I am subscribed too truly reevaluate them but yours will allways be there as a reminder to value my attention when I need it.
@diabl0r 9 ай бұрын
I appreciate you making this video and taking a principled stance. Over time I've noticed these compulsions and modes of interaction with my environment as a result of being jacked into the hyper-attention economy. This feeling of urgency and speed, fear and anxiety of being left out and not keeping up with totally imaginary social spheres that arise and disappear without any roots. I've already wiped my social media several times and I have to consciously work on my compulsion to build endless watchlists/bookmarks/folders that I'll most likely never revisit. It's as if curating depositories of content has displaced my enjoyment of them (while my enjoyment of said content has displaced my attention/time for 'introspection'). What Mark Fisher explores in "Time Wars" and elsewhere, the idea that we are required to live in a condition of “continuos partial attention” (attention habitually distributed across multiple communication platforms) and "hyperkinetic boredom". We are always-busy-always-bored pathological cyborgs produced by accelerating information exchange (Franco Berardi). Boredom has effectively been eliminated from social life and yet we have never been more bored. When the pessimist in me turns I think I understand Pascal, and perhaps Zapffe even more. What if there was time to self-reflect? Pre-industrialised people also suffered from melancholy and boredom. Are we assuming that there even is a self/ego that could and should grow and become unique? Perhaps our cognitive surplus and our uncanny being in the world won't let us rest. Given even the 'best' circumstances we cannot "sit quietly in a room alone." I would prefer growing a community rather than expanding my own subjectivity, but we live under neoliberal constraints that promote individualist profile-building and atomization. There is a conflict, like your video is content and my comment is a reaction, it feels as if these exist in a space that will always reduce them to attention/engagement. Your decision to dis-engage and touch grass is a good one and I respect it.
@iltitano 9 ай бұрын
But this channel was so good! Don't stop, please! Why is it always the case that the good ones walk away from social media?
@user-gf8ml9lt5l 10 ай бұрын
Thanks much!
@garyratcliff2480 11 ай бұрын
Great explanation. Thank you 🕛
@peteshacker6146 11 ай бұрын
amazing analysis. Love it!
@Eng.Creation Жыл бұрын
🙏🏾🙏🏾
@evilbetty99 Жыл бұрын
So LGBTQ is based on pedophilia and communism... if we are to believe what we read.
@garyratcliff2480 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant 🕛🤩
@yoced Жыл бұрын
huh
@jassjot8723 Жыл бұрын
🥰🥰👍👍🌺🌺🌺
@theosayad5146 Жыл бұрын
This is gold. The relatively low number of views on this says something about our society with regards to the last men.
@atibetanspirit230 Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Watching at the foothills of the Himalayas, Mcloadganj, Dharamsala, India.
@TheRenoir Жыл бұрын
Thank you, from one who is now delving into the works of Plotinus's Ennead.
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment. If you want something more substantial, I recommend Eyjólfur Emilsson's Plotinus.
@zeckmar Жыл бұрын
Thank you. This video was very important to me
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
I'm glad it meant something to you:)!
@samuelwilson8334 Жыл бұрын
This is brilliant. Here's to hoping that those intent on doubling down don't last
@priellie4339 Жыл бұрын
the music is unbearable! it makes it so hard to focus on the matter!
@trippy6183 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the hope.
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
It's up to us to realise the hope and turn it into reality:)!
@Lablancchatheseventh Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the short!
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
And thank you for listening:)!
@paulrxxxmann6718 Жыл бұрын
so what would a transcendental entity look like, be named, have function ? Why is he using this term in a differnt sense as to how it is normally used i.e. as quasi religious realm, as a non material sensation..... say, give me a sentence w. transcendental in it that makes it operational ... forgive my philistine reaction !
@Cedrus1952 Жыл бұрын
GIGO
@BrandanLee Жыл бұрын
STRONGLY AGREE, in the most prosaic terms inhumanly possible.
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
Let's hope there will be fortunate things to agree on in the future.
@theartoftzara Жыл бұрын
Most informative! Thank you!
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@johnholmesinchesahead2347 Жыл бұрын
Just think, 41 million Soviet men, women and children were murdered by the Nazi Germans for your right to speak shit about their system. Now, if that's not the death of intellection - nothing is. The suicide of non-inverted thought indeed.
@mahyarmohaghegh Жыл бұрын
you are persian.
@00matthew00 Жыл бұрын
Interesting! It is far easier to systematize teaching a totalizing ideology (eg capital s Science) than it is to systematize teaching existential (subjective). I am interested in what your broad existential teachong program would look like. I am not sure it could be organized at nation scale
@schnetzator Жыл бұрын
I have been a tutor for the introductory course in formal logic for a handful of semesters and this is what I have observed as well. It can definitely be a useful tool in certain branches of philosophy, but theoretical knowledge of formal logics and logical reasoning is something completely different from everyday reasoning or the reasoning in most philosophical works. It is a fallacy to believe that the two have much in common. It's a bit like Sudoku, and just like becoming an expert in Sudoku, studying formal logic reasoning does not have any impact on ones capability to challenge ones internal biases or to make tough decisions based on limited knowledge. Won't stop me from putting it on my curriculum vitae though.
@joshnicholson6194 Жыл бұрын
I see where you are coming from, I agree. However, I think your position, and transitively--;)--mine, are in tension with this video's "thesis". *I think* we agree that studying logic/mathematics improves one's logical and mathematical reasoning, but are sceptical as to whether (or to what extent) it improves logical reasoning more generally than in logic/mathematics. The above proposition, the one which *I think* we agree on, is not equivalent to the proposition: studying logic/mathematics does not improve logical reasoning. That is because we think it does improve logical reasoning "in the classroom"--and logical reasoning "in the classroom" is a subset of all logical reasoning... (Reasoning involving value judgements, such as political decisions, is not logical reasoning in this sense--if it is, then the whole debate rests on an equivocation, or is trivial). *I think* a more accurate statement of our position, and *I think* the video author's (and researchers), is that learning the theory behind formal logics/mathematics is not in itself enough to be capable of applying that theory. This is a trivial fact. One can learn how to use algebra to solve systems of equations, but learning to apply this knowledge to solve real world problems involving relative oil levels or relative boat speeds is another matter entirely. I.e., the ability to apply some theory correctly in the world is not implied from one's knowledge of the theory per se. This is so trivial that it can be derived from the fact that someone can understand some mathematical theory but not know how to apply it to some real world problem. I.e., the geometry that Einstein used to formulate his theories of relativity was known prior to anyone knowing that it could be used to model a pretty accurate physical theory of the world. This fact is also why someone does not, necessarily, immediately know following learning about the classical "only if" truth conditions that, P: P only if Q: therefore, Q. Knowing a rule does not imply knowing all of the consequences of that rule. If it did, we could learn any consistent system by learning sufficient rules to distinguish it from other systems (I.e., knowing the classical, propositional rules for negation and disjunction, as well as the S 5 axiom, would be enough to know everything about classical, propositional S 5...).
@LeventeCzelnai 8 ай бұрын
so how can you improve it?
@AMANKUMARSINGH-yp1qz Жыл бұрын
Great
@junaetovi1132 Жыл бұрын
what did Nietzsche meant that true men wants women as playthings? is there any mistakes in translation too?
@SteveJones379 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate your insight and video. Thank you! ☮
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
And I thank you for your kind comment:)!
@problematicalgorithm6743 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this! Good to have new videos from you!
@problematicalgorithm6743 Жыл бұрын
I don't know how many more episodes there are gonna be in this series, but looking forward to the rest of it.
@ExistentialistDasein Жыл бұрын
Thank you:)!
@lelagrangeeffectphysics4120 Жыл бұрын
I have mixed feelings about this vid: By putting yourself in the role of a "Philosopher" with the role and privilege of judging philosophy and to preach the enlightenment to the masses its comes across as arrogant and self-entitled and as i said in my other response much of the crisis we see today comes from economic stagnation much like it did in the 1930's, omce again philosphy detaches itself from reality and it thinks it can feed the common man by teaching it Nietzsche or Kant. Saying that conspiracy theories are inherently bad is like saying checking your wife for cheating is bad, conspiracy theories only crop up when there is an abuse of state secrecy and a lack of transparency, if a conspiracy was true then well it is true and then conspiritors are ought to be punished, if not then our trust in our goverment is reinforced. If science as we know it has become a religion for some but science is the foundations of our truth then who is the beholder of truth? if Nietzsche and other philosophers are our source then why? If religions preach their faith, scientism preaches its truth and philosophy preach its reason, are you not part of the "church of philosophy" or is philosophy exempted from this by its very name, what you just made me realize is that all of them are Reason in way, all of them reflections of reality, merely just tarnished by the human mind in a shape or form but all of them have the same objective that is to make sense of the world, they are just competing between each other
@lelagrangeeffectphysics4120 Жыл бұрын
What i currently see is that very much like the past, the present and probably the future, war and war films are pressure valves for societies to offload their frustrations and shortcomings on to others, right now life for most of the west is while not hard, it certainly is harder than it was 10-20 years ago, people find themselves on a very short budget and career/social progression is very hard to achieve, mostly due to elite-overdominance and incompetent nepotistic goverments, this creates rage and hatred for the elites which builds up over time, if you dont have a war to throw it at you get the french revolution, if you do you have WW2, The Afghan war and the Falklands war, and right now we have the ukraine war for us to rejoice over dead Ivans in the trench and a crusade aggainst ists and phobes. I also find it funny how Sellinger protested to not glorify WW2 which ironicly enough ended up becoming the romanticized war in history, and while the Axis did not leave many choices for a peacefull surrender or negotiations of any sort of matter i just ask myself on easy it is to make a war "noble", how noble it was to put iraqis in a shoebox with hellfire missiles because it was to combat terrorism and that every dead iraqi, taliban or not would aid in world peace.