Harvard HouseZero Animation
3:00
6 жыл бұрын
Harvard CGBC Lecture Series:  Gordon Gill
1:06:46
Пікірлер
@Jared_Albert
@Jared_Albert Ай бұрын
So a Million to upgrade windows,insulation oc geothermal heat pump erv and you reduce energy consumption by 5.7% lol never a payback period just exposed the scam
@safitrianwar
@safitrianwar 4 ай бұрын
HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN
@sykwitit2o1o
@sykwitit2o1o 4 ай бұрын
Is this now abandoned?
@weston6351
@weston6351 8 ай бұрын
promo sm 🌸
@drzavahercegbosnaponosna5974
@drzavahercegbosnaponosna5974 11 ай бұрын
Nice! Not nice > that you are not updating your research news! You don't seem shy to me. ;-)
@shubhamkarps
@shubhamkarps Жыл бұрын
Hello, can someone please explain the charts at 15:45, how is the Energy Consumption (GJ/ capita) of countries changing between charts even though the scale of x axis is same?
@teddyber6337
@teddyber6337 Жыл бұрын
Very good talk 🙌🔥🔥🔥
@R.E.A.L.I.T.Y
@R.E.A.L.I.T.Y Жыл бұрын
No thanks. From the advise i received from a former employee his people have to talk him out off consistently bad ideas. He certainly lives of their ideas, pays the young subsistence salaries and employees poorly, while his Lordship flies to his building on the Thames in a helicopter.
@johnnylee8194
@johnnylee8194 Жыл бұрын
Harvard GSD and like is a joke that always accepted 3rd rate school kids in wholesale because no smart sane person will pursue more schooling for art degree except "competitive applied art"(oxymoron) majors. GSD degree no better than JC art degree
@synon9m
@synon9m 2 жыл бұрын
9:09 lecture starts
@pitfa1140
@pitfa1140 2 жыл бұрын
too short man u gotta keep takling
@fernando-alonso-tuero
@fernando-alonso-tuero 2 жыл бұрын
Great inspiring lecture!
@angelmatos9143
@angelmatos9143 3 жыл бұрын
Harvard conducts these talks to then 'stick it' to the world. Some things never change.
@drasmahaliamohamadbohari8407
@drasmahaliamohamadbohari8407 3 жыл бұрын
Glad i found this KZbin channel.. very interesting
@intezashariar
@intezashariar 3 жыл бұрын
Lord ...😂
@OlexiyLitinsky
@OlexiyLitinsky 3 жыл бұрын
His deep awareness in the technological, cultural, urban issues gives an ability to balance , of course, and move in a desirable direction by few surfaces simultaneously. I see here a sort of new understanding of ancient dogma :'usefulness, strength, beauty', it was turned into something like : 'Technologicalness, Nature-care, Sustainability ' ; and in this speech one can clearly see a wish of Mr. Foster to push humanity in this complex directions . It is his vision of the future. Will see...
@aaronreynolds5303
@aaronreynolds5303 4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting talk, thanks for sharing :D
@atoms-to-atoms
@atoms-to-atoms 4 жыл бұрын
Norman can't Riechstag without lecturing.
@maryspencer813
@maryspencer813 4 жыл бұрын
only rich people....!!!!
@strategiemarketing-busines8578
@strategiemarketing-busines8578 4 жыл бұрын
🔎 Hello, découvre le meilleur partenariat pour ton contenu youtube: Webtalk Webtalk est un réseau social avancé, qui te permet d’avoir un contrôle total sur ton compte, tes post & la visibilité de ces derniers. Mais aussi rémunère ses utilisateurs pour: leur présence, activité, interaction & les recommandations jusqu’à 5 niveaux. Webtalk va dépasser tout ce que tu connais comme réseau, découvre le meilleur partenariat: join.webtalk.co/6795663
@frankiebingxinyu2947
@frankiebingxinyu2947 4 жыл бұрын
a great project!
@johnnylee8194
@johnnylee8194 4 жыл бұрын
Many confused people throw around false equivalency by comparing Pritzker prize to Nobel prize. Pritzker prize is just a vanity project and is a branding effort for wealthy Pritzker family name. Moreover, the prize committee is composed of mostly random buffoons who have no knowledge of building design and hence the prizes has no credibility. Its akin to trash collector in Nobel award selection committee making award for physics. Architecture is a more a humanities degree than anything. Almost all top tier us college or university do not offer this degree for a reason. Harvard graduate design school has lot of people from second, third rate undergraduate schools because most kid smart enough to get into top tier undergrad schools are too intelligent to get into this non technical profession.
@jonsl2000
@jonsl2000 4 жыл бұрын
For the benefit of those high school kids interested in this profession, there is rampant fallacy held by people including myself before I entered architecture school that architects are technical people in traditional STEM sense in addition to working with aesthetics but that is complete false. Architecture education in US is 99% humanities discipline i.e. art, history and english with virtually no science classes to receive a diploma.
@jonsl2000
@jonsl2000 4 жыл бұрын
If one look past often grandiose declarations (particularly known) architects make about their profession, those most satisfied with their job tend to be dim witted science wise and university education is all amalgamation of art/history/english majors. I regret graduating with this pussy degree where architects office environment can be very petty & stifling. If you honor STEM, best to stay away. Cream does not necessarily rise to the top in this profession i.e. you have to be buffoonish and sell yourself. Also many so called known architects are not from best undergrad schools including this ding dong Foster fella. That should tell you something.
@Punk_vise07
@Punk_vise07 4 жыл бұрын
Lol yeah it tells me something. And that something is that you failed massively in this course to the point that you're now hating it lol. You couldn't make it to the big leagues because your works might probably have been shit and wasnt recognized because they're worth shit. And now you hate it because no one can appreciate your shitty work :(. It's okay, im sure your more STEM oriented work now is doing you wonders. Have your substandard technological designs made it to the big leagues of technological designs yet? :( Hahahaha your opinions dont have much value because you couldnt even perform your best in the architecture world lol.
@rickysturgis4614
@rickysturgis4614 6 жыл бұрын
I would like to see this talk given again after they had to include 10,000+ (?) parking spaces to the Apple campus; no more connection to nature with that much pavement. How do we balance the difference in some of the these hyper idealized proposals (Apple being wholly unrealistic), and severe limitations in ability to be energy efficient due to restrictive codes and zoning requirements that don’t facilitate or encourage a deviation from the norm (pun intended 🤷🏻‍♂️).
@xavier2303
@xavier2303 7 жыл бұрын
Very amazing talk and show a great combination of sustainable and technology in an architecture what foster said is deserve to contemplate, thanks for the sharing
@farrahnazmahdavi5921
@farrahnazmahdavi5921 7 жыл бұрын
a great combination of capitalism and green growth....
@mohammadmoradi1826
@mohammadmoradi1826 7 жыл бұрын
Great workshop,thanks
@MaZEEZaM
@MaZEEZaM 7 жыл бұрын
Very interesting talk, thanks for sharing :D
@ljudmilakoprivec5289
@ljudmilakoprivec5289 7 жыл бұрын
higher knowledge
@tao7802
@tao7802 8 жыл бұрын
go environmental awareness
@MrBiggeorge93
@MrBiggeorge93 9 жыл бұрын
this should have millions of views