cat meow at 0:48

Your excitement with this beatiful piece of math is contagious! Thank you.

Jim Fowler my dude, i just bought a laptop from a third party and noticed that the OneDrive of the laptop is already full, i went to check and somehow the it was filled with your videos, 189 of them but all dated to 1st of January 1970. I don't know if the previous owner of this laptop is a huge fan of yours but i accidentally found your channel from the intro and the name MOOCulus.

Mumu man

Thank you Sir, very very simple

More of variables with no real example

Interesting but useless tech

mod 7 is a week, then the 1st, 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th are all "equal" (they are all mondays)

I know this was made about 7 years ago, but I still want to provide a quick proof by contradiction for why if A is not invertible, then AB is not invertible: Let AB be invertible. Then, there exists such a matrix C that when multiplied with AB yields the identity matrix, I. We can write this as an equation: AB * C = I Now through associative property of matrices, we find A * BC = I So if AB is invertible, A must be invertible as well. Therefore when A is not invertible, AB must be not invertible as well.

Thanks alot. Simple explanation and the motivation for why the analytical fuctions are studied in the first place.

Im gonna pretend i wasnt here😅

Wow wow wow wow wow wow wow

you are speaking gibberish young man. i don't believe any of this!

But what is the hypotenuse? I want to know how long a board I need.

this is a good explanation !

Great video

how r u writing like that dude

Thanks

Unless otherwise stated it should essentially be done away with as a “symbol” of an “operator” on the equation that comes after it to instruct the mathematician to take the derivative of the equation with respect to the bottom variable (x,y,x,s,t,u,v,etc)

It’s best interpreted as if an epsilon change is made on another axis how much does the axis in question change but until a much higher level is needed it should just be viewed as notation for the current base along that axis to quantify the units.

Man keep it up, this way of teaching math is rare.

I've spent days trying to wrap my head around this algorithm. Everyone is always missing steps. Thank you so much!!!

best lecture, thanks , where find a note book

the pen grip 😭💀

Very good

Let X={a,b,c} and ~ be {(b,b), (b,c), (c,b), (c,c)}. This example is symmetric and transitive but not reflexive. I like having a non-vacuous example as well.

Good! But, the guy in the screen looks bored!

Thank you so much for explaining this to me.I used to think that 0.9 repeating does not equals 1, because it does not feel like it intuitively.Haven't thought of using infinite sum to prove this

Beautifully explained!

Верха нет, сознание запаяно

Thank you for this very clear and concise explanation. I have been racking my braining for hours trying to understand this!

I want to use this knowledge for a bra sewing pattern. Never thought that I would use math's for this. It is great. Thank you

Love how u hold the pen

That is sooooo good. Thank you.

👏👏👏👏

thank you! this is the only one video I found which really helped me; what you say here seems so fundamental and it is really difficult to find a neat explanation of it! it seems mathematicians and engineers nowadays worry only about applications, and they have lost intuition and can't explain even the most fundamental things conceptually;

Beautiful explanation, though the keyboard settup in the background remains a mystery to me 😂

thankyou for this, spent days trying to figure this out

The enthusiasm of this presentation made it a joy to watch. Love this.

the pauses sure are creepy.. must be the hardware video encoding, not the interpreted language with recursively defined arithmetic. like the idris dev advertising his 86000 line program compiling in under 4 minutes. btw what is your genetic background? fowler strikes me as an unusual name for the physiognomy.

it is not ^2n

Hey what if it was only 1/k I really need it

what is bro drinking

Good stuff why was this series taken off of coursera? It's probably the best calc course out there

thank u goat

Thanks for the video! It's the first one I found that's talked about operators which has cleared things up for me. Why is d/dx * d/dx = d**2/dx**2, instead of d**2/d**2x**2? Are there implied parentheses on the denominator? Does d**2/dx**2 mean that the derivative is "applied" twice? In the same way that 3**2 * 4 is 3 * applied twice to 4? If we take a partial derivative why can we combine the d's, but not their dx's and dy's?

Great video

you haven't proven the last assertion ?!?!?!? tf is this video? some kind of mathematics for engineers type of shit I guess?

Impressed by the lucidity and the communication skill with the simplest of tools - pen paper.. Great work!