Where do we observe unemployment in this diagram?

Me ayudó, sin embargo buscaba contenido con impuestos lump sum.

thanks you are a saviour

Class analysis and alternative economic systems have been an enormous boost to my interest in anarchism. Anarchism unlike the state prevents powerful individuals and groups from emerging

What do Economics, weather predictions and sociology have in common? To predict uncertainty, all require height math.

i love you

4:04 bellman eq rewriting

wheres part 5?

No. At the start. It is not about economics or social considerations. It is about domination and control. Always. Let us start from there.

He doesnt say anything in this video

how to generate this CEAFC, suppose using TreeAge. thanks

But can't you argue of a time dependent preference? Like ice cream in summer and hot chocolate in winter?

It’s a great series. To make it even better I am wondering if you can solve this using numerical methods with codes in python. Another direction to go is to add uncertainty and repeat the analysis.

What i don't get is why you only have i in the Slutsky equation when every version online says i and j

How do you run this module in STATA

This video has sheer compendiousness coupled with unmatched perspicacity, great work!

This is really helpful thanks!

You teach like you think everyone understands the subject like you do - very poor

Just speed reading

Thanks a lot, but I have a question just at the end of video, for 2 order stochastic domination, for the PDF function, the area below the 2 functions should be 1, but as you showed it, they seem have different area, which I don't understand....

That's a great introduction BIA !!! Thank You John !

Can you help me understand the RHS of the equation right after you take the derivative w.r.t. p_i? Where does the first term (dxi/dpi) come from? If I were just doing this myself, I would just use the chain rule and come up with the second term alone. This is a 5yo video so I know it might be a long shot but you never know, thanks!!

Good video. I need to watch it couple of more times. Have a question though.. can Marlon models validate drug approval process? Are they being used now ? What about Monte Carlo simulations ?

That made no sense

What is the main difference between solow and rck model in Eco

Amazing Professor. Is there any code of this model?

Every qualified physicist that solves similar problems in physics knows what that means. It means that you can not add up individual behavior to come up with a model of how the whole works. They call that emergence and it is a common and well understood problem of deriving macro scales from micro scales. It basically destroys the very fundament of equilibrium models and neoclassical economic theory, which is why it is downplayed and hidden from undergraduate students who do not bother to question the fundamental assumptions anyways. It is pure insanity from the perspective of other actual sciences where those kind of problems are common. Econ101 is pure insanity. It is a cult that is motivated by their world view that a society doesn't exists and there are only individuals to prove their already disproven ideas.

My textbook couldn't explain this at all, this saved my ass.

Hey, I think there is a mistake deriving the FOC of V0 at min 5:33 because the D' of Ln(Bx1/(1+B)) = B/BX1 = 1/X1

Why, in step 3 (FOCs, wrt k) is the rho term subtracted... from the previous step it seems like it should be added (should be the same sign as mu-dot).

IS IT possible to send a video analysis of this model to the EViews application

❤

Thank you❤

Hello, Do you still actively working? I've been thinking about this idea for years. I wish i had someone to talk and clear my foggy ideas about this context. Is there any social groups for this. I've looked up few of them and none of them caught my interest. And i liked your video

Musn't the sign be the other way, such that the integral for (the stochastically dominant) F(x) <= the integral for G(x)? As far as I've understood correctly from your video, in the PDF, the smaller, because more narrow area below F(x) shows that this distribution represents a gamble that is less risky, and thus F(x) stochastically dominates the green G(x) (with a larger area below) in second order. ?

Amazing video. Cleared the concept quickly. Thanku

Hi EconJohn. Thank you for this video! Really great stuff. May I ask, are there some references that you like in addition to the standard SLP reference?

if there is subsidy given unemployed in Shapiro Stiglitz Model. How this will change the model and graph

😅 *Promo SM*

Whether both equality and inequality constrained are allowed in solnl() function?

Great debate, I really apreciate your videos. I care to ask, what is this refinement you are referring to? Because it seems that the more complex and refined the mathematics, the more useless general equilibrium analysis seems to be. What is your possition?

Thanks for sharing! I understood math is important for deriving the consumer theory, profit maximization, even utility functions, and/or cost benefit functions; or measure/adjust the predictability of the statistical model. Since I am a master's student, and I have a poor math background. I wonder do I learn math proof while I learn all the calculus, linear algebra, etc on the way? Thanks!

Thank you so much

Thanks a lot bro

How to do step 2 when we have perfect complement utility function?

Great video. I only like to inquire about any reference book, to read more about the subject, that you could recommend. Thank you in advance for the information.

I love this series, thank youu so much!

upon solving it would it be < pie/{(2w1)^0.6 *(2w2)^0.4}> also thanks for the solve.

Thank you So So much! Helps a lot!

Thanks a lot Any upload slides?