you don't necessarily need to be a 4D creature, just need an 3D view, maybe we can plot a 3D view into a 2D plane, so we can see everything in one single 2D imagine
@Yu-Gi-Oh3650814 сағат бұрын
two negatives, two fives, choose the negative 5
@HeavyMetalShredder18 сағат бұрын
Same because torque equals Frsin theta and the product is the same for both scenarios
@VaffleManКүн бұрын
Do 6D now.
@MakememesandmoreКүн бұрын
tesseracts are one of the onIy shapes that work in any dimension
@projackson3552 күн бұрын
The tesseract is actually the shadow of a 4d cube
@GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals2 күн бұрын
Also, for definite integrals, the C's from the antiderivatives cancel.
@Neo340142 күн бұрын
That’s like the easiest question in jee chem
@planeth85862 күн бұрын
Now do -1D
@lennartdahlback2 күн бұрын
Do the beams have mass?
@FITHyt2 күн бұрын
This is more of a mechanics problem in a quantum physics context. This is pretty simple
@areuokay49842 күн бұрын
we are literally germs
@areuokay49842 күн бұрын
the dumber people get the more these will be needed
@bradjohnston98002 күн бұрын
D
@yellow951112 күн бұрын
Basically what we see in the Sims game is what a 4d creature would see
@rianfelando74962 күн бұрын
But would they be earths any more? Or just blobs of stuff that used to be earths? If the question was how many earth volunteers you could fit into the sun, then sure. But if someone asks you how many bowling balls will fit into a box, you don't grind them into powder first.
@ilghiz2 күн бұрын
Do the earths remain round leaving gaps or fill every single point of space?
@petergrave51753 күн бұрын
What about the mass of the lever itself and the center of mass
@display91383 күн бұрын
Hardest ncert question😂😂
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
I am the stupidest person in math ever and i never thought id learn anything about math at this point, but this video actually managed to make me understand something that isn't basic math for the first time in years. I hope youtube reccomends me more of these
@domacleod3 күн бұрын
The question is ambiguous. How many objects the size of earth fit inside a 3d space the size of the sun? Or how many actual earths can be shoved inside the sun? Would they have to be shoved in at the same time or one by one? If one by one, just about an infinity, as the sun would take the mass of the earth and use it as fuel and gain more mass in the process, eventually ending up a black hole, at which point it could keep eating Earths and getting bigger.
@highqualitygrunt81953 күн бұрын
Jesse, what the fuck are you on about (we did not ask)
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
Buddy you're complicating things for no reason, this is a math problem, we don't need to consider gravity or the sun using the earth as fuel.
@rachmielshragalichtenstein82253 күн бұрын
Or maybe consider how black holes work. The answer is infinite
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
He never even mentioned black holes?
@rachmielshragalichtenstein82252 күн бұрын
@@Leopard_211 start feeding planets to a star, it gets heavier and heavier
@Leopard_2112 күн бұрын
@@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225 okay but why should this matter? It's a math problem.
@rachmielshragalichtenstein82252 күн бұрын
@@Leopard_211 I know it's a math problem. And the answer is infinite
@kencampbell-rf6ot3 күн бұрын
About...
@brokenswordmen3 күн бұрын
maybe 4th dimension is time, not only u can go in a directional but u can also go up to the past and the future????
@danicusramxynapuntar97093 күн бұрын
can you rotate the 5d cube?
@Rickachu_uwu3 күн бұрын
Fun fact: the earth is a perfect sphere. If you schrink earth down to the size of a biljard ball its smoother then a biljard ball
@prometheus73873 күн бұрын
Unfortunately the earth is also a bit squished on the poles so the proper term would be an oblate spheroid
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
@@prometheus7387I find it so funny how so many people say this thinking they're saying something, not trying to be offensive here but that doesn't say anything. The squishing is WAY too small to matter in basically any way. The earth is objectively a sphere. It is more spherical than any ball on earth. If the earth is not a sphere to you then nothing is. It's like saying a cake slice isn't a triangle because it isn't 100% perfect
@okami18193 күн бұрын
@@Leopard_211It's like saying that the earth is a geoid, since "geoid" literally means "shape of the earth", it doesn't mean anything to say that the earth has the shape of the earth!
@DeadEndSTREET3 күн бұрын
Molly and Josh can both see you.. But cant see each other.. yet you can see both Josh and Molly .. 👁️❤️🔥🧘🪽
@fatalerror70473 күн бұрын
What about -1 - 2 -3 dimension
@ws34233 күн бұрын
so the old adage that the 4th dimension is time is not entirely accurate, then?
@Eduardo-tq5sk3 күн бұрын
Thank for review it profe! Iam on it!😂❤
@diht3 күн бұрын
Well, technically It would have to be given that the area of contact between the mass and the stick is zero.
@user-rl1iu6iy5k3 күн бұрын
there is just 1 small problem: there is no 4th dimention. happy dreaming.
@Astriodia23 күн бұрын
oh what the actual fuck
@AdrianSmith743 күн бұрын
If you’re an engineer and can’t solve this, Your not an engineer.
@its_puggy_pugster84693 күн бұрын
yoyzers!! What an amazing and educational video for my eyes to enjoy! 😜
@paiperos3 күн бұрын
Jimmy don’t get inside that bedroom to change your clothes…
@Kratosin2.03 күн бұрын
4th dimension is time, and fifth is adding the element of choice, so just parallel universes
@n4p3r03 күн бұрын
It’s impossible to see anything but the past. Even if it’s just picoseconds.
@justanalthere21873 күн бұрын
isnt this like basic 9th grade stuff???
@jayyyzeee64094 күн бұрын
We're just going to neglect packing considerations and consider the Earth to be a fluid?
@deananderson77144 күн бұрын
I’d argue that if you put a million Earth’s together they indeed would combine into one mass and fit a spherical area
@Plasmapigeon3 күн бұрын
@@deananderson7714But then they’re not “Earths”. That’s like asking how many ice cubes fit into a glass and saying it holds half a liter of water.
@booty_mcscooty3 күн бұрын
@@Plasmapigeon but, if you were to truly have that many earths in the real world, they would not stay perfectly rigid as packed spheres, otherwise those are indestructible earth-sized spheres. both are equally not really useful lmao
@adgaming74033 күн бұрын
For the purposes of this particular question, the comparative size of the earth is small enough to neglect packing considerations, a bit like saying how many grains of sand will fit into a bucket, though not quite as extreme as that
@iakinose3 күн бұрын
@@adgaming7403 how does that make sense when spherical packing efficiency maxes out at 75% (via quick google). This does not suggest it changes with relative volumes.
@anonymous0719854 күн бұрын
In other words. To determine number of planets fitting in another planet. Assuming perfect sephere. And that you are given the radius in measurements of the smaller planet it's a simple power of 3 ratio.
@dennisk50544 күн бұрын
From the given options I would pick the 4th without any calculations tbh.
@FunctionW3 күн бұрын
Yea, kinda the only reasonable option 😂
@Avg2084 күн бұрын
Instead of doing all this complex thing what you can do is watch youtube and some of the videos teach you the answer which is D
@lorenz008x3 күн бұрын
This is the worst advice I’ve ever read.
@TheCyanKiller4 күн бұрын
For any 2 similar solids of any irregular shape, if u take the same 1d measurement of both of them and get their ratio, the ratio of their volumes is cubed. Also same thing with 2d shapes except it’s squared
@supomosupomo99414 күн бұрын
Now rotate it.
@ImHidingInFlStudioCorner4 күн бұрын
First?
@supomosupomo99414 күн бұрын
3 minutes ago?
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
No.
@Leopard_2113 күн бұрын
You're actually last
@Literally_A_Tree4 күн бұрын
People in the fourth dimension using the third dimension as an example for this same point:
@Lee-x7k4 күн бұрын
I am not sure how they conclude the formula and ensure it's accuracy
@martineizinger15114 күн бұрын
"quite difficult" my man I have bad news for you 😂
@umair94565 күн бұрын
Trampoline example is not for noobs like us....Cone example provide much more clear explanation