A Scientist’s Favorite Engine??
2:39
TRUE Engineers Can Solve!!
1:10
2 жыл бұрын
What Is "Torque" Exactly??
0:55
2 жыл бұрын
Copper OR Plastic?!?
1:00
2 жыл бұрын
Can You Do Math In Your Head?!?
1:01
Torque In 60 Seconds!! (Physics)
1:01
Drag Force!! (Physics)
1:01
2 жыл бұрын
Aerospace Engineering in 3 Minutes!!
2:58
Kinetic Energy (Physics)
1:00
2 жыл бұрын
Civil Engineering in 3 Minutes!!
2:59
Calculus 3 in Three Minutes!!
2:58
2 жыл бұрын
Linear Algebra in 2 Minutes!!
2:51
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@DarkuzHell
@DarkuzHell 8 сағат бұрын
you don't necessarily need to be a 4D creature, just need an 3D view, maybe we can plot a 3D view into a 2D plane, so we can see everything in one single 2D imagine
@Yu-Gi-Oh36508
@Yu-Gi-Oh36508 14 сағат бұрын
two negatives, two fives, choose the negative 5
@HeavyMetalShredder
@HeavyMetalShredder 18 сағат бұрын
Same because torque equals Frsin theta and the product is the same for both scenarios
@VaffleMan
@VaffleMan Күн бұрын
Do 6D now.
@Makememesandmore
@Makememesandmore Күн бұрын
tesseracts are one of the onIy shapes that work in any dimension
@projackson355
@projackson355 2 күн бұрын
The tesseract is actually the shadow of a 4d cube
@GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals
@GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals 2 күн бұрын
Also, for definite integrals, the C's from the antiderivatives cancel.
@Neo34014
@Neo34014 2 күн бұрын
That’s like the easiest question in jee chem
@planeth8586
@planeth8586 2 күн бұрын
Now do -1D
@lennartdahlback
@lennartdahlback 2 күн бұрын
Do the beams have mass?
@FITHyt
@FITHyt 2 күн бұрын
This is more of a mechanics problem in a quantum physics context. This is pretty simple
@areuokay4984
@areuokay4984 2 күн бұрын
we are literally germs
@areuokay4984
@areuokay4984 2 күн бұрын
the dumber people get the more these will be needed
@bradjohnston9800
@bradjohnston9800 2 күн бұрын
D
@yellow95111
@yellow95111 2 күн бұрын
Basically what we see in the Sims game is what a 4d creature would see
@rianfelando7496
@rianfelando7496 2 күн бұрын
But would they be earths any more? Or just blobs of stuff that used to be earths? If the question was how many earth volunteers you could fit into the sun, then sure. But if someone asks you how many bowling balls will fit into a box, you don't grind them into powder first.
@ilghiz
@ilghiz 2 күн бұрын
Do the earths remain round leaving gaps or fill every single point of space?
@petergrave5175
@petergrave5175 3 күн бұрын
What about the mass of the lever itself and the center of mass
@display9138
@display9138 3 күн бұрын
Hardest ncert question😂😂
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
I am the stupidest person in math ever and i never thought id learn anything about math at this point, but this video actually managed to make me understand something that isn't basic math for the first time in years. I hope youtube reccomends me more of these
@domacleod
@domacleod 3 күн бұрын
The question is ambiguous. How many objects the size of earth fit inside a 3d space the size of the sun? Or how many actual earths can be shoved inside the sun? Would they have to be shoved in at the same time or one by one? If one by one, just about an infinity, as the sun would take the mass of the earth and use it as fuel and gain more mass in the process, eventually ending up a black hole, at which point it could keep eating Earths and getting bigger.
@highqualitygrunt8195
@highqualitygrunt8195 3 күн бұрын
Jesse, what the fuck are you on about (we did not ask)
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
Buddy you're complicating things for no reason, this is a math problem, we don't need to consider gravity or the sun using the earth as fuel.
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225 3 күн бұрын
Or maybe consider how black holes work. The answer is infinite
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
He never even mentioned black holes?
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225 2 күн бұрын
@@Leopard_211 start feeding planets to a star, it gets heavier and heavier
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 2 күн бұрын
@@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225 okay but why should this matter? It's a math problem.
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225
@rachmielshragalichtenstein8225 2 күн бұрын
@@Leopard_211 I know it's a math problem. And the answer is infinite
@kencampbell-rf6ot
@kencampbell-rf6ot 3 күн бұрын
About...
@brokenswordmen
@brokenswordmen 3 күн бұрын
maybe 4th dimension is time, not only u can go in a directional but u can also go up to the past and the future????
@danicusramxynapuntar9709
@danicusramxynapuntar9709 3 күн бұрын
can you rotate the 5d cube?
@Rickachu_uwu
@Rickachu_uwu 3 күн бұрын
Fun fact: the earth is a perfect sphere. If you schrink earth down to the size of a biljard ball its smoother then a biljard ball
@prometheus7387
@prometheus7387 3 күн бұрын
Unfortunately the earth is also a bit squished on the poles so the proper term would be an oblate spheroid
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
​@@prometheus7387I find it so funny how so many people say this thinking they're saying something, not trying to be offensive here but that doesn't say anything. The squishing is WAY too small to matter in basically any way. The earth is objectively a sphere. It is more spherical than any ball on earth. If the earth is not a sphere to you then nothing is. It's like saying a cake slice isn't a triangle because it isn't 100% perfect
@okami1819
@okami1819 3 күн бұрын
​@@Leopard_211It's like saying that the earth is a geoid, since "geoid" literally means "shape of the earth", it doesn't mean anything to say that the earth has the shape of the earth!
@DeadEndSTREET
@DeadEndSTREET 3 күн бұрын
Molly and Josh can both see you.. But cant see each other.. yet you can see both Josh and Molly .. 👁️❤️‍🔥🧘🪽
@fatalerror7047
@fatalerror7047 3 күн бұрын
What about -1 - 2 -3 dimension
@ws3423
@ws3423 3 күн бұрын
so the old adage that the 4th dimension is time is not entirely accurate, then?
@Eduardo-tq5sk
@Eduardo-tq5sk 3 күн бұрын
Thank for review it profe! Iam on it!😂❤
@diht
@diht 3 күн бұрын
Well, technically It would have to be given that the area of contact between the mass and the stick is zero.
@user-rl1iu6iy5k
@user-rl1iu6iy5k 3 күн бұрын
there is just 1 small problem: there is no 4th dimention. happy dreaming.
@Astriodia2
@Astriodia2 3 күн бұрын
oh what the actual fuck
@AdrianSmith74
@AdrianSmith74 3 күн бұрын
If you’re an engineer and can’t solve this, Your not an engineer.
@its_puggy_pugster8469
@its_puggy_pugster8469 3 күн бұрын
yoyzers!! What an amazing and educational video for my eyes to enjoy! 😜
@paiperos
@paiperos 3 күн бұрын
Jimmy don’t get inside that bedroom to change your clothes…
@Kratosin2.0
@Kratosin2.0 3 күн бұрын
4th dimension is time, and fifth is adding the element of choice, so just parallel universes
@n4p3r0
@n4p3r0 3 күн бұрын
It’s impossible to see anything but the past. Even if it’s just picoseconds.
@justanalthere2187
@justanalthere2187 3 күн бұрын
isnt this like basic 9th grade stuff???
@jayyyzeee6409
@jayyyzeee6409 4 күн бұрын
We're just going to neglect packing considerations and consider the Earth to be a fluid?
@deananderson7714
@deananderson7714 4 күн бұрын
I’d argue that if you put a million Earth’s together they indeed would combine into one mass and fit a spherical area
@Plasmapigeon
@Plasmapigeon 3 күн бұрын
@@deananderson7714But then they’re not “Earths”. That’s like asking how many ice cubes fit into a glass and saying it holds half a liter of water.
@booty_mcscooty
@booty_mcscooty 3 күн бұрын
@@Plasmapigeon but, if you were to truly have that many earths in the real world, they would not stay perfectly rigid as packed spheres, otherwise those are indestructible earth-sized spheres. both are equally not really useful lmao
@adgaming7403
@adgaming7403 3 күн бұрын
For the purposes of this particular question, the comparative size of the earth is small enough to neglect packing considerations, a bit like saying how many grains of sand will fit into a bucket, though not quite as extreme as that
@iakinose
@iakinose 3 күн бұрын
​@@adgaming7403 how does that make sense when spherical packing efficiency maxes out at 75% (via quick google). This does not suggest it changes with relative volumes.
@anonymous071985
@anonymous071985 4 күн бұрын
In other words. To determine number of planets fitting in another planet. Assuming perfect sephere. And that you are given the radius in measurements of the smaller planet it's a simple power of 3 ratio.
@dennisk5054
@dennisk5054 4 күн бұрын
From the given options I would pick the 4th without any calculations tbh.
@FunctionW
@FunctionW 3 күн бұрын
Yea, kinda the only reasonable option 😂
@Avg208
@Avg208 4 күн бұрын
Instead of doing all this complex thing what you can do is watch youtube and some of the videos teach you the answer which is D
@lorenz008x
@lorenz008x 3 күн бұрын
This is the worst advice I’ve ever read.
@TheCyanKiller
@TheCyanKiller 4 күн бұрын
For any 2 similar solids of any irregular shape, if u take the same 1d measurement of both of them and get their ratio, the ratio of their volumes is cubed. Also same thing with 2d shapes except it’s squared
@supomosupomo9941
@supomosupomo9941 4 күн бұрын
Now rotate it.
@ImHidingInFlStudioCorner
@ImHidingInFlStudioCorner 4 күн бұрын
First?
@supomosupomo9941
@supomosupomo9941 4 күн бұрын
3 minutes ago?
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
No.
@Leopard_211
@Leopard_211 3 күн бұрын
You're actually last
@Literally_A_Tree
@Literally_A_Tree 4 күн бұрын
People in the fourth dimension using the third dimension as an example for this same point:
@Lee-x7k
@Lee-x7k 4 күн бұрын
I am not sure how they conclude the formula and ensure it's accuracy
@martineizinger1511
@martineizinger1511 4 күн бұрын
"quite difficult" my man I have bad news for you 😂
@umair9456
@umair9456 5 күн бұрын
Trampoline example is not for noobs like us....Cone example provide much more clear explanation