The story attached to this channel is unbelievable.
@ushashrestha306219 күн бұрын
Thank yopu very much. This is of immense help .
@kirtichoudhary76321 күн бұрын
Thank you for the lecture ! Just a doubt at 52:12 where the first rectangle's width is 4.7 kPa should be from 0 to 4 m depth and for bottom 2 m shouldn't it be 3.6 kPa(Ka2*surcharge) ??
@JavierOchoa271223 күн бұрын
why all vertical stresses need to be converted to their equivalent mean stresses in CSM?
@mohamednor3925 күн бұрын
thank you for the lectures
@tommycohen482Ай бұрын
Hey sir, lve the videos, going to help me pass my class! At 24.49, how do you solve for your friction angle when its on both sides of the equation, I'm struggling with isolating thw angle to solve for it. Thanks!
@abdulkadirthecarguy1948Ай бұрын
0:29
@kabirajphuyal5124Ай бұрын
This Video is so cool and thank you for this video.
@tanishqkaranwal3566Ай бұрын
That's really amazing. Thanks ❤
@ErickBatista-y5eАй бұрын
There’s no way this could have been explained better. 🎉
@ashrafali1022Ай бұрын
Are you asthmatic patient? Those breathes are heavy
@proflavia1210Ай бұрын
Amazing video on CSM, thank you !!!!!
@ManishDadu-q9pАй бұрын
Bdbd uh ch IC es hf ok sb jh ch xs vi s vr RT vi s grrsg
@golagha1959Ай бұрын
question: In your example, you used the moist unit weight of 110 pcf to calculate the total stress at 10 feet. Sometimes I have seen examples where both dry and moist unit wights are given or dry unit weight and % moisture are given. One solution in one problem uses the dry unit weight to calculate total stress. In a similar problem elsewhere the author uses the moist unit weight to calculate the total stress without an explanation why. If you had a problem with both dry and moist unit weight for a layer given, which one would you use to calculation both total and effective stresses? I believe moist unit weight makes more sense since soils are hardly dry from practical point of view.
@johnlongest54882 ай бұрын
Thanks for this, good clarification. Although I'd be interested in how you obtain Kv vertical acceleration coefficient
@TheAncientColossus2 ай бұрын
41:30 What do you do AFTER getting the correct stress path according to the field condition?
@TheAncientColossus2 ай бұрын
41:30 What do you do AFTER getting the correct stress path according to the field condition?
@StructuralNature2 ай бұрын
Awesome lecture on this topic.
@alexbradshaw54663 ай бұрын
thanks, 2024 omaha nebraska
@geneva12023 ай бұрын
Good Job!
@pikxo3 ай бұрын
Gracias, una clase magistral 😊
@satyokothon90723 ай бұрын
Lecturar name?
@SlettedalTorgeir3 ай бұрын
Hey, Kevin. Thank you so much for all the videos, and hope you are doing well. 🙂 Can you share the videos 6-10 in this class?
@ChinthanieMahanama3 ай бұрын
Awesome explanation. Been stuck on an assignment and this video helped me understand it.
@LS-nj4bt3 ай бұрын
I never liked Geotechnical/Soil Mechanics, BUT after listening to your lectures I am loving it… because I really understand it! Thank you so much. Your students are lucky to have you as their professor. Thank you so much for making your lectures available to everyone. 🙏🙂
@Sin-ro2fk3 ай бұрын
Bro just speaking normally, so annoying when you keep pausing...
@jamaltahat14 ай бұрын
Hello Dr. Frank. This is great work. would it be possible you can share the unlocked Excel file?
@danellbaptiste30844 ай бұрын
Never calc the Area like this. I think I computed it all in one step.
@yonathanmolina37744 ай бұрын
Thank you for the great class
@hieutrung14 ай бұрын
I don't see any difference between Critical Void Ratio line (Casagrande) and Steady State Line (Castro) from the way that you explained them: both include states (effective confining pressure, void ratio) that loose soil reaches to at the end of their shearing. Please clarify.
@nunglembaangom31674 ай бұрын
Thank you, 2024 india, manipur.
@hermannaftaliiek86834 ай бұрын
I'm about to start my MS in Civil Engineering at USC. Your video might be a good kick start for my first year.
@vicentebravomunoz84705 ай бұрын
what happen if the soil is NP for the correction for the Su of the VST?
@vicentebravomunoz84705 ай бұрын
why the ssl is below the cvr?
@gfy29795 ай бұрын
Cringe af
@alandiaz57195 ай бұрын
I have a question. If we have two UU test (or two CU with the same isotropic effective stress) in the lab, and I apply two differents path, for example, one increasing sigma 1 and sigma 3 is constant, and the another one decreasing sigma 3 and sigma 1 constant, the value of qf will be the same? I know that it will be in the Kf line, but i have the quetion because i don't know if it posible that two UU test (the same material and effective stress) can have two values of Su (kpa) due to the path. Thank You!
@seanhummer48325 ай бұрын
This is a great lecture! It supports my assumptions of how overly conservative retaining wall design is particularly in the residential construction industry.
@pradipkumardas24145 ай бұрын
Excellent Teacher!!!!
@lateefmhaimeed93355 ай бұрын
Thank you , Dr. Frankie, much appreciated 🎉
@silverbackdungeongorilla43155 ай бұрын
thank you old man
@Engr_Zeeshan6 ай бұрын
sir, in academic license baseline correction and filtering options are not available, please guide?
@AyoubSalih-t8n6 ай бұрын
Good Job
@PJ-ej9do6 ай бұрын
Your lectures are incredible. The pacing and tone is simultaneously comforting and enthralling
@afghanking17626 ай бұрын
hello sir i need this soil mechanic lectuers slides can u help me? please!
@susangardner44986 ай бұрын
Returning to the engineering realm after a 20-year break. This is so helpful for getting back up to speed. Thank you!
@diogomenezes20246 ай бұрын
Happy 13th Birthday Russell Franke 🥳🙏🙌👏😊🤝🎂🎁🎊🎉🎈
@moseshanne97506 ай бұрын
Civil engineer is a bridge that connect different town cities and societies
@bangjaggi-ov1tn7 ай бұрын
dear Dr Franke. i really love your lecture so i hope i can see ur lecture 6 to 10. would really help me alot. thanks :)
@farrukhchoksi28727 ай бұрын
Hey, do you have a video on deep soil or shake?
@B27-o2c7 ай бұрын
Very good video. I’m in a graduate geotech class and a lot of these concepts are bit rusty for me. You explain it all in a very concise and thorough way that is understandable.