tilt your motor up more when driving, more speed and fuel efficiency.
@JackspratcouldeatnofatАй бұрын
Good useful comparison.
@jacobswell2533Ай бұрын
I have a feeling that you 4 stroke is not propped correctly. The expected fuel consumption at WOT for the 130hp EFI engine is 32.5 liters/hour. definitely not 47l/h. This is way too much for a 4 stroke and it is likely to be overreving. I preffer to cruise @4500 and run WOT @5600 rpm. But, Man! Your 2 stroke looks mint! Well done
@jonsmith3982 ай бұрын
that 130 yamaha 2 stroke every time
@timrainger89082 ай бұрын
Out of curiosity what prop were you running on the 2 stroke? Thanks!
@cottonsoxx16773 ай бұрын
5:15, what is that thing on the prop blade?🤔
@ShortFlic3 ай бұрын
It's a flag. It's required when travelling on road (trailer). I just didn't take it off when I got home and flushed outboard.
@OGMoses_4 ай бұрын
I have a 2015 130hp Yamaha 2stroke goes really well I’ve had no issues so far it’s got 270hrs on it but I’d rather a 130hp 4 stroke for the reliability and fuel efficiency I’ve owned a 100hp 2010 4 stroke and never had any issues I put 1200 hrs on it too
@mikeamphlett79135 ай бұрын
Got the two stroke. We do mainly skiing with kids so will stick with it.
@pavelmartinov6615 ай бұрын
здравствуйте. что можете сказать о моторах Эвинруд Итек. Знаю что их болье не производят как они себя зарекомендовали,
@ShortFlic6 ай бұрын
Now put 130hours in my F130A Four Stroke and it's opened up nicely. Best economy is around 3800rpm at 2.8km/litre. Also, 4300 / 4400rpm provides 2.5km/litre at 50km/hr.
@pjimmbojimmbo19906 ай бұрын
A boat with a 2 Stroke will be across the Lake and back before the 4 Stroke gets on Plane
@shyman90236 ай бұрын
2004 two stroke is an old motor.
@DustinKeating-yk3vq6 ай бұрын
I have a 07 Yamaha 115 2 stroke i take very good care of so i can't last until i die
@shanewatkins53227 ай бұрын
Pardon my language, but two-stroke sounds meaner than hell! My dad has a 115 two stroke, it will get on down the water
@metinakpinar97248 ай бұрын
Great compaison and what a cracker that 2 stroke motor is.
@shivamohan54088 ай бұрын
Which size propeller do you use for the 4stroke 130
@ShortFlic6 ай бұрын
The 2 stroke was using 13-1/2 X 15 Pitch S/S. The four stroke has a 13-1/4 X 17 Pitch S/S
@danielturner41549 ай бұрын
I went from the 140 v4 yamaha to a f130 and definitely not disappointed. Hole shot was about the same. Top end on the f130 is 2kmh less but is running a size down on prop vs the 2 stroke. Getting 6400 rpm 2pob 100L fuel. 73kmh. 5.5m glass hull.
@zizwehunt1872 Жыл бұрын
I have both 150hp on a bass boat. Tried both on the same boat and i love my 2 stroke way more the only down fall is how it drinks twice as much gas at W.O.T. Besides that everthing was perfect with my two stroke!
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@JackJack-ld5eo Жыл бұрын
Great comparison video! I have a 94 Yamaha 85 hp 2 stroke that I'm replacing with a 115 hp Yamaha 4 stroke. While I do love my 85, it is 30 years old and some of the parts are becoming "no longer available". I do a lot of trolling which the 2 stroke hates, and then there's the noise. On a small boat like mine, even if your up front the engine is loud.
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment. I do soooooo much more tolling now I have the 4S
@mikesolns1364 Жыл бұрын
What does it hates trolling mean? What does it do?
@cavedivecamp6377 Жыл бұрын
I had to replay this video. Lots of talk about impeller problems with the yamaha motor being displayed onscreen....
@danielturner4154 Жыл бұрын
What prop is on the 4 stroke?
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Hi, the prop is 13-1/2 X 17". Probably could be a tad less pitch with max RPM being 5800
@danielturner4154 Жыл бұрын
@@ShortFlic thanks mate. Have just repowered from 140v4 yamaha to the f130. Still yet to water test but trying the 16" for max rpm.
@siviunative5241 Жыл бұрын
I still love 2stroke
@Topofthegears Жыл бұрын
I feel bad ruining 2l per hour on a 25hp inboard
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Diesel? or Petrol 4 stroke. My brother had a 30ETEC which did 6km per litre of fuel (at 30km/hour). This equates to 5 litres per hour. That's the best I've come across in petrol..
@Topofthegears Жыл бұрын
HOLY JESUS 56 liters per hour that’s about £85 😮😮
@disilberg9896 Жыл бұрын
🚩👍👍👍
@marshmellow3110 Жыл бұрын
I had twin 130 2 strokes on my first catamaran and 150 4 strokes on second. I currently have a 115 on a aluminum center console. Looks exactly like your 130 but 15 less hp and I’ve never seen that 130 in the US. Not burning oil is nice and better MPG’s, but hole shot on the 2 stroke is unbeatable
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comments. Yeah, I think the F130 was something Asia Pacific? or Australia / NZ thing. Maybe we are the Ginny pigs :). Both are great motors
@stevekamitsis1327 Жыл бұрын
Steve in Florida I have a 115 4stk at low rpm at 800 remember I also have the prop rattle good video thank you Steve
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I found some seriously technical documents online but it makes sense with heavy Stainless props verses and 4 stroke power cycles. I purposely avoid that rpm. I would suggest any extra vibration or load cycles is not good for engine longevity..
@MrWhiskylee2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for taking the time to put the comparison video together, very informative
@jonsmith3982 жыл бұрын
two stroke will beat a equal 4 stroke every time
@Boaters_hub2 жыл бұрын
Great video👍
@mooen832 жыл бұрын
The 2 stroke is 165 kg and +the oil system.
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
My motor was 130BETOX 169kg.
@armagansabetian52692 жыл бұрын
Great point highlighting 2 stroke's terrible fuel economy at low speed.. I get at best 1 litre per kilometer on a 90hp Mariner.
@andrekemp50592 жыл бұрын
We call the 130hp Yamaha 1 Thursty! Power is good
@jimjg99232 жыл бұрын
The 2stroke can handle higher pitch....
@michaela84352 жыл бұрын
If you want to go faster then buy a Merc Pro XS and you have alot more fun
@Bp2.5 Жыл бұрын
🤮
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment, appreciate the Yammie / Merc rivalry. Merc don't do a 130hp...yet. 150hp too heavy too
@johnbumpus71382 жыл бұрын
Excellent non-biased video I’m assuming this is Australia , it’s funny 130hp on that boat would be considered significantly under powered here in the US but it seemed to perform just fine
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment. Probably something to do with boats and outboards being sooooo much cheaper in the States :) . Boat is rated to a 150hp but an extra 50kg is a lot to consider going from 130 to 150 including a six cyclinder (verses four) and quite high centre of gravity. The balance is perfect
@rwd3232 жыл бұрын
I reckon the 2 stroke has one of the best outboard sounds at idle
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Yeah agree. Punchy. The four has opened up a bit, now doing 120hours. It has a nice mid-range whine (like the old mercruiser sterndrives). Miss the 2 stroke, not the fuel bill or smoke.
@lorenzomasi70232 жыл бұрын
Hi..can you tell me the weight of the boat without engine? Thanks..great video!
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your question - sorry for the late reply. The boat hull is 860kgs
@mrpoky2082 жыл бұрын
I'm on my second season with my new Evinrude etec 60/40 jet. No issues so far. Anything I should be aware of? I was going back and forth between the Yamaha and Evinrude....
@timjohnun42972 жыл бұрын
There's a lot to like about those old V4's (Pretty sure they are a copy of the old OMC's), but personally I would never go back to a 2 stroke after having a 4 stroke. Just personal preference
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
Yeah, those 60 degree cylinder angle (low head design) were manufactured by many outboard makers with commercial fisherman in mind, especially netting with low obstruction over back of boat
@martinschulz93813 жыл бұрын
Right on. I live two strokes...sorry to see them go, but I love my new Suzuki. I was surprised though reading the owners manual and watching KZbin videos at how much recommend maintenance there is.
@ShortFlic Жыл бұрын
After starting to do my own, it really isn't a massive issue or cost, even running full 5W - 30 Synthetic oil. Cost from dealer is $750. Cost at home is $120...Bit like a small 4 cylinder car
@muhdhairul71403 жыл бұрын
Mantena blok v...1.3..
@tcap79173 жыл бұрын
Nice video comparison. What did you use to capture the fuel consumpsion on the 2 stroke?
@ShortFlic3 жыл бұрын
Hi, Thanks for your question. I installed a Lowrance Electronic Fuel Flow Sensor (SKU: 000-11517-001). This connects to Lowrance HDS7
@bonoyoutoo27463 жыл бұрын
2 STROKES FUMES KILLED PEOPLE THAN 4 STROKE...PERIOD
@TasmanianDevil33 жыл бұрын
Try propping the 4 stroke correctly. You're short 500rpm
@ShortFlic3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, could do with a minor prop change although its done 100 hours now and its opened up a bit. Can get about 5900rpm
@lorenzotr933 жыл бұрын
There is an error in the consumption calculation: the 2-stroke travels 1.21 km / l about 15% more, not bad. Furthermore, the state of the water is different in the two tests and this affected the 2-stroke.
@ShortFlic3 жыл бұрын
Hi, thanks for your comment. Not sure what you mean about error? At WOT the 2 stroke is only doing 0.82km/l (820mtrs) and the four stroke at about same revs is doing 1.47km/l. Based on my recollection, when the 2 stroke is doing 1.21km/l , the revs would be about 5,000rpm (probably 62km/hr). The four at this rpm would be doing about 2.4km/l and maybe 55km/hr. Hope this make sense
@nimsu3 жыл бұрын
I love banging on my 93 Evinrude 120 for hours.
@geraldkoth6543 жыл бұрын
You can run a two stroke wide open for as long as you like. Run a four stroke wide open and you will soon be buying another one.
@ShortFlic3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment. I asked the Yamaha Service guy about this (as I've just completed my 100 hours). He said the four is happy to sit in the top end rpms. In the past 2 strokes with few moving parts were definitely considered more reliable however fours have come a long way. Near flat out at 5500rpm is nothing for a 1.6L four cylinder vehicle engine....
@TasmanianDevil33 жыл бұрын
Absolute nonsense.
@prevost86863 жыл бұрын
I’ve owned both and for me the 2-stroke is my preference.