Thanks for all the great videos sir. mashallah you are amazing! I have a question though. For the solution at 21:23 I tried to follow your method doing it graphically and I do not see any overlap of x[k] with h[n-k] at n = -1 but the solution at 21:23 implies there is an overlap at n = -1 and the computation starts from there. based on my understanding and the graphical method I only see an overlap at n = 0. I got confused. please can you clarify because I may be missing a point. thanks a million

Excellent 👍

thank youuu <3

Really cool lectures, wish I could find this playlist before the examination XD

You should change the colour of mouse point and if its not possible please try to focus the cursor in the main point of a selected topic.really hard to understand the dot convention because of this .

What is the book ?

❤

Very nice explanation Dr Sb!

Sir Ib angle is -210°! How you have wrote 150°??

Your explanations are the best sir

thank you

please solve 14.11 practice problem

This channel is great

Thank you so much sir

Thank you

Thank you

You've saved me for my afternoon exam😊

❤

Asalaamualaykum i dont speak your language but congrats on being able to perform umrah!! i watch your videos a lot. your signals and systems explanations are always helpful and understandable. you deserve it. please keep on making these videos :)!!

Thank you sir!

Walaikumsalam Jazakallah Khair I was very confused

Sir chapter 32 er all solve playlist ki ace

want to ask for 4:43 u said we need to cancel out omega,w first before we substitute w=infinity. Then why w=0 u not cancel out omega first before u substitute 0 but u just change it w=0 and get o because numerator is 0 so get 0?

I love how active this channel is 😊

JazakAlla Allah pak AP ko salamat ur saith mend zendgi dy Ameen good information

How could that design be carried out assuming the third approximation for the diode (Vd = V_gamma + rd*Id) instead the exact modeling (shockley's equation)? I have been breaking my head but no success at all. Obviously it is not possible to design the proposed case assuming the second approximation since the Vd is assumed fixed, but from the thrid approximation it can be solved in some way as a linear variation with corrent is added to the V_gamma bias to generate the diode voltage drop Vd. In spite of that intuition, I could not find a way to solve it properly. Could you help me with that?

Best explanation no doubt

love you man

thank you for these helpful videos sir!

Guru🙏

Thank you, sir.

assalamu alaikum, sir you are a life saver <3

Thank you so much, sir, God bless you ✨

Thank you sir

Assalamu Alikum, I am your son from the ccupied land Palestine and I was happy to find your channel for two reason..1st coz I noticed you r proud of Islam AlhamdulilAllah , and the second reason is the beautiful scientific explanations that I have begun to benefit from, . So thank you very much and may Allah reward you with good.

thanks alot sir, lifesaver

Thank you soo much sir❤❤❤❤

thanks sir, very helpful class

Sir how can we take the lcm if we have j in the denominator

Great sir well explained

sir plz make video on zero square and pole squre

very helpful video..Thank Your sir

Thank you so much sir

Sir your videos are always awesome, I'm watching it from my 2nd semester. Now I'm preparing for the 3rd semester exam.

Tysm sir

Thank you very much for such wonderful videos sir! May Allah grant you happiness in life

Sir is there any playlist for the op amp?

sir why the gradient is -2 doesnt it to be -1 as 2/-2

Thanks you so much sir

Sir kr lo umra ap b. kia sari zindagi pase e jorny rehna ha?