No.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZispoinrNKSnqs

How about stop infecting folks

Private equity is a parasite making the world worse. Pure greed, nothing else

Total bs equity firms only goal ever is make more money at any cost. Lay offs, higher prices, cut benefits, cutting service quality…all the most horrific things

Trumpe is our Savior

I don't understand, if the bubble can be predicted then aren't we actually incorporating the available information at hand? I mean this makes the market rational if we are able to predict it somehow using the data...

wish they gvae more layman examples like apple oranges & 20$ bills

necdote why? graph based on data

White colour is always honesty

❤

There has to be a distinction made between religious practices and spirituality. They are not mutually exclusive. One could argue that people have lost interest in traditional religious practices, but are more spiritually inclined. One could also argue that this change occurred with the introduction of the internet (Information Age).

Nobel medal, not a prize. Economics isn’t a science per se. it’s a social and political discipline, prone to influence. We can model homo economicus, but he doesn’t exists, as if he exists. Kind of useless paradigm as Richard said many times.

This video, while helping to clarify different types of PE and concepts, was ultimately disappointing. Professor Kaplan comes across as an apologist for the industry, glossing over the very real negative consequences of PE practices that we all see too often. • Excessive debt loading, often leading to financial distress and job losses. • Focus on short-term returns, often at the expense of long-term company health and innovation. • Layoffs and industry disruption. • High fees, detracting from value creation for the underlying companies. These are the realities of PE that we see in everyday lives. I would suggest additional interviewees that will bring different viewpoints for a more balanced and critical discussion.

Maybe there is hope for people if they are becoming more logical.

Because religion has been turned into a giant scam!

🤓🤓🤓

BTC has failed 😂 Always was a fail lol

Hmmm, who should I vote for when it comes to Vanguard’s board of trustees🫤

I listened to the entire interview and didn't hear a single reason why Bitcoin will fail. I'd like the 28 minutes of my life back, payable in Bitcoin, please.

I agree that by 2140 the price of bitcoin will become 0 - unless something crazy motivates miners to keep mining besides the block rewards. I fail to see what that is, besides bitcoin somehow being so essential that governments fund its mining - which kills its decentralised state. Or the community fundraises or something similar.

this is going to age like milk

Your mom can't work remotely. Her business is very much in person

Why can’t you just let people live? Ffs, ppl don’t earn enough to get a house, car, married or have children WFH has saved them from the stress of toxic work culture/colleagues, cost of the daily frustrating commute and spending money on lunch. When it comes to productivity many legit reports say ppl end up working overtime since they don’t have to worry about getting home and doing their chores. But ofcourse why should the common man get a breather we need to have our boot on his neck at all times.

I leaved a like!!!!!!! 0:14

Would be interested to see your data sets and how you accounted for variables. WFH now can’t be compared with during the pandemic. During the pandemic you had everyone home, parents were trying to be teachers, caregivers for elderly. The fact that you found the quality didn’t suffer is extremely positive. Yes it may have taken more time to get there as people were dealing with so much during that time. To this day we are not training managers to manage a remote team, you need effective leadership to make remote teams work but when they work it is a positive for both the employees and the company

This video is hilarious. With sweeping shots and monochrome color, you can really tell they tried to squeeze as much "drama" out of this "research" as possible. They even let him drone on about his great working relationship with an unnamed company just to hit that sweet sweet 10 min mark for ad revenue. Although he glossed over it completely, he does admit that this is not a study, just a dataset he got from a company. A dataset that you absolutely cannot look at in isolation since it happened during and immediately after the pandemic. So many variables were at play here the he likely never accounted for, with the major one being compensation. I have seen a continuous drop in productivity at my company since the pandemic, but it has nothing to do with WFH. It's because the people who do the actual work in my company have only received a 2-3% raise each year, so with inflation they are making less and less each year. How can you expect more productivity for less?

This remote work happened due to a pandemic, not through voluntary change. The stress and other concerns of a massive plague likely had substantial effects on productivity.

Obviously productivity drops if you can't afford a home with a propper office space to work in... if only we lived in a society that tried to maximize human wellbeing rather than operacional efficiency to increase profit margins. I am sure they did the study well but they're still trying to answer dumb questions.

The productivity decline can be mitigated with proper management. Most employees can take a >15 - 20% pay cut anyways and still come out ahead due to better tax efficiency plus cheaper rent and travel costs. The company can also cut office rent costs. So all-in-all meaningful productivity loss should only affect mismanaged teams as remote work is more cost efficient for both parties.

I am so happy that probably the best clinical professor at Booth, has found an area where his significant insights and abilities to discern the important factors is giving him a broader audience - that will be better off for hearing it.

do they use etching chemicals to open upnthe rock more?

I agree 😡

Basically the corporate elite families that have been around for hundreds of years. Owners of private equity. The top shareholders.

I'm satoshi

Eugene's is in different realm of understanding...he doesn't see the market the way other people see it...a bit philosophical and deeper

Wtf would a college profession who has never brokered a single business deal know about actual negotiations?? Not a damn thing. NEXT!!!

Because NO ONE CARES ABOUT US, NO ONE, LISTEN TO MICHAEL JACKSON SONG, THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT US

Trump doesn't have that much money.

My experience is that a lot of people don't even bring their phone to church. Has this also been analysed?

Well said.

Lee Betty Taylor Michelle Robinson Gary

23:49 Please, stop doing whatever you think that is (smiling, presumably). You, like the others, are creepy enough. Well…what can I say? With such specialist consultants I am not surprised the world has gone to shit. And, as a side note- what would such psychometric tests entail, if I may ask? Ethics, anyone? 🔥

🥰

Is it really free if you're merely shifting the financial burden? There's a false equivalence in this argument. Disincentivizing the use of cars is not equivalent to incentivizing the use of public transportation.

If people are more willing to pay for an Uber(Lyft than take public transportation, charging more qill hurt people more than boosting transit rudership.

It's not public transit if it's not fare-free! It's a cute idea and I lurrrv congestion pricing. Somebody tell Hochul in NYC; highhandedly destroyed that dream. Thanks Kathy. Rude. Let's talk about implementing a 1% wealth tax. It would generate what some economists are calling an "inexhaustible pool of public cash." We could fund virtually limitless transit projects. Dismantle the fare gates. Free the trains. We could also abolish income tax for annual earners below, let's say, 150K. BERNIE2024

When I first came to the US, one of the things that fascinated me was that the interstate highway system is largely free, even in areas where commuter rails and metros exist. That really shouldn't be the case if you want to pull people from driving and push people towards public transit.

The issue is more than funding and incentives. There is a reason people avoid taking public transit, safety. Who wants to be the unfortunate person standing on the subway platform that is pushed by some deranged person onto the tracks or getting caught in the cross fire when by some gang member starts shooting at a rival. Of course, let’s not forget the panhandling, blaring obnoxious rap music, and other misdemeanor crimes. Finally, who wants to be crammed into a poorly ventilated subway car surrounded by people expelling all sorts of contagions into the air? I’ll stick with my ev, thank you.

I would imagine that towns and smaller cities might consider transit as a road-maintenance measure, making it nearly free for all.