I really appreciate this interview with Dr. Pigliucci! Years ago, I used to follow him when he was doing biology and promoting science over psuedo-science. He's humble and direct in his answers and he's correct when it comes to origins of life explanations. There are many faith-based explanations that don't hold water, like Pigliucci said "there's no 'there' to go to" as an explanation because there's no investigation to be done. Whatever science lacks in understanding isn't any evidence for another type of explanation.

see "How Space and Motion Determine Biological From"

I love Erica komisar , is this an upcoming release?

What Does It Mean To Be Good? ~~~ All 'meaning' exists in the eye of the beholder, it means whatever you think it means. The toxically vain think that their perspective is the only Truth!

There is no objective morality (or anything else)! 'Good' and 'evil' have their existence in the unSaved judgmental dualistic mind/eye of the beholder! There are equal amounts of (whatever) 'good' (is perceived as) and the same for evil in the Universe. The Universe is perfectly balanced; The First Law of Soul Dynamics; "For every Perspective, there is an equal and opposite Perspective!" For us to imagine/conceptualize 'good', we must imagine 'evil'. Such vain judgment is not made by the Saved! In Heaven, here is neither good nor evil, here is just God! ;)

What is the societal impact of not believing in free will? ~~~ Dismissal, marginalization, violence and, ultimately, if you can't keep your mouth shut, they will kill you. The free-will belief virus is so deeply entrenched into our psyches, our Egos, that the vast majority of humanity host the belief. 'Belief' is a pathologically symptomatic virus-like infection of thought! The three main symptoms displayed are; 1) the constant needs (compulsions) to 'defend', 2) to 'validate/feed' 3) and to propagate (spread) the 'beliefs'! (What is the societal impact of believing in anything?;) No one has ever deliberately harmed another unless he hosts a belief, usually crawling with them. They eat holes in your brain and make you insane. Critical thought is a functional prophylactic against belief infection. Learn critical thought, and use it!

I love word play and alpha numerics, I wonder why no astrologers mentioned the 16* pattern this year, or even replied to my mentioning of it. What is 121? 12:1? 1/21? What about 77, did you know flight 77 flew 77 minutes into the 77 foot pentagon on the 77th meridian flying 777fps? Alpha numerics, guess what September Eleventh equals, or World Trade Center? Why does the Liber Al Vel Legis say hail ye twin warriors about the pillars of the world? Daniel 12:1 Revelation 12:1, and the 16* pattern on 6/6 when mercury was at 66* or 6* of gemini like Alpha Bet Google bard name change, allah who ak bard? Counter Strike lol. But new moon in gemini was conjunct with Venus and Sun obviously at 16*. And Saturn was 16* in pisces and coming to it was the moon 16* behind it and 16* from it was mars and 16* from that was mercury and 16* from that was venus. in may. when Mars began its 2 year cycle in Aries. on 1/21/20 crown virus came to king county see at all washing ton. daniel 12:1 talks of Prince Michael. Rev. 12:1 talks of woman clothed in sun crown of stars moon at feet. 121 equals revelation, apocalyptic and antichrist too. I wonder if you even can interact with this. Funny, I caused several mandela efects in this video. Like, several in every video I see. M.E. Johns Hopkins University is mandela effected to have additional S and now it equals 121. Neat right? And Jesus cross parables messiah gosple masonic simple english gematria lucifer occult, all these words each equal 74. Causality lol, don't talk of causality, living reason over dead letters.

I love the start, it reminds me of my husband who said that the living word/reason is better than dead letters/ideas.

40% of people don't believe in free will. Is that statistic high? ~~~ It's not high, it's a LIE! More like 99% would be closer to reality and the evidence, and I'm pulling that from the same place that you pulled yours! ;)

So it kind of boggles my mind that processes such as intuition, mediumship, etc., which have been around for thousands of years are expected to fit into the narrow confines of I’m science, which is only been around for 400 years. should science not be trying to fit into these other practices?

With so much good, free information available from sites like KZbin (for which I'm very grateful), it's exceedingly rare for me to buy books. Dr. Radin's is quite worth the purchase in my estimation, a cut above. Thanks for this interview. It expands the mind.

I just want this mf to get his real life gold plated mercedes benz cause he fucking deserves it 🫶 i even included that in my last night rituals 😅

Great guest!

Wait a minute Im Discovery Quantum is everything, while he's discovering quantum is nothing, Now I know im a Genius::::::::::::🛑

Thank you - Most helpful.

She is so condescending towards others.

Magic is energy and energy work/ Use/ Manipulation.

come to india and meet people who have visions. They easily See Past lives.

From concert violinist to psychic espionage scientist? Dean Radin’s career path redefines 'thinking outside the box.' 🎻🔮 On a serious note, his work on consciousness is groundbreaking. I explore these topics on my channel with other experts, and it’d be amazing to discuss his insights one day. How do you think his research on consciousness could impact our understanding of reality and human potential?

39:05 The "Lorentz transformations" of the mathematician Minkowsky did not satisfy the physicist Einstein, since this is just a mathematical expression of the constancy of the speed of light and therefore it is not surprising that: Pauli, RT, paragraph 22, Geometry of the real world: "Until now, we have tacitly assumed that the ds^2 form is a certain form. This is not the case in the actual space-time world, since ds^2 in normal form has three terms positive and one negative." 0.It's time to transform the “Lorentz transformations”: Pauli, RT: "Indeed, it is clear that we cannot report the translational motion of the entire universe and check whether this motion affects the course of any processes. The principle of relativity therefore has heuristic and physical meanings only if it is valid for any closed system. However, the question arises, when can a system be considered closed? Is the remoteness of all the masses outside the considered system sufficient for this? The answer, according to experience, says that in the case of uniform and rectilinear motion, this is enough, but for other movements it is not enough. Summarizing, we can say that the postulate of relativity includes the statement that the uniform and rectilinear motion of the "center of gravity" of the Universe relative to some closed system does not affect the processes in this system." 1. Obviously, the opposite is true for an expanding universe. Apparently, the researcher can detect and measure the effect of the aging process in his own frame of reference caused by the phenomenon of global time t(universe)=1/H: ds^ 2=c^2dт^2=g(00)c^ 2dt^2=(1-Ht*)c^2dt^2, where the parameter Ht* it shows how much of the global time has "passed" in its own frame of reference, t* is the measurement time according to the clock of the resting observer, t is the duration of any physical process in its own frame of reference relative to the clock. 2.The observer can measure the increase in the duration of the processes in the laboratory frame of reference: dт=[√ g(00)]dt=[√(1-Ht*)]dt~(1-Ht*)dt<dt; that is ∆t/t=Ht*. {For example, the lifetime of a free neutron (t=878.4sec) in one year (t*=1 year) increases by: ∆t=6*10^-8 sec, at H=2.2*10^-18sec.} And for t*=t, ∆t=Ht^2. {For example, the duration of the Earth's rotation around the Sun per year (t=t*=1 year) increases by: ∆t=2 milliseconds.} In other words, ∆w/w(0)=Ht*, where w(0) is the oscillation frequency of any physical periodic process, ∆w is the frequency shift. {For example, the frequency of the green part of the light spectrum [v(0)=5.4*10^14 Hz] will "turn red" for one hour (t*=1 hour) at: ∆v=4.27Hz.} 3. “Thus, Einstein's special theory of relativity does not eliminate Newtonian absolute space; it only creates for all physics, including electrodynamics, the same position that mechanics has occupied since Newton's time." (Born, RT, chapter VI, paragraph 10). 4. Indeed, the SR actually eliminated only relative simultaneity, reserving the right to be simultaneous within its own frame of reference. GR partially “notices” this problem: clock synchronization is an ambiguous procedure here and depends on the path along which it is carried out. That is, RT does not eliminate simultaneity completely. 5. However, the observer can choose the observable Universe as his own frame of reference, and then the redshift of the spectral lines in the global/own frame of reference is characterized by the value: z= [w-w(0)]/w(0)=Hl/c, where l is the characteristic size of the frame of reference, and in this case, l=l(universe). Then in the frame of reference at t*=t(universe)=1/H for the light signal ds^2=0, therefore, we have the invariance of the speed of light c=cdl/dx(0) with respect to spontaneous Lorentz transformations. 6.That is, along the time coordinate x(0), own frame of reference turns out to be relative to itself: moreover, all subsequent states (which are equal, but not equivalent) are causally related to each other (apparently, this circumstance leads to exotic metaphysical interpretations of quantum theory). 7.And therefore, the experimental results confirm the Lorentz covariance. 8.Introducing the concept of 4-space, a fundamental difference between time x(0) and spatial coordinates is allowed. It supposedly consists of the fact that along the world lines corresponding to physical processes, x(0) can only grow, whereas x(1), x(2), x(3) can change as you please. However, the unification of spatial coordinates and time into a single manifold is not formal but is a real reflection of the picture of the world, and self-closure does not take place for the 4-line. 9.Apparently the time coordinate pulls along with it the spatial coordinates, because if it is impossible to return to the past, then it is also impossible to return to where "there" changes with the spontaneous accumulation of space-time, history. 10. By the way, this approach allows you to calculate the exact age of the universe in the laboratory. For example, H=(∆w/t*)/w(relic).* And this is not about the "fatigue” of light, but about its aging, like everything else. P.S. The inscription on the ancient Roman clock: “More than you think”. ----------- *) - If the universe is really 13.8 billion years old, then every day (t*=1 day) the frequency of the relic radiation will decrease: The shift is ∆w=[Hw(relic)]t*~ 0.2 Hz. Thus, after a series of measurements “over time” and according to the values of ∆w, the age of the Universe can be determined. From the beginning of observations (1964) to the present, the relative shift is: ∆w/w(relic)~4*10^-9. **) - However, calculations show that w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H, that is, H=1.72*10-20sec^-1. 0.Expansion is a special kind of motion, and it seems that the Universe is a non-inertial frame of reference that performs variably accelerated motion along a phase trajectory, and thereby creates a phase-quantized 4-space. And according to the strong equivalence principle: g=|a|=πcH [=r(pl)w(relic)^2]. And w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H. 1.Real gravitational fields are variable in space and time, and we can now talk about the fact that it is possible to generate a gravitational field in a variable non-inertial frame of reference (|a|=g).That is, finally achieve global (instead of local in GR) compliance with the strong equivalence principle. 2.According to general estimates, this acceleration is: |a|=πcH: the equations of the gravitational field can be arrived at based on the Poisson equation ∆ф=4πGp, and for a weakly curved metric, the time component of the energy-momentum tensor: T(00)~=pc^2. Therefore, the Poisson equation can be written as: ∆g(00)=8πGT(00)/c^4, where g(00) is the time component of the metric tensor. This equation is true only in the non-relativistic case, but it is applicable to the case of a homogeneous and isotropic Universe, when Einstein's equations have only solutions with a time-varying space-time metric. 3.Then the energy density of the gravitational field: g^2/8πG=T(00)=pc^2, where the critical density value determining the nature of the model is: p=(3/8π)H^2/G. Hence it follows: g~πcH. And according to the strong equivalence principle: g=|a|=πcH. 4.Then the energy density of the relic radiation, that is, the evolving primary gravitational-inertial field (= space-time): J= g^2/8πG=(πcH)^2/8πG=(ħ/8πc^3)w(relic)^4~1600 quanta/cm^3, which is in order of magnitude consistent with the observational-measured data (about 500 quanta/cm^3).} 5..So: w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H; A.|a|=r(pl)w(relic)^2 =g=πcH. B.Intra-metagalactic gravitational potential: |ф(0)|=πGm(pl)/λ(relic). 6.Finally, it turns out that the age of the Universe can be determined based on a really observable value: the frequency of the relic radiation: H=1,72*10^-20(sec^-1). By the way, it turns out that the universe is 1.6 trillion years old. {Then all shifts should be shifted in a less favorable direction for the experiment by 127.9 times.} 7.At t(universe)= πт(pl), w(“relic”) was =w(pl); at 1/”H”= t(universe)=380000 years, w(“relic”)/2π was =3.5*10^14 Hz! It follows ∆w=[w(relic)^3/πw(pl)]t*~(1,7*10^-8)t*. 8.Thus, the frequency shift of the relic radiation over 1 year is: ∆w~0.5Hz. That is, the relative frequency shift is ∆w/w(relic)~5*10^-13. And since the discovery (1964), respectively, ∆w=30 Hz, ∆w/w(relic)=3*10^-11.

It's not that there is only one God. It's that there is only God. God is what exists. It is what you see all around you. It is self created. It is what we are.

I’m sure he knows Newton was quite versed (and adept even, perhaps) in Metaphysics, and he almost certainly is attacking both it’s deployment in Pnysical Sciences by "academia", and it’s Hegelian weqponization resulting in the dogma franca of colloquial materialism and agency-neutered consumerism, without the Patriot of 76's consciousness of the power of his purse as a weapon of American Republicanism and moral and populist capitalism, against vulturine faux capitalist debt slavery central banking elitiets pushing materialism and a neo-con Marxist global government. I guess I'll own to spinning that, but it’s truly the end result of this intentional distortion of Newtonian Physics by the elitists. As Eric Blair scathingly noted of his fellow British Communists upon returning from fighting in Spain, they pretend to embtwce the masses, but loathe and despise them, believing them too stupid to embrace a world proletarian revolution. Only worse can be believed, known, and said about those behind such perverse, malicious Machiavellian abuses of wisdom, knowlege, and public trust. Therefore he's a bit too specialized in bis field to see the forrest for the trees.

Also, Hawking was literally at Eps Isle, so... Love your channel, though! And probably would like his long format interview. Cheers

That's just redefining a bad acid trip or a nightmare, and tagging a euphemism on it, lol. We co-create reality, so it’s up to us what we do with it, and we definitely are not at the height of our powers even yet, so if true, it’s beyond far off, ae off the map, outside the event horizon.

Just took a minute and a whole bunch of words to say nothing. Yes, obviously anything done “purposefully” requires a mind by definition, but then how do you determine if something was done purposefully? You’re just swapping a word with a synonym at that point. And the process could go on forever. “How do you determine purpose?” “Something was done with intent” “Well how do you determine intent?” “Premeditation.” “Well how do you determine premeditation?” And so on

I think this is the only explanation

When I worked in psi research I remember reading papers by Michael Persinger correlating psi with geomagnetic field activity. The observation was that psi was more robustly occurring during periods of quiet GMF activity. I wonder if the global consciousness random event data was correlated with GMF data. Perhaps this was already done. If not, it should be easy to do.

..when you use the word "MAGIC" your covering a lot ground, "magic" is just a word that be applied to anything...

John 14:6 I am the way, the truth, and the Life; no man come unto the Father, but by me.

There is no philosophy free science. Philosophy always comes first, or, as she said, it is the ground floor

All religions endorse Jesus Christ, but Jesus Christ only endorsed himself.

You know god wiped out millions in the bible? Made people kill their family members, killed firstborn boys, sent plagues to cause disease and death... You eat his flesh and drink his blood.... Think about it. You're in a cult based on a book written by corrupt men who perfected manipulation of the masses. Where was your magic sky daddy for the first 4 billion years of earth? Why show up 2 thousand years ago? Jesus was a carpenter and a con man. The Vatican worships Lucifer and molests children. Wake tf up. You probably use religion to seem devout to hide how evil you are like every other cultist.

as far as we know.... humans show the least interspecies love... Or rather, show the greatest opposite of this "love". anyways, back to tranny dreams god, get out of your cage...

Fantasyland fictions

there is no "far right", only brainwashing by the C.I.A. fake news mockingbird press msm, and it is censorship of the web. Q anon was a psyop like Alex Jones - but all disinfo assets deliver truths, it’s their currency with which they are later able to fool you. Q anon kept americans docile whilst the globalist take over went into is final stages - but they’re so incompetent and evil they'll fail in their own- that said we can't rely on Trump to clean out the Epstein Ratschild corruption - if he doesn't do it he's just controppo and that's that unless we remember that Grand Strategists still study the patriots of 1776 as a masterclass in revolution. All those lessons apply. Maybe you could talk about the ego in Magic and Kabbalah vs Parabrahman.

CBGB's! Ah, for me it’s Spaceland. Cheers

Dr Tucker is always a pleasure to listen to

Quantum mechanics, as it's been understood for the last century, is unable to answer basic questions of what, where, when, and how. That's at the heart of why the measurement problem is so intractable; QM fails to offer any satisfactory explanation of the global coordination within quantum systems required to bring about wavefunction collapse (or, more accurately, narrowing) in causal fashion consistent with the strictures of special relativity.

So left hand path and monkey brain.

Can you please link to the original? Or give it’s name in the notes? Cheers, thanks

Trinity.

Parabrahman, all is One.

This channel is almost certainly Verbotten and severely shadowbanned. They like the woo woo superficial shyte. Tx, Cheers

It depends ultimately upon your belief in two things- wether we are, ourselves, the creation of an all powerful God or god(s), or wether WE, OURSELVES ARE Divine and Creators - or even Parabrahman and ETERNALLY ALL POWERFUL. The next steps depend merely upon wisdom and life experience with overcoming or failing to overcome certain types of huge, universal human tragic experiences and crises [ie loss of a partner(s) to death, loss of motivation, will, faith, joie de vivre, loss of agency, being victimized - criminally, s.a./emotionally or psychologically abused, homelessness, addiction, co-dependency, depression, suicidal ideation and attempts, feelings of despair, feelings of desperation and obsessive "love" for a former or prospective life partner who is inaccessible etc. -- and not merely surviving such, but to find or regain a pure sense of limitless love and gratitude for your life and those of all other living beings (includes "creatures")]. These aren't necessarily prerequisites to belief in Free Will as a limitless Creator, but they are certainly helpful and should be understood as the things one needs to overcome in order to be able to grow sufficiently spiritually to even begin to realise oneself as having such an ability as a Creator. Ultimately one must realize everything is consciousness and Maya, and that even the gods die, Parabrahman spontaneously created everything from void - and wether you believe said void and oblivion is bliss as the Vedas and its Masters say, wether the actual ignorance and total loss of self and all physical control in the mini death and brush with oblivion of a deep and dreamless sleep itself and it’s void is the true state of "bliss" and "completion"- or wether it is the experiencing of having had such a petite mort meaningless without the waker's awakening to know of it. In the end it is a realistic assessment of your current situation v where you wish to be and then faith in action as intent that does not fight against but flows with consciousness & others, and practice. As far as the existence of any materialistic physical (lower case) "free will", such a chimera would be, in the purest sense of such transcendent and scientific-spritual forces, agencies and earthly "realities-- as farcically absurd as a communist UTOPIA in which Komrade Unicornstalin waved zimzeyzurb's magicphallovajic wand and blew rainbow scented skittle pharts to make such a "workers paradise". Do mirages exist? Of course. What they are is an entirely different matter, as well may even my original definition of a True Free Will, ultimately prove, lest said free agent ultimately either learn otherwise from either rediscovering or evolvng beyond the need for - or actually funding some kind of eternal company and companionship. Otherwise they'd likely eventually tire of undying life alone after losing those loved ones unable of attaining the same sense of limitless agency. So it is all relative, and yet All One.

Fields are regarded as real, I hear from shows like these. A little latitude please. Take a look a Smolin and Verde 2021 The quantum mechanics of the present. That's an ontology. What Bohr didn't consider is that the transition from uncertain to certain states is simultaneous, that is to say instant. So collapse of the wave function is instant. That is acausal, do you see why? Instant means occurring at one point in time. To establish temporal order is to establish causal order. To establish temporal order, one needs more than one point in time. There is one point in time for say an incident simultaneous. Bohr acknowledged that complementarity is an arbitrary term used to highlight the epistemological problem that the measurement problem leaves us with. His coat of arms is the Tao. That's a truism. What is needed is Coppola and Purves 1996 as to allowing us to empirically define 'instant' as a dimensionless incident. Since a point in time, like a point in space, would have no dimension. Only when dimension exists is causal order measurable. At a point in time, there is no height, depth, or breadth, no space at all. Quantum collapse, objective reduction, would be where the quantum transitions into flow for time. From no relative time to relative time. That implies absolute time exists, call that the Now. Time so defined becomes timelessness in our physics. Something a mind dedicated to causality and physical substance just cannot imagine or use their tools on, without a reconceptualization of the fabric of existence itself. This woman is in that category. Acausality is the key here, and allows a new definition of time. She wouldn't stumble on that line of thought in a million years.

She’s full of crap. Find Jesus

Huh

Intuiting the origin of one God is problematic enough. Multiple gods are untenable.

Scientific evidence?

Beautiful post, thanks for sharing ❤️