Lololololol oh fuck our first flat earther.... lololololololol

A dumbass. That's all you're seeing here, folks!

To put it simply, it's a shortcoming in how cameras work--specifically when it comes to the ambient light levels when the shot is taken. Unlike the human eye--which can effortlessly dance between irregularly lit features [highlights and shadows] without missing a beat, making you perceive everything as fairly evenly lit--cameras are far more limited. The reason you can sometimes see the stars and sometimes you can't depends on how different the brightest and darkest points in-frame are. Stars are very faint compared to sunlight. In these shots, you can see them because it's all filmed on the night-side of the Earth, where ambient illumination and city lights are very dim. If it were filmed in full daylight, the overall illumination would be much brighter, which would force the camera to ignore the little delicate details in the shadows in favor of capturing the midtones and highlights in proper detail. (This is basically the reason you can't see any stars in the Apollo moon-landing footage: the landscape is fully-lit because it was daytime on that part of the Moon! :) ) Next time you take a photo with your smartphone camera, try paying attention to how different the overall picture can be affected if you touch around and focus on certain shadows or particularly bright parts of the sky. More often than not, you'll end up with the sky completely whitewashed if you focus on the darkest shadows, and completely black terrain if you focus on the sky. Hope this helps :)

basically all evidence has to be studied from the beginning of a shoot. that all cameras settings , analzed sealed digital prints or film must be handeled in trust. so that isnt going to happen nor would any trust the ones doing it. so there is no proof the angles were not changed due to settings or lenses. my conclusion, ill focus on faith in Jesus and whats happening in th ewworld not its shape. god bles syou great point

The shape of the Earth has nothing to do with it. I disliked it because it took them 50 years to fake stars, streetlights and the bright green glowing atmosphere, all of which were not in over 50 years of NASA videos and images. Do you think that green glow that surrounds the Earth just magically appeared a few years ago? lol. This is the most unrealistic video I've ever seen. Well, besides the Apollo videos.

kyouki109 I'm 100% NASA and I watch ISS HD live almost EVERY NIGHT, and I've seen NOTHING like this! I can't even get a glimmer of light when it's on dark Earth; not even the lights from my city. Once I observed ALL 16 sunsets, as well as ALL 16 sun rises, and it seemed like the same footage. Obviously it wasn't the same footage because i you can see varying cloud patterns. Have you ever seen anything cool watching ISS HD live?

Doctor Satan that green glow is the Aurora borialis (pardon my spelling) but your right, this shit is obviously fake AF! when you watch the ISS HD live, you can't see shit during the dark Earth, but this video shows lights? Oh hell no. I actually just got finished watching 2 sunsets, and 2 sunrises, and when it goes dark you don't see shit! Let alone lights.

@@astralmindny9055 hey, I'm impressed by what you've said, I'd like to have a conversation with you, whatsapp me +918700708352, by the way, this is Salman from India

yep

the earth gets 7000 strikes a second always. big place

kzbin.info/www/bejne/noqwpJiEab2trqs

thanks dude!!!!!