Thank you 😊

Thank you so much for the kind words! We’re thrilled that you enjoyed the video and truly appreciate your support. Your encouragement keeps us motivated to keep delivering quality content. 🙏

Haha, you’ve definitely pointed out some of the quirks of baseball that cricket fans find hard to relate to! The rules in baseball can seem a bit restrictive, especially compared to the more strategic and varied gameplay in cricket. In cricket, batters can take their time, accumulate runs at their own pace, and play in all 360 degrees of the field-making it feel a lot less limited. That said, each sport has its own unique charm, and while cricket allows for more creativity, baseball fans enjoy the fast-paced intensity of their game. But yeah, running after one hit and waiting for another chance? That’s a very different world compared to cricket! 😄

Nice! Lucky number 7 🎉, thanks for the support! 🙌

Here we are talking about batting quality and his talent. Not captaincy

Sachin Tendulkar's captaincy is often a subject of debate, and while he is undoubtedly one of the greatest cricketers of all time, his leadership was not as successful as his batting. It’s crucial to put this into context rather than making direct comparisons to captains like Javed Miandad or Aravinda de Silva. Tendulkar led India during two separate periods (1996-97 and 1999-2000). Despite his exceptional performance as a batsman, India’s record under his captaincy was less than impressive. India won only 4 out of 25 Test matches and 23 out of 73 ODIs under his leadership. A key factor was that the Indian team was in transition during his tenure, with inconsistent performances and injuries to key players. Therefore, Tendulkar’s captaincy struggles were more a result of circumstance rather than poor leadership on his part. Unlike Tendulkar, Javed Miandad had a relatively successful captaincy stint before 1992, though his later tenure was marred by team conflicts. Aravinda de Silva, despite his brilliance as a batsman, also didn’t make a significant impact as a captain. In contrast, Tendulkar didn’t face major team tensions or internal issues, and his resignation from captaincy was voluntary, not forced by internal dynamics. It’s also essential to note that while Tendulkar didn’t shine as a captain, his role as a senior player was crucial in India’s successes under other captains like Sourav Ganguly and MS Dhoni. His influence in the dressing room and guidance to younger players, especially during India’s 2011 World Cup win, was invaluable. In short, while Sachin Tendulkar may not have had an outstanding record as a captain, comparing him to Miandad and de Silva isn't entirely fair. His contributions as a player and mentor far outweigh any shortcomings he had as a leader.

Awesome thank you!

Haha, you’re absolutely right-Sachin Tendulkar getting out in the nervous 90s was the only time his fans felt mortal fear! It was like he’d built up so much suspense, cricket suddenly turned into a thriller movie. The man hit 100 international centuries, but he also got out in the 90s an eye-watering 28 times. So close yet so far, right?

@@BoundaryBreakers_channel He struck out at 99, and so did Rahul's grandpa 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣