the random blurring of the pen strokes kept me thinking that my bit-rate was plummeting
@Marv_335 ай бұрын
thank you this was so helpful
@waynewagner22555 ай бұрын
You're very welcome!
@JP-hb6wr5 ай бұрын
wish this guy was my lecturer
@waynewagner22555 ай бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@garrettsanford14937 ай бұрын
You know this class is hard when he says “a few of you actually got the answer!”
@waynewagner22557 ай бұрын
My expectation is rarely that my students would get a question 100% right, though some will! There are too many tiny places to make errors. Heck, I usually have to fix my key after I start grading. It's not that I don't know the physics! It's just that all this algebra creates so many opportunities for careless errors. Be vigilant, of course, but always ask yourself if you understand the physics. If you do, you're okay (even if you're error prone.) If you don't know why a sign is negative instead of positive (and you error is one of understanding rather than careless), then you need to study more. When my students understand the physics, they will get A's even if exceedingly few will get 100's.
@joaoc69207 ай бұрын
Man I just wrote an entire essay around a similar subject and this video would've saved me a whole bunch of time. Genuinely phenomenal explanation, the best I've seen yet.
@waynewagner22557 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback. One day I'll tighten these up, but it's good to know that they're useful. I know that when I made it initially, I was really struggling to understand where the squared came from. One r made sense, but I couldn't wrap my brain around the second one. (I'm sure my college prof must've proved it for me, but I couldn't remember. I suppose we need the proof when we're ready for it!)
@johncena-fy3mo8 ай бұрын
Sir can you make a video on how can I calculate magnetic field inside a solenoid on it's axis with using complex integration at any point on axis?
@waynewagner22558 ай бұрын
I would love to, but I do not have the time at the moment. Can you send me the problem? Maybe I can work it out quickly if you like?
@walidwalid-y7b8 ай бұрын
KEEP GOING SIR YOU'RE PERFECT
@waynewagner22558 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@tolgaarslan88568 ай бұрын
it was the best 3 exam reviev video ı ve ever watched. thanks sir wayne
@taherscholar58629 ай бұрын
Excellent
@seriktabussov58929 ай бұрын
28:00 why you did't add th weight of the nozzle is't that also affect to anchoring force ?
@waynewagner22559 ай бұрын
For the part of the problem prior to 28:00, I have done a FBD of the water (and not the nozzle). As such, the weight of the nozzle is does not act on the water so it is not included. This problem can be solved quicker by doing a FBD of the CV of the water and the nozzle at the same time. I did not do this here, though, because (I think) I wanted to make the point that you can draw the FBD of whatever system you want, as long as you keep track of the forces (and reactions).
@seriktabussov58929 ай бұрын
in given sead that one side is filled 4m deep with acetylene correct ? in that case your gamma in right side is not correct and equation becomes quadratic and height of water should be 3 meters aprox
@waynewagner22559 ай бұрын
The gamma used on the left was gamma_w = 9810 N/m3, The gamma on the right was gamma_acetylene = specific gravity of acetylene*gamma_w = 0,38*9810 N/m3. You can see this done right around 31:45.
@seriktabussov58929 ай бұрын
come on man pay attention to what you are teaching you messed foot with meter at 27:10
@waynewagner22559 ай бұрын
Fair enough. Obviously (I hope), I did not do these with a ton of production. I messed up a distribution of a negative sign and accidentally wrote m instead of ft.
@seriktabussov58929 ай бұрын
you really messed up man from about 20:00
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
.... this is America you have enough freedom to redraw rhins...... thas funny🤣
@JamesVestal-dz5qm10 ай бұрын
He takes a peter dismilesian approach to scolding his students for their poor performance.
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
dude sometime you sound like somebody put a bag on your head
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
18:59 (z2 + z1)
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
Correct. I almost need to remake these as there are errors here and there. Thank you-
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
what does that mean "cooky cutter" ? your vocabulary is rich and colorful i am not just learning fluid mechanics and also new expressions. thanks a lot🤝
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
Cookie cutter implies that all of them are identical. I don't recall when I said that, but it probably meant that a technique could be re-applied over and over in exactly the same way. I hope this helps!
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
thanks man
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
You got it!
@seriktabussov589210 ай бұрын
rate of change of the level after converting from in to ft suposed to be 0,00694444
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
Yes! Wow! I was waaaaay off.
@AlinaCaramas10 ай бұрын
Thanks I understood everything
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@noogai910 ай бұрын
So funny and informative made my stressful study night better!!!!!!
@waynewagner225510 ай бұрын
Ha! Thank you. I keep considering re-making this in the style of 3Blue1Brown, but I suppose that would take the humanity out of them!
@poopym3511 ай бұрын
i needed to hear that affirmation at the end. thank you.
@waynewagner225511 ай бұрын
Of course, poopy
@kraken_811 ай бұрын
Can we just appreciate the effort he puts into these videos?
@waynewagner225511 ай бұрын
Let's be glad I don't know who this is. I take points off for schmoozing.
@coyl.4652 Жыл бұрын
Hello Sir, I appreciate the video, at the end of the first problem, I noticed that you wrote the final answer as 180 slugs, did you mean 480 slugs?
@waynewagner2255 Жыл бұрын
You appear to be correct. Thanks-
@ruizhang2269 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this! But when you use the summation of moment=0, this should be the summation of the moment of each tiny area (moment acting on dA) over the whole beam cross-section area. What I mean is you get the F=EA(r/R) then at each "tiny area" the corresponding moment can be calculated. Then all the moments added together should equal "0".
@suveermanj1001 Жыл бұрын
@waynewagner2255 Hi there, why does your FBD show the compressive/tensile forces in opposite direction to what you showed on the beam around 7:02?
@hoomanprz21829 ай бұрын
The FBD shows the internal forces that react in the beam. An element in tension will pull pack to react oppositely.
@joeywang3369 Жыл бұрын
I am studying in a college, and I have this course in my college. And the question from my test is harder than the question in the video. The same knowledge but question can be very sick.
@waynewagner2255 Жыл бұрын
Hi Joey Wang- I know this is late, but I could always do a video on your problem if you like. I'm sure you're through the class already, but let me know if I can help- I can't guarantee timeliness, but I will try.
@nadeemkhouri40547 ай бұрын
@@waynewagner2255 Could you help me with one of my questions please
@jawherballoumi6766 Жыл бұрын
thank you
@zachp23892 жыл бұрын
I have a statics exam on Sunday and I’m fortunate I get to learn from your students mistakes. Thanks for the video
@heckleyeah3992 жыл бұрын
Hello! I am confused on how a smooth pipe can have an epsilon (and thus Ks) of zero but with the table you showed us copper pipe, for example, has a Ks of 6 x 10^-5 in". Could you explain this for us? Furthermore, if I have a reynolds number of 1. 4000 and other example 2. 8000 for flow in a smooth copper pipe, what would f and epsilon be? (Referring to Moody's graph and the Colebrook equation).
@satishbastola96652 жыл бұрын
great video!
@johnijadunola58472 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation! It was really worth it.
@satishbastola96652 жыл бұрын
Great lecture!! Enjoyed
@karnvirbhangu3342 жыл бұрын
Sir you have a full and insane understanding of a very complex subject. Hats off to you sir. I am learning alot from these videos.
@CLINTWOOD10002 жыл бұрын
This is by far the best explanation for forces on planar surfaces ..... !!!
@sahalsidat88212 жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you for all your videos on fluid mechanics, really helped me get through my semester.
@GoudaTheCavalier2 жыл бұрын
This class can only be efficiently taught w powerpoints, but my prof keeps deriving and deriving and barely gets to examples. Sitting at a C... first time i felt so helpless in a class
@GoudaTheCavalier2 жыл бұрын
@@waynewagner2255 I appreciate you for a timely, lengthy remark with valuable information. Even though it is my duty to learn the material through the book as a student, I really didn't learn much from my professor. A bunch of typos in his work, and most the times all the examples he has done in class are no where the difficulty on the quizzes/exams. I definitely do believe i would've learned a valuable amount if I was part of your course! I 100% believe so.
@allenmeyer29122 жыл бұрын
😉 p̷r̷o̷m̷o̷s̷m̷
@conniecalero92032 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing the explanation you provided to your class about closed conduit flow. Great job 👍
@waynewagner22558 ай бұрын
Out of curiosity, would these be improved if I re-did them with sharp animations (like say, 3blue1brown)? I've been considering re-creating the entire series (without errors) so there would be a complete set for fluid mechanics out there. I wonder if doing them completely clean would be better though. (They would lose some of the humanity!) I think, maybe, I could do these with great clarity and retain my humanity, but I am not sure. Also, I don't make a living (or any money at all off of these), so I'd want to be sure that they were helping people!
@conniecalero92038 ай бұрын
@@waynewagner2255 If you are able to recreate this problem with animation it will be fantastic, and will captivate younger audiences with this great explanation. In fact, you are actually helping people with this detail explanation, which we sometimes do not receive in the classroom. Thank you for your great work for humanity.
@muhammedg-tips15842 жыл бұрын
Great work man ♥
@samholt91772 жыл бұрын
Is this high school or university stuff?
@bodiielectriic Жыл бұрын
this is definitely university.. I'm a junior in mech E and this is what we are learning.
@laurenzjor-elona95532 жыл бұрын
Nice video!
@mmmben2 жыл бұрын
Dagnubit!
@alexm91412 жыл бұрын
What up Wayne!
@seseikkailija53732 жыл бұрын
omg i hate imperial so much!
@Khadra20242 жыл бұрын
our dr. taught us that we should put (+) if it is against the gravity, I solve Q2 as we learn but I got -2275.9 N/m2 how we determine the sign, now I'm confused.