Would you want them to let it go if you were innocent in this situation? There is absolutely no credible or reliable evidence in this case! The LEO’s involved and their investigation lack credibility. The drugged confessions? The GARBAGE ballistics? The “white” van that was all over social media for YEARS? The true crime obsessed psychiatrist that was all over social media in the groups about the case and visited the CS? Who also failed to record the so called confession with the “only detail” the guilty person would know so she had him call his wife and repeat it (with a little help from her) is credible to you? That’s your evidence? I believe you; like the jury, have a skewed definition of reasonable doubt.

Oh, can’t forget the that same psychiatrist illegally accessed information about prisoners (KK) that she did not have the right or authority to access.

he is still guilty, even if she accessed KK files! It doesn't make Richard Allen innocent. ​@@Criticalthinker0927

Not necessarily. The people that paid attention will not vote for her.

Chadwell is who I thought resembled BG the most. However, I don’t think it was him. Whoever did this went in for Libby and Abby was an unexpected casualty. I also believe they (yes I believe there was more than one person involved) cared about Abby and that’s why she was washed and clothed. They showed sympathy for her but absolutely none for Libby. Those girls deserve true justice and I believe they will get it. I feel something HUGE is coming and the true killers will be exposed.

Yes 💯 almost felt like they were bought. There’s no true journalism anymore they just blindly go along with the state!

RL’s last divorce was in his seventies and it’s understandable that Valentine’s Day may not be his favorite holiday. Probably the one day of the year you don’t want to be around him. There also some history of him having anger issues and being violent to women. There is more… More people could be involved in this crime, but one person could have committed these murders. Even a person in his mid-seventies. RL wouldn’t be the only 70ish and older who’s ever committed a horrendous crime before on his property or in his home. RL had horses and regularly moved around hay bales usually measuring around 14” high x 18” wide x 35” long and weigh 50-60 lbs. If fed twice a day, two-string small square hay bales with these dimensions are expected to feed one horse for a week. Most medium-sized round hay bales weigh between 700 and 900 lbs. RL had a large piece of property and had worked his land with little to no help for over the 50 something years he had lived there. Photographic evidence and other evidence and coincidences puts RL on the bridge and say’s he’s BG. There is also evidence that says one or both of the girls may have known RL and that RL may have known one or both of them. We believe the other POIs that LE has looked at are other monsters amongst us and that the girls could have been lured to the trails as a result of the actions of one of these other monsters, maybe/maybe not, but unfortunately ran into another and a different kind of monster along the way. “Dudes like Kegan Kline contact hundreds of girls. This doesn't have to be as complicated as” some people “want it to be. Logan killed them, went home, cleaned up, went to the fish store, went back home. That's it.”- Andre the Giant. We concur. Richard M Allen is not BG. RA may or may not be involved in these murders. LE believes they have evidence that ties him to the murders. In time, the facts will come to light. RA may or may not be innocent of the crime. The results of our work and our conclusions is that RA is not BG and that RL was in fact BG. Possible MOTIVES if RL was involved in this crime: 1) Doesn’t want the trails or people near his home/Doesn’t want anyone on or near his property 2) Went through a 2nd Divorse while in his seventies. This is a crime that occurred the day before Valentine’s Day. 3) Anger or control issues 4) Drinking and crime of opportunity 5) Depreciation or suicidal 6) Revenge 7) High on drugs and or alcohol 8)Issues with other family members 9) etc, etc. We can only guess and wonder why some people do what they do. The video of Bridge Guy is indeed Ron Logan (RL). RL is, without a doubt, BG. We have photographic evidence that says RL was BG with a 99% certainty. However, the challenge has been in convincing the masses. We have been diligently working to develop improved algorithms and leverage Al to effectively showcase our image analysis findings. Our aim has been to convey our work convincingly, leaving no room for doubt regarding the true identity of Bridge Guy. It's been a slow process due to time spent on other projects, but IA&D has been making significant progress towards achieving this goal. IA&D •

Your analysis is certainly clearing RA. Please know that I mean no disrespect by my following questions, for I am just brainstorming ways that we may be able to help RA. Do you have the education, experience and background where your analysis could be considered to be expert testimony? This could be very helpful.

@@michelletaylor4211 Confessions obtained through torture or duress from a broken man-willing to say anything for relief-should hold little weight. However, some circumstantial evidence, though weak, suggests he might have been involved. If you want to believe that RA is likely innocent and not BG, you must first verify BG's height. This verification will need to be confirmed by multiple sources to carry weight. Secondly, take a closer look at the video evidence. It’s not impossible these days to examine BG more closely. Prove whether the hat worn by BG belongs to RL or someone else. Either of these findings-or both-could go a long way toward proving that RA is not the man on the bridge in Libby’s video and may also suggest the involvement of others in these double murders. Our height estimates have been made, and we’ve examined the video evidence more closely, but these findings must be verified by multiple sources to be considered credible. IA&D •

The height analysis cleared RA from the beginning. All the witnesses described a tall man. The FBI calculated height as 5'10. In my opinion, the video is too blurry to positively identify anyone. You can't say its X person. But it is useful for exclusionary purposes -- we can see he is male, he isn't black, etc. But RA is 5'4 and there is just no way possible he is BG.

@@juliee6770 The prosecution claimed that no one else was involved in these double murders and that RA was the man on the bridge. Despite the unfairness of the trial, the prosecution won their case. He was never cleared because of his height. The jury found RA guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, based on the limited evidence allowed in, believing that he was BG and that he committed the crime. IA&D •

I sure do as well

A white van amongst other things has been talked about off and on, for 5-6 years in Internet forums like Reddit and by some KZbin creators like UAP Research and Harvey Carroll, Jr.

That’s because RA never said a WHITE van, he said a van. BW told investigators in his initial statement that he drove his black Subaru that day but changed that statement later.

Great post. Gull needs to be kicked in her big ass till she falls to the ground what a ego she has or had

They sure do Right now free Richard on no evidence which makes him guilty

Agree can u look into this? Contacting these lawyers is so hard

Thank God. I'm not sure jurors can overcome this knowing how much was kept from them. But even with all the information blocked from entering the courtroom there was still massive amounts of reasonable doubt.

Thank God, because the people in the jury will always have PTSD from those pictures

Really? Wow so she is in allen county

@@pollygraph9977 came to say exactly this.