Topics 2.5 - 2.6
3 күн бұрын
Topics 2.1 - 2.4
3 күн бұрын
Topics 4.7 - 4.9
Ай бұрын
Topics 4.5 - 4.6
Ай бұрын
Topics 4.1 - 4.4
Ай бұрын
Topics 1.7 - 1.8
2 ай бұрын
Topics 1.4 - 1.6
2 ай бұрын
Topics 1.1 - 1.3
2 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@haniahcomonog7128
@haniahcomonog7128 Күн бұрын
I LOVE YOU THANK YOU😫😫😫
@sallymusenja9812
@sallymusenja9812 Күн бұрын
Thank you kinggggggg
@ChampChamp000
@ChampChamp000 Күн бұрын
Hi Mr, i genuinely want to thank you and please dont stop uploading ❤❤
@-ClaireHogan
@-ClaireHogan 8 күн бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS YOU ARE A LIFESAVER
@thewhat2
@thewhat2 10 күн бұрын
You slayed with this! 💅
@AbdallahAttiaA
@AbdallahAttiaA 10 күн бұрын
here i am in 2024 still learning from the video thank you
@nolegsme
@nolegsme 11 күн бұрын
please do more I really need it please please !!!!
@obamacrockadile2136
@obamacrockadile2136 11 күн бұрын
man 3.4 is tough...
@-ClaireHogan
@-ClaireHogan 16 күн бұрын
thank youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
@-ClaireHogan
@-ClaireHogan 16 күн бұрын
thanks king I much appreciate you and your selfless contributions to our learning
@obamacrockadile2136
@obamacrockadile2136 18 күн бұрын
you are a lifesaver
@dinakhaled7491
@dinakhaled7491 19 күн бұрын
for ur effort
@Y4AKl
@Y4AKl 20 күн бұрын
He covers every type of question that might come on a unit 1 test in a packet of 9 pages W Mr. Farabaugh carrying me in Pre-AP Chemistry
@zerereka
@zerereka 26 күн бұрын
36:47
@emperalbeast
@emperalbeast Ай бұрын
PDS Students. I present to you... despair.....
@shayplays2693
@shayplays2693 20 күн бұрын
Real
@gau.ravofficial
@gau.ravofficial Ай бұрын
Ka be professor ka bo rhe ho 😂
@10nessee
@10nessee Ай бұрын
thank you king.
@ciellestudies
@ciellestudies Ай бұрын
thank you for this! i was wondering why o had a greater binding energy than n though, since isn't there an exception between group 15 and 16 bc of half-filled p orbitals in group 16? n has a greater ionization energy than o so i'm not sure why o has a greater binding energy than n.
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh Ай бұрын
If you look closely at the details in Question 14 of this packet, we are comparing the binding energy of the 1s electrons in a nitrogen atom with the binding energy of the 1s electrons in an oxygen atom. This difference in binding energy for the 1s electrons (which are located in energy level 1) can be attributed to the greater charge magnitude of the positively charged oxygen nucleus. Oxygen has one more proton than nitrogen does. In Period 2, there are two anomalies in the general trend for ionization energy values. One of these anomalies involves the elements nitrogen and oxygen. The 1st ionization energy of an atom involves the removal of the outermost electron from the atom. With nitrogen and oxygen, that outermost electron is removed from the 2p sublevel. I discuss those two anomalies in the trend for ionization energy in my video for Topic 1.7. Here is the link to that particular section of that video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJmacqR6h7RgiLM
@ciellestudies
@ciellestudies Ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh thanks for the reply!
@waterpizzacat1053
@waterpizzacat1053 Ай бұрын
good job, michael
@daddylonglegs2744
@daddylonglegs2744 Ай бұрын
Ms. Lee if you’re looking at this screw you
@OfficalMPSBVB
@OfficalMPSBVB Ай бұрын
for question 21 why wouldnt u do just 18.016 why do u need to multiply by 2 since were only trying to find H2O not 2H2O
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh Ай бұрын
The chemical formula of calcium chloride dihydrate is CaCl₂•2H₂O For every one mole of this substance, there are TWO moles of H₂O 2 moles of H₂O = (2)(18.016) = 36.032 g 1 mole of this substance = (40.08)+(2)(35.45)+(36.032) = 147.012 g Mass percent of H₂O in this substance = (36.032)/(147.012)x100 = 24.51%
@chemistrymrt
@chemistrymrt Ай бұрын
Hi Michael, The link to the packet is not working. Could you please try to fix it? Thanks in advance.
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh Ай бұрын
I just tried that link, and it seems to work okay for me: bit.ly/3z8RipZ
@chemistrymrt
@chemistrymrt Ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh Thank you!
@gale-b5h
@gale-b5h Ай бұрын
💕💕💕
@KaileyTorres-ip1ke
@KaileyTorres-ip1ke Ай бұрын
Thank you
@astridhelfant
@astridhelfant 2 ай бұрын
Thank, you, Michael, for uploading this practice! This will certainly be helpful for my students.
@Shampootis
@Shampootis 2 ай бұрын
Don't understand....slow down.....
@a2ylifestyle365
@a2ylifestyle365 4 ай бұрын
( Potassium permagnet + glycerine) se aag lag jati hai
@Macabresque
@Macabresque 4 ай бұрын
This was the explanation I needed to help wrap my brain around this concept. Thank you!!
@GladnessBanyanaMoipolai
@GladnessBanyanaMoipolai 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for your tuitions, they've made Chemistry more fascinating for me
@iclalmalazgirt_35
@iclalmalazgirt_35 4 ай бұрын
05/06/24 18:33
@ThaoDang-pg1it
@ThaoDang-pg1it 5 ай бұрын
I will pass the Earth Science SOL
@911.porschelover
@911.porschelover 4 ай бұрын
same whens ur sol
@ThaoDang-pg1it
@ThaoDang-pg1it 4 ай бұрын
@@911.porschelover today and I passed
@kubzyeee
@kubzyeee 5 ай бұрын
59:12 I originally wrote the equation as HF + OH- double arrow F- + H2O. Is this equation still applicable, or does it have to be F- reacting with water?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 5 ай бұрын
Since that question was looking for evidence that the pH of the reaction mixture is greater than 7 at the equivalence point, we need to see the fluoride ion (F⁻) behaving as a base (H⁺ acceptor) in aqueous solution. The equation (HF + OH⁻ ⇄ F⁻ + H₂O) only shows the chemical formulas of the products of the reaction that occurred in this titration experiment. However, that equation does not show evidence of the fluoride ion reacting with water as a weak base, which results in a pH > 7. That's why we need to see this: F⁻ + H₂O ⇄ HF + OH⁻ You might be thinking, "But isn't this equation just the REVERSE of the other one?" Yes, but showing that hydroxide ions are produced when fluoride ions react with water provides evidence that the pH > 7 at the equivalence point in that titration experiment. I hope that helps.
@kubzyeee
@kubzyeee 5 ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh Thank you! I just took my AP Chem exam today. Your videos were very helpful.
@legoperson5025
@legoperson5025 5 ай бұрын
Yall I think I’m cooked
@maxmerritt4850
@maxmerritt4850 5 ай бұрын
you help me so much thank you sir
@LidaMaganga
@LidaMaganga 5 ай бұрын
thank you so much i love you
@DeeDolp
@DeeDolp 5 ай бұрын
Mike you're a hero and an icon
@DaliaMuro
@DaliaMuro 5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your videos!
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 5 ай бұрын
On question 5c at 37:16, I didn't use as precise numbers as you did. For example, instead of 31.2455kJ, i used 31.2kJ, and instead of using .01747mol C2H7OH, I used .0175. Also, I converted from mol C3H7OH to mol rxn before my calculations rather than multiplying the final value by 2 as you did. Doing these steps, I got -3570kJ/molrxn. Would I get points off for this? Thank you so much!
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 5 ай бұрын
You would still get full credit for that answer of -3570 kJ per mole of reaction. When a calculation involves multiple steps from the beginning to end, I try to follow a procedure in which I wait until the very end to round off my final answer. Slight variations occur naturally due to rounding numerical values. It is reasonable to expect such variations in a multi-step calculation.
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 5 ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh Ok thank you!
@the_negus
@the_negus 5 ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh I did 31.2/0.0175 to find per 1 mole and got -3560 as my answer instead of -3570. Is this my mistake or yours?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 5 ай бұрын
@@the_negus Those two answers are similar, but slightly different based on rounding. When we round off the answers to our intermediate values, it can cause slight variations in the final answer. Don't worry about this issue, because you definitely understand how to do the calculations. -31.2 / 0.0175 = -1783 -1783 x 2 = -3566
@AbdulnasirMohamnedAbdulkadir
@AbdulnasirMohamnedAbdulkadir 5 ай бұрын
Thanks
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 5 ай бұрын
Will there be separate MCQ subtopic practice for units 8 and 9? Thank you!
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 5 ай бұрын
It's a work in progress. I will definitely create them, and upload them to my channel. I'm not sure if I will be able to complete them all before May 6th.
@ryanolijnyk3109
@ryanolijnyk3109 5 ай бұрын
Ur a beast
@AbbyCrutchley
@AbbyCrutchley 6 ай бұрын
I love this MF videos!
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
At part 24:10, would it be more accurate to say that the value of [Ca+2] in the 100mL sample is roughly equal to the value of [Ca+2] in the 75 mL sample rather than exactly equal, since some (though very little) Ca(OH)2 has dissolved? Thank you!
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
Some of the solid calcium hydroxide likely dissolved when additional water was added to the saturated solution. However, equilibrium has been re-established in the new solution. There is a distinction between the AMOUNT of solid (moles, grams) on the bottom of the beaker and the CONCENTRATION of the calcium hydroxide in the saturated solution. The concentration of calcium hydroxide must be the same in both beakers because both solutions are saturated and at the same temperature.
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
​@@mrfarabaugh Ohh I see! So though the AMOUNT of the calcium hydroxide solid does decrease, the concentration remains the same, as it takes up the same "amount/percentage" of the solution? That is, mol/L?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
@@kaitlyn8185 Yes. You can think of the Ksp value (at 25°C) for an ionic compound as a property of that compound. It applies to the equilibrium system of being a saturated solution of that compound. Once you have established a saturated solution of an ionic compound, then the concentration (mol/L) of the ions in that saturated solution (at 25°C) is only dependent on the value of Ksp itself. The concentration of the ions is NOT dependent on the volume of the solution. In fact, the specific reason **that I wrote** parts (d) and (e) of Question 2 in this packet was to address that issue and the potential misconception associated with it!! Thank you for your comments.
@boater9
@boater9 6 ай бұрын
Thanks so much. Tremendously helpful. Will you be releasing more videos for units 8 and 9?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
Yes. My goal is to add short MCQ practice sets that will include the Topics in all 9 of the AP Chemistry units. It's definitely a work in progress.
@boater9
@boater9 6 ай бұрын
Super duper helpful! TSM!
@aidan8579
@aidan8579 6 ай бұрын
Great Video, thanks Mr. farabaugh
@reaganl.1529
@reaganl.1529 6 ай бұрын
Is there a Unit 9 Practice Assessment?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
Not yet. I still need to complete that packet for the Unit 9 Summative Assessment Practice and upload my video to my CED playlist. It should be available by the end of this month (April 2024).
@reaganl.1529
@reaganl.1529 6 ай бұрын
@@mrfarabaugh awesome thanks!
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5-9aZylbJynaJo&ab_channel=MichaelFarabaugh
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
At 1:52:07, shouldn't the conjugate base of a weak acid be a strong conjugate base? Because if the acid is weak, it doesn't want to give up its H+ ions, and instead wants to accept them?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
According to the AP Chemistry curriculum, there are six STRONG ACIDS that students should memorize: HCl, HBr, HI, HClO₄, HNO₃, and H₂SO₄. These acids have rather large Ka values and are 100% ionized in aqueous solution. The six conjugate bases of these six strong acids (chloride, bromide, iodide, perchlorate, nitrate, and hydrogen sulfate) are so weak, that they are considered as negligible bases, and don't affect the pH of the solution. Examples of STRONG BASES are metal hydroxides in which the metal is located in Groups 1 & 2, such as NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)₂, and Sr(OH)₂. When these ionic compounds dissolve in water, they split up to produce cations and hydroxide ions. The conjugate acid of the hydroxide ion is water. Everything else that is classified as an acid or a base tends to fall into the WEAK category. I consider acetic acid to be a weak acid (Ka = 1.8E-5) and the acetate ion (Kb = 5.6E-10) to be a weak base. I consider ammonia to be a weak base (Kb = 1.8E-5) and the ammonium ion (Ka = 5.6E-10) to be a weak acid. When I compare two different weak acids or two different weak bases by looking at their relative K values, I use words like stronger and weaker as comparative words. Acetic acid is a stronger acid than the ammonium ion (but they are both classified as weak acids). Ammonia is a stronger base than the acetate ion (but they are both classified as weak bases).
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
​@@mrfarabaugh Ohh I see, so I should use the Ka or Kb, and the acids and bases AP wants us to know to determine the relative strength of the acid or base? Thank you for taking the time to reply!!
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
At 1:08:49, I was hoping you could clarify the difference between partially ionized and partially soluble. For example, if a weak acid like HF is highly soluble, does that mean that H2O molecules can break apart the intermolecular attractions between multiple HF molecules so it dissolves? Thank you!!
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
Think of it like this. Some substances such as sugar or ethanol are very soluble in water, but they are nonelectrolytes. They mix with water molecules very well to form a homogeneous solution, but they don’t break up into ions. Some substances such as NaCl or KNO₃ are very soluble in water and also strong electrolytes. They mix with water molecules very well to form a homogeneous solution and they also will break up completely into positive and negative ions. Then there are weak acids and weak bases such as vinegar and ammonia.They also mix with water very well. But they ionize to a small extent. Since they are only partially ionized in solution, they are weak electrolytes. So the ability to form a homogeneous solution is one property that is unrelated to a substance’s ability to break up or ionize in the solution. With sugar or ethanol, they can form hydrogen bonds with water. With ionic substances, they can form ion-dipole forces with water. With weak acids and bases it can be a combination of these attractive forces.
@kaitlyn8185
@kaitlyn8185 6 ай бұрын
At 1:07:11, how is it possible that the k values merge together into just k? Since the k values respond to the rate constant of different elementary reactions, ie k1 and k-1 are different than k2, shouldn't they be different values?
@mrfarabaugh
@mrfarabaugh 6 ай бұрын
In Topic 5.9, the usual situation that requires that algebraic substitution procedure involves a mechanism in which the first step is a fast equilibrium followed by a second step that is the slow rate-determining step. Although each elementary step in a proposed mechanism should have its own specific rate law and rate constant, we don’t normally get these values from experimental data. That’s because we don’t normally have the ability to carry out the elementary steps as single events. Instead, we can perform the overall reaction under various conditions in order to obtain the overall rate law. An overall rate law has a single rate constant. This number is simply a proportionality constant that is determined from our kinetics experiments for the overall reaction.