Light does not carry mass. Energy carries mass which is why he said mass is equivalent to the energy contained in a body. Therefore **E**=mc2. not sure why they made this mistake
@Crazy_diamandooo12 күн бұрын
Photons have rest mass and by planck's theory we know that light has dual nature .
@wolgerman3657 күн бұрын
Rest mass of photon iszero@@Crazy_diamandooo
@nonel45153 күн бұрын
Because shortened writing carries more information to the viewer. Sometimes necessary. You can be smart AND street-smart, if you wish. Why he played violin.
@GTayanesАй бұрын
Albert was wrong when he theorized that light carries mass right?
@asadwarsi3240Ай бұрын
Well yeah he was but I don't know I just want to do research well
@Pico_FaradАй бұрын
Yes but photons do have momentum so he wasn't far off.
@asadwarsi3240Ай бұрын
@@Pico_Farad how photons have momentum if they have no mass
@Pico_FaradАй бұрын
@@asadwarsi3240Light can push objects, see Solar Sails.
@asadwarsi3240Ай бұрын
@@Pico_Farad bro it's hyper theoretical can't be achieved by scientists needs very research in this and also not very easy and also it's laser not light laser maybe made of subatomic particles having mass.
@maleaccountant7198Ай бұрын
Does anyone know where I could watch the whole series
@sabatino1977Ай бұрын
I’ve been trying to figure that out as well. The series was a National Geographic original. NatGeo is a sub channel of the Disney+ streaming service, which I happen to have. So I opened the app and searched for it but nothing came up. It came out in 2017 so only 7 years ago. Still trying to find a source for full episodes.
@cibichakravarthyramesh9438Ай бұрын
Try prime
@gokugoku631613 күн бұрын
Downloaded it from the torrent
@VMCTALKS4 күн бұрын
I got it frm telegram
@bartbarton3082Ай бұрын
That was a well crafted dramatization. Thank you Albert. My brain could not have dipped a toe to where you have taken it, thank you to those you have inspired to follow your lead with the next steps to your imagination.
@fuzzy_boi78Ай бұрын
me when the exam is in 3 min Einstein : time is not absoulute
@ristodogАй бұрын
Nikolay Umov was the first scientist to indicate interrelation between mass and energy proposing the formula E = kmc2 with 0,5 ≤ k ≤ 1 as early as in 1873. Six years before Einstein was born.
@mine_mo7md66524 күн бұрын
Unfortunately for him, if you show E=kmc^2 to anybody, they will recognize it as Einstein equation of Energy, and will say that you wrote it wrong.
@ManikaSharma-z8oАй бұрын
Please may I know the name of this series or movie because when I saw it for the first it is soo fascinating to me that I cant really wait to watch it
@oneforall5945Ай бұрын
The show name is The Genius, it's a national geographic documentary on Einstein
@ManikaSharma-z8oАй бұрын
Thanku😊
@AbdwSellamАй бұрын
Of cours Ginios
@visca7Ай бұрын
big mistake here einstain saying light has mass never happened and its against his own theory
@mascot4950Ай бұрын
I did a search and it looks like he did suggest that photons could be treated as having an effective mass (relativistic, as opposed to rest), due to the mass energy equivalency, in that paper. He was mistaken, but it supports that this is something he might have said at this time. Note that the clip says "carries mass" not "has mass", which seems like an intentional distinction. There seems to be a pretty deep rabbit hole to go down here if one really wants to. I don't. :p
@rovell7221Ай бұрын
The train & lighting bolt is such a bad example 😂 It's probably the worst example even if it had some fact on it.
@unknownknown235Ай бұрын
that is not E =mc squared. he is talking about time and space being relative
@mascot4950Ай бұрын
How to let everyone know you did not watch the whole clip, without saying you did not watch the whole clip.
@AnimeNight-q4sАй бұрын
You can stopwatch at different areas or in underwater and above water
@WilliamBoone-w9m2 ай бұрын
But time throughout the universe was calculated by a sundial. Basically on the Earth, turning around and around well going around a sun. Because of the way math actually evolved time would be non-existent on the moon because the moon does not make revolutions round and round like the Earth that you made time up from called math, a sundial that turned into an economic clock. To tell you that we don't run on a 24 hour day. And the planet itself did not always have the same time on it with the great ice age PAN GA4. The 3 rivers course stamp from China. How will the Earth turn around and around everyday? That was your mathematical basis. They didn't think about the beginning of mathematics before they made any calculations. Weirdly.
@robertteh30562 ай бұрын
Einstein and numerous Scientists hitherto have been trying to explain the universe in terms of gravity. I f gravity is not a force nor an elementary constituent, then we should try to think out of the gravity box by looking at universe perhaps, the origin of light or energy. Where does energy come from? There are enough scientific evidences of entanglement, it is logical to deduce that the origin of energy/light is not within gravity, quantum gravity spacetime relevant to living things' but in the vacuum or void of non-gravity space outside which being void is unstable fluctuating between (+1) and (-1) giving rise to energy!
@unflexianАй бұрын
and yet, i can jump.
@muhtasimmahin50572 ай бұрын
If Einstein is still here and taught us physics.. physics would've been the easiest and everybody's favourite subject.
@robertolopez94832 ай бұрын
fr
@mine_mo7md66524 күн бұрын
Or maybe the hardest. Imagine that he asks every student to come with a new high complicated theory within a week as homework ☠️
@robertolopez948323 күн бұрын
@@mine_mo7md665 i doubt that would be complicated taking in consideration that to be in a class like that you would probably had to be a selected student with a lot of experience and knowledge on physics and math so if you’re at that level already nothing is complicated
@dushyantchaudhry46542 ай бұрын
Sorry ffor my naivety but if 2 lighning bolts happen at different ends of a moving train then isn't it obvious that one will be observed earlier? Its only the speed of light that makes them appear simultaneous. My doubt is... how did that dramatisation come anywhere close to explaining that time is not absolute?
@funnyvidoes2772 ай бұрын
Yeah , that's not what relativity is about. I think they made a mistake here
@天気予報-x9q2 ай бұрын
It’s just that they didn’t explain it thoroughly in the scene. The interesting thing happens if you think about an observer in the train passing just the same place as the observer on the platform at the time that the lightning strikes. The observer on the train sees two lightning simultaneously while the observer in the train sees them happen one after the other. The only different thing about the two observers is that one is moving and one is standing. How could they experience the same event differently even though they’re in exactly the same place at exactly the same time? That’s special relativity
@dushyantchaudhry46542 ай бұрын
@@天気予報-x9q is THAT special relativity (sorry for the caps)? I think that is the same as catching 2 balls at different times even though they are thrown at you at from the same point outside the train if you are moving towards one point of throwing and away from another. thats newonian mechanics I think.
@dushyantchaudhry46542 ай бұрын
@@天気予報-x9q I am glad to meet you. I am equally stupid and keen to learn about the universe. Much respect to you.
@天気予報-x9q2 ай бұрын
@@dushyantchaudhry4654 the main thing is that with balls, the speed of you moving towards the ball flying towards you would actually affect the speed of you coming closer. But with light, which has the same speed in all frames of references it wouldn’t matter. So for you to experience one lightning sooner that the other would actually mean that one lightning has struck before the other. In the frame of reference of the rider lightning bolts were literally not simultaneous. Again, it is very well explained in the picture in the Wikipedia article. Glad to meet you too
@qtxiil2 ай бұрын
how and where can i watch this
@jojackborsemanАй бұрын
PHub Pay for premium
@Kabir_piano082 ай бұрын
3:07 that moment when both besso and Einstein look to each other on what they heard about and the best when they stood up in respecting the father of Quantum physics.
@PentagramMachinist16183 ай бұрын
*The Cross as Representational of Educational Danger* Education is power. I, for one, refuse to be limited by contemporary scientific fashion models! Even to the least educated person a lion is but a dangerous animal and a lesser being. Science and reason has become that lion. Science is attempting to replace Jesus by capping humanity’s growth potential thereby becoming like the gods themselves and controlling information. Understanding takes steps and doorways. One only has to understand near a doorway to potentially open it with a cognitive leap. By eliminating the steps to the doorway they prevent that potential. Religion is proof that education is dangerous. That fact should not be covered up. It should be used and cherished so that all may understand. What is the Bible really about? Try this key to understand that the Bible really is a morality tale about educational danger, whereby the student is set to reign above masses of people.
@DarthHide12343 ай бұрын
There Are Consequenses Of Knowledge. Always. Remember Oppenheimer And Nuclear Bomb.
@AH-fm2ex2 ай бұрын
whgat is blud yapping about. i don't know if he's smart or stupid.
@aswinganji78702 ай бұрын
Don't forget that we are the ones making the science. They are not capping humanity's growth, they are accelerating it. If we would have been bound by religion we could not have made it till the progress of advancement that humanity has made. Education is the reason we are living longer lives, understand the universe, have complex thoughts and is the reason why you are able to comment. Education is not danger, it is enlightenment.
@aswinganji78702 ай бұрын
@@DarthHide1234 You are writing this comment as a direct consequence of knowledge.
@PentagramMachinist16182 ай бұрын
@@aswinganji7870 *Math is a Bad Blueprint* "Materials Death Sentences" True wealth comes from raw materials and engineering techniques. Mumbo-jumbo such as science, math, storytelling, religion, and politics are just distractions to this fact. Not being born into wealth is a psychological death sentence where one struggles endlessly for the truth. The truth and reality only lead to engineering and even the universities do not teach in its true light. This is because the wealthy do not want you bothering them or stealing their secrets. Any political war is about wealth and wealth is about engineering. The leaders of governments are not the wealthy, they are the poor. Families with raw materials and factories are the wealthy. Any war is, thus, just a bloody changing of hands whereby the poor become the engineers. -A. Merguile
@LionPorsche.Batman.Grandizer3 ай бұрын
Yes ❤
@OpinionatedGuy-o1k3 ай бұрын
I love how they both stood up out of respect when they heard Max Planck cause he's the father of everything that's possible and every thing that one could imagine for. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
@regalmedia94873 ай бұрын
I still dont get it
@kukiko2873 ай бұрын
It’s speed of light same as a sound. who closer to speaker hear before others
@Fireunity3193 ай бұрын
E=mc2 energy = mass x speed of light x speed of light
@achyuthansanal2 ай бұрын
@@kukiko287Not really about being ‘closer’ to the source. It’s about the relative velocity, not the distance.
@Gauravyyyadav2 ай бұрын
Yay me two isn't it just relative motion when seeing bolts from train idk i am too dumb too understand it
@DavidSmith-lj1yzАй бұрын
Most of it is beyond me as well but a quote from the great man might help.."when you are with a beautiful woman a day seems like a minute but if you are sitting on hot coals a minute seems like a day, that's relativity!" Probably not an exact quote but ya get the idea.
@radenmohamadmahfudin61563 ай бұрын
assalamu alaikum warohmatuAllah 41104 hi wabarokaatuh, the God of Albert Einstein wassalamu alaikum warohmatuALlah hi wabarokaatuh.
@kirutheesg39572 ай бұрын
einstein was a jew...
@U_Y_S3 ай бұрын
People's then...🗿 People's now🤪
@Aeschylion3 ай бұрын
sad we wont be able to see it but with the level of technology we have now it is only a matter of time until we get another einstein level genius, in 1000 years from now humanity might even be a type 2 civilization with life expectancy being atleast 2 centuries. imagine a world like that
@AH-fm2ex2 ай бұрын
@@Aeschylion by that time jesus will be back. 2060 is when newton predicts will be his second coming. i doubt with climate change, war etc humanity will make it there. also, i feel like the world is getting dumber. reverse flynn effect.
@kirutheesg39572 ай бұрын
@@AH-fm2ex god is just a fake concept to garner followers. All this Jesus, Allah and all are completely fake.
@deadplex3995Ай бұрын
@@kirutheesg3957well it’s better to say “I’m not sure but seems like bs” rather just just being too certain in these matters
@PentagramMachinist16183 ай бұрын
*The Devil’s Spade* “A Collection of Stars” It is the curse of humanity that we must dig in the dirt for eternity. The problem with seeking the truth is that one becomes weak and loses their propensity for survival. The truth brings power but also a lack of grit and determination. Therefore, one must always keep a spade handy in the event that they lose the argument, or especially if they win it because that is the surest way to get cast out of Heaven. Look. Peace is typically stagnation. You know what I mean. And sometimes the truth isn’t fit for mass consumption. To think it is all spades and shovels, though is pure folly. People think learning is passive. Go ahead. Stick to that argument and burn all bridges in its name. Don’t think, though, that we’ll pull you up when you lose! The Atomic bomb? It’s nothing more than a bullet cartridge with uranium instead of sulfur. Just seal in the bullet. Hilarious. It took two thousand years for humanity to find the Egyptian snake entanglements that compose the universe. Here, have a Pharaoh’s hat. It sends energy to build a reincarnation partition in the minds of dead Pharaohs. Lol😂
@me_yt23 ай бұрын
Drama😂 like 1:43
@danalyze3 ай бұрын
Why can't we do groundbreaking discoveries like this today
@skuldug12503 ай бұрын
What we are doing is orders of magnitude more difficult. In the 20th century most discoveries were relatively low-hanging fruit, and didn't require immense technological advancements to prove or discover. We have answered many of the easier questions, what we are left with is combining special and general relativity, debating the determinacy of our universe, dark matter and so on and so forth. The scale has been increased massively, far more than what we are capable of measuring with our current technology. We haven't plateaud in terms of discoveries, but what we are doing is a lot more tedious. We have to chip away. While we are standing on the shoulders of giants, the mountains we now have to climb are far steeper, and the paths are far less clear.
@danalyze3 ай бұрын
@@skuldug1250 i dont know man.. why wouldnt it be the same case that in 200 years they discover something that would male todays scientists go WTF Remember, fundamentally, science is the map - not the territory
@ELBARTO2023-bg1rw3 ай бұрын
@@danalyze thats only possible in extreme events of space time, because gravity works so well even at intergalactic distances, or maybe some property of neutrinos is awaking to be discover to explain why is more than 100 fundamental particles
@bide25053 ай бұрын
One reason is too much specialization btw we got one ground breaking one recently in 2023 in bells inequality nd also 2024 3 days ago in physiology@@danalyze
@automation-nv4ww2 ай бұрын
well most kids today are debating about their gender...sooo 🙃
@patrickandrew78863 ай бұрын
Last part literal chills
@Johanliebert-154 ай бұрын
Movie name
@hassanabdullah67424 ай бұрын
What has that anything to do with time
@hassanabdullah67424 ай бұрын
Oh now I understand
@ĴĚË_ÄđVäñçēð_Wolf3 ай бұрын
What did u understand
@lachlanpfeiffer81993 ай бұрын
The key thing to understand is that Maxwell states that light moves at one speed in any frame of reference (nervermind what non-inertial means) So this is in contradiction with seeing those flashes of light at different times for the two observers. As if both observers are the same distance away from the lightning bolts then they should both see them at the same time. Therefore light must slow down or speed up depending upon the observer or, time passes differently for observers at different speeds. Since Maxwell showed that light only moves at one speed, the latter is true. This concludes the proof 😂
@TahmidHossain-h8j4 ай бұрын
Is it just me or the last scene gave everyone goosebumps.
@Experience-Explains5 ай бұрын
Every single man is hopeless at the initial stage of life. There is no need to test, EDUCATED NEVER INSULTS GENIUS.
@mohammadfardinchowdhury1773 ай бұрын
what does it mean?first correct your grammar
@aodaddgaming5 ай бұрын
Speed of light , Space , time ,Velocity ,Mass, Gravity . What is their connection ? Why They can effect each other ?
@animenmusic165 ай бұрын
General theory of relativity. In simple terms, the more mass an object has the more it will be warp the space-time fabric. And more it will have its 'gravitational efftect'
@syther8364 ай бұрын
its like asking that what is the connection between brain, heart, kidney and liver. why they can effect each other.😂😂😂 mass *exists* in space time and explicitly configure it according its quantity. this is a simple rule that governs the universe. And this rule is written by GOD
@anushka.singh.024 ай бұрын
When there is mass,it has its own gravity which makes space and time warps around it. When space time is warped, gravity is present there which is why the light gets slowed down. For the connection between mass and velocity, none of the objects with the recognisable (the object which we can observe?) mass can move with infinitesimal speed/velocity.
@anushka.singh.024 ай бұрын
With the recognisable mass I meant, the bodies which are heavier in comparison to atomic/subatomic particles.
@Jeeprepdiaries122 ай бұрын
welcome to physics
@krishnakoya94795 ай бұрын
Conceded
@miraklet21866 ай бұрын
Time are timing.
@승수노-z3e6 ай бұрын
I will do for you.
@adejareoladiran7 ай бұрын
I understand
@AdrianStoica-e5b7 ай бұрын
No....!!! Time is Absolute !!! Einstein was very good cheater in science...😮
@prant557 ай бұрын
knegga ur not compared to him
@Sayuti111-q6k6 ай бұрын
Absolute when you sleep
@AdrianStoica-e5b6 ай бұрын
@@Sayuti111-q6k good point...!!!!👍😄
@Sweze6 ай бұрын
guys time is absolute!!, no go to bedtime
@Electric_075 ай бұрын
some people are using there commonsense knowledge to deny scientifically proven theory😂😂😂
@erwinmanalastas58277 ай бұрын
It is because of falling object vy = -gt
@anushka.singh.024 ай бұрын
How can you?? v=LT^(-1), y=L, g=LT^(-2), t=T Hence, vy=-gt gives L²T^(-1) = - LT^(-1) So, how could you??
@AnubhabSinha-x7z3 ай бұрын
@@anushka.singh.02 i think he meant v(y)=-gt
@gamestar708 ай бұрын
Time is not absolute, Speed of Light is.
@Thomas-hj7uc8 ай бұрын
Yes!!! Because Time is Relative.
@drsn19697 ай бұрын
In vacuum*
@mmeettwwoo7 ай бұрын
Why c square, for 3 dimensions it can be cubed...some dude (me)
@syther8364 ай бұрын
@@mmeettwwoo 😂😂😂 nice one. check the proof of E = gamma * mc²
@KartikPatel-nt4ff8 ай бұрын
😅😅😮😅😮😅😅😅well ingormeti0n.Good show more content 😅😅
@bala2k28 ай бұрын
Very very very rare pieces in human kind are Newton & Einstein...
@venkat41678 ай бұрын
Kurt Gödel
@Kafiul-eo9lv9 ай бұрын
Bangali k k ase?
@akibkhanK9 ай бұрын
Ami
@gamingwithabid11665 ай бұрын
🖐️
@AlbertPacaj-z2f9 ай бұрын
Nebudem niekomu tvrdiť že 100 % nikto nevidí
@TsukiRaiki10 ай бұрын
where can i watch this show cause everytime i search genius it’s a different show
@jannatulferdowsijannat892710 ай бұрын
u can on fmovies
@dhiva-san10 ай бұрын
There's different ones....search Genius Einstein
@QurratulainAttiq6 күн бұрын
@@jannatulferdowsijannat8927 no I heard it's unsafe
@DanielKolbin11 ай бұрын
moment
@LithinHariprasad-vg3yr11 ай бұрын
Max Planck, the father of quantum physics, Albert Einstein, the father of relativity. Together the biggest unification, QUANTUM GRAVITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@LithinHariprasad-vg3yr11 ай бұрын
GRAIL OF PHYSICS!!!!!!!!
@LithinHariprasad-vg3yr11 ай бұрын
It’s HOLY GRAIL
@TheStarDreamer8 ай бұрын
If that had happened...
@karnaghose47843 ай бұрын
Such a theory actually exists, it's called Quantum Field Theory or Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
@girlwithamacbook Жыл бұрын
Where this series is available ? Which ott
@Deoxys_da28 ай бұрын
I watched it in telegram there are 10 episode
@rohitjain7698 ай бұрын
@@Deoxys_da2 can you provide link please of English version?
@Skiller-cx2vs Жыл бұрын
What’s this movie called or documentary
@DrBolinger Жыл бұрын
It was done by National Geographic TV series called Genus. Einstein was covered in the First Season, Picasso in season 2, Aretha Franklin in season 3