I hope tou make a good video soon love your content is still the best Sim for me , il started in fsx and Xplane 11 and Switch late 2019 to P3D definitely the most realistic Flight system no questions about it for me is the biggest default of MSFS2020 and for this P3D is the best and In comparaison PMDG run realistic in P3D not in MSFS2020 , yes Graphics is bad part of this Sim but i like it because im old school flight simmer and bring le back to me first Fligt and love it !
@Ale_v2-3120 күн бұрын
Is this QualityWings' 787?
@Ale_v2-3120 күн бұрын
Yeah until Asobo doesnt release a good weather radar API pmdg wont be able to recreate the weather radar as in p3d...Im resting in this sim until theyre doing that
@aviatorsound91426 күн бұрын
P3D was originally designed to be used for realistic military simulation and it’s kind of the default software for many of the in real life simulators…
@canaltijuaneroАй бұрын
p3d is still alive next year... Im using fslabs and its still better than fenix
@M1A2-XАй бұрын
would be interested to watch non fastforward version
@g7uslАй бұрын
For me, P3D will ALWAYS be better than that 'Xbox' sim.
@gamertardguardian12992 ай бұрын
The price is because its supposed to be used for professional use and can be shared across an entire classroom of students
@burgadahz172 ай бұрын
No, next question.
@GG_Booboo2 ай бұрын
Is that P3D coz it looked like MSFS2020 to me! Hope not then $1k is a rip off unless the realism is that good
@g7usl2 ай бұрын
Realism! starting both engines at the same time? You having a laugh?
@flyingbarbarian12 ай бұрын
For vatsim simmers I’d have said at the time yes but now no.
@thatguyplayer69692 ай бұрын
Now the 777-300ER is released for msfs, I can say they improved A LOT
@TranNhatLong-bu9fl3 ай бұрын
can my gtx 1060 6g and cpu i5 9400f do that ?
@Zakk9003 ай бұрын
Without further ado....such a tool
@randi_stress3 ай бұрын
that is the smoothest ryanair landing ngl
@Tpr_18083 ай бұрын
I still use p3d because I use a laptop with good cpu but bad gpu
@c0r5e3 ай бұрын
I use Xplane. Shame there is no 777. P3D old ones need scenery updates that will cost me more money with which I can buy msfs and a better laptop
@Tpr_18083 ай бұрын
@c0r5e FlightFactor are working on one for X-plane and it's looking good. As I save for a better pc I still use p3d with nothing new really. Stopped spending money on it since I can't use a payware plane with payware scenery due to performance issues. There are good freeware airports for my planes
@Tpr_18083 ай бұрын
I know this is an old topic but they were greedy enough to give us a variant few people uses as a basepack and make the expansions as expensive as the basepack making both mandatory. I wouldn't be surprised if someone cracked them already
@GG_Booboo4 ай бұрын
PMDG are still the leader in plane sim!
@5cG0014 ай бұрын
I cant find the lucas cavatoni preset anymore.. Where can I find it?
@jafo3264 ай бұрын
greetings, do you think this can be applied on p3d 5.4? these are settings when flying OFFLINE correct? thanks for your time
@CTde1104 ай бұрын
Tail strike LOL
@redwatch11004 ай бұрын
I think I'm going to wait ten more years until MSFS2020 is affordable and fixed or a better one comes out.
@ShawnsAviationAndSpottingKEWR5 ай бұрын
Can you make a gameplay of it like in the menu and how to choose your aircraft. I don’t know how to get P3d
@HummerGabor6 ай бұрын
I think this game is more realistic Than any other…
@evanblakeman81757 ай бұрын
The Textures of P3D Could be Better but it looks really close to msfs. At least its better than Xplane graphics!!
@ceff017 ай бұрын
your supposed to start right dam enginee first ahhhhhhhhhh, why you do it all wrong, im a pro pitot for 5 years on p3d v2
@FreightFox8 ай бұрын
MSFS is shit. Go P3D all day everyday.
@AngryHatter8 ай бұрын
1) You get what you pay for. 2) These (PMDG) aircraft are probably the best in terms of technology & modeling. 3) My issue is lack of love for P3D.
@strumminandwrenchin91628 ай бұрын
What do you use for weather engine?
@echosierrakilo20898 ай бұрын
Ok, it looks actually not that bad as I used to think about the P3D previously. For some reason back in 2019 when I started simming everyone on the internet was recommending X-Plane, and then MSFS was released, so I missed the P3D completely. High quality long haulers like 777 with working weather radar and proper physics look promising and attractive, so I'm now considering buying the P3D. Does it really cost $1000? It looks like $60 for the sim and $140 for the PMDG 777, so $200 - quite expensive comparing to my existing MSFS + PMDG 737-800 bundle, but kind of affordable considering it's so much better. What other addons are must-have to enjoy it like the MSFS in 2024? Are there good freeware scenery sites you can recommend? Thank you in advance!
@GGking7478 ай бұрын
Well if you read the description you can see how many add on. You neeed for a better graphics (default look so bad) but if you just want a sim with a plane from pmdg or else so there no problem.
@echosierrakilo20898 ай бұрын
@@GGking747 yep, ok, thanks, I saw the list in the description, it’s quite long and I’m wondering if they all are necessary to make the nice picture.
@GGking7478 ай бұрын
@@echosierrakilo2089 Well, it depends on what you want. For me, I fly with ORBX Global (for all worldwide), ORBX Vector (landscape), PMDG, and P3D. The total cost is around $250, and it's fine for most sceneries. You don't need to spend $1000 👍
@echosierrakilo20898 ай бұрын
@@GGking747 got it, thank you very much!
@majoraviatior16116 ай бұрын
@@echosierrakilo2089it’s definitely not worth it. P3d looks shocking out of the box. Pmdg triple for msfs is coming out within the next 2 months
@MatrixMaverick19808 ай бұрын
Go Aerowinx Precision Simulator for system depth.
@Skybound_7379 ай бұрын
Nah xplane is always on top
@paperaviationphilippines3209 ай бұрын
Did you use earth tiles for the scenery or is just like that? Overall amazing video my man
@TheFlightShow9 ай бұрын
Thanks, nah I didn't use any imagery - the Taipei scenery is just THAT good
@paperaviationphilippines3209 ай бұрын
@@TheFlightShow amazingg!
@tomschik9 ай бұрын
As far as I can say after 20 Years of simming.... I changed to P3D as Microsoft announced, not to continue with developping. Also MS was allways very unstable, not so on P3D. Now I bought MSFS 2020 to find out differences and I think it is 1st overloaded and 2nd you are a slave of Microsoft running thir product. Why do I need a Microsoft account for simming ? And to be online all the time, hey whats wrong here ? You have to accept a lot of overload with MS-Games and Xbox necessarities. I have no Xbox and never want one. Yes, online scenery downloads are sexy, but if you are interested in IFR flying, scenery is not really what you need. A slim and easy system is a lot more sexy.... I am running a 1:1 cockpit in original size to sit in and MSFS is no choice for this kind of application. I like the visuals and the World in MSFS but it is not practicable to implement so easy than P3D. My wish is, to have the scenery in this quality as it is with MSFS, but everything else you can forget. I need no Aircrafts, my sim is a A320, nothing else. So it depends what you want to do, many (unnecessary) things around or the essential functionality. MSFS is really a GAME for simple gamers, P3D is a training solution of first class. I never called flight simming a GAME. It is a simulation. I stay on P3D, because i do not want to be a slave of Microsft. But the scenery quality of MSFS vs. P3D is great. But if you want to learn flying, P3D is the better choice. I hope Lockheed Martin will follow up the scenery quality soon. Unfortunately P3D V6 is rubbish, no increase of performance or funcionality. A waste of money so far.... So I think the best solution is still allways P3D V5, but with the scenery (and nothing else) of MSFS.
@Ale_v2-319 ай бұрын
note that now it is improved
@flopedross10709 ай бұрын
Hey! Do you use the academic version? Thanks
@TheFlightShow9 ай бұрын
Yes I do
@Tukangbedil77999 ай бұрын
Do you think the reflection on aircraft seems better in v5 than v5.3 ? im seeing from your vids that those v5 looks better than v5.3 or its just because of the planes?
@TheFlightShow9 ай бұрын
I'm not sure, I may have changed some settings in the process which may be responsible for the different reflections
@Tukangbedil77999 ай бұрын
Do you know why most of my airplanes reflections shiny are gone in 5.4 ? they just like flat skin without reflection shiny , if there's reflection its only small not like yours
@LongLong-wk5lz10 ай бұрын
😭你能分享卢卡斯·卡瓦托尼(Lucas Cavatoni)预设吗 我搜索了整个网络,但没有找到
@guiduz346910 ай бұрын
Hey @theflightshow I tried all of your settings and they work great! This is my rig: CPU: Intel Core i7-11700K GPU: Nvidia RTX 4070 SSD: Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB SSD: Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB MBD: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE AX I run DCS in a 3x4k monitor setup.
@arsenakopian447811 ай бұрын
this is a good product for pmdg but 747 i think its brtter
@m_zayank11 ай бұрын
I love your bloom settings 🔥
@decendx11 ай бұрын
FS2020 crashes,lags,glitches on my laptop.P3D V5.3 will be my primary flight simulator.
@rafaelc.1770Ай бұрын
P3d have more ctds my man
@owenbache7316 Жыл бұрын
Um yeah
@m_zayank Жыл бұрын
Where can I get that Turkish Airlines Boarding sounds?
@TheFlightShow11 ай бұрын
I added them from KZbin while editing the video
@owenklein1917 Жыл бұрын
Something p3d will have an advantage on for a while now is long haul. The sim basically has every single plane and a high quality one. Msfs is still quite lacking in airliners. Only good ones we have is the a310, a320, CRJ, md-80, 737 and an OKAY 787 and 748. The only super high quality ones here are the a320, 737 and md-80 tho. And there’s not any amazing long haulers.
@Thphnts Жыл бұрын
Longreach is not related to it being an ER aircraft. It’s the location in Australia where Qantas began.
@superjet1007 Жыл бұрын
P3d is great... If you have a lot of money, beast pc =)