Dear goodness, how beautiful is this water… Truly lovely shots! Could you please share whether you were filming handheld?
@SuperRawza2 ай бұрын
Thanks! Yes handheld, but slow motion.
@gemmamarti10762 ай бұрын
truly nauseating. ☝️SECT
@healing2gether2 ай бұрын
Bro your talking head parts of the video are an absolutely insanely beautiful image!! It’s awesome!! I assume it was shot with the c200, but what lens?
@SuperRawza2 ай бұрын
Thanks, yes c200 and probably just the canon ef 24-70 MkII (this was a while ago now). It’s mainly just the lighting setup and composition in this case.
@healing2gether2 ай бұрын
@@SuperRawza thank you my friend! I am learning to light better as you can see from the videos on my channel here, I’m an addiction recovery coach started a community called healing together, but I take a lot of pride in my production value. I hope someday I can light as well as you, love the image you’ve got here!
@ISplimeI3 ай бұрын
Beautiful spider. I wish the music wasn't so ominous for no reason tho. 😭
@CatherineDuVal-t2n4 ай бұрын
What grade or how old are students
@mariangoodman19234 күн бұрын
The students are in grade 5 and 6 and are 10-12 years old. ❤
@AWilliamsfilm5 ай бұрын
Do you have any knowledge regarding the C200 and fixed pattern noise? I'm noticing faint vertical lines in my 4k video
@SuperRawza5 ай бұрын
Have you tried to do a black balance? But no I hadn’t experienced fixed pattern noise when I had the c200. If Black Balancing doesn’t fix the issue then it’s probably a dying sensor or perhaps you just need to avoid under exposing.
@AWilliamsfilm5 ай бұрын
@@SuperRawza thanks, I'll have to learn/try a black balance. And cross my fingers that the sensor isn't dieing 🤞🏻
@AWilliamsfilm4 ай бұрын
Black balance had no effect. I still have feint vertical columns in my video especially noticeable when panning. Weighing the Canon repair cost against purchasing another second hand c200 , I realised that my C200 is about to become a very expensive paper Weight.
@SuperRawza4 ай бұрын
Ah damn. That’s very disappointing. RIP. 😢
@AWilliamsfilm7 ай бұрын
My exposure scenario doesn't get much harder and I'd appreciate an opinion 🤔 I shoot land-based surf video with C200 in 4k raw. I viewed this post looking for knowledge regarding iso as I'm uneducated. How should one approach iso selection with regards to these factors . The foam created by waves is white, the wave is generally quite dark, the subject (substance abusing, peace loving surfer) is generally in a black wetsuit, generally shooting at full telephoto end of the lens (400mm) The white foam must be overexposed for everything else to be correctly exposed. You' may have subjects to the left side and right side of you, meaning, you may at any time have the sun providing great or poor light if it is early morning here in sunny Newcastle, Australia on the beach, facing left into the sun will help using a polarising filter , but facing right, the polarising filter will darken the image. I could go on,... Eg, many sunny days will still have broken up clouds which requires constant quick readjustment of exposure. settings So regarding iso, what should I consider .... Would very much appreciate any assistance 🙏🏻
@SuperRawza7 ай бұрын
With the waves, iso 400, white parts of the waves no higher then 93 ire if you want any detail in them. But you always have to consider what’s most important and compromise!
@AWilliamsfilm7 ай бұрын
Much appreciated, thankyou.
@rickicoughlan8 ай бұрын
What a delight! Striated Thornbills are not only beautiful little bird but also probably the most fascination of their genus in so many respects.
@Beesthataregelatonas11 ай бұрын
These are my favorite spiders
@smievil Жыл бұрын
never skip frontleg day
@godrilla5549 Жыл бұрын
I saw one today and regret not bringing it home and putting it in my flowers
@herbie72 Жыл бұрын
Like R2D2 and other Star Wars sound effects. Marvellous stuff :)
@watergirl929 Жыл бұрын
Finally I figured out what this spider is! I found one is the bush once and was mesmerized by it. I picked it up (with a leaf) to inspect it. It tried getting away but I didn’t let it go I liked it lol. So it finally gave up and decided to just build its web in my hand 😂 it was floating inbetween my fingers building its web there
@SuperRawza Жыл бұрын
Interesting! Might have been a different spider as these guys don’t hunt with webs, more rely on stealth and waiting where something is likely to come!
@vidviewer100 Жыл бұрын
I'm impressed that you got such good footage. I was stalking one today in Sydney bush and got close enough to make a good recording but no video. Did you have a powerful zoom? I only had my phone and as soon as I got close enough to film he was gone. It being thick scrub didn't help and it was hard to move quietly. I got the feeling he new I was there all the time. I've stalked them before in SE QLD and never got anywhere near them.
@SuperRawza Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Yeah a 400mm on a 1.5 crop. So basically 600mm!
@lastEvergreen Жыл бұрын
Haha it attacked with the Star Platinum.
@pacificaclark8087 Жыл бұрын
when you accidentally type 🤨🚋🚋🚋🚋🚋🚋😐✋
@pacificaclark8087 Жыл бұрын
only in Alberta 💀💀💀
@pacificaclark8087 Жыл бұрын
vbfgybvjh
@pacificaclark8087 Жыл бұрын
fgjgyhjhuk
@harley0546 Жыл бұрын
TRUTH SPOKEN
@timbytheriver2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rory. Firstly, your images look gorgeous - whatever your exposure strategy is! :) I stumbled onto this post (late to the party, I apologise) after interrogating my own exposure strategy - currently with the Canon R5 shooting Raw. All that follows is regarding shooting in RAW only! Your test is interesting, and perfectly valid, but I wonder whether the way you describe Expose To The Right (ETTR) in this video could use some clarification? Beyond the processing software responding to changes in metadata, the raw data captured will be exactly the same given the same light/aperture/shutter-speed at ISOs 100, 400, 800, 1600 etc. (NB ARRI Alexa users may disagree here. But that's another discussion…) The only way to truly ETTR (or ETTL) I know of is by increasing - or decreasing the light reaching the sensor for a given exposure - whether by aperture, shutter-speed - or increasing the physical lighting. This is also the only way to re-distribute tonal value-weighting either side of a middle grey point e.g. A bright high-key sun-lit exterior will benefit from careful ETTL (less light) if you wish to preserve highlights and mid-tones. And if you want to 'see into the shadows' in a low-key night interior it'll better be served if you ETTR (more light). Noise-wise, best results will always be produced at the sensor's designed/native ISO - if you can do so at the light levels available. I was initially thrown by your commentary at 10:06 about 'avoiding shooting a sunny-day at ISO 200 because the clipping of the highlights isn't so nice'. On reflection, I see this less as being directly related to ISO (intuition tells us to use lower ISO for more available light) - as exposure (light levels at the sensor). I translate this as 'better to be careful to just ETTL here to get bright tones & highlights retained' Simply altering ISO in raw won't in and of itself alter the tonal distribution of the shadows and highlights. Only a deviation of exposure: plus or minus from Normal (N) can do this. Or have I misunderstood your example here? I'd say digital ISOs are really just a convenient/modern way of visualising a correct/pleasing exposure on our camera screens - not a way to increase/decrease actual exposure. Many have argued that including digital ISO as part of the 'exposure triangle' is just plain wrong. So to answer the opening question you raise re noise at the start of the video I'd answer: Ideally, both! Lowest ISO possible, maybe in tandem with ETTR - that is judicious over-exposure (more light). Anyway, results-wise maybe we are actually in agreement - just using different terms to get to the same endpoint. ;) Anyway, great post - and thank you for stimulating my ageing grey-matter. PS The RawDigger app is invaluable in comparing actual raw data count and distribution, and as of the last update will open Canon CRM files for scrutiny. I recommend it! (not an affiliate btw). All the best.
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
Hey! Wow I appreciate the full attention you gave this. I actually don’t care too much now haha! I actually agree with you on pretty much everything. It’s incredibly hard to describe the complexity’s of all this. Changing ISO when shooting raw doesn’t change the data collected but many people don’t know it (save when a camera has dual native iso). Really all we are debating with ISO’s and expose to right or left is when important characteristics of the image might be threatened or when those characteristics are best delegated to a certain range of the sensor’s dynamic range. Basically saying that a higher iso is better for highlight clipping is only really saying the clipping will appear softer if data is recorded at ire values below 94 ire for example. So the clipping happens where there is still plenty of data to make it less harsh. The clipping is essentially artificial because the exposure raised above native iso. Saying that a lower iso is good for clean shadows is saying that data collected at IREs above a certain level will be clean from noise and have more detail. All you’re doing by using ISO instead of I need to expose left or right is making your life easier. You can look at it on the screen and know what it’s going to look like once recorded. All this is relevant for non raw recording and sometimes more important since you can really change exposure later one, not very well at any rate! I have the c70 and it has like 10:1 raw which I would have dreamed of 4 years ago. I don’t use it though! I just shoot 10 bit and often only in 2k! 🤣 But evidently these exposure concepts are very important for non raw! But then the dual gain on the c70 makes for some insanely clean shadows. You don’t have to worry about them. Only the highlights. One less thing to worry about! Nice! How are you liking the r5? I recently got the R6mkii as a b cam to the c70. I’m interested in testing it against the c70. It seems decent. I do miss the c series menu though! Going to move on the c200 soon. All the best, Rory.
@timbytheriver2 жыл бұрын
@@SuperRawza And thanks for an extensive and detailed reply. We do seem to agree on the important points. ;) Complex indeed it all is, which sometimes can get in the way of an intuitive process. The C70 sounds lovely, but I'm sure you'd get lovely images out of any camera! The R5 has hidden strengths: but it's not the raw 8K I'd say. With careful exposure placement I'm finding that the downsampled 8K ( 4K-Fine) setting shot in Rec2020/PQ in H265 can look peachy - better than the C-logs I'd say. Shooting to a compressed format also makes one more disciplined at the point of shooting - and less post-processing too. But of course, you're right - none of this matters! I see you're getting on with life and getting lots out of it! Stay well.
@istoleyourtoast5672 жыл бұрын
THIS IS HORROR
@lostinflow2 жыл бұрын
Some things you do not notice until you do some heavy color grading. Iso 400 usually holds up much better than 1600
@jayflournoy29772 жыл бұрын
My girl penny is about to turn four months soon such a great mix of dog
@simplycurlyde2 жыл бұрын
Wow!
@merton7052 жыл бұрын
Hi Rory, Can I use this video as promo for my upcoming podcast with Bruce?
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
Sure mate, as long as Bruce is okay with you using it.
@007jcha2 жыл бұрын
Can we get an update video?!? My border heeler male looks just like this.
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
I’d like to, in fact I started one like 6 months ago. Got a 3 month old daughter now so life’s currently a bit hectic. But yeah I’ll get it done at some point. 😝
@RoleyChiu2 жыл бұрын
I admit that I've watched this short video at least 20 times.
@toad4ever1032 жыл бұрын
KLR productions need this video.
@toad4ever1032 жыл бұрын
Just found one of these guys in my roses. I've never seen one before. I'm in the PNW.
@jockturner15472 жыл бұрын
Beautiful work Rory! That drone footage is gorgeous
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Blessed to get an actual sunset!
@njiemotombifrancis76022 жыл бұрын
Wow, beautiful
@lauriestweart57142 жыл бұрын
In my Eurythmy sessions we have been working on the diamond excersizes xxx
@theteentheatre_subsdiary_20222 жыл бұрын
I am inspired from the cinematography of yours, basically the closeups you use in your videos. We attempted a little. Would love to get a few critical thoughts. Thanks
@theteentheatre_subsdiary_20222 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppynoKuHeKqdhsk
@n.85442 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Beautiful. My family enjoyed watching this.
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@sahebdey90802 жыл бұрын
Really Awesome captures
@murrayhassell1872 жыл бұрын
im the one in the blue
@murrayhassell1872 жыл бұрын
yo im back
@jalbu83302 жыл бұрын
How wonderful to see all that water on that beautiful country. The filming is first class and shows that country in all it's glory. Thank you for sharing, makes my heart glad to see that system overflowing and quenching that parched land. Watching from far north Queensland. 🙏🏾😊🌺
@SuperRawza2 жыл бұрын
Pleasure is mine, thanks!
@jonnynoakes90703 жыл бұрын
Something I read or heard was that the best iso increments are 800 then 1600 then 3200, apparently the isos inbetween those can introduce more noise. Who knows if that’s true 🤷♂️😂
@jonnynoakes90703 жыл бұрын
Love this! I have the c70 and only used it once but it’s so filmic, this looks so close to a film stock. Do you expose so you just miss clipping highlights?
@SuperRawza3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! In this case yes, highlights just under 90 ire.
@scarletb793 жыл бұрын
Support from Italy!
@mh6053 жыл бұрын
This is so cool! Thanks!
@MrWazzin3 жыл бұрын
Good but... Weird skin tones...
@SuperRawza3 жыл бұрын
Weird light can produce weird skin tones.
@adventureswithdan843 жыл бұрын
Eastern spinebill and red and white Salvias, nice :).
@adventureswithdan843 жыл бұрын
I really admire the blue banded bees :)
@adventureswithdan843 жыл бұрын
Wow, that was mindblowingly epic, I loved the sound.