Hi, we support quads for import. They're turned into meshes. But we don't have a quad meshing feature.

Yes, this visual mode is based on MeshLib functions and shows how fast they work.

Hi Markus, thanks for your feedback. It depends on your usage during the month. For $30 you get not only mesh cleaning tools, but other tools for mesh inspection, scan alignment and conversion between data types. We are sure that our mesh repairing tool quality is on the level of other applications that are being used in the industry, however, their cost is at least twice higher. We will consider adding to the mesh healer the functionality you mentioned, thanks for the idea!

Hi! Sure. You can try it yourself!

Hi Jerome, Thanks for your comment and feedback. If you ever need our help, please feel free to email us at [email protected].

Hi, sure. Please feel free to ask for this on GitHub, so our developers will provide it for you: github.com/MeshInspector/MeshLib/discussions

Hi Sergey, we recommend to start with the default voxel size parameters. If you are not satisfied with the result, you may want to either increase or decrease the voxel size. Take into account that the smaller the voxel size is - the more model details will be preserved after the operation; however, the operation will consume more computing power and, therefore, time. And vice versa. If you need to get the result quicker, you can put a larger voxel size for surface reconstruction.

Hi! here you can see use of this function github.com/MeshInspector/MeshLib/issues/2606#issuecomment-2060845796 ( mm.positionVertsSmoothly(mesh,newVerts) is call of Re-position/Simple ) It is edgeWeightsType parameter that set to mm.LaplacianEdgeWeightsParam.Cotan by default. It is same value that is used in MeshInspector Application in Re-position tool in Simple mode.

@@ruturajarolkar798 could you please share pictures at [email protected]?

Hey, thanks for your comment. Moving the Merge tool to the Points tab makes sense. We will try to make merging scans more convenient in the next releases. Thanks again.

Hey, thanks for providing the details on your model via chat. Finally, it worked for your case as it is shown in the video

Hey, thanks for providing the details on your model via chat. Finally, it worked for your case as it is shown in the video.

Hello! The wall thickness is identification in mesh healer is linked to the tolerance setting. There is a separate tool Measure Thickness on the Inspect tab that you can use.

Yes, sure! Ctrl+W for Windows or Command + W for MacOS. In this video we show where you can find other shortcuts: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4vCmXekrbODmbMsi=u1KMFBVJfQ2i5sGs

Dear ImGui

@@meshinspector i had no clue that it has ribbon control

Have you implemented Ribbon-like control in the scope of MeshInspector project?

@@denisstepanenko3037 MeshInspector is an application powered by MeshLib SDK. We implemented ribbon using Dear ImGui in MeshLib. meshlib.meshinspector.com/

Hi! Thanks for your feedback. In the next release, we will decrease the voxel size as we did it in Mesh Healer tool. So far you can try to use Mesh Healer Rebuild tool with the lowest voxel size possible.

@@meshinspector like i currently have model, that is split into multiple pieces in blender, i have decided to combine them into 1 mesh and bring it to mesh inspector so i can just turn it into voxel then mesh it to force fix all the issues, because this is a very complex model. if i try to voxelize the entire mesh I'm limited to a specific number which voxelises the whole mesh for me at the same time i lose a lot of the small details i wanted... compared if i bring each piece by itself and then try to voxelize i can bring the voxel size to even a smaller amount so i can retain all the details.. but this still wont fix the gapes between all the pieces i would still need to somehow fix all those holes and little minor issues.

@@mahmood392 we already improved mesh to voxels. We can share the draft version that you can try right away. If you are interested, email us at [email protected].

@@meshinspector i will think you.

Hey! Thanks for your feedback :)

Hey, thanks for the question. Yes. Could you please create an issue in our github? github.com/MeshInspector/MeshLib

Hello! Depends on your task. Basically, like it is shown in the video kzbin.info/www/bejne/sKimmGuugpibbpYsi=fGrvSAGJVodqe3An&t=108. You can zoom in and snap to the area you are interested in.

@@meshinspector Hi. I'm trying to measure certain portions of my bones on a CT scan with milimeter measurements. I'm not sur eof meshinspector can replicate the real life size of it and give me a measurement based in mm like how my orthodontist does it.

​@@tamerofhorses2200 Hi! MeshInspector imports your files in the same measurement system as other software does. If it's mm, than the measurements will be in mm. If the original file is designed to be measured in meters, then whole numbers on measurements will be meters.

Thank you for your question! By default, MeshInspector categorizes components into large and small using a threshold of 0.20% of the surface. This setting is customizable, and you can adjust it in the component settings.

Certainly! This bike model has 3D printable potential, but it's important to note that it requires additional preparation after using Mesh Healer before it can be printed. 🚴💨

Hey! Thank you for the meeting. I've sent you the example via email.

We just updated the application yesterday and combined Mesh Inspector and Mesh Healer tools. When you open a new Mesh Healer tool, Mesh Inspector launches and identifies the main mesh inconsistencies. A new video comes soon!

Hey, here is the link to the latest updated video of Mesh Healer that includes Mesh Inspector features now: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHyZlGyudtGXY9Esi=zn4k9-RZS_iP8Dlc

@@meshinspector thanks

We updated the tool and recommend downloading a new version: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHyZlGyudtGXY9Esi=zn4k9-RZS_iP8Dlc