Наверное как то связано с политикой было все это дело. Актеры то украинские.

@@Vicmor0 Очень грустно всё это. Для меня голоса из оригинала просто часть атмосферы, без них игра потеряла половину своей притягательности. Мне никогда не забыть эти вставки между локациями под саундтрек и божественный голос Вилкова. Или бандитский говор Бурбона в исполнении Германа. Даже Андрей Прохоров, который ни разу не актёр, и то оставил часть себя в Metro. Каждый голос в оригинальном 2033 уникальный и запоминающийся, каждый актёр вложил всю душу в это великое произведение. Озвучка в других частях тоже порадовала по большей части, но только оригинальный актёрский состав навсегда в сердечке ❤️

Yeah...

In reality, in my opinion, in the original plans there shouldn't even have been the death of 30,000 men among Shepherd's motivations given that in the cut ending of MW 2 he clearly says "We helped and financed Zakhaev" and then mentions some mysterious "patriots" who 'they helped. In fact, in the initial plans, Shepherd was supposed to be the cause of the events of Cod 4 Modern Warfare and not just Zakhaev. In short, the main person responsible for the death of those 30,000 American soldiers had to be Shepherd and not just Makarov. In practice, Shepherd at the beginning was supposed to be an all-round bastard comparable to Zakhaev and Makarov and not simply a lonely madman. In all honesty, I like this cut ending more than the ending we had because it makes the story grayer and the events more complex.

​​@@Dr_Piscatellain Cod 4 Shepard was Command and Chose to Send 30,000 Men to Get One Guy( Even Commenters said this). Knowing they may have a Russian Warhead as Seen in the Shock and Awe Mission Intro.

I still think that's weird to send 30k marines into a Area where the enemy leader may have a Russian War head. It's weird asf

@@hurricane7727 When you are against an army, you can't just go in with the usual spec ops OR they are gonna have to go in HARD and FAST before it deploys although it was already too late once the unit that went to find it were behind schedule (in MW3 they were setting it up until they called Makarov saying its ready). If we are sticking to the final character aspect of Shepard still being the good guy and not the ORIGINAL aspect before the nuke turned him insane for losing 30k people and in obsession for REVENGE and POWER (Blank check by setting off WW3 and convinced the council until price used a nuke to make an EMP in the atmosphere) Although a night spec ops would be the better option, but perhaps Shepard's battalion isn't equipped for stealth and had to go all guns blazing instead after raiding the radio station

@@justasimplegamer129 Their Intel was wrong as well . Al Assad wasn't in that City which was a apart of the reason for the Army Invading the Capital. SAS also didn't tell Command there was a Nuclear device and just said a Russian Warhead and one of them could have been a Mole Sent by Makarov or Imran Zakhaev( reboot Makarov used moles and Og Makarov could used a Mole Too).

placeholder voice

Man, read the description. Thanks.

@@Vicmor0 ok like when I saw the video I was on Mobile ,didn't read the discription :))

Vicmor said as roach

Ahh

Simply put, in the initial plans for Modern Warfare 2 Shepherd was supposed to be responsible for all the messes that happened in the first Modern Warfare. In fact, as Shepherd says in the cut ending, he, presumably together with the American government, financed and supported Zakhaev to start a civil war in Russia with the aim of weakening the nation but in the end the situation got out of hand transforming Zakhaev into a threat for the West, and this is where all the messes of the first Modern Warfare begin. Shepherd at the beginning was not supposed to be a mere lonely maniac but a real cog in the big military system. Even today we don't know the reasons why they cut everything, there are those who assume that they cut everything for purely political reasons, perhaps under pressure from Activision but we can't know for sure but one thing is certain, the cut ending, from what we saw was much nicer than the ending of the full game

Activision definitely felt pressure for political reasons, hence why they changed up the ending a bit. If it wasn’t for that, we might as well have gotten this ending. Oh well

it is an alpha build, so maybe they didnt think of that detail yet

they tend to hire voice actors right before finishing the game

Also cus it’s an alpha the real voice actors hadn’t come in to record their lines yet

Perhaps the mysterious man seen in the cut ending of MW 3 could be one of the "patriots" that Shepherd talks about in the cut ending of MW 2. It would make sense if you think about it

There is no briefcase in that ending, you are just making things up.

@@luiseduardo4803 There is a cut ending scene to MW3 that takes place right after price lights his cigar, you can watch it online.