This really helped!! You gave an excellent and easy to understand explanation!! This is a very easy way to point out polar and non-polar molecules.
@AmnaMizam-po1kqАй бұрын
Fantastic
@The_CGAАй бұрын
The “more detailed information” that you call “classified” is now bouncing around the internet, it turns out having the info be open source helps the public unders how close or far places like Iran and North Korea are from making their own. See Scott Manley’s series on nukes for an examplr
@ognjenrad4905Ай бұрын
Thank you! I like the way you drew the diagram. Other diagrams were only irritating to me
@annaoaulinovnaАй бұрын
plutonium spark plug is made by using plutonium foam.
@ChimpFromSpaceАй бұрын
Just the explosive lens itself is an insane feat of engineering. Using geometry, and chemicals with different combustion speeds to turn outwardly expanding explosions into an inwardly collapsing implosion. Even mechanics of the neutron source at the center of the imploding core is also fascinating, and genius. For better or for worse, the people who worked on the original Manhattan Project were very very smart, to say the least.
@CRSolariceАй бұрын
THANK YOU. Most videos about this topic try to push the belief that FUSION is the destructive force in a thermonuclear weapon by hyping it into some sort of mythological event. This almost always causes people to misunderstand what is happening in a thermonuclear weapon. Its all about the fission, fusion isn't what causes the damage (directly). The fusion reaction cause a release of extra neutrons which cause many more fission reactions before the nuclear fuel material is thrown apart by the explosion. People are wrongly believing that fusion is some sort of ultimate explosive force but it isn't, at least not in thermonuclear weapons. To be certain fusion is an energetic event but in our weapons the energy created by fusion is dwarfed, mightily, by the energy released from the fission component(s). One curious note about the fusion fuel that you touched upon is that it first undergoes the process of fission and then the resulting elements undergo fusion. Its a "two for one" burst of neutrons and extra energy from the same source. I do appreciate your video for being clear and accurate. Skipping the mythological, hype and dumb down parts really "does it" for me. The credit needs to be given.
@80sandretrogubbins25Ай бұрын
How are you able to more concretely define "dwarfed"? In the video I watched called "C.7 Calculating energy released in nuclear reactions (HL)" by Mike Sugiyama Jones, it seems that mole-for-mole, fission produces 10x more energy then fusion, but fusion still releases huge quantities of energy. For fusion to be "dwarfed" by fission in a hydrogen bomb, I would infer that there has to be a lot more fissile material than fusionable material present. I get that more neutrons become available for the fission to occur, but is that the only factor?
@user-cr5yy4te3i17 күн бұрын
your post is confusing. There are lots of h bombs with yields in excess of one megaton, but i have never heard of a fission bomb greater than .5 megaton. And the fission bomb in an h bomb is quite small, in the kiloton range. The purpose of the plutonium rod in the LiDu is to serve as sort of anvil against the uranium or lead tamper . Also serves as a source of neutrons to fission the lithium into tritium.compare the net energy of a deuterium/tritium fusion to u235 fission. The rate of fusion is proportional to density and kinetic energy of the reacting particles. In the core of the sun, the density is about 200 times that of water. And fusion in the core of the sun proceeds at a leisurely rate, less energy produced per unit volume than in a fermenting manure pile. Who knows what the density of the burning hydrogen in a bomb is?
@CRSolarice17 күн бұрын
@@user-cr5yy4te3i An H-bomb is a fission device boosted by the release of neutrons by the fusion of Hydrogen or Lithium. There is so much nonsensical word salad in your post that I don't know where to start. The bottom line is that you have no idea what is really going on in an H-bomb, you've just picked words out of some articles somewhere and threw them together in phrases that you feel sound super-scientific and reinforce your sci-fi notions but the truth is that they make no sense, realistically. I'm not going to waste a whole lot of time re-explaining everything here. For an explanation just re-read what I posted or look it up somewhere. You need to research the topic and do it without any preconceived notions as to what a Hydrogen bomb is and how it works. I suggest that you find the information from reputable source and not youtube or Quora.
@CRSolarice17 күн бұрын
@@user-cr5yy4te3i Here is my explanation of what occurs in an H-bomb. (While fusion can result in a very energetic release an H-bomb is not configured to release large amounts of energy directly through the process of fusion. The fusion reaction 'boosts' the fission reactions via a release of neutrons. The huge amount of destructive force produced by an H-bomb is the result of the fission process and the fusion reaction, while relatively energetic, is small in comparison to the fission component. This information is out there for all to see but if you read it with the belief (bias) that fusion in an H-bomb is some sort of heretofore magnificent explosive force that dwarfs anything else then that is what you will incorrectly believe. I know you won't believe me so go ask Neil D'grasse Tyson, he'll explain it to you.). ----------------------------------------------------------- The fusion reaction in a staged nuclear weapon does NOT produce a more destructive reaction than the fission reactions; the fusion reaction only helps to promote a more powerful fission explosion due to the release of a huge number of extra neutrons which is the key to causing fission reactions in large unstable atoms such as Uranium or Plutonium. These 'extra' neutrons help to produce many more fission reactions within the weapon's fuel, that would normally escape the explosion without undergoing the fission process. In other words the only thing that the fusion reaction does is that it provides a huge number of extra neutrons that normally would not be there in order to cause a large number of extra fission reactions, hence causing a larger explosion. The fusion reaction does not produce some sort of mythical explosive force by itself, it only acts as a catalyst to cause a larger number of fission reactions.
@CRSolarice17 күн бұрын
@@80sandretrogubbins25 Well, I tend to agree with you. Fusion can be configured to release tremendous amounts of energy and comparatively by mass fusion fuels release more energy. It gets complicated to explain but I follow what you are saying. I'm only trying to explain that in a thermonuclear weapon of 'today' the fusion process is not configured to be the part that creates the huge destructive force, directly that is. It is the fission that creates the 'lions share' of energy boosted by the release of neutrons from the fusion reactions. The fusion component isn't configured or expected to cause the destructive force, directly that is.
@Ally-io7mpАй бұрын
This actually really helped! Thank you :)
@stephenmolo7681Ай бұрын
triangle of fire
@phantomblindsight907Ай бұрын
we should do the same thing for fusion power. and a tokamak
@cassidaymoriarityАй бұрын
Where can I get a copy of this table to help with determining solubility?
@TimRobertsen2 ай бұрын
Awesome video!
@TimRobertsen2 ай бұрын
Great video!:)
@danichang27002 ай бұрын
Oh Mein Gott, thank you so much! It's so funny, I'm studying a chemistry in German right now and you've said nein-polar jsjsjssjssjsjsj xD
@ataberktamis90792 ай бұрын
thank you so much it was very hepful
@ChihurumnanyaHezekiah-np5wl3 ай бұрын
Hi
@MrThelovechannel3 ай бұрын
Thank you, this helped a lot! After watching your video, I found that an easier way for me to remember polar AA are that they have a polar atom at the end of the side chain and nonpolar side chains are composed almost entirely of C/H atoms and any polar atoms they might have are within the side chain.
@forensix783 ай бұрын
Real Chemistry, Thank you for making these videos. I’m sorry that the KZbin algorithm has not been kind to you. But I personally appreciate your knowledge and effort. Take care.
@vespera1063 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video, it was really helpful. I just have a question - why is the triplet excited state lower in energy than the singlet excited state?
@donutsdonuts3703 ай бұрын
Looked at so many videos and this one helped the most! Thank you
@oogabooga52954 ай бұрын
Wooow you killed this king
@tvan48544 ай бұрын
Always wondered how the 2nd stage did not get physically blown up prior to criticality. Then, someone described how the rays travel at the speed and "outran" the physical force of the first stage. Hopefully, that was not an oversimplification.
@martystu9004 ай бұрын
I should've watched this 7 years ago 😢
@samuelofosu20514 ай бұрын
I believe you made a mistake in you calculation in regards to the time frame 9:21 where you used the EMF value for the Ni. Aren’t you supposed to reverse the equation in the table since in the table it’s observing a reduction. And reversing it should cause a change in sign of the E value for Ni making it have 0.257 instead of -0.257??
@RealChemistryVideosАй бұрын
Good observation! The negative sign in the equation takes care of this. Notice 0.151-(-0.257) becomes 0.151 + 0.257.
@lawo20414 ай бұрын
i have a question
@chrisparsons44744 ай бұрын
Thank you for such a lucid explanation.
@aishabebemohamedtahir14154 ай бұрын
Thank you so much sir, straight to the point and easy to understand.
@selin47004 ай бұрын
best explanation
@joaquinfabrega4 ай бұрын
I got lost, why is called Hydrogen bomb? I did not see that element inside the bomb.
@BC-wj8fx2 ай бұрын
deuterium and tritium are hydrogens
@user-xz8nc5hn3c4 ай бұрын
very helpful
@HazelVsTheWrld4 ай бұрын
You're telling me that hydrogen bombs uses a similar chain reaction that the sun uses.💀
@BC-wj8fx2 ай бұрын
The sun has fusion occurring, like the bomb, but unlike fission it is not really a chain reaction. Not a nuclear chain reaction anyway, like fission is.
@moiraatkinson5 ай бұрын
But of a misnomer calling it a hydrogen bomb …. seems from this that hydrogen plays just a small part. Thermonuclear describes it better.
@ashdos72055 ай бұрын
thank you
@kemia12465 ай бұрын
Thanks. This was very helpful
@cg18685 ай бұрын
So simplified and easy to understand. Thank you
@aalsaad74525 ай бұрын
Thank you for your explanation .But I have a question what about proline it doesn’t have an O and it’s polar and histidine it doesn’t have a charge but it’s in the positively charged category
@oonniiigg5 ай бұрын
excellent teaching better than my professor
@santoshchhajed56965 ай бұрын
Identification of alcohol kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmbYoaSbgLWtoqssi=C51-3ipI-QL64L_G
and i had to pay to sit thru hours of lectures? seriously, i learned more in less than 11 minutes than a week of lecture. plus this cost me absolutely nothing.
@dotytanner6 ай бұрын
Why is the last answer not 8.37 for sig fig
@kingnotail38386 ай бұрын
The fusion fuel is lithium deuteride, not lithium
@Hotepsekhemwe6 ай бұрын
Thank you! I was a physics major and this is the clearest, BEST explanation I've EVER heard. Some people just like to totally nerd out and try to impress you with their knowledge RATHER than teach you!
@MishaCoolDude6 ай бұрын
Nice!
@thebigww91086 ай бұрын
0 comments bro what's going on
@RealChemistryVideos6 ай бұрын
Haha, not anymore. Apparently this isn't the best lesson.
@ishita_046 ай бұрын
what if there is a bicyclic compound where both have aromaticity hoe is that polar?
@emmanuelmassela71066 ай бұрын
I appreciate you bro!
@RMalai6 ай бұрын
Finally I came across a second person that I agree with and do correctly with SFs. Including the conversion factor 273.15 instead of 273. Thank you.