amen

that is what the 2mm kolibri was originally advertised as, a self defense weapon you could fit inside a purse

This is true.

I like mind craft

jack paul like jake paul lol

ok, first of all you missed the joke with that part secondly, teach the kid proper firearm safety thirdly, gun safes exist and leaving a gun in there is a good way to make it secure

@@ddynamite3835 I agree, but people keep being really stupid about that. Most would disagree with me, but if you need to test for a driver's license, renew it (and even re-take the test for CDLs), and purchase car insurance just to drive something that kills even more than guns do, why can't you do the same for guns? Require a firearm safety course as part of the license requirement, require that any first-time gun owner also purchase a safe of some kind to store the weapon properly, and possibly make people retake the safety course every X years. It would at least cut down on the accidental deaths due to kids finding a handgun in the bedside table, or some idiot giving himself a Darwin award (or killing someone else) due to mishandling. Won't do much for crime, obviously.

@@WisteriaDrake I think that has a lot to do with the 2nd amednment, these might seem like logical laws but the 2nd Amendment is against the government, and test is handed BY the government and wants you to retake the course.....which is directed by the government, I don't think people would be down for that I think it might do much for crime, ironically with what you said people would be more disciplined with using a gun with the things you said above, but there's trade offs to things. Some figuratively, some literally

Funny thing is, mutually assured destruction exists. Nothing I have to say about this otherwise, but it's something I'd like to point out.

That logic won the Cold War.

@@finaoo1167 Exactly, so why not apply our logic across the board and give toddlers mustard gas

@@debrickashaw9387 - are there bad toddlers with mustard gas?

Idiot

Howard made them equal

Zurtlw

Stop screeching about the BS you were fed by some loser on the tube.

horses don’t exist silly billy

“Issued” is not the same as “forced”. In this plan, they are free to do what they want with it. If I get a free sample of Tide detergent in the mail nobody would describe that as P&G “forcing” their detergent on me.

@@finaoo1167 I will force detergent on you. There is nothing you can do about it. Concede.

If somebody wants somebody dead, lack of guns will never ever stop them

@@hawkofthereborn43 a fucking knife could.

@@wardjunior1450 if someone wants someone else dead TOO BAD. Murder is illegal. It is against the law.

Then she’s still better off than if she didn’t have one.

Well he won’t shoot her because that would be sexist. Jesus dude, it’s 2021. You can’t just shoot women because you don’t like their gun colour. It’s against the law.

Now imagine the manager coming out with the pink 50 cal desert eagle AE, telling the Karen to calm the fuck down.

Yea I guarantee you most karans already cary a gun its America threr are more guns here than people

Imagion the winston who can’t get a woman so has to rape them , I’m actually all for women having Guns idea

Then she'll go to prison where she belongs. I say the odds of that actually happened are about as likely if all women were armed vs the number of women out there who are all currently armed.

@@djjazzyjeff1232 it's a joke my guy he doesnt think this will actually happen

pretty sure his house has like a whole play room set up so not surprising

Come on! Meddling in other people's business is what the human do.

Can you direct me to the studies for the statistics you mentioned?

@@finaoo1167 Being the cynic that I am, I'm going to assume your request is disingenuous. But that's ok, I deal with disingenuous people all day, so I will humor you a bit... To understand the statistics I mentioned, one has to look into multiple studies. However, I will give one instance, just to demonstrate that I'm not saying things without any foundation. Here is one study that holds a singular position in the mosaic that is my understanding of the subject: [Webster DW, Vernick JS, Zeoli AM, Manganello JA (August 2004). "Association between youth-focused firearm laws and youth suicides". JAMA. 292 (5): 594-601. doi:10.1001/jama.292.5.594. PMID 15292085.] This study looks at the implementation of CAP laws in a dozen or so states. Limiting child access to guns in the household, resulted in a 23% reduction in gun deaths to children under the age of 15 [95% confidence interval]. Other states that have not implemented CAP laws did not see similar declines in the same period. The study has been well peer reviewed and considered by experts to be reliable. So, this is but one example of how a specific group of people are less safe with guns. I could give you more examples to demonstrate in a more general sense, but as I said, I don't think you are actually interested... and frankly, I don't have the patience... and I'm not trying to convince the unconvincable. We live in a culture where a majority of people think their right to own guns takes priority over the rights of others not to be victims of gun violence. I can't even change the culture within my small organization at work. What chance would I have with the gun culture?

@@quinnmendel449 - Actually, I was quite sincere. I am always open to review data on both sides of an issue. On an issue like gun ownership, both sides are going to have an agenda, so it's hard to sift through the data and draw objective conclusions without being misdirected by the spin, but I'll always listen.