Looking forward to getting the 7 blade props on my aircraft in the near future. Thanks for the update info.
@rcafmaintainer37236 ай бұрын
Can increasing the cumber on the right side of the tail-boom further help? In theory speeding up the air should reduce pressure, like the topside of a wing. Sure it might look symetrical to the discerning eye.
Eventually they will make one large slotted disc for a King Air🤣
@jimmyjango5213 Жыл бұрын
Certified 7 and testing 9? That's awesome!
@OneHoof Жыл бұрын
I absolutely love the Bell Huey. But, the Huey’s tail rotor system is a complex & some what controversial subject! 😳 Bell Helicopter Textron has had problems with creating tail rotors that aren’t effective enough with their thrust. The 206B Jetranger’s are notorious for spinning out of control because of loss of tail rotor effectiveness (LTE). I guess the Jetranger tail rotor was just too small for the amount of torque that the 206B was capable of producing. With high gross weights Jetranger pilots have to avoid right pedal turns to avoid getting into LTE. Eventually a company called Van Horn started producing more aerodynamic & effective after market composite 206B replacement tail rotor blades that greatly increased their effectiveness & safety. The original Bell UH-1 Hueys & AH-1 Huey Cobras spin their port (left) side mounted, pusher prop, tail rotors counter clockwise which is aerodynamically less efficient. Hueys are powerful helicopters, but like the Jetranger are prone to getting into Loss of Tail Rotor Effectiveness (LTE) & spinning out of control at high torque power settings & low air speeds. Bell could have fixed the Huey’s inherent anti torque design flaw in 1965 by redesigning the tail rotor gear box, remounting the tail rotor blades, & simply spinning the tail rotor blades the opposite direction (clockwise). Around that time, helicopter engineers discovered that spinning the tail rotor clockwise, & upward into the main rotor’s (MR) downwash, gave the tail rotor more bite/thrust; similar to translational lift, making the tail rotor more efficient & more effective. Unfortunately Bell helicopter did not want to pay the extra money of redesigning the Huey’s tail rotor gearboxes to fix this inherent aerodynamic problem at its original source. Instead, they started flipping the old gearbox over, & putting the tail rotor on the opposite (starboard/right) side of the vertical stabilizer. This did spin the tail rotor upwards into the main rotor’s downwash. But, it changed the tail rotor from being a pusher prop system to being a tractor system. Therefore; this induced a new aerodynamic problem because now the large vertical stabilizer was blocking maybe almost 1/4 of the tail rotor’s thrust. So, while spinning it upward into the downwash added a slight thrust advantage, this advantage was lost because the vertical fin was blocking so much of its thrust. Therefore; by switching the AH-1 Huey Cobras’ & Hueys’ tail rotors to the opposite (starboard) side in reality possibly made the Hueys’ ineffective tail rotor problem even worse! Hueys were still getting into LTE & spinning out of control & crashing when flying at high power (high torque) situations hauling heavy loads or high density altitudes. This has been a problem with the Hueys since their inception in the early 1960’s. They’re great helicopters, but they could have been even better if Bell Helicopter Textron would have spent the money to design a new gearbox to spin their tail rotors clockwise on the original port side, to keep them as a pusher system, spinning upwards into the MR downwash. In more recent years, Bell essentially tried putting a “band aid on a bullet wound “ by making the vertical fin smaller (Fast Fin), so it doesn’t block as much thrust from the starboard mounted, tractor tail rotors, hoping to increase tail rotor thrust a slight bit. Bell also started installing strakes on the left side of the tail boom to interrupt the air flow, to increase air pressure on that side & decrease airflow on the right side creating the Coandă effect, like McDonnell Douglas MD520N NOTAR helicopters. I guess this has helped increase tail rotor effectiveness in fast fin modified Hueys? The problem is, the vertical fin is designed to aerodynamically keep the helicopter from spinning if you maintain 65 knots forward speed, in the event of a tail rotor failure. Unfortunately, I don’t know if the narrower fast fin vertical stabilizer is big enough to aerodynamically prevent the Huey from spinning. So, to me, reducing the vertical fin’s size is like robbing Peter to pay Paul. Sure… it might increase tail rotor thrust of the less effective tractor system, a bit, but the vertical stabilizer might not have enough surface any longer to prevent a spin, in the event of a tail rotor failure. This just doesn’t make sense to me! Bell could have created a more effective pusher, tail rotor system by redesigning the tail rotor gearbox, to spin the tail rotor, clockwise, almost 60 years ago. But to save money they’ve engaged in shenanigans robbing Peter to pay Paul, by flipping the gearbox over, to change it to a less effective tractor system. So, whenever I see the Hueys tail rotor system brought up, it’s a frustrating topic because Bell decided to go cheap, instead of making the Huey’s tail rotor system the best it can be. The tractor system, equipped with fast fin, is a compromised system stacked onto a compromised system… to avoid fixing the root problem, of redesigning the gearbox to spin the tail rotor the opposite direction, they’ve done less effective things, to save money. 💴
@bougie2k Жыл бұрын
Where is thé 11 blades model
@mitchwood66092 жыл бұрын
ill take 2 please. where to order?
@blraerospace2 жыл бұрын
Check our website, BLRaerospace.com. Where are you from, we have USA dealer and international dealer, too
@ricardobbblanco2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing.
@c.gauthier60252 жыл бұрын
Why does Airbus not give us the increase in fuel burn numbers as well...
@kapitiheliworx19242 жыл бұрын
Can we put this on a B2....whats the lifting advances
@paulhuck34062 жыл бұрын
I crashed in a Kingair 100 Dec 1, 1974. Burned lungs out. Currently on VA hospital Bhm. trying to improve breathing.
@mikeabc53552 жыл бұрын
Lots of hype and no specs that actually compare props.
@Robberbarron272 жыл бұрын
If you contact them they will provide specs. Apparently they are pretty good. We have a fleet customer that buys these things like hot cakes.
@viniciusguiarone56252 жыл бұрын
A empresa que eu trabalho Quick aviação estala inguiletes e hélice de material compositor de fibra de carbono MT nas Aeronaves 🤘☠️🎸✈️🇧🇷
@pgreenx2 жыл бұрын
I want to add these on my AFL KA 350!
@Entity_BlackRed7772 жыл бұрын
No!! I will not be able to hear the mighty prop sounds at high altitudes no more!!!!
@mlatifanramadhani16972 жыл бұрын
Good
@seankadar95502 жыл бұрын
Worst accident per aircraft sold in the industry. 1960’s air frame design. Purchase one from the 70’s thru the 2000’s and it’s the same air frame principle. Outdated. Sorry fans but it’s true.
@TheEdge922 жыл бұрын
I think you are talkin about one of the first Lear Jets. King Air is ridiculously reliable
@syedforkanuddin55132 жыл бұрын
can we do para dropping from this aircraft
@bravofoxable3 жыл бұрын
Amazing product
@Ed_Belen3 жыл бұрын
Nice nice
@alcameron60713 жыл бұрын
I’m curious how much that upgrade would cost.
@bradgeary34673 жыл бұрын
if you have to ask….
@MrOsvaldoFreire2 жыл бұрын
@@bradgeary3467 millions. it's useless unless money is not your concern. If it's the case, feed starving children all over the world.
@bobbyd5353 жыл бұрын
A competent left seater right there!
@bobbyd5353 жыл бұрын
A competent left seater right there!
@mohamadyouness42913 жыл бұрын
keep it going.... maybe you don't get so many views...but the ones who are watching are really benefiting<3
@rollingacresfarmstead2063 жыл бұрын
I got 10 bucks this gonna get it done?
@marxxmann87583 жыл бұрын
The only thing the king air is missing is a dual wheel nose gear
@leefithian37043 жыл бұрын
I keep hearing that , something to it
@marxxmann87583 жыл бұрын
@@leefithian3704 who knows maybe for the next generation after the 360 they mite do that upgrade
@Brian-rn2wx Жыл бұрын
Doesn't need it. It's good enough without it
@bingomichl44893 жыл бұрын
Sieht aus wie die legendäre Huey nur eine Nummer kleiner.
@johnnywalker56353 жыл бұрын
All CGI. Can’t you get your hands on some cool looking BLR notified King Air’s?
@nerkal45334 жыл бұрын
Superbe
@MrOsvaldoFreire4 жыл бұрын
Great twin turboprop. I'm burning to get mine soon, with the help of GOD.
@johnnywalker56353 жыл бұрын
Powerball.com megamillions.com 😂
@ryanlewis36233 жыл бұрын
You wont get yours if you burn.
@MrOsvaldoFreire3 жыл бұрын
@@ryanlewis3623 Funny
@ChrisCokeRobinson19 күн бұрын
Did you get it in the end? :)
@gerardhaubert82104 жыл бұрын
Can this plane fly with one engine?..if not, why have 2 engines.? Do the BLR upgrades void any of the std warranties?
@alcameron60713 жыл бұрын
That’s kind of a dumb question. All twin engine aircraft are certified to fly on one engine in case of a failure.
@sergefontano66554 жыл бұрын
Best air craft : Innovation Number ONE .... CARBON FIEBER...led ligth...HAUTE TECHNOGOLIE OF PERFORMANCE
@TheKnightDrag0n4 жыл бұрын
Best looking prop aircraft out there.
@PacoOtis4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video but it twice as long as it needs to be! Best of luck!
@sergefontano66554 жыл бұрын
BEST IN THE US
@thebabbler88674 жыл бұрын
Is it better than blackhawk tho?..
@leefithian37043 жыл бұрын
Good question,
@ryanlewis36233 жыл бұрын
Blackhawk uses the same 5 blade MT propellers.
@Brian-rn2wx Жыл бұрын
Blackhawk gives you more powerful pt6-67A engine.
@TRPGpilot4 жыл бұрын
Metric please!
@AllanEvansOfficial4 жыл бұрын
When your nuts and eyes tickle LMAOOOO
@mountjoy236 жыл бұрын
How much extra weight and will you produce OGE charts for this ?
@sigurdkohler38477 жыл бұрын
wow das ist super Video
@blraerospace7 жыл бұрын
That’s correct! If you want to learn more about this technology, this link is a great place to start: www.blraerospace.com/products/fastfin-for-bell/