Talk is cheap. When it's on the market. I will believe it.
@Madonsteamrailways3 сағат бұрын
Well, you also have an election coming up!! Give dear old Mr Bidens a go and electric vehicles will become the norm rather than the freak show!!
@Madonsteamrailways4 сағат бұрын
Should be a great new truck!! I sincerely hope so because I’m into trucks because there’s a great deal of potential for the import of pickup campers.
@UltiumTech3 сағат бұрын
Fingers crossed!
@glennmorgan41974 сағат бұрын
10:09 If there's a loophole then the Chinese will find it 😢😮
@tpbtpb26024 сағат бұрын
Didn't say anything about the electrolyte, is it prone to thermal runaway?
@glennmorgan41974 сағат бұрын
2:34 Sounds like the Shark's eating Tesla for lunch 😂
@glennmorgan41974 сағат бұрын
0:30 I like BYD's truck better than the ridiculous looking cyber truck 😮
@E.A.I.S.9 сағат бұрын
Hey, why don't we develope a good old fashioned American invention: Stanley Meyers hydrogen engine
@UltiumTech11 сағат бұрын
Go to Aura.com/UltiumTech to start your 14-day trial of *Aura* and stay protected.
@LILEE37613 сағат бұрын
Even with a revolutionary much better battery the EV is doomed currently, because they are extremely pricey even with the current probably cheaper batteries. So a new, better probably much expensive battery pack just make worst this already worse situation. The greed can easily ruin any idea, any market.
@plentypotential14 сағат бұрын
I shall wait longer before I get one EV. The development is too rapid. Not sure when all these tech is going to be commercialised.
@calahubinc235719 сағат бұрын
I learnt nothing
@headfirst622723 сағат бұрын
8800 wh/kg for gasoline compared to 247 wh/kg for this battery…..no contest.
@almaspite123411 сағат бұрын
you are comparing apple with peach. if you have an ICE car with full fuel tank how far you can go with it. if you have an ev how far can you go with it fully charged. it is the correct way to compare them you will see that there is no big difference and it is smaller year by year. EV needs 1/3 energy for the same distance. so the contest ends soon.
@headfirst622710 сағат бұрын
@@almaspite1234 well I’m talking about is the energy density in the folding tank. But yeah, I don’t want to add a half a ton to my car just to get the same distance..
@glennmorgan4197Күн бұрын
This is another Missouri situation, show me don't tell me 😮
@garyclack3807Күн бұрын
This is the new battery for the week
@thecam0073Күн бұрын
In 9 minutes I could have learned alot about "water" engines. Could have anyway.
@chrismawby1805Күн бұрын
How many times have we heard this, we are still waiting.
@douglascutler1037Күн бұрын
Sodium ion is already in some EVs.
@kirangirija7567Күн бұрын
Wish you speed up commercialise it soon and get rid of Chinese Dominance
@TheMan-jz5teКүн бұрын
It's still heavy 👎👎
@PETERJOHN101Күн бұрын
No heavier than a combustion engine, plus with fast charging it won't matter anyway.
@rxonmymind8362Күн бұрын
Lose weight then. No fat people in this car.😂
@sony5244Күн бұрын
Their is always a" BUT"
@douglascutler1037Күн бұрын
And that is why battery tech has hardly advanced at all since the days of Edison.
@mafp22wКүн бұрын
While many ev car owners will love this, it will have an even greater impact on airplanes. Electric motors spool up almost immediately which equates to shorter runways. However, using them requires low weight energy storage. As soon as more energy per pound can be stored in a battery than in jet fuel, everything will change.
@JRP313 сағат бұрын
This be h is no where near energy dense enough for airplanes. It would need to be around 500 wh/kg.
@patdbeanКүн бұрын
But with EVs the charging speed is mostly limited by the amount of power available. 25-30 minutes for a 20-80% charge on a 150kw charger becomes 18-20 minutes on a 250kw. With 350kw on the way and 500kw+ being talked about. So the battery is not really the issue, is it?
@leiflillandt148814 сағат бұрын
Exactly, you are right! But if you charge 90 % of your driven miles/kilometres at home, does it really matter if the battery on the few long journeys of the year charges half of the time you need for lunch! The high charging speeds only matter to some extent for truck drivers, who also have to rest for a certain amount of time every few hours. But even quite "low" speed charging stations are a challenge to build if the "charging station" is quite big. The power grid must deliver enough amperes anyhow. Maybe the solution will be many small charging stations instead of a few mega stations. Here we really talk about "time will tell".
@patdbean10 сағат бұрын
@@leiflillandt1488 yes quite, from memory, the truck/hgv driver has to take 45 minutes stoped and out of the vehicle for every 4.5 hours of driving. So 2x 20 minute charges on a 500kw charger "could" be 2x 150kwh added. In those two 20 minute charge stops.
@MadonsteamrailwaysКүн бұрын
Let’s be having it!! We need a less volatile type of battery for our electric vehicles!!
@CristiCroicuКүн бұрын
how about resistance to fire and outside forces?is it as stable as an LFP ?
@PETERJOHN101Күн бұрын
Sodium is very nonvolatile so on those metrics it beats Lithium.
@CristiCroicuКүн бұрын
@@PETERJOHN101 this seems too good to be true. There is no downside to this technology…
@PETERJOHN101Күн бұрын
@@CristiCroicu Sodium is heavier than Lithium, so it's not perfect. But with fast charging, lower range won't matter anyway.
@CristiCroicuКүн бұрын
@@PETERJOHN101 it has almost same energy density to nmc batteries. So it does not matter if sodium is heavier. If it has same energy density as nmc than it is something that will change the entire battery industry
@jlamm2223443Күн бұрын
go go go We need non Chinese companies to go here since there are such high tariffs.
@leiflillandt148814 сағат бұрын
The Chinese company CATL already has factories and development centres within the EU. Three sites in Finland as an example.
@jlamm222344310 сағат бұрын
@@leiflillandt1488 good. but we need more competition. CATL seems to reign supreme right now which is not their fault. Good for them, but If the rumors are true that China poisons the Sea around the Philippines, then we need some economic clout and independence.
@johnjohansing2 күн бұрын
The best idea us to go buy one, Now!
@madmotorcyclist2 күн бұрын
China is BS'ing the world: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4Sol6qlprCFi5o and their quality kzbin.info/www/bejne/p3zEaaCMhMpoqdE and kzbin.info/www/bejne/p3zEaaCMhMpoqdE
@jerronng60362 күн бұрын
Who needs petrol??? Save the Earth. Pls figure how to safely rid this world of unwanted batteries. Thanks.
@TheMan-jz5te2 күн бұрын
With speed 120km/h the range will be 300klm 👎👎
@reactdev1012 күн бұрын
never gonna buy this car because of the ugly logo brand.
@phetbounchanthavongchantha87612 күн бұрын
2 expensive 😢
@Parture2 күн бұрын
QS has already produced a commercially viable solid state battery. Their factory is finished. Massive rollout now is expected. 24 layer cells.
@corblimey87292 күн бұрын
Sound promising
@marcomalo022 күн бұрын
Yeah right. Buy a Chinese electric car. Go ahead. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA...
@TheMan-jz5te3 күн бұрын
Maybe after 100 years 👋👋
@lufknuht59603 күн бұрын
last longer? battery doesn't die?
@fglatzel3 күн бұрын
Induction motors run without magnets and were invented by Nikola Tesla in 1888. Under what rock did you hide?
@predatorishi3 күн бұрын
These channels need to be banned. “Let’s buckle up for a math…” fucking bogus
@predatorishi3 күн бұрын
Fake news
@SurangaRanjithtrans3 күн бұрын
The EV industry should not touch both terminals at once. Then, they will not be shocked.
@Shadowxlove3 күн бұрын
The new frontier is quickly here. Great time to be alive. Let's get busy!
@cleanpaws48053 күн бұрын
Toyota is having the last laugh !!! Everyone said that they were wrong not going EVEVEV !! They continue to make hybrids, makes more sense. They have perfected the hybrid and they’re blowing GM and Ford out of the water.
@hardikvparekh863 күн бұрын
Wonderful 🎉
@Rick-qf5de3 күн бұрын
No need to have a vehicle , call girls that deliver....
@matthew041013 күн бұрын
Remember, this video is about year 2030. But with CATL condensed batteries are already in production, all these talks about year 2030 sound boring.
@filhodarosa75123 күн бұрын
Blah, blah, blah
@martinwidmer59613 күн бұрын
This video is total CRAP.... a wild carrusel of animations which have nothing to with the topic and no useful information. It is for the waste bin. Bad bad bad.
@rtqii3 күн бұрын
2:16 is a modern opposed piston swashplate axial engine of the exact type used in the Mark48 torpedo. Designed to burn Otto fuel II it produces an advertised 500 hp and propels the torpedo at an advertised speed of 65 knots (120 km per hr) ~75 mph... The torpedo is actually much faster, it uses pump-jet propulsion. Other than that few seconds of animation, which is completely unrelated to the narration, which is selling Toyotas and this is AI voiced clickbait. If you want to see how a torpedo is driven the link is above.
@Ray88G3 күн бұрын
Complete and utter waste of time Most likely written by F Ai.. Nothings
@markuc3 күн бұрын
Hahaha every week you come up with something newer and even more ridiculous. Give it up, Toyota doesn't innovate anymore. It's an old company with a bag full of outdated patents and piles of debt. It thrived on engineering and precision last century, but now is an empty shell led by greedy capitalists...