I would say fixing the water shortage especially from the atmospheric as what's it removing as the ocean drinks that Spanish rome city with out water treatment management to farm land water irrigation systems which should be on higher 95% efficient system to seasonal vegetables that could yeild 5 time that per m2 while Apple trees are a little more complicated to a ground drain vs off run contamination so????end up like Hobart fisheries or get a real aquarium tank to real boys math to a pen treatment standard metrics 😁.
@johnlemuelm.santiago603611 күн бұрын
We can made a flight suit thats why we put it in the movies and comics
@Sam-yv8ze14 күн бұрын
European are the best! Never buy anything from china❤🎉😊!
@butchfajardo883216 күн бұрын
Can this handle a typhoon?
@eniolaomotilewa467119 күн бұрын
for me to use the virtual anylzer it requires me to subscribe
@saundrayork165420 күн бұрын
Thank you for this video and for the research links
@bernardayala112820 күн бұрын
Total lie. This has been debunked several times! No significant amount of water produced. This is Debunked Science! Mostly a scam to get you to buy this junk!
@orionvick26422 күн бұрын
Would love to be able too contact the gentleman in the video because I have a ton of questions to ask 🎉
@jwaltermeansbiz27 күн бұрын
Waiea Water only sells the best of the best !! I’ve had two different machines by them
@RedRyanАй бұрын
This could be extremely helpful and really change the outlook on water. It would be revolutionary in wartime as well
@MockBrainworthyАй бұрын
Why not related to volume of absorber? Micron thin vs meter thick performs same?
@ВалерийВовк-ш8цАй бұрын
Let's look at some numbers. Since this panel does not generate water, but extracts it from the air, the amount of water will depend on the humidity of the air. Let's assume that the humidity is 30%. At this humidity (and a temperature of 30 degrees Celsius), 2 gallons of water are contained in... 841 cubic meters of air. Most likely, the panel does not extract all the water from the air that passes through it. Let's assume that the panel extracts 50% of the moisture from the air. Then, to get 2 gallons of water, 1682 cubic meters of air must be passed through the panel. On average, 1 cubic meter of air contains about 100 micrograms of dust. In less dusty areas, this figure drops to 5 micrograms, but in dustier areas (for example, deserts) - up to 1000 micrograms. But on average, it is about 100 micrograms per cubic meter of air. If you pass 1600 cubic meters of air through the panel every day, then the unit will get... ummm 58 kilograms of dust per year. Of course, some of the dust will come out. But some will remain. Let's say half will remain. But 29 kilograms of dust is also a lot. Where will this dust end up? In the collected water? Most likely - no. Most likely, there should be a coarse filter there that will collect all this dust. But... how often should it be changed, if we assume that 29 kg of dust needs to be collected (80 grams daily)? Perhaps some of these 29 kilograms will remain inside the panel. So... won't this reduce the panel's throughput? Will fungi and colonies of other microorganisms appear in the panel? And 29 kg of dust is an indicator for an average dustiness of 100 micrograms per cubic meter of air. And what will happen in regions with a dustiness of 1000 micrograms per cubic meter? The most important thing is that replacing the filters does not seem so cheap.
@plymouthtinytiresid10traci67Ай бұрын
Lmfao in my basement we call them dehumidifiers and there cheap.
@henryjohnjoseph2547Ай бұрын
Now that is what you call quantum.👍
@GIRARDINFАй бұрын
It doesn't matter: EXO-7's wings are not something we can create with current technologies. But maybe we don’t need to go that far to take a step forward into the future. Take a look at the wing suit. They have the sensation of flying, even though they lose 15m/s with ridiculous lift. Before wanting to revolutionize everything, we can perhaps just improve things first. We have 3D design software, we have innovative materials, we have electronic sensors, we are intelligent... Wouldn't it be possible to find a human-sized solution that increases the lift to approach that of an eagle?
@davebean2886Ай бұрын
Any updates after 10 months?
@annhofland7232Ай бұрын
😎👍😊
@grahamkearnon6682Ай бұрын
Impressive, you know as soon as a maker is up & running, a massive oil cheque will be offered so it can be shutdown & hidden.
@TBoneZoneАй бұрын
How about extracting water from the air when driving a vehicle?
@douglascutler1037Ай бұрын
A good start but let's go for 5 in 1. Add on board energy storage and heat pump energy extraction for warm water. Then send an armada of several thousand into the path of oncoming hurricanes to attenuate their energy by what? Maybe 1 or 2%. Just joking. Neil deGrasse Tyson recently complained about lack of engineering plans to extract energy from hurricanes. Love Neil but he was swinging wildly on this one.
@flemmingqvist8326Ай бұрын
3 small and inefficient energisystemt that each only generates close to nothing. But combining them in one unit - and POW miracle happens. It grows to a Gigantic Powerhouse. Gratulations !
@douglascutler1037Ай бұрын
Right. These "inefficient" renewables now surpassing 100% energy requirements in certain regions within specific time frames, said time frames growing larger.
@anjanettebenjamin868Ай бұрын
How do you recharge these battery
@Think666_Ай бұрын
How does the cost of this compare to the cleanest form of reliable energy? Nuclear £65-75 per megawatt-hour (MWh) levelized cost of energy (LCOE).
@Think666_Ай бұрын
PS. for reference Gates' new plant opening 2028 if things go well will produce 345MWh for 60 years with an NRE of about $4B after operating costs will probably be about 20-30% cheaper that the LOCE quoted above.
@douglascutler1037Ай бұрын
For several years now the International Energy Agency (IEA) has declared solar energy as the cheapest for of electricity bar none. Including nuclear. Wind, solar and storage only continuing to get cheaper since the original announcement. And who is the IEA? The IEA is a long-standing, industry-standard, go-to data aggregator and forecaster for all things related to the global energy sector. All the pros in business, investment and government turn to the IEA when they need reliable energy data. The IEA has historically favoured legacy energy like oil, gas, nuclear and hydro in their projections. But now they especially say SOLAR IS CHEAPEST! Look it up.
@Think666_Ай бұрын
@@douglascutler1037 I just went to their (levelised-cost-of-electricity-calculator) page and Nuclear seems to be top of the list... Number 1 with 28.18 LCOE: Sweden, Nuclear, LTO (20 years), (1000 MW) Sweden - Nuclear - $28.18/MWh Denmark - Wind - $29.18/MWh Switzerland - Nuclear - $29.60/MWh France - Nuclear - $30.65/MWh Norway - Wind - $30.76/MWh Sweden - Nuclear - $31.36/MWh USA - Nuclear - $33.25/MWh Switzerland - Nuclear - $33.53/MWh Brazil - Wind - $33.59/MWh France - Solar - $33.94/MWh This is a really useful tool.
@Think666_Ай бұрын
@@douglascutler1037 My detailed reply to you was deleted... according to IEA nuclear still dominates as the most cost effective reliable solution. levelised-cost-of-electricity-calculator Sweden Nuclear LTO (20 years) (1000 MW) 28.18 USD/MWh Useful website though, thank you.
@skasteve6528Ай бұрын
If you lose the turbines and made it smaller maybe some sort of rigid inflatable, so it could be air transportable, I could see limited use for one of these in disaster relief scenarios. Apart from that, I don't see the point.
@danielstapler4315Ай бұрын
The wind turbines will hinder the solar panels - this looks like BS. If this comes into existence let me know.
@pr5991Ай бұрын
Show us the real not ai
@pr5991Ай бұрын
That wind turbines shading the panels is great idea!
@synergyfiles3536Ай бұрын
True. But the masts can be made longer
@jedics1Ай бұрын
And those turbines aren't going to create chronic shading at all....Such an obviously bad idea.
@halcon2134Ай бұрын
That is a very bad idea because there is a lack of tidal, geothermal, nuclear, gas, oil, alcohol , biomass, and bicycles.
@skasteve6528Ай бұрын
Yes that and the lack of tea making facilities, means it's a no from me.
@zombi3lif3Ай бұрын
🥰
@gurbanliyeАй бұрын
Everything is a lie. We do not have a water shortage. We have bussines that bottles water of any kind that separated from the stream for a long time. At least you can calculate how many million tonnes of water bottled by Cola company for beverages each day. Now multiply it by the number that does this bussiness. That is your water that you were looking for.
@joshpinchuk7061Ай бұрын
So cool!
@rjung_chАй бұрын
Thanks for another interesting video, I like this 3 in 1 solution indeed. Cheers 👍💪✌
@synergyfiles3536Ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@parrotraiser6541Ай бұрын
Indigenous reserves in Canada have problems with drinking water supply. This might help them.
@RandLoreTwoАй бұрын
I would be interested in learning more about this product in advance of a purchase. Please send more purchase information.
@jamessmith5554Ай бұрын
What happens to the fumes from your heater, thanks
@chrisconklin2981Ай бұрын
Regarding long duration battery storage. Just watched a video about Sage Geothermal company. They are working on geothermal electricity. They also mention the possibility of using geothermal for long duration energy storage.
@hattifattener1Ай бұрын
5 kilowatts from 9 square meters of swept area? are you crazy?
@ChrisEbbrsenАй бұрын
Thank you for fastenating report on hydrogel. Clean drinking water is paramount for health.
@michaelvanallen6400Ай бұрын
*All practical tests show that small wind turbines hardly generate any electricity! Because there is hardly any wind close to the ground.* It is also extremely gusty, which usually shortens the service life extremely! 9 out of 10 systems no longer work after a few years. *Due to the extreme drop in the price of solar panels, they produce at approx. 2% to 5% of the cost of small wind turbines!* Reliable and almost maintenance-free for 25+ years!
@pr5991Ай бұрын
Solar panels and Lithium iron phosphate battery has life of 30 years plus, in Australia you can get free solar panels and cheap lithium batteries. I have 8kw solar and 15kwh battery and I run everything in the house including cooking all year round, yes in winter some days can be sun less, only those days I wish I have temporary wind energy.
@UkepaАй бұрын
what a breakthrough this would be !!!
@madmarvdesignsАй бұрын
It's a shame there's so little experimental data proving this works...where is it? Also White paint is unattractive in many conditions...we need a clear coat that works effectively so that everyone will use it and it will work for any color...Also most heat gains 48%-87% come from windows not the roof or walls so why not just block all the heat from windows instead?
@rjung_chАй бұрын
I really like this design, but it is assumed the wind mostly comes from the same direction? Thank you.
@pankajpiyush3772Ай бұрын
A I can be used to monitor the direction of wind and can be managed with a servo motor at the mounting shaft
@kimdonaghyrealtor8238Ай бұрын
Excellent explanation and video. Thank you.
@synergyfiles3536Ай бұрын
No it turns into the direction of the wind by itself
@rjung_chАй бұрын
@@synergyfiles3536 well then it's perfect, thanks for the answer.
@pankajpiyush3772Ай бұрын
@@synergyfiles3536 Great 👍
@patrickday4206Ай бұрын
This technology will cause droughts
@RynaxAlienАй бұрын
So Nicola Tesla was right after all! Be like Tesla, go vegan.
@CarolinaSmith-r8nАй бұрын
Very informative! It will relieve the drought problems in the Philippines!
@michaelvanallen6400Ай бұрын
*Nonsense! All practical tests show that small wind turbines hardly generate any electricity, because hardly any wind blows close to the ground.* Moreover, the wind is extremely gusty, which almost always greatly reduces the service life. Only those who MUST be off grid in winter should install a large wind turbine on a high tower. Otherwise: Forget wind power! *Solar systems, on the other hand, reliably generate over 25 -30 years electricity at approx. 3 to 8 cents/kWh.* Reliable and extremely low-maintenance.
@mikeguitar9769Ай бұрын
I believe I discovered or invented a better design, but even then, it’s a very niche use-case and otherwise not competitive with commonly known methods of obtaining fresh water.
@mikeguitar9769Ай бұрын
People understand that leaving the faucet to run down the sewer is wasteful, but they don’t understand that letting rainwater run down the sewer without use is basically the same kind of wastefulness.