Good evening Father Patrick and Father Michael. I’m watching this in three sittings, a very thorough extra-long talk. A very illuminating discussion, which follows The Royal Path, always good to hear the various opinions and practices, and understanding the traditional normative practice and if and when Economia is in reality properly possible, and where and when it is not a safe practice. Also, important point made upon personal responsibility and being broadly informed, and caveats against blind obedience that are not grounded in the Canons and historical practice correctly applied. 🙏☦️🙂
@TumeheRongonui2 ай бұрын
Thank you father 🙏
@TumeheRongonui2 ай бұрын
Thank you father 🙏your blessing, tu & judy
@nikolaosaggelopoulos81133 ай бұрын
Christ is one hypostasis and one prosopon but you are saying these two are not meaning the same thing, that is correct. I am not sure how to best define hypostasis, Wikipedia does not have a clear defnition. It is like a characteristic quality, a unique qualitative identity but different from essense (substance). So the Father and Son are of the same essense (substance) but different hypostasis because the Father creates through the Son. Christ has two natures, human and divine. I was not aware that Nestorianism claimed two hypostases but one nature. So that is the other way around from Orthodox and Catholic Christianity but perhaps the meanings of hypostasis and nature are different in how the Nestorian Church and the Apostolic Churches understand them. Having said all that, I feel sorry for his excommunication by his Church, it seems very harsh.
@FatherMichaelOrthodox3 ай бұрын
Thank you, Nikolaos, for your comment.
@FaithfulComforter4 ай бұрын
❤️🔥
@KaterinaAmbrose4 ай бұрын
15.02 Monday, UK. Dear Fr. Michael, and Fr. Patrick, bless! A very interesting and informative discussion, many thanks. 🙏☦️