You don't Even read it

BANGER!!! I wish i had come across this channel long before

Was off to a good start but the criticism of ‘tidy your own room’ disintegrating into an argument of establishment and economic problems was well… a bit off the mark

Na I am sorry. I know the idea of people abstaining from joining a culture war that creates hate and vitriol, serves no purpose to the individual, doesn't better their lives, pushes them into a preconceived set of beliefs and only serves as a psuedo - self righteousness goldmine offends the F out of people who's identity and ego are completely tied to their political views but... Ya. We exist. This whole video was just a caserole of logical and srgumentstive fallacies...but those two things are like the sword and shield for politically driven drones so i shouldnt be surprised.

What "lesser-evilism" functions to do, in actual practice, is give the self-proclaimed "lesser evil" carte blanche to commit whatever horrific atrocities they wish, on whatever scale they desire, all while marketing themselves as heroes for doing so. It is beyond mere cruelty; it is abject sadism.

Wow nice half story!

So Karl marx was a capitalist with dident Unterstand Kapitalisem got it

Well....that Thumbnail was personal😂🤣

Hey man your content is great but i just wanna put my point that if an author says to "Clean your room or surroundings" In order to maintain focus so whats wrong with that ? It's an advice then why you took that statement too restictively harmfull or serious ? May be unfair ! Btw plz dont mind i just wanna make sure what the actual reality is.

Content on par with hair style. Well done, comrade!

this is BS meybe the elite was nomanig woriers and owner of menny goodst and cows

Good discussion, do Mohenjo Daro and Crete next and you might have something.

Of course hunter gatherers lived in "primitive Communism", for starters, they did not have a massive surplus so there would be no hierarchical class system developed, and so after the initial agricultural revolution it would of taken time for the state and therefore class society to develop. Of course the means of production would of been common. Engles historical analysis was generally correct (although specifics may vary)

I like how I'm halfway through the video and I'm not hearing about what the video said I was going to be hearing about

I find applying modern economitics to ancient models is often inaccurate, but I'm willing to listen; People with bigger houses 🤔 Priestly caste 🤔

You can call proto-communist but does not work that simple in this complex development of stage of our world. Everyone wanted communism went solution to be like spartan state.

I know this has nothing to do with the video.... But Indians in 2024 have the best hair on Earth. I'm always jealous.

Great video. i think it's very valuable to view Çatalhöyük as a society that is in the process of observable transformation from primitive communism to a sedetary way of first class societies, maintaining the "egalitarian" superstructure while undergoing profound changes in foundation.

We commies are the ultimate conservatives: too conservative for even warlordism-landownerism-patriarchy (slaveism = feudalism, no real difference), we demand the real deal and will settle for nothing else. Also Vasconic, which also produced many other ancient communist or somewhat socialist societies, such as Cucuteni or later the Farmer Revolutionary Free Zone in Vasconia-Cantabria, product of the 5th century Bagauda and which was focused on persistence of the family farmstead (against feudalism but also against atomization by split inheritance), participative democracy and collectivist work (auzolan), judging for its legacy which, albeit mutilated, has reached present day. Said that, it's not an ethnic issue: Vasconic societies also developed class and hierarchy in other contexts, from El Argar to Varna. Such degeneracy was surely unavoidable as the Metal Ages arrived and the militarist tendencies became dominant, bringing patriarchy and slavery/serfdom. In a sense the ancient notion of the "ages of man", with degeneracy taking over from a legendary Golden Age to the very violent and cruel Iron Age, is real and happened everywhere.

Propaganda

communism and paradise in the sam sentence lmfao

This stuff is like what Dawn of Everything talks about right? These old civs are so cool

Thank you for the great video! Your channel like a breath of fresh air for me, I enjoy every piece you produce. I have a question about theoretical possibility of a classless society. Classless equals in practice to monoclass, since all the members of society enjoy the same economical conditions. But doesn't it contradicts the dialectics where everything has its opposite? We can define proletariat in contrast to bourgeoisie and vice versa, but how could we define a member of a classless / monoclass society?

Great video! I also agree that classless society does not necessarily equate to a violence free society. The scope of possible human societal configurations is very large, and I could easily imagine a fairly economically classless society wherein violence is an important religious or cultural practice and not directly the result of class conflict. Also, the gender findings are very interesting! It does seem as though the society was fairly egalitarian when it comes to gender. Though I suspect there is a gender imbalance when it comes to the scars of violent attack. Did any of the sources in your research specifically mention the gender distribution of the head trauma found in the later period of the settlement’s history?

Egg heads getting hundreds of millions killed for over a hundred years . But if you try it out. It will work this time

Love you videos also finished how to read marx thanks for the recommendation.

Just found your channel while I was looking for videos about lesser evil voting and I loved your work! Will definitely watch your other videos. so much has changed in US politica since youve made this video but it still is true. I wanted to add the 2023 Turkish elections as an example for this too. KK was a relatively progressive candidate running against Erdogan who has been in seat over 22 years now. People demanded for another running candidate but KK did not listen. That was the last time I voted for lesser evil bc he lost by a landslide bc his voting base did not bargain for smth better. I now know as much as voting is my right, withholding my vote until a candidate actually does what we ask them to is also my right. Thanks again for the video.

how often do you find "Uncoditional love" and how often do you find greed and exploitation? we only cooperate when we get something out of it for ourselves, there might be exceptions but that doesnt mean its human nature to act selflessly

This whole critique seems really biased and manipulative. Especially to posit that all postmodernist thought is in the aim of capitalism. I think there are useful things to take from both philosophies and individual philosophers without being a card carrying member of either mode of thought. I think postmodernism proves itself useful by that merit alone, not to mention the fact that it seems fucking impossible to find anyone on this god abandoned hellhole website who can actually describe either of these fucking concepts objectively without inserting some sort of ideological bias People come to these videos to learn and are inevitably manipulated

Amazing channel. Will be watching most videos

I’m apolitical due to mental health focus. Politics does not stress me out, but I’ve determined that if I cannot effectively navigate my own life, I have no position making decisions on behalf of broad society. I’m very content to influence people who know me and forge meaningful reciprocal relationships that work for the benefit of all parties. This is not an arrogant isolationist attitude nor one that ignores reality. It’s simply a pragmatic choice of focus.

This is a gem

Just because your life is shape around politics doesn’t mean you need to be involved for example a person life can be shape by religion as a child but it may affect them but you don’t have to be involved

Lysenko didn't destroy or ruin genetics in the USSR, he just represented the Michurinist Proletarian trend in Biological science, Soviet science Socialist science. Bourgeois science is the one that upholds Idealism with their chromosome(now DNA) Theory of heredity. Also, even Bourgeois scientists don't say he ruined Soviet science(only more Reactionary Idealist sections) they say he was "incorrect about X or Y." **The Problem of Lysenkoism** by Richard Lewontin & Richard Levins > During the war years, the Soviet Union suffered a catastrophic loss of productivity while it was recovering in the United States. Then, beginning in 1950, both countries began a period of rapidly increasing yields which kept pace with each other, the Soviet increases being somewhat higher. *We should note that 1948 - 62, the period of Lysenkoist hegemony in Soviet agrobiology, actually corresponds to the period of most rapid growth in yields per acre!* Moreover, even a time-delay hypothesis, supposing that the effects of Lysenkoism on genetical research are felt only later, is at variance with the observed continued growth in yields per acre. The data in the table are even more remarkable if it is noted that, during this period, the total acreage occupied by wheat increased in the Soviet Union from 30 million to nearly 70 million hectacres, while US acreage shrank from 60 to 45 million acres. Thus increased Soviet yields have been in spite of bringing large amounts of new and marginal land into cultivation, while the opposite process was going on in the United States. > > While there may be particular crops and situations where Lysenkoist doctrines prevented the solution of some specific problems (breeding for disease resistance, perhaps) *there is no evidence that Soviet agriculuture was, in fact, damaged* and Soviet yields have followed the same upward trend as yields in other advanced technologies, chiefly as the result of massive capitalisation of agriculture, including pesticides, fertilisers and farm machinery.

There are some good ideas in them, but the main problem is the main measure of "self-help" is books is how many dollars and dating app matches one has. Some of the most vile narcissistic people on this planet love these books, but they are rotting inside.

If you remain apolitical in an opressor-opressed situation you side with the oppressor? That's utter bullocks. By thatblogic if I don't give my money to starving kids in africa I am solely responsible for their starvation. And by not donating my kidney I am a killer because I could have saved the life of a terminally ill person. Not actively helping someone is not the same as actively harming someone. I'll leave it to the politicians to actively harm us as they usually do.

Interesting. Wondering when art hasn't been a tool of propaganda? When art wasn't sponsored perhaps? Well done. Liked & subbed. 👍 (over from reddit btw)

Another phenomenal video!

Very good video, thank you.

Hell yeah comrade! So happy I found your channel

Very enlightening summary. Postmodernists wrongly interpreted the situation of capitalism through the lenses of modernism that they were all against in one sense or another. The most famous one, Foucoult, once said that if he had read the Frankfurt School, he would not have written 90% of his works. I say in my book "Digitalism vs. Capitalism" that if he had read McLuhan, he wouldn't bother to write the remaining 10%. The real basis for their wrongness is that technology determines everything. In fact, what they refer to as social determination is nonsense. because without technological infrastructure, society could not survive. Read Harold Innis. To the questions, "Where is capitalism coming and going? Going to its graveyard?" I have a hopeful answer, which is highlighted in my book: Digitalism is killing capitalism. A novel perspective, a suggestion first in the world! “Digitalism vs. Capitalism: The New Ecumenical World Order: The Dimensions of State in Digitalism” by Veysel Batmaz is available for sale on the Internet.

The lidar planes use to to see what might lie below the ground makes it appear as though there are several pyramids, possibly cities buried deep in the Amazon. I'm not saying that is El Dorado but there are definitely still things to be discovered if they are ever able to be escalated.

Garcia Amy Jones Sharon Smith Helen

Postmodernism basically was: Yeah our system doesn’t work and facts keep proving it. It must be the facts that are wrong! Fuck objectivity! 😂

Human nature is to be shaped and molded by our surrounding environment. The capitalist system rewards avarice and selfishness, which are therefore the traits people might default to in order to protect themselves from the downward pressure the system is putting on them, and conclude, erroneously, that these traits are natural to human behavior, when in reality they are natural to the _system_ of capitalism. The problem most people have is they are unable to conceive of existing within any other type of system, because they have probably never experienced it.

“Marxist theory anticipated that the dictatorship of the proletariat would be a temporary measure leading to the eventual establishment of a classless society. However, in practice, what has emerged is a new form of despotism, where the revolutionary leaders become the new ruling class. The promised end of oppression has been replaced by a new tyranny, revealing the profound limitations of Marxist thought in achieving genuine liberation.”

We are witnessing the negation of the negation in real-time right now in China as capitalism is sublated by Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, one quantitative change at a time, leading toward an eventual qualitative change thereby creating a totally socialist society (potentially by 2050, as China is targeting). The folks who love to boast that "China isn't socialist!" seem unable to comprehend what you have so eloquently elaborated on in this phenomenal video. Excellent work!