Deep reflection. Thanks for the video, keep up the good work!
@InsightsForCreatives2 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@Deepfriedfunk5 күн бұрын
Looks like Kyle Gass at the beginning
@meninagreen57045 күн бұрын
These are actually good insights. Thanks!
@johnbland7149 күн бұрын
& in a million years you could write I compare thee to a day off with pay !
@getkraken806420 күн бұрын
How to SELL great fiction is another great point. J.K. Rowling herself just about didn't even get Harry Potter published.
@petersheely724626 күн бұрын
👍😳
@Yourbankaccount27 күн бұрын
Is this voiced by AI? 😢
@InsightsForCreatives26 күн бұрын
I don’t have the money for a voice actor!
@maggiebryan235527 күн бұрын
Greatest of them all dylan
@frankforster133627 күн бұрын
Well done!
@tomlewis4748Ай бұрын
That's all great advice. She knows what it takes. I agree, and I do all those things all the time in my writing. While I wholeheartedly agree that empathy is important (and I believe it is one of the most important things to engender in the reader), there is one place where that just does not work-first-person villains. Empathy is the strongest tool for getting your reader to bond with your protagonist, and is usually accomplished by giving them problems to deal with. That bonding should happen as early as you can manage it, early in ch 1. But in first-person, there will be no empathy for the villains. Since everything in first-person comes from the mind of the protagonist, there is no way they can have empathy for them, assuming the villains are premeditated. Would your protagonist feel for the villain and respect how much the villain loves his mother while he has a gun pointed at their head? Likely not, meaning redeeming qualities in a villain are also not likely to make it into a story narrated by a protagonist. People who are out to murder them or make their lives miserable are pretty much always going to be nothing more than black hats to a first-person narrator/protagonist. Anything else would just be ridiculous. Giving villains redeeming qualities can make them more realistic, that is true. But that is not going to be the way a first-person narrator/protagonist is going to see them, and not the way they tell us about them. If it were, the story itself would not be realistic. But, well, there might be exceptions, such as when the villain doesn't really act premeditated. One that comes to mind is a terrific performance by Donny Wahlberg in The Sixth Sense. Yes, the character does shoot his psychiatrist, played by Bruce Willis, but BW's character has tons of empathy for his patient-at least up until he gets murdered by him. The DW character is not premeditated. He's just broken, and therefore, dangerous. Of course, Rowling wrote in third-person, and the difference here is The Sixth Sense is a movie, and movies are not in third or first-person. They are in objective POV or camera POV, which is entirely neutral. If that sort of scene appeared in a first-person novel, though, that could be an exception. Other than rare scenarios like that, a first-person protagonist/narrator will likely have zero empathy for the villain and also will not ponder their possible redeeming qualities as they plot how to prevail over them. Readers/viewers might have empathy for them, but that will not be on the page in a first-person story.
@skeller61Ай бұрын
Dexter would beg to differ with your statement that first person villains can’t be empathetic. I think the idea is that unless you create a black and white cartoon character, which wouldn’t be very interesting, you can help your reader understand how the character became who they are. The reader doesn’t have to agree with your chapter’s decisions to have empathy, but only to understand why they are making the decisions they make. Also, and I struggle with this myself, you could have said the same thing in one or two paragraphs.
@tomlewis4748Ай бұрын
@@skeller61 I'm sorry, did I make a 'statement that first person [sic] villains can't be empathetic'? The 'statement' I remember making was something completely different, which is that first-person narrators are typically not going to see their mortal enemies as empathetic or ponder their 'redeeming qualities', unless the narrator is unfocused, possibly insane, and is most likely a terrible main character who will scuttle any attempt at the reasonable storytelling that is commonly expected in a first-person novel, which would reveal that the author is not up to the job. That, and that since all information is funneled through the protagonist, the reader won't get it from other sources, either. Maybe 'beg to differ' with what I actually said rather than what you are incorrectly claiming I said. We can take the TV show, 'Dexter' off the table. Dexter was never a story told in first-person, except in the novels. I thought the show was brilliant and the novels were, 'meh'. And regardless how Dexter himself might have felt, as the narrator in first-person novels, I think it would be hard to find moments where he expressed empathy for child molesters (first victim in the first novel and first episode), so I don't see any way, since all info comes from the protagonist, where any of that could end up on the page. Every single first-person story adapted to film is moved completely out of the realm of first-person and into the realm of camera POV, which is a completely different thing than first-person POV. In the rare film and TV where there is voiceover narration, such as Dexter, which did it really well, that does not place them in the realm of first-person. It's similar, but it's not first-person. There are scenes in the show that Dexter is not even in, taking it even farther from the realm of first-person. Any scene in a first-person novel that the narrator/protagonist is not in can only be told as a frame story directly to the protagonist then potentially retold to the reader. So a villain in the TV show, Dexter can certainly be painted as sympathetic, even if the lead character of Dexter might not see them that way, because this is storytelling very different from first-person, where all POV comes from the protagonist instead of from the camera. And in a first-person novel, there are still plenty of opportunities to show how a villain became who they became. Dialogue with other characters where elements of their past come out, a 'speech in praise of the villain' scene where an underling praises them or the villain praises themself and reveals things, and a 'hero at the mercy of the villain' scene where they praise themselves. But good luck getting the person narrating the story to the reader, the protagonist, to show that they feel any empathy for them or to wax poetic about their redeeming qualities, as they are the only conduit through which all story elements flow. You are not required to read posts. That's up to you. When commenters comment, they. have. the. floor. There is no effing countdown timer ticking. There are zero restrictions on how much a poster might feel the need to say. If you know what you're saying, there's no need to struggle with anything other than making sure you believe everything you're saying is relevant. Someone unable to make anything other than a single weak, rambling, unfocused point condemning someone for making multiple points, all of which they feel are relevant, is nothing less than reprehensible.
@DAGDRUM53Ай бұрын
3:20 & 4:53 are the only two times the AI voices pronounces Rowling's name correctly.
@elauriesАй бұрын
Brilliant :)
@jerroldhewson3600Ай бұрын
who gives a fuck what she thinks nowadays
@wespenre3418Ай бұрын
He nailed it. He explains the human creative Spirit perfectly. As an artist myself, I agree with Tolkien's profound insights 100%. Thanks for a wonderfully composed video on this subject!
@InsightsForCreativesАй бұрын
Thank you!
@wadewithcoffee12072 ай бұрын
Tolkien is a very deep thinker awesome thank you for the upload exactly why I create art. It greatly improves my thoughts and ideas about life and living. He was a gift from God ❤
@InsightsForCreatives2 ай бұрын
Couldn't agree more!
@heyall39142 ай бұрын
Fantastic analysis. Thank you.
@taliabeaumont16172 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@flame-sky71482 ай бұрын
Yea Miles started it with the Birth of Cool that was actually recorded in 1949-1950, but was released seven years later. Getz, Baker and Mulligan took it over as Miles went some place else. It's sort of like the same thing with jazz fusion. Zawinul, Shorter, Mclaughlin, Corea and Hancock would take fusion some place else after In a Silent Way/Bitches Brew sessions.
@rawbones41174 ай бұрын
Great little video. I'm a big fan of Americana, as a wide genre, and have always been a fan of the "Heartland Rock" genre. Even though growing up I always just figured it was "classic rock". A lot of people, even nowadays, don't appreciate classifying some of the heartland rockers into their own genre. Which I feels robs them of their achievements as a cultural movement. Lots of people just go "it's just rock" or "Dad rock" and leave it at that. Heartland rock isn't really a solid term but it's a definite feeling / aesthetic. It's one of those things where you can definitely recognize it when it's there. Also wanted to point out it's ties to country artists. Steve Earle and Joe Ely are the two country boys who leaned into the style the most. Earle with his album Exit 0, and Ely with his Lord of the Highway album. Ely in particular is crucial for nailing the specifics of the sound when in comparison with his other albums. It sticks out considerably.
@Great_PatBingsoo4 ай бұрын
The music is completely incongruent with the topic. It is triggering my suppressed anger.
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
Hehe, so it is a chance to explore how to process anger in healthy manner
@IndianOutlaw18705 ай бұрын
Blood Meridian has more similes than Disney World has tourists.
@millennial84419 ай бұрын
The first one that popped me up in jazz was Chet Barker.
@nickmills84769 ай бұрын
I hear this a lot, but I have a suspicion that it’s also Musk’s master of systems thinking combined with first principles thinking. We often hear Musk talking about the importance of efficiency in manufacturing as a cost cutting driver - this is systems thinking in action. Maybe you could say first principles guided systems thinking.
@tokyoroslynttv Жыл бұрын
Im already fully suppressed like really bad how do i reverse it i cant get it to come out
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
Just feel it. Our explanations are messing it, our expectations, our greed - our unrealistic views how life works are messing us up. We think that now we will become rich and we will poop money.
@Israel-nw4ci Жыл бұрын
🎊 *PromoSM*
@dominiknewfolder2196 Жыл бұрын
I admire Mate, but he is delusional in this case. Women are allowing themselves to be angry because they are able to tolerate anger longer than men. Because of stronger male reaction to being angry they are forced by body to resolve anger. Women can hold to "being victimized" for years without letting go, which is learned skill. It's opposite, being "victimized" is virtue for women today. Instead of forgiving they ruminate for decades about being "abused" as a child. My God, from time of Jesus nothing changed 😅 In order to be healthy you MUST forgive and bless your enemies. Or else We move backwards in psychology by sanctifying resentment towards everyone who is suspected of "hurting" us. Nope, I can't agree. Probably he is blinded by his love to victimized mommy. I would understood because that was exactly my problem.
@InsightsForCreatives Жыл бұрын
Do you really think forgiveness is possible for really terrible things? Some things are just too bad to forgive
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
Sounds like a lot of repressed anger here.
@dominiknewfolder21964 ай бұрын
@@ranc1977 Yep, because expressing any anger means "repression" 😅 Especially towards mommy. Sure thing dude. I like your cover way of insulting me 😉
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
@@dominiknewfolder2196 It does not matter whether it is repression or suppression to person who is doing this. This is mostly done unconsciously or as operant conditioning - so it is mixture of both in the same time. The cure is the same for both condition - so it really does not matter for healing. Secondly, I do not insult anyone. I do not know you. And I do not care who you are or what you want. I am discussing here general ideas - not Ad Hominems.
@dominiknewfolder21964 ай бұрын
@@ranc1977 "Diagnosing" your interlocutor may be easly seen as insult and usually is. Like you did. Essense of ad hominem, isnt it? But it doesnt matter. Lets forget abut that. Repression in society is rampant and its caused by women. Proof? Try to say single critical word to woman without being accused of being narcissist or threaten in some way. Try it Now imagine how mommy reacts to childs complaint. I don't need because I've seen it. Silent treatment and witholding of affection is usual measure. You can do it without making your hands dirty and with making kid feel guilty. It's exactly how repression is usually fostered in people. Adding to that "I'm doing so much for you" and we have exactly what causes majority of mental disorders in youth. Do yourself another favour. Walk around your neighbourhood and listen. You will for sure hear some woman screaming on kid. Usually short walk is enaugh. Victim pose is perfect place to hide when you are monster. Mothers abusing children are always "victimized" by them. The same is actually true for female teachers who had it sooooo hard. I'm laughing because cult of female mrtyrdom is exactly what created perfect space for punishless violence. Dont judge mothers because they have it sooo hard. Mate is part of that. So fck him Major part of toxicity in our culture is psychology meaning looking for places where you were "victimized" or "abused". Just pick one book from psychology shelf at random Now those morons are working on searching generations before, three are usually "enaugh" :) Those are all excuses for violence. Nothing but retributive "justice" Far cry from Jesus and his "forgive". He condemned only one group: moralizers. Not thiefs, prostitutes but moralizers. Today he would for sure found "caring" theraphists as wolfs in sheep cloth. For sure :) Good people treat other well. They arn't looking actively for wrongdoings in others. Speaking how "you were victimized" is rarely doing anything good other that providing luxuary jobs for the most "caring" professionals.
@big8dog887 Жыл бұрын
Nicely done. I'd throw in Creedence as kind of a bridge from the Dylan folk era to the Springsteen heartland era. Not sure if CCR would be strictly classified as Heartland Rock, but you'd be hard pressed to find a fan of one who wasn't also a fan of the other.
@Vitamincontrol1 Жыл бұрын
Great read
@percivalthelegend7001 Жыл бұрын
i have alot of difficult rage to get thru i need him!
@killer_loli Жыл бұрын
Everyone say the jazz music suck I actually enjoying it calming my head.
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
But it ends up like watching two very interesting movies in the same time, side by side - not focusing on either
@njamofficial Жыл бұрын
great video! thanks!
@jimmypinero Жыл бұрын
Great analysis. But I still think that McCarthy's overall style (except for maybe "No Country For Old Men") is not the "minimalistic" and "simplistic" style that critics love to tout him with. His prose is extremely poetic, and thus, at times, very complicated (again, "No Country for Old Men being one of the few exceptions). There's absolutely nothing wrong with that; but I just wish critics would stop calling his writing style "simple," because, in my opinion, it is not. The great American minimalist novelists would be writers like Ernest Hemingway, Pete Dexter, Elie Wiesel, Walter Tevis, and Phillip Roth, to name a few. A lay person could read those writers' works and get it the first time around. I would never advise a beginning reader to pick up a Cormac book; that'd be like introducing a fledgling reader to the world of literature by handing them a collection of poems by William Blake. Pete Dexter has a famous quote: "I know what beautiful lyrical writing is, and I don't even try to do that. I try to make each sentence as clear as it can be, because the integrity of the book is tied to the clarity of each individual sentence." I would venture to say that though McCarthy's sentences are concise, they are not by any stretch of the imagination CLEAR most of the time (No Country being the exception), but rather "poetic" and "lyrical". Add to that the fact that he goes out of his way to break all the rules associated with punctuation... it can make for a very frustrating reading experience at times. And this coming from me, a voracious reader and published author. Having said that, great post! LOL.
@breeeegs10 ай бұрын
Elie Wiesel wrote a lot of his books in French, not English.
@nswayze2218 Жыл бұрын
Surpressed not repressed
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
Suppressed - when we try to remove anger actively thinking how to do that. Repressed - when we remove anger without being aware of it.
@gogogolyra1340 Жыл бұрын
I hate the jazz music!
@trippytrueman4422 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, deserves so much more recognition!
@Tamales212 жыл бұрын
What about my sadness.
@InsightsForCreatives2 жыл бұрын
definitely repress your sadness
@sue1657 Жыл бұрын
what are you sad about
@ranc19774 ай бұрын
Feel it.
@edieandy12 жыл бұрын
Oh no no music behind
@bgarcia9512 жыл бұрын
Music ruins the video
@qanishque2 жыл бұрын
hey liam, really enjoy your videos! cheers! 🍻
@62Cristoforo2 жыл бұрын
Maté is the most relevant teacher/healer today, and his message should be shouted from the roof tops. In some of his lectures he elucidates and describes the mechanisms and causes of cancer, ground breaking information, and gets a few hundred views. Blows my mind.
@62Cristoforo2 жыл бұрын
The body is connected to the mind? Wow. Now I’ve heard everything.
@jennytaylor33242 жыл бұрын
I know! Now somebody's going to have to break it to the medical profession. Good luck to them, I say.😁
@vendrameister Жыл бұрын
@@jennytaylor3324 hahah
@n.p.mackenzie6 ай бұрын
Buddha and the Ancient Greeks and all eastern philosophies enter the room 2000 years later hearing western ‘scientists’ ‘discovered that the mind and body are connected: 💁♂️
@philip43242 жыл бұрын
p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶m̶ 💦
@danielbailey57222 жыл бұрын
You are doing some good work, keep it up🖒
@lorraine16512 жыл бұрын
RAIN is taught by Tara Brach: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e6TPoH2Hd9iIpLc
@InsightsForCreatives2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I'll check that out
@bugnut822 жыл бұрын
Good vid, but music is bullshit
@jadek58222 жыл бұрын
Great info! Please get rid of happy jazz! 🎶
@InsightsForCreatives2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, that music may have been a bad choice
@NTO01g2 жыл бұрын
@@InsightsForCreatives i disagree with Jade K on this one, music was good
@priscilladisciglio72572 жыл бұрын
Another words “shadow work”
@queenmplite34992 жыл бұрын
Anyone triggered by the music choice has inner work to do. Lol 😂 Thank you for the video.
@avanm420 Жыл бұрын
I find the music too distracting. Hard to focus on content.
@PinkFlowers3652 жыл бұрын
ty
@swamibendananda13682 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Keep it up! Subbed
@graemegladman2 жыл бұрын
Elon Musk has not had to invent the wheel but has learnt how to stop it squeaking. He has made his mark on the world by answering just one question. How can I make it better? He has made existing technology usable by following this principle.
@emmagoldman66162 жыл бұрын
Thank you....all of this is facts.....and helpful...