Samuel Cantor

Пікірлер

@cvb777 24 күн бұрын

Dummett must have had a brandy before the conversation.

@felixpotter6420 Ай бұрын

such a good video.

@ChrisSargent-f5j Ай бұрын

Walker Sandra Perez Daniel Thomas Kenneth

@sasanrahmatian312 3 ай бұрын

How many doctorate degrees in philosophy are you supposed to have to understand all the fancy terminology used in this conversation? What happened to lucidity? Also: They reject truth, but are they not uttering every single sentence meaning it and wanting it to be true?!

@Phi792 3 ай бұрын

This discussion very much feels like a meet-up between a fantasy-book author and an avid fan, where the fan has read and discussed the literature so much that they start to try to correct the author on their world-building 😂 I like McDowell's work a lot and his passion for Davidson's work really showed here.

@KaiWatson 4 ай бұрын

Is anyone here from the Rorty-Davidson conversation on Philosophical Overdose?

@Fofenk 7 ай бұрын

Teo neden bakır'ı tek başına bıraktı? Az önce müttefiğiz dedi şimdi de ölün daha değerlş diyor. Hiçbir sey anlamadım.

@danielsacilotto3196 7 ай бұрын

Jesus Christ McDowell is insufferably indulgent and unclear.

@die_schlechtere_Milch 8 ай бұрын

Just imagine having written "On Two Dogmas of Empiricism" or "Truth and Meaning" yourself. One simply cannot doubt the greatness of these men!

@victorsauvage1890 8 ай бұрын

Good

@TheYoungIdealist 9 ай бұрын

I really wish McDowell would have let Davidson speak more in this video as opposed to interrupting him every time he speaks. This video is just McDowell stumbling and muttering ...

@ReflectiveJourney 9 ай бұрын

Pretty great discussion. Interestingly this also kinda practically proves the Davidson's thesis as this was uninterpretable 2 yrs ago lol

@firstal3799 10 ай бұрын

Good

@ghamessmona Жыл бұрын

❤❤

@lokeshparihar7672 Жыл бұрын

19:10 23:10 28:00 34:35

@Krelianx Жыл бұрын

I find McDowell impossibly unclear and meandering.

@stevenlynaugh974 Жыл бұрын

they're all so doddery and old 😂 i bet chrysippus ad carneades looked just the same, but for the silly 20th century uniform

@comradeluffy Жыл бұрын

miss you professor stroud ♥️

@RosaLichtenstein01 Жыл бұрын

Great to sit in on this conversation between these two leading philosophers; pity they were both clearly past their best. But thanks for posting! I was privileged to attend one of Davidson's lectures about ten or fifteen years before this video was shot, and when his mind was much sharper, too.

@RosaLichtenstein01 11 ай бұрын

@@dostoyevsky1222 I agree, but as I said Davidson certainly isn't as sharp in this video as he had been in the early 1980s when I attended his lectures. And the book you mention is excellent, even if I disagree with his brave attempt to repair traditional theories of predication.

@richardburt9812 Жыл бұрын

Thank you.

@isaias6974 Жыл бұрын

この2人、お互いに論敵だったけど、一緒にサーフィン行ったりしていたらしい。良いね。

@craine5132 Жыл бұрын

I had no idea that Dr.Strangelove was such a great philosopher.

@NathanWHill Жыл бұрын

29:14 this historian who said the thing about us revising the truth, can't he just be a Hegelian. He clearly thinks his new truth is better or he wouldn't be writing a book.

@gerhitchman 6 ай бұрын

He could be lots of things, Davidson would still take issue with it.

@NathanWHill Жыл бұрын

41:06 need Hegel here

@dubbelkastrull Жыл бұрын

52:56 bookmark

@adriancioroianu1704 Жыл бұрын

It's very important to state the date and time of these conversations, please. And tahank you very much for the content

@StephenPaulKing Жыл бұрын

Could anyone explain Quine's version of Pre-Ordained harmony to me, please?!

@farhadfaisal9410 2 жыл бұрын

One rightly says, ''better late than never''!

@martinkennedy2400 2 жыл бұрын

...nebulous fog of ideas dire

@quietenergy 2 жыл бұрын

what's the third dude doing? he just wanted to b in the frame?

@ernestofeuerhake Жыл бұрын

at times, he seems to be taking notes. that at least. maybe he wanted to be in the frame taking notes.

@anderscallenberg8632 2 жыл бұрын

I’m ”shot through with normativity” 😀

@pablobtk 2 жыл бұрын

and that was his friend and mentor... I don't want to see him asking questions to his enemies, lol

@Self-Duality 2 жыл бұрын

This is pure gold!

@factumsordidum 2 жыл бұрын

who is the director of this program?

@die_schlechtere_Milch 8 ай бұрын

Richard Dawkinds? Just kidding. I don't know either.

@manuelmanuel9248 2 жыл бұрын

Sounds like a word salad. The question is whether sensory information managed through induction works or predicts.

@elwood1029 2 жыл бұрын

Very glad these are now available free online, it's a shame to hide them away

@GonzalezAce 2 жыл бұрын

anyone have this conversation in papper? plz ♥

@micahnewman 2 жыл бұрын

Epochal. As cantankerous a philosopher as Rorty is, I think it's cute how much he admires Davidson (whatever quibbles he might have with him).

@camiloospinarodriguez190 2 жыл бұрын

35:27 is everything I needed hahahaha

@exalted_kitharode 2 жыл бұрын

1:31:39 1:31:46 1:31:50

@pablo-c-vera 3 жыл бұрын

1:02:14 Such a GREAT question for such a POOR answer: "most of our direct perceptual judgements are true, not because they're based on something else... but because of... umh... how they come to have the contents they do." - Really? Talk about covering the sun with your finger! "Not some magic thing in experience..." Oh, nonono, no: Rather some magic thing in... "I DON'T KNOW WHAT AND CAN'T SAY WHY OUR PERCEPTUAL JUDGEMENTS TEND O V E R W H E L M I N G L Y TO BE TRUE" - 'All I know is that it is not because of Reality. Oh no, that's magic.' - Well, at least MAGIC seems to make SENSE. Let's believe in magical Reality! - And forget about charlatans.

@pectenmaximus231 2 жыл бұрын

Bryan Magee was the question-asker

@GolumTR 3 жыл бұрын

Does Quine or Davidson have a paper where they reconcile their individuation principle (which, historically, comes from Schopenhauer through Einstein) with quantum mechanics?

@fr.hughmackenzie5900 3 жыл бұрын

In the disagreement that dominates the 2nd half does McDowell not get very close to affirming the given?

@gerhitchman 2 жыл бұрын

McDowell's position is anything but clear, but he does seem adamant on maintaining that some (unclear) version of consciousness can be affirmed while not giving into the myth of the given. No idea what his position actually is though.

@fr.hughmackenzie5900 2 жыл бұрын

@@gerhitchman Thanks. From my more recent studies it does seem that McDowell affirms that pre-judgement perception has a "minimal" subjective conceptual contribution. So he accepts a significant given component, but it doesn’t have it’s own independent intelligibility.

@Philover Жыл бұрын

@@fr.hughmackenzie5900that's a similar account advocated by phenomenologists like Zahavi.

@Fafner888 3 жыл бұрын

Alternative title: McDowell lectures do Davidson on how to be Davidson.

@owenk1814 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for posting these! Such valuable conversations. Their preservation and dissemination is a real service to philosophy. I hope someone will find the rest, including the conversations with Nancy Cartwright and Jennifer Hornsby.

@Kittylover074 2 жыл бұрын

The Bart Simpson voice actress? Lol

@kaffeephilosophy Жыл бұрын

@@Kittylover074 no. There are two different Nancy Cartwrights.