o noes!

Joey Chestnut and Kobayashi will actually be competing on Labor Day for that rival brand.

I use my iPad to watch KZbin shows during work like TWIT

I'm not too sure if it's simply your accent, or if you literately mean "16 Gigabits of RAM"? You've said that at least twice. If that's correct, then please excuse me: I have never heard anyone describe RAM in "Gigabits" before now; always in "Gigabytes", or "Megabytes", least ways.

All of the features except encryption! Don't gloss over that.

Neither Harvard nor Stanford have the resources to stand up to political conservatives and/or meritless lawsuits, so they just completely buckled and closed shop?! Much more likely is the charges of university malfeasance were substantiated and that’s why Stanford and Harvard dismantled their programs.

Amazing how monopolies react when the threat of antitrust action looms…

More like “GreeK Mythology”… 🤓 😉

Good!

I blame the Personal Confuser anyway

Jeez haven't seen Leo since the screensavers

Eu is not America's friend. America should withdraw from nato. Nobody wants us poking our nose into everything anymore anyway.

Why should apple be forced to let others use their platform to compete with them. Build your own app store and phone. Stop crying because you have inferior stuff

Anti trust laws are evil.

My monopolies not big enough I need some of yours! People starving:

So Apple's efforts from the START were to contain the development of apps that would work on their phone to avoid theft or predatory apps so as to keep people happy with the offerings and not worry about bad actors. So now the EU wants to open that oversight of the apps to allow poor code on their phones. What a phenomenally bad idea.

Not shocking that Apple would refuse to comply with a law designed to increase competition. In the past, Apple has stolen apps from independent developers, rolling them into their software, and then banned the original because it duplicates an official function. They did all that without compensating the original app designer for their intellectual property.

Spacex doesn't need $11b to get this done well before 2040. They are Already developing a lunar lander that can put tens of tons on Mars and return. (Its Original purpose.) They could do Mars in about $5billion and 5-7years (lunar landing and return will be achieved no later than 2027... and that is 75% of the work already bought and paid for). Spacex is going to Mars Anyway, so they would partially fund the effort out of pocket (and the pockets are becoming very deep with snowballing Starlink revenue (esp with new E-band and Starship ability to put up massive numbers of satellites). Anyone else has to start from scratch. Spacex just has to carry on doing what they have been doing... with a little nudge to get to Mars faster. This would also pioneer: - In-situ fuel production in a methane atmosphere. - Human form robots for space exploration (Tesla will have terrestrial version in all their factories by 2026 - pilot already begun.) - Electric rovers larger than Cybertruck with 300km range (so tthat you can land the 10 ton truck in a place with ice for fuel production and retrieve the samples (with human form robots driving if you want a non specialized vehicle)... a hundred kilometers away if need be. Again, not much work to adapt existing Cybertruck components. - Use small nuclear plants NASA is developing today to provide power (2 or 3 if you want redundancy). The plant is targeted at 2030 and 6 tons/40kw... the only bit with any time frame issue. Not a problem for a rocket with a capacity of 100t to mars surface. ... and that would make even $11 billion well worth it. But Spacex won't charge that much. Sample return would be a Great test of many of the the technologies Spacex needs to build their cities. This would be worth doing for them if there were No samples and No money from the feds. So... even if it failed in 2029, Spacex would return over and over if necessary (he will soon have the money at Spacex to make this a minor side show in his budget) There really was never a question of who should do this. The only company that can... because they were always going to do this anyway.

The U.S.A is more oppressive than China. You just are all oblivious to it.

In the words of the great professor Farnsworth… “I don’t want to live on this planet anymore”

Oh no a program inspired by an Orwellian nightmare is being took down what a loss.

I don't think John D. Carmack II has anything do with this release. 😢

Paul lives in Mexico now?

I always thought you were one.

2:00 They think they were successful when Russian interference still hasn’t been proven…

Certain politicians that claim they want to "Protect 1st Amendment Rights" really want to protect their "Right To Lie."

Censoring US citizens is OK?

"Conservatives sue stanford to aid russian misinformation campaigns" sounds so 2024.

All is lost. (I’m surprised you have comments turned on.)

When a criminal wants to rob something he will try to take out the security system to make it easier. The GOP knows that the misinformation works for them and they can't have some body sounding an alarm when it's happening.

It's really important to set a stage for a tragedy if you plan to profit from it

$ is at my pay scale on retirement income is not wanting to make a mistake on a bad buy. That said you’ve been making some very good decisions that I can appreciate. Thumbs up 👍

It's about time, Apple. Now my iPhone family and friends won't pester me about it anymore. If only they'd download some 3rd party app for video calls instead of sending me a crumby web link for FaceTime through the mobile web browser, it'd be peace on earth and good video calls for all.

I'm really disappointed to see this. I mean, it's gotten to the point where when one side does something it's wrong and when another side does something, that you agree with, it's okay. Politics absolutely sucks and I'm tired of having it crammed down my throat every single day. There are more important things that we need to worry about.

No democracy should police information. If people aren’t smart enough to parse and verify what they see on the internet then they probably are not intelligent enough to make a decision like who should be President.

I understood all of this. Except for what a CVE is

Game script for the xbox is the best app. Vermintide 2 is icing on the cake.

Thanks Leo, Great Clip for Xbox Lovers, but are Apple for Lifers.

Shades of the 70's/80's concept of an industry standard (then the S100 aka IEEE 696-1983) system bus you could slot in different boards. That period of an open S100 expansion bus sparked a whole industry of startups, until Big Industry (IBM) came along with the PC and their proprietary bus architecture and some OS from a startup (MSFT).

Wait. You didn’t paint a complete picture. Where were the SIMs installed? On burner phones to send the SMS payloads or were these SIMs injected into the market for soldiers to install on their phones unaware they were tainted?

I remember that Leo Laporte talked about the idea of a 1st party Microsoft PC back in the 2000s in one of his shows and now it is a reality with the Surface.

RISC-V Ubuntu laptop, appealing, but 8 hours of use can already be achieved with other systems... I would have imagined a fanless 16h experience or similar, also given the absence of MS Windows

No one can stop Apple

Will it be any good for gaming? Edit: the specs don't even list a graphics card, so I would assume no.

I'm just hoping Qualcomm is honest about native linux support coming to the new snapdragon PC I pre ordered

Nobody knows what tomorrow will bring..

This has been true since the original Apple Ii ad where the female olympian threw the hammer at the screen. Yes i am old enoigh to remember this ad. My favourite example is the ZUNE vs the IPod. I had both and the zune was better in every single aspect but tonthis day o can not remember a single ad To this day i can still envision that ipod image of a silhouette of a girl with her hair flying around as she dances with a solid color background

And about everyone should stand down, If you read the terms of service you can clearly see that adobe did try to grab ownership of the content. It was not poorly worded at all: "4.2 Licenses to Your Content. Solely for the purposes of operating or improving the Services and Software, you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free sublicensable, license, to use, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, create derivative works based on, publicly perform, and translate the Content. For example, we may sublicense our right to the Content to our service providers or to other users to allow the Services and Software to operate as intended, such as enabling you to share photos with others. " They wanted to be able to use it for their purposes, and even resell it to other users. I don't think you can dismiss this text as poorly worded. I think it was purely worded to enable Adobe to do whatever it wanted with the content and the public outcry about it made them issue some lame clarifications.