Khulife podcasts

Пікірлер

@Sig.Cacciavite 3 күн бұрын

جزاكم الله خيرا

@moha-nf8uh 4 күн бұрын

بارك الله فيكم

@JourneyofTawhid 8 күн бұрын

جزاكم الله خيراً

@JourneyofTawhid 8 күн бұрын

وفقك الله

@JourneyofTawhid 8 күн бұрын

Jazakum Allahu khayran

@baselhakim2080 9 күн бұрын

This has to be the most idiotic useless video on KZbin. Even watching a video of a toilet flushing is more useful than this. In addition, simply dropping names is not any evidence at all. Especially in some cases like Ibn Ma'in and Ibn Mubarak (who followed the Hanafi Madhhab, so how could they speak against him?) or Imam Malik and Imam Shafi'i, who praised him and this is well known and proven. "The Fuqaha are dependent children to Abu Hanifa" said Imam Shafi'i. I myself am a Maliki , not a Hanafi, but thank God I'm not a buffoon to go and make such an asinine video like this!

@adilmannan1 9 күн бұрын

Ibn Taymiyyah says: There is no doubt regarding Imam Abu Hanifah’s knowledge; people later attributed many lies to Imam Abu Hanifah which were all untrue. The aim of such writings was to taint Imam Abu Hanifa. [Minhaaj Al Sunnah Al Nabawe’ah, 1/259) Imam Ibn Abdil Bar (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him), a Maliki scholar, has said: “Such things were attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa which were not in him and such things were fabricated against him which were not suitable.”(Al Khayraat al hisaan, 157) He also said: “Those who narrate from Imam Abu Hanifa and regard him as authentic are much more than those who criticized him. And those who criticized him from the scholars of Hadith mostly only criticized him for engaging in opinion and qiyaas; but it has already passed that this is not a defect.” (Jami bayan al Ilm wa fadhlihi, 2/149) Nasr bin Ali al-Khareebi (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him) has said, “People were either jealous or ignorant of Imam Abu Hanifa…” (Tahdheeb al kamal, 29/441) Allamah Taj as Subki (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him) mentions in Tabaqaat al kubra, “Beware of misconstruing their statement that ‘jarh is preferred over tadeel’ is in its generality. The correct view is that that person whose imamah and ‘adaalah has been firmly established, and majority of the scholars praised him and those who criticized him were very few, and there is also a clear indication that the jarh is initiated because of being prejudice etc, no consideration will be given to the jarh. If we regard the principle that ‘jarh is preferred’ as being general, no scholar would be saved, since there is hardly an Imam except that there are some people who criticized him.” (At Tabaqaat al kubra, 1/187) What further shows that most of the criticisms of the contemporaries are false is the statement of Yahya bin Ma’een, the Imaam of Jarh and Ta'deel (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him) when he said: “I have not heard any person weakening him.” (Al-Intiqaa, 1/127) Allamah Mizzi (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him) did not relate anything derogatory of Imam Abu Hanifa (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him) in his Tahdeeb al kamaal. Allamah Dhahabi (May Allah Ta’ala be pleased with him) has said: "May Allah have mercy on our Shaykh Abul Hajjaaj (Al-Mizzi) for not narrating any of those narrations which will portray Imam Abu Hanifa as being weak.” (Tadheeb at tahdheeb, 9/225) Hafidh Ibn Hajar (May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on him), when he was asked about Imam Nasai’s vilification of Imam Abu Hanifa, he replied by saying: "An Nasai is a great scholar of hadith. The statements which he has mentioned is in accordance to what became manifest to him and are the conclusion of his ijtihaad. There is no being whose every statement is accepted (besides the Prophet ﷺ). A group of Muhadithoon has agreed with Imam Nasai. Imam Khateeb has written in much detail concerning Imam Abu Hanifa in his Tarikh. Some statements which he cited are accepted and some are rejected. A possible excuse for Imam Abu Hanifa is that he was of the view that one of the conditions of narrating a hadith is that a person should remember the hadith from the time he heard it until he narrates it. Therefore, his narrations are relatively less because of this. Otherwise, he had many Ahadith. In short, it is better not to engage in this. Imam Abu Hanifa and others have already crossed the bridge and as a result nothing that anyone says against any of them can have any effect. They are in the highest level, where Allah Ta’ala has raised them, through their being Imams that are followed and through whom one reaches guidance. Let this be clearly understood, and Allah is the Giver of success. (Al Jawahir wad durar 2/946-947)

@abdulazeezabdulmateen4750 9 күн бұрын

Thanks, but what do you want us to benefit from this?

@khulifepodcasts2525 9 күн бұрын

Do not follow the Hanafi school of fiqh and instead follow the three Sunni schools of fiqh: Hanbali, Shafi'i and Maliki.

@abdulazeezabdulmateen4750 9 күн бұрын

@khulifepodcasts2525 okay, you mean the whole of hanafih scholars are not Sunnis. I still don't understand.

@khulifepodcasts2525 8 күн бұрын

you don't need to understand , just be away from Hanafi school of fiqh

@justabrother356 9 күн бұрын

Can you share the reasons fore contemporary people not accepting these evidences? The shaikh was going to talk about it but you didn't include it. Jazak Allahu khairan

@alinakhan946 9 күн бұрын

reasons of the people who speak against him are that imam Abu hanifa believed in irja'a and believed the quraan was created by manking [however the people who support him say he in the end of his life asked forgiveness from Allah, and people against him say that he didnt]

@justabrother356 9 күн бұрын

@@alinakhan946 What do you mean it doesn't matter? How can someone be from ahlusunnah if he believed in irjaa and khalqurquraan?

@alinakhan946 9 күн бұрын

@@justabrother356 youre right my mistake i meant there is evidence of his repentence** الله يغفر لي such as videos from shaykh saleh fawzan and ibn albani that he asked for repentance

@justabrother356 9 күн бұрын

@@alinakhan946 It seems shaykh khulayfi was going to talk about the counterarguments but the video stopped before that. Here is the video in arabic where the shaykh I assume talks about this:kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJ3dineOnZh9o7c

@khulifepodcasts2525 9 күн бұрын

Because they are not consistent with their Salafism

@mominrafiqui2538 10 күн бұрын

The majority of people (if not all) in the indian subcontinent are Hanafis (or at least theyre scholars and imams are). They have an extremely strong chokehold over Islamic preaching and masjeds over there.

@khulifepodcasts2525 9 күн бұрын

Unfortunately

@omabdallah5152 11 күн бұрын

لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله

@omabdallah5152 11 күн бұрын

لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله

@واحد_1441 13 күн бұрын

jazakumu allahu 5ayra ❤️

@khaled_ibnali 13 күн бұрын

جزاك الله خيراً

@Mohamad_Mah 14 күн бұрын

Could you please share a link to the original Sheikh recording?

@صل_على_من_يجلسه_ربه_على_عرشه 12 күн бұрын

u'll find it on the sheikh's channel, It's called (مشاهد الأثري يوم القيامة …) at 20:20

@Mohamad_Mah 14 күн бұрын

Jazal Allahu Khayran Akhi. I suggest creating a Telegram channel and sharing the English transcript to amplify benefits and help English speaking Dawah supporters.

@Saud7RB 9 ай бұрын

masha allah

@alderwal Жыл бұрын

جزاك الله خيرا