Thanks for your question. No AI-based tool can avoid AI detection. We promote transparency about ai and education instead of detection. Moxie is designed NOT to write for you, so there's no need to worry about this question of detection.

@@PiccadillyHangover thanks for that feedback!

@@fmdj all the 600+ people who cited the letter, apparently. And many more.

@MoxieLearn this seems so insane to me. Opioids have been around since the dawn of time, anyone who's tried them knows how addictive they are. I can't imagine doctors not noticing their patients becoming addicted, whether in or outside of hospitals... Same for the general population... Just ask any addict. Crazy.

I suppose that it is an unusual kind of torture to be a doctor, feeling impotent and hypocritical as you tell overworked patients to manage pain with things that are not accessible to them, oftentimes working with similar levels of exhaustion.

It's all relative to Trump!

Yeah -- this is another piece of the puzzle. Great point. In the original Substack on this, I also mention the issue -- tried to make the video more concise. substack.com/home/post/p-151651719

The tragedy was escalated by opportunistic, grandstanding politicians and DEA stepping in to "help". They certainly helped enrich criminals and increase deaths caused by illicit opioids. The pharmaceutical companies and those who headed them were never really held accountable either.

Or consensus over evidence. Consensus without evidence is the equivalent of saying "we've always done things this way"

Great, certainly it’s something certainly that needs to be considered. I love to ask AI to summarize an article for me.

@@Nassifeh I agree. It’s very difficult. But step 1 is awareness, no? Asking the questions.

Also as someone in tech, I believe Moxie has a very valid point. This is not about prompt engineering. LLMs are regularly used to summarise information and - more significantly - these summaries are then often republised on the web with no indication that they were created using AI. Scientific publications have become increasibly lazy about their peer reviews. LLMs notably fail to indicate when they don’t “know” something and confidently write bullshit with no warning. As humans get lazier and lazier, the use of LLMs to summarise and publish is increasing. Unless and until AI-derived content is clearly and cryptographically signed as such, the issue of fake information - whether that is fake news, fake videos or fake medical papers will continue to grow.

Are you asserting that LLM's lack the capability to summarize?

@@MoxieLearn Ironically I think many people working in tech are being bombarded with hype about LLM, and may be in their own bubble of super-hype here, because of social media algorithms, not AI. But when someone says they are concerned about the idea that an "LLM model that would reliably do any of this," -well there's a concern that it will happen at all!! Also I am regularly reassured in social media that AI will not take over major sectors of the workforce, but isn't there still a danger that there will be layoffs done with the excuse AI can replace workers? Even in just a small percentage of the workforce? Shouldn't we still be extremely concerned that will happen, even if it's not mass unemployment? I, even not being in tech, can see that AI will not mean "Skynet" in Terminator, but... that does not reassure me that AI won't be misused! I am in fact MORE (sorry I don't know how to do boldface on YT) worried that I'm being constantly reassured "it won't be that bad". Sorry for the tangent on employment, but I think there's a danger of racing to middle ground and sounding reasonable, I want AI danger MINIMIZED! Now!

@@PEHowland The American public is already skeptical of science, so the repercussions of bad science is already having an effect. I don't think it's laziness, but greed, and desperation to publish or perish, and as in the case of opioids described, cherry picking favorable data to sell a drug. I don't think Perdue can be accused of laziness. It's unrestrained greed. And it's probably going to get worse before it gets better.

This is not the point of the video.

@@MoxieLearn Really? Sure as hell seemed like a talking point to me. Where was the action when the opportunity to act was theirs? I've been given opioid pain relievers. As far as I'm concerned they are pretty much useless for pain. What they do is diminish consciousness. They are *NARCOTIC* i.e 'sleep inducing'. The fact that some people are enticed by that 'mental fog' the so called 'high' of drugs, is what causes me to have zero sympathy for the consequences of overdose. The face that people will harm others to attain that high, makes me not just unsympathetic, but contemptuous of them. And so I borrow & paraphrase the words of Ebeneezer Scrooge; "Let them OD and decrease the surplus population." Cheers!

I really wish more people would resist the urge to synthetically inject precision and tolerate the messiness for longer, but alas ... thanks for commenting!

This is an ideal workflow @jonwinagan1! Thank you for sharing. Students -- read this comment again! He's exactly right.

Did you reach out to our customer support team? You shouldn't be charged bi-monthly if you have an annual membership. Our customer support email is [email protected]

I was able to look up your account with us based on your username. It looks like you signed up for an annual membership but the monthly membership didn't cancel. We apologize for the inconvenience and refunded your recent bi-monthly payments.