Remember kids if theres only one story to tell its better than 2 stories.
@jos_meidСағат бұрын
Because a skilled prosecutor can't tell a compelling story to the jury if the victim is dead?
@user-yx5hj1hr3w13 сағат бұрын
Temu amber alert
@TotalDramaGuy-u2dКүн бұрын
Cops and Judges are always dumb point blank.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Insomnia is perpetual factor for domestic. One of the biggest.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Time stamp28:26 Perpetuating factors are events, behaviors, or stimuli that can cause symptoms to continue or worsen over time. They can maintain the course of a disease or illness, or keep a mental illness in motion. Here are some examples of perpetuating factors: Mental illness These can include poor coping strategies, such as ruminating, or environmental stressors, such as social exclusion or bullying. They can also include lack of supportive relationships at home, lack of stable income at work, or being bullied at school. Eating disorders These can include malnutrition, weight suppression, excessive exercise, and binge/purge behaviors. Anxiety disorders These can be perpetuated by heightened physiological arousal and avoidance. Trigger points These can include nutrient deficiency or insufficiency, injuries, postural dysfunctions, poor ergonomics, allergies, psychological or emotional stress, infections, endocrine and metabolic inadequacies, and hormonal imbalances. Insomnia Insomnia symptoms can increase depression and anxiety symptoms. Insomnia at baseline has also been associated with heavy alcohol consumption.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
I started drinking after the car accident
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Maryland v. Syed: A Very Brief Legal Timeline Adnan Syed was convicted by a Baltimore City jury in February of 2000 for the murder of his classmate and ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. Syed has maintained his innocence for the past 23 years, but it was not until 2014 that the Serial podcast, led by Sarah Koenig, uncovered new evidence that cast doubt on Syed’s conviction. After a lengthy investigation, on September 19, 2022, a Baltimore City judge overturned Syed’s murder conviction after the State lost confidence in their original case. The judge ordered Syed released after he spent 23 years incarcerated. Applicability of the Brady Rule to Adnan Syed’s Case The State’s motion to vacate cited two Brady violations. First, the motion noted that the team prosecuting Syed suppressed evidence related to other potential suspects in Lee’s murder. Second, the motion stated that the prosecution failed to disclose to Syed’s legal team that one of the suspects had previously threatened Lee’s life and had means, motive, and opportunity to kill Lee. Syed’s original defense strategy involved highlighting alternate, more plausible suspects, and in the motion to vacate the State asserted that this suppressed evidence would have bolstered Syed’s argument. In other words, by suppressing this material evidence, the State violated Syed’s 14th Amendment Due Process rights as it did to Brady. An interesting element to this latest twist in Syed’s case is the dispute between Baltimore City State’s Attorney, Marilyn Mosby, and Maryland’s Attorney General, Brian Frosh, both Democrats. Shortly after the judge agreed to vacate Syed’s conviction on September 19, Frosh released a statement fervently denying the alleged Brady violations. Frosh then went on camera to assail Mosby’s decision to conduct the year-long investigation into Syed’s conviction stating, “If State’s Attorney Mosby were concentrating as hard on trying murder cases and putting murderers behind bars as she has on this case, I think our state would be quite a bit safer.” On September 21, Mosby responded to Frosh’s comments claiming that the attorney general willfully suppressed evidence from Syed’s defense team for seven years thereby denying Syed a fair trial. What Happens Next? The question now, of course, is where does this case go from here? While Syed is ordered to serve home detention, State prosecutors have 30 days to decide if they will bring a new trial against Syed or drop the charges. The State’s Attorney’s office and Baltimore police detectives are again actively investigating Lee’s murder and following the new leads. While Mosby has not disclosed many details, she did tell The Washington Post that if the new DNA tests come back inconclusive, she will drop the case. On the other hand, if the DNA tests point to Syed, she said her office would “consider” a retrial. Interestingly, on a new episode of Serial that dropped the day after Syed’s release, host Sarah Koenig said, “The chances of the State ever trying to prosecute Adnan are remote at best.” While Koenig is not a legal expert, her journalism related to Syed’s case lends credibility to her perspective. Despite the dramatic legal twists that have mesmerized the nation since 2014, there has been one constant through it all: Hae Min Lee and her family deserve justice. Wherever the evidence leads the prosecution, hopefully Lee’s family one day finds justice. Sources:
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
The Brady doctrine, also known as the Brady rule, is a pretrial discovery rule that requires the prosecution to disclose any exculpatory evidence to the defense in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that could exonerate the defendant. The rule was established by the United States Supreme Court in 1963 in the case Brady v. Maryland. The court ruled that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose material evidence that is favorable to the defendant, regardless of whether the prosecution acted in good faith. The court also ruled that the suppression of evidence that is material to guilt or punishment violates constitutional due process. The Brady doctrine is important because it gives the defense the right to examine all evidence that could be exculpatory, not just evidence that could show the defendant's guilt. When a defendant understands the case against them, they are more likely to decide to plead guilty. All states have sanctions for prosecutors who fail to comply with discovery obligations. Some states allow a trial court to dismiss charges as a sanction for prosecutorial misconduct, while others consider this to be too harsh.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Brady v. United States. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).[1]:
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
On June 27, 1958, a 25-year-old Maryland man named John Leo Brady and his 24-year-old companion Charles Donald Boblit murdered 53-year-old acquaintance William Brooks. Both men were convicted and sentenced to death. Brady admitted to being involved in the murder, but he claimed that Boblit had done the actual killing and that they had stolen Brooks' car ahead of a planned bank robbery but had not planned to kill him.[2] The prosecution had withheld a written statement by Boblit (the men were tried separately), confessing that he had committed the act of killing by himself. The Maryland Court of Appeals had affirmed the conviction and remanded the case for a retrial only on the question of punishment. Brady's lawyer, E. Clinton Bamberger Jr., appealed the case to the Supreme Court, hoping for a new trial.[3]
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
On June 27, 1958, a 25-year-old Maryland man named John Leo Brady and his 24-year-old companion Charles Donald Boblit murdered 53-year-old acquaintance William Brooks. Both men were convicted and sentenced to death. Brady admitted to being involved in the murder, but he claimed that Boblit had done the actual killing and that they had stolen Brooks' car ahead of a planned bank robbery but had not planned to kill him.[2] The prosecution had withheld a written statement by Boblit (the men were tried separately), confessing that he had committed the act of killing by himself. The Maryland Court of Appeals had affirmed the conviction and remanded the case for a retrial only on the question of punishment. Brady's lawyer, E. Clinton Bamberger Jr., appealed the case to the Supreme Court, hoping for a new trial.[3]
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Brady was given a new hearing, where his sentence was commuted to life imprisonment.[3] Brady was ultimately paroled. He moved to Florida, where he worked as a truck driver, started a family, and did not re-offend.[3][7] Police officers who have been dishonest are sometimes referred to as "Brady cops". Because of the Brady ruling, prosecutors are required to notify defendants and their attorneys whenever a law enforcement official involved in their case has a confirmed record of knowingly lying in an official capacity.[8] This requirement has been understood by lawyers and jurists as requiring prosecutors to maintain lists, known as Brady lists, of police officers who are not credible witnesses and whose involvement in a case undermines a prosecution's integrity.[9]
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Maryland v. Syed: A Very Brief Legal Timeline Adnan Syed was convicted by a Baltimore City jury in February of 2000 for the murder of his classmate and ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. Syed has maintained his innocence for the past 23 years, but it was not until 2014 that the Serial podcast, led by Sarah Koenig, uncovered new evidence that cast doubt on Syed’s conviction. After a lengthy investigation, on September 19, 2022, a Baltimore City judge overturned Syed’s murder conviction after the State lost confidence in their original case. The judge ordered Syed released after he spent 23 years incarcerated. Applicability of the Brady Rule to Adnan Syed’s Case The State’s motion to vacate cited two Brady violations. First, the motion noted that the team prosecuting Syed suppressed evidence related to other potential suspects in Lee’s murder. Second, the motion stated that the prosecution failed to disclose to Syed’s legal team that one of the suspects had previously threatened Lee’s life and had means, motive, and opportunity to kill Lee. Syed’s original defense strategy involved highlighting alternate, more plausible suspects, and in the motion to vacate the State asserted that this suppressed evidence would have bolstered Syed’s argument. In other words, by suppressing this material evidence, the State violated Syed’s 14th Amendment Due Process rights as it did to Brady. An interesting element to this latest twist in Syed’s case is the dispute between Baltimore City State’s Attorney, Marilyn Mosby, and Maryland’s Attorney General, Brian Frosh, both Democrats. Shortly after the judge agreed to vacate Syed’s conviction on September 19, Frosh released a statement fervently denying the alleged Brady violations. Frosh then went on camera to assail Mosby’s decision to conduct the year-long investigation into Syed’s conviction stating, “If State’s Attorney Mosby were concentrating as hard on trying murder cases and putting murderers behind bars as she has on this case, I think our state would be quite a bit safer.” On September 21, Mosby responded to Frosh’s comments claiming that the attorney general willfully suppressed evidence from Syed’s defense team for seven years thereby denying Syed a fair trial.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Timestamp 23:16
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Joe pool lake. Fourth of July alot of drunk driving
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Timestamp 20:58 what about the argument . The started drinking after the vehicle was parked. Could of parked vehicle walked to the gas station got something to drink and came back to parked vehicle
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Timestamp 18:40 now intoxicated assault you can go after business owner for over billing the customer. Intoxication assault business owner can be held responsible
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
You can probably be head of security for Winstar they pay a lot More.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Time stamp 16 minutes template. I like that word. That's a Margaret Shelby word. She was using templates to read light tickets.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
David it's real easy if you just came from Humperdinks and they have you on camera spending a hundred dollars how are you gonna say your not loaded
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
HGN argument only works with vertigo diagnosis
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
12:30 that argument only works if you have vertigo a doctors note
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
That' guy drank all those drinks at fuzzy taco and crashed his car in Arlington detective.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Cervantes in Mansfield
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
Just call a cab. All you have to do is call a cab.
@ReserveHomehealthКүн бұрын
They have a disease. They can't help it. They shouldn't be driving.
@matthewd.18052 күн бұрын
The only reason i keep my carry permit up to date now, is to skip the waiting time with new purchases, and so I can carry in certain other states that I frequent.
@gregoryjohnson43192 күн бұрын
Tricksters!!!
@TravisEastlick-l6z2 күн бұрын
A survivor is suggestive for a reason. This could be witnesses, family members and many other people that experienced emotional trauma where is emotionally attached to the victim.
@imdatdude532 күн бұрын
Lololololololololol........i like how he states these things as if logic exists for the people who are carrying.......
@lovevlogs16174 күн бұрын
Hi i have a question a family member just got mtr in tx. For none payment and for smoking weed he had gotten 2 years probation then they added 1 more year for none payment he never missed an appointment and finished his 40 hours community service. So now what would he come across for this? one more thing never got in trouble but with this ??? 🤔
@Poppyseed3724 күн бұрын
Amber was 1st she’s the og
@EJackson824 күн бұрын
And just to check, we can turn these off like we do with Amber alerts, right?
@echo9374 күн бұрын
There’s a big difference between aggravated murder, and murder.
@aspenhill14795 күн бұрын
NOPE
@jorgedeleon96855 күн бұрын
actually all they want is money,lawyers,court fees and then they let you go,everything is money
@icecold95115 күн бұрын
A lot of these split second decision moments are your own creation. Like the cops that shot the Rice kid, they deliberately into an immediate action position. Nor is the issue simply about split second moments. There is a whole host of issues with law enforcement, especially protecting bad cops from even the simple consequences of ending their law enforcement career before they kill someone, as in the case of the pot of hot water now in the news.
@starkhalessi00006 күн бұрын
What if the police won’t let you? In serious crashes with injury, a crash team is required to come out. They immediately block off the area. Then tell you you need to leave.
@starkhalessi00006 күн бұрын
Question. I’m in another state but general legality. The blood should have all substances in the body? So all your medications should be listed. How long is a typical DUI stop with sobriety tests? Do you estimate
@starkhalessi00006 күн бұрын
And as a health care provider, if they say no, I can’t touch them, as this is battery. It also doesn’t mean I will be successful in obtaining that blood, all I have to do is try. I will never be successful again for the police, unless there was an accident causing death or injury. My job is not to infringe on people’s liberties.
@geminisimon17887 күн бұрын
Do you help with people that are already in prison
@constitutionalli75227 күн бұрын
So like.... Pretty much what cops do whenever they violate our rights and somebody gets hurt? Or no
@edwardvillate21127 күн бұрын
😂 let's 🙏 PRAY & wish, that the TEXAS LOW , can EXTEND to ALL 50 STATES !!! and you will see the DEMORATS & DEEP STATE & CONMUNIST = KAMELA HARRIS 😅 in PANICKING MODE !!! 😂....🎉
@justmythoughts27867 күн бұрын
Debtors jail
@darknagaadventures78847 күн бұрын
Lower threshold means lower certainty and higher risk of vigilante or overly aggressive pig action against an innocent party.
@RemedialRob7 күн бұрын
A child under ten is equivalent to a police officer... yeah that tracks... same level of education, same emotional maturity level. I see it, I see it.
@edwardgarcia3668 күн бұрын
Too much noise
@TryorDie20248 күн бұрын
You can afford to pay someone who can create a way better video that represents you I wouldn't call you just based on this video alone
@hunterrick48 күн бұрын
Cops shouldn't be held more valuable than other adults.
@Koli52987 күн бұрын
Bullcrap. Leaving cops aside for a moment, some adults have always been considered more valuable to society than others and always will be. Even by pc morons who claim everyone is equal and no one should receive special treatment out loud. Doctors are more valuable than criminals. Firefighters are more valuable than salesmen. And yes, cops and soldiers are more valuable than civilians. Why? Because they provide essential services. They would have easier, better lives doing some other job. They would be better paid in many cases. Cops choose to go out everyday and potentially risk their lives. And that's just one of the negatives in the long list of crap they have to deal with. The State acknowledging the higher value of their lives is simply a long-accepted way by the government to repay their service instead of paying them a fairer salary, hiring more cops so they aren't overwhelmed by the sheer number of criminals, taking better care of their health both physical and mental, giving them better training and a long et cetera.
@cfmpam4982308 күн бұрын
Show up with a lawyer
@EvanChristopher-of4ed9 күн бұрын
Jejd
@kelzbaldwin72179 күн бұрын
Nope police aren't your friend never talk to them
@RockShasta152510 күн бұрын
can’t the amber alert be used for just one county and not state wide?