Introducing Qiskit SDK v1.0
3:33
How can AI help modernize code?
4:04
Toward Business Value with Quantum
38:17
Unveiling IBM Quantum System Two
2:18
Пікірлер
@michaelbabchuk5639
@michaelbabchuk5639 3 сағат бұрын
Very smart Ukrainian science creative.
@benjaminrogers1343
@benjaminrogers1343 8 сағат бұрын
How you gonna do it ? Your gonna QS 2 it
@themercurytranshumanist4052
@themercurytranshumanist4052 Күн бұрын
As a biochemistry I find simulated chemistry very exciting, it has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of all medical research. I don't know if it will be 10 years or 30 years, but I see simulated chemistry eventually replacing most of the wet labs and paving the way for truly personalized medicine. Where we take a person's genome and test what medication they will have a reaction with, sequencing the DNA of cancer cells to find the most effective treatment, and test gene therapy treatments before they enter human trials. The amazing thing is since human bodies are mostly composed of organic compounds (which are the first elements on the periodic table) you only need to simulate the first 20 elements of the periodic table before you can in theory simulate most of the chemical reactions in the human body. The trace elements mostly fall in the 20-30s range with the outlier being iodine at 53. It is my understanding the farthest element we have been able to fully simulate so far has been lithium, the third element of the periodic table. In theory that means we can now simulate 3/53 elements that comprise the human body. It is a very exciting era to be alive.
@ChuckBaggett
@ChuckBaggett Күн бұрын
The view of Lincoln was extremely unclear. I couldn't really see it even with it being pointed to and labeled. Is the copper-colored image from an optical microscope?
@ChuckBaggett
@ChuckBaggett Күн бұрын
Do you get many people calling John Ott to getting something scanned as a result of this video? If so, any interesting, silly, or otherwise remarkable ones?
@Lordsofplural
@Lordsofplural 2 күн бұрын
wow that guy at 2:30 really said some words in a very coherent way
@Wheezr
@Wheezr 2 күн бұрын
2:19 hey I know those bozos
@MaklonTechStartup
@MaklonTechStartup 3 күн бұрын
Sippp.... Orang Indonesia mana nih
@c123bthunderpig
@c123bthunderpig 4 күн бұрын
Right, I got my electron microscope at Wal-Mart, use it everyday. Glad to see that IBM's research dollars go to looking at pennies, improperly prepared for imaging. You can see Lincoln with just your eyes, and better with magnifying glass. Goo IBM.
@tabamal
@tabamal 4 күн бұрын
The Background Music is too loud.. i hardly understood a few words.. it looks like a mainframe of the 1950s
@psoon04286
@psoon04286 4 күн бұрын
The demo was unimpressive but the explanation was what I was after. Thanks👍🙂
@user-80011
@user-80011 5 күн бұрын
Wow
@Skarlett00
@Skarlett00 5 күн бұрын
A penny? I can see Lincoln in the memorial with my naked eye. Let me see cell, an atom, something significant.
@careycrowson-ud2px
@careycrowson-ud2px 5 күн бұрын
3 minutes I'll never get back...
@willardchi2571
@willardchi2571 5 күн бұрын
You don't need an electron microscope to see the statue of Lincoln inside the monument on a penny.
@markswishereatsstuff2500
@markswishereatsstuff2500 5 күн бұрын
I wanted to see Lincoln's nose hairs. Lame use of equipment.
@user-ts8lt3wb2h
@user-ts8lt3wb2h 5 күн бұрын
Watson is using internet to get infotmation, thats cheating
@daverice2426
@daverice2426 6 күн бұрын
What a dumb example. Hilariously, sitting Lincoln was even less discernable WITH the microscope.
@cheekkeith74
@cheekkeith74 7 күн бұрын
Yeah. Thanks for the tracking service...
@kpdvw
@kpdvw 7 күн бұрын
the image of Lincoln inside the momorial is as small as the value of the entire coin AD 2024......
@davidwilson2621
@davidwilson2621 7 күн бұрын
It was interesting to see explained how the electron microscope works. I would have loved to see it scan a blood sample, my blood sample to see if there are any self replicating nano particles building their structures inside of me!
@joshuapowers4623
@joshuapowers4623 7 күн бұрын
US gun culture is so pervasive we're now putting them inside microscopes
@SickofTired
@SickofTired 7 күн бұрын
I B like M this for real
@joewoodchuck3824
@joewoodchuck3824 7 күн бұрын
That's it? A <1 second glimpse with conventional optics? Talk about clickbait.
@1someoneelse
@1someoneelse 7 күн бұрын
Alot of money for something I can do with my eyes 👀
@santhoshk5224
@santhoshk5224 7 күн бұрын
He is talking about trillions of artificial neurons and synapses way back a decade before, then Where is IBM today in Neuromorphic Computing?
@LitoGeorge
@LitoGeorge 7 күн бұрын
Seems like a nice fellow. Thanks for the clear presentation.
@trevorhoward7682
@trevorhoward7682 7 күн бұрын
I'm not critical .... simply in awe!
@vootzombo
@vootzombo 8 күн бұрын
This is like asking somebody what time it is and they tell you how to build a clock.
@rockintoanewbeat
@rockintoanewbeat 8 күн бұрын
And the Earth rotates around its axis at a rate of about 1,600 kilometers (1,000 miles) an hour or 1,525 feet per second at the equator and the Earth revolves around the Sun at a rate of about 67,000 miles per hour. However he says "because these these tools are so sensitive to acoustic vibrations and building vibrations so we're on the ground floor here in a very quiet and stable room because any vibrations of the building will cause an issue that will ruin the image" Are we being lied to???? Think about it, use that brain!
@jakep5121
@jakep5121 8 күн бұрын
you'd think the screen would be bigger.
@coletanner5193
@coletanner5193 8 күн бұрын
Word for the day kids is underwhelmed
@DiacoNori
@DiacoNori 8 күн бұрын
so.... calls on IBM?
@hunterthelord
@hunterthelord 8 күн бұрын
LETS SEE JOE BIDENS BRAIN!
@RoboCop-zn8bt
@RoboCop-zn8bt 8 күн бұрын
You showed it for less than a second.
@ray.shoesmith
@ray.shoesmith 8 күн бұрын
You could have made this exact same video using a $50 ebay microscope
@rcnelson
@rcnelson 8 күн бұрын
I think I saw Bigfoot, Santa Claus, and J. Edgar Hoover peeping around the columns.
@russellpeffer7736
@russellpeffer7736 8 күн бұрын
That was disappointing
@ucfj
@ucfj 8 күн бұрын
No one here bothered by the fact they're showing us mockups? If I didn't know it worked from other sources I'd be calling it a scam right now
@biowerks
@biowerks 8 күн бұрын
My smartphone takes a better picture, why waste this machines reach and ability on stuff that it wasn't designed for?
@DadLogic
@DadLogic 8 күн бұрын
I thought it was interesting that you had to use the microscope inside of an anechoic chamber. I’ve been in one and it can make you feel weird after a few minutes inside. I wonder how he can spend an extended time in there. The intense quiet isn’t for everyone.
@plupyduplupydu1369
@plupyduplupydu1369 8 күн бұрын
Thats metal copper-electrons(from your scope) would cause oxcidation(or any various combinations) and spoil the sample-and what do you amplifly
@CDaisy-tp7hw
@CDaisy-tp7hw 8 күн бұрын
WOW!!! Talk about anticlimactic.
@mr.foxwiz1653
@mr.foxwiz1653 8 күн бұрын
Can I send you my paycheck to see if you can find any money? 😮
@tminusnyc2915
@tminusnyc2915 8 күн бұрын
I really needed him to uncover some illuminati secret.... Hahaha
@CoZmicShReddeR
@CoZmicShReddeR 8 күн бұрын
Microscopes don't lie! ;) I've always wanted to use an electron microscope. I'm a retired defect analyst for Ford Paint for 17 yrs seen a lot of interesting things with just a 100x optical.
@1861James
@1861James 8 күн бұрын
Thumbs down, you spent 90% of the video talking about electron microscopy and finally showed what you can “BARELY” see 😡
@kyloctopus
@kyloctopus 9 күн бұрын
We should get every major tech company’s AI and see which would win a Jeopardy tournament
@RobertBird333
@RobertBird333 9 күн бұрын
The U.S. coin is a "cent" or "one cent piece", not a "penny".
@holyngrace7806
@holyngrace7806 9 күн бұрын
That was interesting, Ty. A question for Mr. Ott. As photons are so much smaller than electrons and logically theoretically capable of much higher resolution, is there not an electromagnetic lens such as used with electrons that would work with electrons? If so, then the resolution and magnification would be orders of magnitude greater.