Ничего нового Алексеев С.С. в право не привнес. Этот «борец с тоталитаризмом» просто воспользовался концепцией нормативизма австрийского еврея Ганса Кельзена. Вот и все. Доктринально и в СССР, и в РФ господствовали нормативизм и юридический позитивизм. Соответственно, если СССР для Алексеева - это тоталитарное государство, то и РФ по этой логике - тоже тоталитарное государство.
@pratyayamrit908011 ай бұрын
Thank you
@dikkie2913 Жыл бұрын
Интересно, спс
@narindersingh10 Жыл бұрын
10:25
@aaronrobertcattell8859 Жыл бұрын
when there was no farm and pet animals was very easy to kill and eat know farm pets know not so easy so no war if you love me as I love you then why fight there's bigger problems?
@aaronrobertcattell8859 Жыл бұрын
food water roof
@manuelmanuel92482 жыл бұрын
No obligation of the rich to the poor? It is not a matter of obligation but of self interest. Anyone can become poor with a little bad luck.
@mateuszliese10592 жыл бұрын
Yes, of course it is like believing without a shadow of a doubt that Obama is equal to the local gangbanging thug from the southside of Chicago. Thus, liberalism is universalism and this example illuminates this fact.
@fuckyoutubengoogle22 жыл бұрын
16:26 Two principles of liberalism introduced.
@springinfialta1062 жыл бұрын
Even a monarchy with a single state church can agree with the first principle. If the political and religious leaders agree that the salvation of souls is most important then they can be justified in creating a political order that focuses on keeping citizens in line with religious doctrine. They will be showing equal concern for all citizens by creating a political and social structure that encourages, or even forces, all citizens to act in accordance with religious dogma. The second principle, where each person is allowed to choose their own definition of success, undermines the first. In such a society any person who chooses to act against religious dogma is a danger to others and to himself. So he must be kept in line. But if a society favors the second principle, then the opposite can happen where the society as a whole has no raison d'etre and devolves into warring camps whose beliefs are in complete opposition, i.e. what we see in the West today. For example, should the government show equal concern for the unborn? This is a question that divides the west and there appears to be no compromise that would be acceptable or even tolerable to all.
@pavelchikalov46222 жыл бұрын
There is no abundance of the religious societies which could consistently stand up for an idea that governments of their countries are illegitimate due to violations of these principles. Whereas it's the only logical conclusion for them that they have to do if their government violates the second principle. Nice Nabokovian nickname!
It seems logical to me to recept liberalism in these two means. True argument. Thank you, professor Dworkin.
@Allen10293 жыл бұрын
Wonderfully lucid.
@lissadawes42433 жыл бұрын
Someone please put a time stamp to when the lecture starts. In this case it is around 4:52.
@srs16594 жыл бұрын
37:37 about coercion
@Martin-dl1om4 жыл бұрын
thx a lot
@gabrielubeda4104 жыл бұрын
What a pleasure is to hear prof. Dworkin.
@lpaulo086 жыл бұрын
Boca mole
@pavelchikalov46226 жыл бұрын
What do you mean?
@jonatasiago90654 жыл бұрын
KKKKKKKKK
@jonatasiago90654 жыл бұрын
@@pavelchikalov4622 significa que ele é um papangu
@susannemeyer70234 ай бұрын
Boca tua? Better close it.
@antonfedorov55226 жыл бұрын
4:01 ... - А ведь "право есть самое святое, что есть у Бога на земле". (Иммануил Кант)
@gorecassady16326 жыл бұрын
Thanks lad
@thriversoffset6 жыл бұрын
love him, but i advise you all to change the speed of this video to 1.25 (completely audible) and better to digest in a normal speech speed, what a brilliant mind he was. Also, it is always best to a) make questions be asked separately and b) if not so, make the person who replies repeat the questions
@pianofreak2475 жыл бұрын
Thanks, you saved me a lot of time
@bodbn5 жыл бұрын
Move it up to Ben Shapiro speed.
@automan15912 жыл бұрын
@@bodbn yeah let's leave mention of the pseudo intellectuals out of here ay?