Playing as him in Tsardoms total war. Cool.

Dober dokumentarec 😊

Amazing that it's enough light to actually see. How much light (photons) would you expect from a natural sample in comparison?

Iklllzlllzikll

Severni in centralno etruscanski jezik južni je po Egiptu in grciji

Dolenjska v železni dobi je polna etruščanskih izdelkov in zapisov

Iklllzlllzikill ikijeizijeizikijezavezati jezičkenavodilo za uporabo ziklojn fibul

Etrusce lingua on.meny artefact 8 7.centoury BC.New village Novo Mesto

Jiahu flutes was identified and date to 6000 BCE, which is about 8000+ years old. Even now, these flutes can be played with 5 holes, 6 holes, 7 holes and 8 holes. We can't say Jiahu flutes are the oldest ones, but they should be one of the earliest ones at this moment.

Anthropology optional na?

Super

Buongiorno, complimenti per l' ottimo lavoro e video , Le situle sarebbero un arte dei Veneti Antichi.

Ni pa najstarejši predmet, ki je bil najdeni. To je bilo najdeno na filipinih leta 2020.

Fascinating, thank you

👍

Absolutely intriguing

I'd love to hear more of the Neanderthal flute.

Per my understanding of my Hmong (Miao) cultural music evolution, I surmised that our whistling from the mouth was our first instrument, then the leaf blowing before the flute and thereafter the musical reed was made to further fine tuned the flute and other wind and brass instruments up to the current modern form. My Hmong heritage too used whistling, leaf blowing, musical instruments for courtship as well as communicated in coded language during flight from enemies and to not disturb animals when hunting. The leather/skin head drum in China is one that may well be part of my Hmong (Miao) heritage used as celebration instrument, as public announcement from mountain tops to mountain tops as well as announcing the arrival of enemies/wars. Just sharing of how music creations and development are so similar internationally. Thanks for sharing this find and this documentary.

What language is this! Is it Sumerian?

👍🙌

👍

👍🙌

As a flute player , WTG Neanderthals!

zelo lepo !

👍

👍🙌😊

👍

You have to be incredibly smart to create an instrument. I believe we have had the same IQ for 90,000 years. We were just to busy being nomads traveling for food and water

Lepo

✌️

😉

✌️

I made my first model of this type of trap in 1984, but mine was of the British single-door variety. I made the body out of tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifer) and the spring and swing door out of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Everyone in the Southern Maryland Fur Takers organization at the time was impressed with how well it gripped a rubber hose, when stuck into the valve opening. Its trigger is much improved by a two-piece treadle. The prop pin can be small, say 1/2 inch in diameter, and a wider, riven piece serves as the treadle itself, with leverage from the lip of the rectangular opening and the prop pin close to the end of the "valve" door. This way, a lot more leverage is placed against the pin, in case one uses a stronger spring than the finger-thick rods of the prototype constructed near the end of this video. My trap's spring was about 5/8-inch thick at its thickest point and tapered toward its ends. The ends were fitted into a slot similar to those in this video. The single door (British type) has certain advantages over the double-door variety of Continental Europe. First, it's easier to construct and its closure point need not be quite so perfectly symmetrical. Second, since it pinches against the wall of the oblong opening, it need not have the circular openings seen in the Slovenian example. An investigator named Rasmussen was cited by James Bateman in his great museum book, TRAPS & TRAPPING, published by Stackpole Books in the late 1960s. Rasmussen, in his travels in the Southeast of Poland (today in Byelorussia) said the swamp dwellers in the region were still using traps of these models to trap everything from weasels to bears, with different sizes of course. In the model I made, I left the foot opening round, not oblong. My purpose was to test it as a canine trapping tool. It's possible this device could help explain the people's ability during the Middle Ages to extirpate wolves from large areas of Europe. This would've been nearly impossible with plain hunting, using weapons of the time, no matter how organized the efforts. Wolves have been known to have ranges that sometimes span hundreds of miles in only a few days. The researchers' focus seems to have been jaded by the Clonmacnoise stone relief of the stag in one of these traps. Reading some of the Medieval hunting books of France and Germany, plus the chronicles of hunting laws in Medieval Spain, one becomes certain the nobility would never have put up with these traps as cervid-catching devices. The art of the chase had innumerable rules and etiquette, the first of which was that no commoner better be caught messing with "the landowner's deer." My tulip poplar housing for this trap would never have held up against a caught wild animal; it was only made to see if the mechanism was really viable. I can wholeheartedly say the mechanism is very viable. The best wood for this, in my estimation, would be very hard, so damage by chewing would not be extensive. This need is borne out by the fact that the specimens found so far in many bogs of Europe contain not a single example of any of these traps made of soft woods. This trap can't be located by someone using a metal detector, as buried steel trap could. This one will quietly do its job: A man is therefore "in 100 places at once," in the viewpoint of the wild quarry. It doesn't hurt a hound if caught, but the houndsman must be of the responsible type, who is willing to come to the calls of his caught, and therefore potentially panicky, hunting dog. As a canine trap, this model lends itself to being a sort of self-contained "Dirt Hole Set." That is, the hole in the top of the trap resembles a rat hole, or a stash hole, made by some other canine, hiding food it couldn't eat. The quarry canine comes along, looking to "steal" the food thus buried, and attempts to dig out the attractive morsel lurking under the trap's treadle. In doing so, the animal presses down the treadle, and the trap door swings up, locking the canine's foot against the wall. Or, in the case of the Continental European devices pictured here, two trap doors close against each other. An advantage of the Continental design is the circular holes in the meeting of the doors. This enables the narrow part of a leg to have some freedom of twirling movement, yet it allows no exit due to the wider part of the lower foot. This would not work for a lot of smaller animals, as for instance, a beaver, whose front foot compacts itself far too small to be held by such a circle. In such cases, the door edge should be roughened by burning (or drilling) a series of small, parallel holes in a line. The two doors would first be made as a single piece, the holes being say, 1/4-inch diameter at most, forming a line along which the single piece could be split apart into the two doors. The door edge thus formed would be serrated. Or the holes could be burned or drilled after the doors were formed and fitted. The main object here is that the animal's foot not be allowed to slide between the two doors lengthwise during the animal's struggles. Doing so often rubs through leg skin, enabling and even possibly encouraging a fracture of the small bones in a foreleg. As you can see, there are many variables in this, and the original technology is complex. One more useful note: So far, all the ancient examples of this type of trap seem to have been recovered from bogs. This is another indication that the traps were used more for wary predators instead of for deer. There would be relatively few things to eat in a bog. It would thus not be an ideal place to trap game. One might say, "Yes, but deer have to drink several times a day." This is true, but several of the trap finds have been several traps at once, and all standing vertically, touching each other, submerged in the bog. This is hardly a viable trap-set for any animal! A much better trapping site would be at the ecotones along the edge of forest and field. I propose these traps were being soaked in the bogs to get rid of the human smell on them, an important prerequisite for catching jackals and wolves. The trapper perhaps met with his fate shortly after the traps were placed. Bogs are notorious for preserving wooden objects, due to their cool temperatures and lack of oxygen for rotting. It's probably true that the demise of this form of trap is related to the development over time of the blacksmith's steel trap. Those were more portable, more storable, more durable, and easier trade items. They also contained the mystery of the metal craft, whereas wood was ubiquitous as a raw material. We do have examples of iron foot traps dating back to the Middle Ages, but the early Middle Ages, nothing. This bespeaks a gradual replacement of the old technology. It's also possible that for a time, the predators were so kept at bay that the wooden traps had little demand for a century. That's long enough for the lore of their use to have totally died out.

🎄😊

😊👍

😊👍

😊👍

😊👍

👍👏

🙂👍👏🇸🇮

👍🏻

👍🏻

👍🏻

👍🏻👏🏻

👍🏻👏🏻

The vast majority of Roman marble statues were thrown into kilns and reduced to powder to plaster the Catholic Churches and homes of the wealthy.

It was an honour to participate, let's work together in the new reality.

Look at all those woke commie trashbag humans virtue signaling for their Chinese overlords. I guess you can take Tito out Slovenia, but you can't take the slave mentality he instilled in the Slovenes out of their minds. How pitiful and contemptible.

👍