Simon, Hope the comment finds you well. Great series, but it is a struggle using v5.3.1 for this as I have not found any way to get 'esp_efuse_mac_get_default' to compile into the project (yes, I checked all CMake REQUIRES statement) and I am using 'esp_read_mac' instead. I have been looking at the Wifi::init() method in wifi.cpp and cannot see how one would ever enter into the 'else if' block of the 'if' block as there does not seem to be any code like this: _state = state_e::ERROR. Hence, it seems that the error state would never be reported. Any clarification would be appreciated.

Hey there, Thanks a ton for the video, hope you're feeling better now 😊. I've also been diagnosed with acromegaly (Microadenoma) and I'm scheduled for surgery in 3 weeks. A part 2 of the videos explaining more about the surgery would be super helpful. But I'm curious, how exactly did you prepare for the surgery? Did they continuously monitor your brain signals? What happens if brain fluid leaks and how do the docs manage it? And how long did it take? Also, did they have to shave your nose or head? Thanks in advance.

Very nice. Thank you!

Could we instead use a fixed-size buffer allocated on the stack at compile time, rather than dynamic memory allocation, to handle data in the _verify_buf function? If the data exceeds this buffer size, we could read or write it in chunks. Thanks for the great videos.

Thank you so much for this, I'm a full-stack web and mobile developer who somehow became the sole dev on an embedded project. This series is a life saver for me, really appreciate it.

Sorry but I found this presentation very slapdash, unstructured, inaccurate and amateurish. Also maybe install a proper video grabber instead of a camera pointing at the screen?

I'm not sure what I hate more... your rambling, your mumbling, or your incessant amount of typos. I had to stop watching, it made me want to pluck my eyes out and cut my ears off listening to a muppet.

Finally , i have been wondering about this for years

"Science conducted" Love it

Thought I cornered the disaster market.

bees!! Very cool

Lol, I also though of going to farming instead of programming XD. Never expected to follow same channels for those thoughts XD

🐝🐝🐝

Greetings from Odesa! Thanks for supporting my country

omg your voice is extremely similar to mine. For a moment I was confused because I didn't remember recording a series on ESP32 programming.

Thank you so much for this series, it's really fantastic. I am struggling with how I can create my own tasks though, like I want to be able to have a member function of a class run as a task. Is this the right approach? Do you have any advice?

You ate using c instead of c++. Using a .cpp extension means nothing.

Just stumbled on this video. Hope you are doing well now. Thanks so much for sharing your story. Currently going through tests myself. Just wondering if you are going to put out the 2nd part I would really love to hear about how the surgery was.

Hello, Around 45:00, you"re starting to consider the "good accessibility" in GpioBase for _pin, _cfg and _inverted_logic. IMO, a good encapsulation rule would be to always put data (and possibly function) in private accessibility , and to provide only functions in protected or public accessibility. So, you should, maybe, put those data in private accessibility and provide getter in protected accessibility, because it seems clear that "outside world" would never to have access to them (only derived classes will). I know that those three data are constant, and that compiler will not allow the derived classes -- whose may need to access to them -- to modify them values, but, putting those data in protected accessibility will -- in some way -- break the Low of Demeter, by providing to derived classes a "direct" access to those data. Putting those data in private accessibility and providing only getters on them in protected accessibility could allow you to minimalize refactoring work if you consider to represent those data in a different way in the future. You are -- of course -- completely right on the fact that it looks like unnecessary code bloat, but, as we don't know -- when writing the code now -- how many access to those data will be done in the future, it could enforce the OCP principle, by allowing you to only have to change your getters behavior if you consider "one day" to change the way those variable are represented. More interesting thing being that those getter's behavior can perfectly be inlined. In the same idea, around 1:00:00, you were stroking your mind to deal with the possibility to use inverted logic. You could avoid such "problem" by just definying some protected function to compute the final state to use according to the _inverted_logic's. We could call this function -- will say -- logic_state(bool state) -- or any more interesting name if you will -- and implement this in a way like if (inverted_logic()) // considering we have a protected getter to know what the value is return !state; return state; or, in a way like return inverted_logic() ? ! state : state; if you prefear ;-)

19:00 39:00 47:00 value attr 50:00 size of type

I'm not quite clear if C++ mutexes and FreeRTOS semaphores can coexist without any problem ?

31:00 const reference, copy constructor 46:20 constructor inheritance. 54:00 init inheritance.

I am using Nodemcu. Facing that error. error: 'time_point_now' function uses 'auto' type specifier without trailing return type [[nodiscard]] static auto time_point_now(void) noexcept note: deduced return type only available with -std=c++14 or -std=gnu++14

16:47 N.I.C.E

Really great job. Just one question and i would like to hear your opinion. I've read in a book once that it's better to include stuff only in .cpp files rather than the hearder files. So,, in your code it would be better to include in .cpp Is it right or it wouldn't actually matter ?. Thanks for that great job btw

Great series, just getting started with C++ in embedded. I previously only used MicroPython but C++ seems to give you much more options. Thank you very much for these videos, I was a little bit lost getting started!

I am using Nodemcu8266 I spend a day looking for this error I spend a day looking for this error undefined reference to `pthread_cond_init' esp undefined reference to `pthread_cond_broadcast' undefined reference to `pthread_cond_wait' The answer is putting the CMakeLists as this : idf_component_register(SRCS src/main.cpp INCLUDE_DIRS "" REQUIRES freertos spi_flash pthread)

I kind of grateful, but after 20 minutes I realized, that this is a 40min video. Does it really take 40mins of configuration to write hello world.

Best dude ever. Thank you very much <3. i was watching another series which describing ESP-IDF, and i couldn't focus on the video for 10 min. But your videos are great, your way in explaining the way of OOP is great. Thanks again, you are the best I've seen in embedded systems on youtube.

Finally, a guy in embedded systems who really cares about his code to be clean and explains the reasons. Not just blinking a LED. You are the first one i find, please recommend anyone who codes in the same way in Embedded systems if you know any.

Thank you

There is actually a vscode plugin, that places text after the closing curly brackets to tell which line it belongs to and it will not be part of the codefile itself.

11:06 13:24 recursive mutex 15:45 send 20:52 receive 31:15 underlying pointer 34:35 QueueInterface constructor 38:20 convert pointer 40:14 copy constructor 46:40 default constructor 47:35 n_item_waiting 50:15 n_free_space 53:00 clear 54:47 create and destroy queue 1:01:00 create unique ptr to pass to Base Q Message

how can i make a !followage command? Because currently averything is broken :(

each your keeypress makes a sound like a drum. why? however I like your lecture.

u didn't finish smartconfig!!!! -.-

excellent project man

@60:03 line 31 xor... return gpio_set_level(_pin,state%%_inverted_logic); ... anyway - great series. just what i was looking for.

But is it really necessary to add extern "C" to the main function?