Excellent man.. I was looking for this from Italy.. I am an old dad Who is looking for a degree and you are the One explaining everything Better.. thank you..
@0xAsterisk10 күн бұрын
nice explanation
@Mk-fi9xfАй бұрын
Thank you, sir ! I am from India . your video helped me to a great extent....
@Mk-fi9xfАй бұрын
Indian KZbin contains creater ,specially in physics,have no sound information and way of explaining.....
@ChristoAndАй бұрын
I thought a downward distributed load is postive on a SFD?
@lizacuteeАй бұрын
Having two dots on head of either r and theta means 2nd derivative??
@ThabangMfene2 ай бұрын
the minute i started seeing whats vtheta and theta dot i had to like the vid seems like i will be staying for the course
@brunospasta3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Rittiuu4 ай бұрын
Which book are you using
@coolbits22354 ай бұрын
Thumbs up if you are watching this to understand orbital mechanics
@sazolbrb32904 ай бұрын
did you make it automatic
@marelleclejon66944 ай бұрын
This is literally the best video I've ever seen!!! Good job!
@marelleclejon66944 ай бұрын
Okay, I said that before watching the full video, but I just got to 10:10 and my mind is blown, this is better than the best
@marelleclejon66944 ай бұрын
I'm not even sure how I got through physics 1 without knowing the fundamentals this video is instilling in me now
@jbragg335 ай бұрын
Agreed, well said
@pratyushpathania70305 ай бұрын
Beautiful video
@Francismwendwa-wr9zn5 ай бұрын
Nicely explained
@Im_sonu0x6 ай бұрын
Thank u sir for clear explanation but mixup hindi please sir
@plucas20037 ай бұрын
Incrível!!
@LovelyShadesYT7 ай бұрын
DUDE I JUST WANTED TO TELL YOU HOW MUCH I APPRECIATED THIS VIDEO 10/10. My college professors would just explain it the same over and over again and it never clicked with me why I would chose on method over the other. Like how you explained why u-sub would drive you in a circle and thats when you should be using the half angle identity instead. It finally all clicked together for me and I cannot thank you enough. LOVED THIS <3
@eng10485 ай бұрын
So glad it helped :)
@fortrixtr8 ай бұрын
😢😢
@eng10485 ай бұрын
You have problem?
@marc-antoinetremblay65398 ай бұрын
I cant believe i’ve paid 500$ for this class, and this guy just broke it down in 15min, I really hope you are a teacher, might never need this again but im subscribing just to encourage you
@eng10485 ай бұрын
That's very kind of you :) Best of luck
@karlie78 ай бұрын
WELL SPOKEN
@familylaptop-gw9ig8 ай бұрын
what a greeat video ....thanks alot
@tristan84358 ай бұрын
Why do we assume FAC is 480? Because it appears in both equations? Is it just because it lets us solve both or is there another reason
@garrettgeffre17928 ай бұрын
You are a freaking unit. I’ve spent an embarrassing long time to understand this. I really wish there were many more videos like your in the world.
@sahibhara76119 ай бұрын
First video that genuinely helped me understand this. Thank you so much!
@etharhamid10 ай бұрын
thank you this was very helpful
@yasminh10 ай бұрын
thanks!
@dangdangheather11 ай бұрын
literally my savior couldnt find anyone explaining this method well
@dangdangheather11 ай бұрын
shouldnt the moment be positive and shoot upwards?
@dangdangheather11 ай бұрын
shouldnt the moment be positive and shoot upwards?
@maksurdu9305 Жыл бұрын
OMG!!! I've been looking for this the whole internet!!! You're an amazing tutor.
@NamasenITN Жыл бұрын
As you did a fit, then why not matching the mapping between motor control angles and position on the image plane, by identifying numerical parameters upon a calibration procedure that does not require measuring lengths in the real world?
@nf_mendoza9767 Жыл бұрын
Might just need a little more videos for KZbin to recommend your channel 😮
@kerogeorge372 Жыл бұрын
can you explain the last step where you got the final answer? the part where you did the matrix
@mohammadshabih5293 Жыл бұрын
thank you, this helped a lot
@sdsa007 Жыл бұрын
nice basic stuff, need to learn basics to understand Coriolis and Euler and centrifugal forces for earth dynamics... I was told centripetal and centrifugal are terms used for 'fictitious' forces in non-inertial frames (ie moving in circles) .... but the concept of normal you have shown seems non-fictitious to me makes perfect sense and I see it used to define Eotvos effect (an up-down force) in the context of gravity on an oblate surface....... the Coriolis force is considered 'fictitious' says on Wikipedia... but I think it too is an effect... related to independent movement on a non-inertial rotating surface... sorry if I am confusing people! But Thanks for keeping it simple!
@amalsal9559 Жыл бұрын
I came from an entirely different background and this surprisingly doesn't look scary at all. My sincere thanks and gratitude.
@martynobrien6720 Жыл бұрын
Perfect inspiration for me halfway through my Mech Eng degree. Top quality video, keep it up!
@ghayaalshamsi4102 Жыл бұрын
LIFE SAVER, THANK YOU!
@BryanRodriguez-lo8bb Жыл бұрын
Easy to understand! Thank you!
@berkedikici1293 Жыл бұрын
How did we find the value of 32.2
@Sibyl9171 Жыл бұрын
Its the english unit version of gravity. 32.2 ft/second^2
@hemsagarjoshi2841 Жыл бұрын
Love you brother u deserve million of subscribes
@weilitan1329 Жыл бұрын
neat explanation, tq sir. leant alot
@noyfbnoyfb1587 Жыл бұрын
Best video I’ve found to explain why the normal force is used in Frictional Force analysis for non-slippage and slippage conditions. Thank you.
@mrjabar6303 Жыл бұрын
Do applied force be greater than Maximum friction force , in case of tipping? Because the body does not move , please explain it?
@beckettakins6198 Жыл бұрын
Sprite!
@em2129 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this great video. What exactly is the unit of the acceleration a = sqrt((a_r)^2 + (a_theta)^2) if a_r is in m/s^2 and a_theta in rad/s^2? Timestamp: 10:25
@dominiczouras8979Ай бұрын
I wish he replied and answered your question, be I have the same one lol
@WYN0302 Жыл бұрын
I'm asking for the book you got the questions from