Thanks for making basic cn easy to understand. One question, why is DR not used as AP. Looking forward your next video.
@Jolie_sailor13 күн бұрын
This was a now to watch and ‘m now ready to circumnavigate. ❤
@joanmargaret489920 күн бұрын
"This side wants to be flat." Truth.
@katyb41522 күн бұрын
You are great and make is so easy to understand!!! Thank you!!!!!
@stephenrobinson817323 күн бұрын
Video has been sped up.
@TippeCanoeT5023 күн бұрын
This video was sent to me by an owner and he said it was actual speed. I think the boat would not leap out of the water at the end if it were not really going that fast! I have seen the T50 do exactly this same thing when I have been sailing it. Basically the boat surprises everyone by being so fast. It is a semi-displacement hull so not limited by waterline length. Very fun to sail!
@jujuforjesus27 күн бұрын
My boy John 1. Lol
@jujuforjesusАй бұрын
It's cool to see how the light
@Pacific.Marine.CaptainАй бұрын
how about a electronic voice recorder, start it at a "certain" time, and then when sighting say mark, then can go back through the audio and get time difference from when it started to when one "says mark" ...... just an idea :)
@User-g2c7tАй бұрын
Amazing teacher ❤ thank you
@Herophilos12 ай бұрын
Congratulations on presenting comprehensive introduction to the practice of celestial navigation so clearly. I would like to add a minor point, that doesn't affect the accuracy of your instructions. Please note that the spherical triangle which Tables 229 solve isn't the one you drew on the board. Two of its vertices are, as you point out correctly, are AP (the assumed position) and GP (the geographical position of the celestial body). But the third vertex is the elevated pole (N or S pole), and not the right angle formed by the AP meridian line and the GP latitude line. You may see these triangles on page ix of the Introduction included in all volumes of the 229 tables.
@duanesmith53212 ай бұрын
To get LONGITUDE directly from the stars at night three is a very simple method. Measure the Local Hour Angle of a star around Polaris. Add the LHA to Right Ascension of the star to get Local Meridian Time. Then subtract LMT from Greenwich Meridian Time obtained for the same moment, and you have a longitude. I have been doing this for a few years and it works
@piotrm48093 ай бұрын
amazing stuff ! I rewatch it every 2 years :) after few times - I fell much more confident now .... and start using my sextant on Baltic Sea (just for training purposes). Cheers
@Rebujito-wl8fm3 ай бұрын
So cute😀👍🛳️!!!
@mayankchadha59793 ай бұрын
Fantastic teacher👍👍👍
@DirtyDickMurdoc3 ай бұрын
Omg!!! This guy wears me out. Saying the same thing over and over. At 41 minutes i had to go
@damian38854 ай бұрын
Thank You Cpt. Nesh!
@damian38854 ай бұрын
Thank you very much
@kartikrawat20294 ай бұрын
This is the best simplified version of teaching celestial navigation on KZbin. Best thing being that , he does not uses the jargon. Wonderful work sir.
@rcm244 ай бұрын
nice, very nice!
@gfalexan4 ай бұрын
This should be a flat earth debunking video. You did it without even knowing it
Sounds like ocean waves crashing on the beach in the background.
@creationgret15 ай бұрын
I like to reserve "declination" for discussion about the variance between true and magnetic north. I understand your use. Thanks for the explanation
@dandeluca71865 ай бұрын
You blab your arse away without teaching anything. you talk way too much. you are knowledgable but dont know how to deliver information. the first 10 minutes of video is useless
@marcg16865 ай бұрын
Your opinion is duly noted.
@kev43545 ай бұрын
This is an exceptionally well-done build log, my T37 is on its way, and this build log will help immensely. Thank You
@godofdead39455 ай бұрын
THANK YOU SIR
@richardmcmurry91026 ай бұрын
This guy’s just great. Im a novice and this instructor is exactly what I need to understand the concepts of navigation.
@wes3266 ай бұрын
The only easy parts to celestial navigation are latitude by Polaris and noon longitude (never done by me). The rest is easy to screw up (extraction, calculation, and plotting errors). Former RC-135 navigator. Thank for sharing.
@Seek2be6 ай бұрын
Best Dang Course on Navigation on the internet, Thank You Sir!
@EuroGuy856 ай бұрын
this is the easy version? 2 and three quarter hours for one part? Second part better be 3 seconds long. What's the difficult version? Maritime academy 4 year program?
@kev43546 ай бұрын
This Great Thank You
@liquidsofa7 ай бұрын
I always remind myself that celestial navigation tells you where you are on an ocean, it does not tell you what side of the table you are sitting on. I also remind myself: Latitude tells you how far north and south you are, Longitude tells you how far east and west you are, Altitude tells you how high you are and Attitude tells you if you're getting dinner tonight.
@PilotBrazil19767 ай бұрын
At 06:48:42 the LHA shouldn't be 342° instead of 018°?
@brianwakefield79717 ай бұрын
😅
@RobbyAndrews-j5k7 ай бұрын
Hey, is this MIT OPEN COURSE WHER
@dranandamay8 ай бұрын
00:00:00 Introduction 00:10:00 Watch Time 00:27:00 Sextant Height 01:16:00 Dec & GHA from Nautical Almanac 03:35:00 Hc & Z from Sight Reduction Table 05:57:00 Making a Plotting Sheet 06:20:00 Practice Problems Bought the cheapest sextant from flipcart @ $12 .... will get it by next week, and then try out from my terrace 😊
@pavaoakrap50264 ай бұрын
Can i ask which sextant you Got? I m curious to get one just for practice purpose at the moment and 12 bucks is good deal lol
@dtsh44518 ай бұрын
Subscribed and liked. You are doing the Lord’s work 👍
@KenHinnenkamp9 ай бұрын
Celestial navigation works because the North Star, Polaris never moves from its point in the sky above the North Pole. If the earth were a spinning globe, orbiting the sun, and chasing the sun around the Milky Way, it seems clear that Polaris would not remain in the same spot in the sky forever. All the stars and constellations would be observed to change their positions along with the earth's movement. If the earth was orbiting the sun, every six months our view of the night time sky would be opposite of the prior starting point. Shouldn't we see a different set of stars and constellations every six months?
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin53679 ай бұрын
Polaris doesnt remain in the same spot, you got the basics wrong.
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin53679 ай бұрын
Nothing to say huh?
@LumBo71669 ай бұрын
Should of been taught this from first grade, why we were not pissies me OFF
@Jeremya7410 ай бұрын
It would help alot if you just used a flat earth map
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin536710 ай бұрын
None exist that are accurate
@AlexFoxthrot10 ай бұрын
FLatearthers make me laugh so hard. They watched a bunch of videos and then go around the internet telling professionals they do their job wrong. Hilarious.
@sissyfus61819 ай бұрын
You really are clueless, aren't you. Rather obvious you can't do this. But again, no phlat erffer can.
@marcg16868 ай бұрын
@Jeremya74 It would help alot if you feckless clowns would demonstrate a flat earth sight reduction.
@timetraveler711 күн бұрын
Bro got cooked.
@DanielDouglas-p6k11 ай бұрын
I was a deep sea navigator for eleven years tramping all around the world we only had a magnetic compass a sextant and a chronometer Starting in the 1950s The current growth round the world single handed race revived my interest in celestial navigation which I had completely forgotten. your explanation is superb and very clear I am thoroughly enjoying re learning even though at 86y I only sail in local Uk estuarys
@miamaxim766211 ай бұрын
CORRECTION: radius instead diameter 58:45 and 55:14
@jeffsmith335011 ай бұрын
This is exactly how I write technical documentation for complex banking and pharma processes. General to specific. It's always frustrating to see a lecturer pile loads of data on the heads of new students without first explaining to them what, exactly, they are doing or trying to understand. Hats off to you. "How are you with differential calculus?" lmao. Good one.
@rupertdunn5578 Жыл бұрын
…and of course, thanks…
@rupertdunn5578 Жыл бұрын
Not the first time it’s been mentioned but I chuckle every time I open this. Navigation made easy in a 7 and a half hour video…😂😂
@warjacare Жыл бұрын
Fortunately no useless Astronomy knowledge is given in this lesson. Congratulations!
@rumenchoooo Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Verradonairun Жыл бұрын
1:37:30 - first diagram (distance D from ground point gp: D = 90 - Hs). D is measured in degrees, but can be converted to nautical miles, nm, by multiplying by 60. 1:38:00 - second diagram (our position expressed as an intersection of two circles/two Lines Of Position, LOP's). 1:38:34 - third diagram, the "trick" (Sight Reduction Tables). Expressing our (angular) distance and direction from a gp as an (angular) distance from an assumed position (ap) on the navigational chart (with known latitude and longitude coordinates for both the gp and ap). Sight Reduction table lists values for Height computed (Hc) - the predicted height sextant (Hs) from any assumed position. (Hc = 90 - distance from ground point, gp) If, for example, the predicted Hc of the assumed position is 2 degrees greater than our local sextant reading (Hs), it means our Line Of Position is 2 degrees farther away from the Line of Position of the assumed position as well as from the gp of the celestial body.
@tonywhitcombe8357 Жыл бұрын
@nathanoakley1980 sent me . he and his panel reviewed your content and celestial navigation needs a 90 degree angle to work .. that dont work with a curved baseline . needs a flat horizon for that .
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367 Жыл бұрын
He and his panel has never done celestial navigation before. The 90 degree is either signifying the GP of a star, no flat base line needed. Or is from the tangent of a sphere. It is a fact celestial navigation requires the earth to be a sphere. These flerfs dont know how its done and make one simple mistake on purpose and you believed them.
@marcg1686 Жыл бұрын
We don't need a 90° angle, but we do need a Nautical Almanac. There is no nautical almanac for a pretend space fritatta. Mindless clown.
@drmantistoboggan287011 ай бұрын
Imagine being told by oakly to go do his trolling for him and actually being dumb enough to do it 😂 Ask oakely if he has ever done celestial navigation. He hasnt.
@sissyfus61819 ай бұрын
Serious question. Why do you bend over and let NAthan examine your prostate?? Do you enjoy that??? Why do you go "BAA, BAAAAAAA" as he has his way with you?????
@schwalleyf Жыл бұрын
I hope you still read this. I took your course awhile ago. I always had a question. Since today you have programs like AutoCad that could blow up a map in software. Using spherical trig to calculate an exact intersection point. I was blown off course going to Hawaii from NewPort Beach. No GPS in 1985. It worked using my computer software. We had a large sail boat. Anyway I love your lectures. Fraser