Hello! Yes, hindi naisama yung vertical effect dito sa vid lec. And yung sa drift combo, honest mistake. 😅 Na-laktawan. Supposedly either 1.2DL+0.5LL+EL or 0.9DL+EL yung sanang iconsider for modern design (yung load combo under LRFD dapat). hehe. Thank you for your comment! Highly appreciated. Hindi ko man na-pansin code mistake ko from years ago if not for your comment.❤

@deanzanoCE 👍good lectures engr. Napdaan kasi video mo sa feed ko Kaya pinanood ko. baka kasi ma-misinform yung mga baguhan kaya ako nag comment.

Good evening! If exactly na yung steel ratio dapat yung basis, then yes. However, since nag round-up tayo ng 400x400 for the gross section, it will be better for us to compute for the theoretically accurate area of steel. para mas economic. And besides, guide lang naman yung "Aim for gross steel area ratio of approximately 3%" para makakuha tayo ng trial section. Hindi siya total requirement na yun daw dapat ang steel ratio niya. :) If gamitin kasi natin yung 3% ratio dun sa 400x400, overdesigned na siya. :)

@Smile-et3fe pag sinabing tension controlled dapat, 3/8. Pero if walang sinabi, ang default by the code is 3/7 na yung max. 😊

@shankylezapanta1464 nasa provision na kapag yung value ng steel ratio ng tension steel is less than rhomax, pwede mo siya ianalyze using SRB. Hindi magkakalayo yung sagot if icocompare mo sa DRB analysis. Almost equal sila. 😊 If gusto mo accurate result: solve mo using DRB Pero inaallow naman ng international code na gumamit ng SRB analysis if pasok siya sa criteria. Halos same din lang sagot 😊

@@deanzanoCE Noted sir thank you poo. Bale sa actual structural design po, kahit na sapat na po tension bars para maging tension controlled yung section, required parin po talaga na maglagay ng kahit 2 bars sa compression zone?? Ang main reason lang po ba nito ay para may support lang po yung shape ng stirrups? bale wala po talagang SRB na design po? thank you po ulit at Godbless po. tanong ko narin po pala sir about sqr. isolated footing design and analysis hahaha. kung sapat na po ba na average effective depth lang po gamitin para sa OWS, TWS, at flexure? nung sa nagtry po kasi ako sa flexure, kapag larger d po ginamit ko, 21 bars po nakukuha kong required against Mu. pero nung ginaya ko po sol'n ng prof ko po na average d gamit sa lahat, 20 bars lang po nalabas. Parang naisip ko po kasi na mas safe po ata pag extreme steel yung ginamit na d na kung safe napo para sa xtreme na d, safe narin sa other way ng reinforcement since sqr. ftng naman po. Thank you po ulittttttt

@@zaifarmanalas1854 hello! The reference table used in the video from came from a western book and apparently not entirely conforming with NSCP 2015. I will try to cross examine the ref table with NSCP 2015. Apologies for the confusion! P.S. Gagawa po ako ng bagong video na specific po for latest code ng NSCP.

@@zaifarmanalas1854 hello! The reference table used in the video from came from a western book and apparently not entirely conforming with NSCP 2015.(as I just saw, sa groove weld ginamit ni NSCP yung 0.6Fexx. Iba dun sa book screenshot) I will try to cross examine the ref table with NSCP 2015 and will be discussing it with Structural Engineering professors on what transpired bakit magkaiba sila. Apologies for the confusion! I will keep you posted. P.S. Gagawa po ako ng bagong video na specific po for latest code ng NSCP.

Hello! Sorry for the late reply. Are you referring to this video? :) kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXrCaZR_n6yims0

0.0853

nominal 0.85 & design strength 0.75

Sir anong nakuha mong value ng Ast?

dapat po 0.03Ag ang Ast ? bali 0.03(400x400)?