otherwise if the voltage is out of phase then output dosnt equal zero ?
@electricalpereview5 күн бұрын
Exactly!
@irishchocolate387215 күн бұрын
There must be round off error. When I add VZ0, VZ1 & VZ2 together I am getting 0. 076 which isn’t zero after storing the values in memory to add them.
@khalaffzihni665723 күн бұрын
still wonder why tf i choose this subject ;-;
@electricalpereview23 күн бұрын
keep your head up. It gets better.
@electricalpereview29 күн бұрын
📖 Video Contents: 0:00 - Video Introduction 0:47 - Example Case Study 2:40 - Is Real Power (watts) Flowing? 3:20 - Determine Real Power (watts) Flow Direction 4:20 - Calculate Amount of Real Power (watts) Flow 7:12 - Is Reactive Power (VARs) Flowing? 9:24 - Determine Reactive Power (VARs) Flow Direction 10:57 - Calculate Amount of Reactive Power (VARs) Flow 13:37 - Is Real Power (watts) Absorbed in the Line? 14:18 - Is Reactive Power (VARs) Absorbed in the Line? 16:03 - Determine the Reactive Power (VARs) Absorbed in the Line 19:38 - Draw the Voltage Phasor Diagram 23:03 - Video Outro
@electricalpereview29 күн бұрын
📖 Video Contents: 0:00 - Video Introduction 1:03 - Phasor Diagram Explanation and Variables 3:52 - Leading vs Lagging Power Factor 6:11 - Real Component of Sending Voltage Re{Vs} 7:44 - Power Triangle Relationships 12:35 - Complete Phasor Diagram 15:21 - Questions and Answers 23:41 - Outtro
@jaysonbolanos1953Ай бұрын
Hi Mr. Zac. In calculating average cost per kw-h. Should it only be calculated based consumed 15million kwh not including the demand cost of 22,000 kw? Since theyre different bills?
@electricalpereviewАй бұрын
Billing demand charges are part of the total cost of purchasing electricity and should be included when calculating the overall average cost per kilowatt-hour since they contribute to the final price.
@tapak3926Ай бұрын
This is the best video on PU I've watched so far. My prof never explained the different cases where a different forumla was used and confused me for a whole year
@electricalpereviewАй бұрын
Thank you for the kind words, glad to hear it was helpful for you! Per unit seems much more harder and confusing at first but it is straight forward once you understand it.
@kinz8727Ай бұрын
Why don’t you divide the KVAr by 3 for the per phase KVAr?
@electricalpereviewАй бұрын
which time stamp?
@kinz8727Ай бұрын
@ 11:12
@kinz8727Ай бұрын
@ I don’t get why you assume that all the current in the motor at no load is going to your stator resistance.
@kinz8727Ай бұрын
This is at 13:20
@electricalpereviewАй бұрын
@@kinz8727 The reason why the total three-phase kVAR is not being divided by 3 at 11:12 is because the three-phase line values are being used in this formula. In the video at that time stamp, the magnetizing reactance (Xm) is being calculated by: Xm = VL²/Q-3ø Xm = (575 V)²/(49,513 VAR) Xm = 6.68 Ω Alternatively, you could also use single-phase values by dividing the three-phase kVAR by three, and the line voltage by √3: Xm = VL²/Q-3ø Xm = (VL/√3)²/(Q-3ø/3) Xm = (575 V/√3)² / ( 49,513 VAR / 3) Xm = 6.68 Ω It's the same result and either method may be used.
@walterbrown8694Ай бұрын
Good presentation - but the term you call "W" is not W, but omega the Greek letter used in electrical engineering for the constant 2pi. At 89, I've seen a lot of what seems to be a loss of rigor in many aspects of engineering and other fields of endeavor.
@Reza200032 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot! Is there a relation between impedance of a "step-up autotransformer" and impedance of a "2 winding" version of that transformer?
@emmab-hq6ml2 ай бұрын
Where is part 4?
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
@@emmab-hq6ml part 4 and 5 will be released next week
@electricalpereview29 күн бұрын
Part 4 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/hanZd2xunqh_r6s Part 5 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqmwimWqn6qNmposi=fXtxWqwn-s1XRqqN
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
📖 Video Contents: 0:00 - Video Introduction 0:45 - Real and Reactive Power Transfer Formulas 1:23 - Direction of Real Power Flow (Watts) 2:34 - Positive Real Power Flow (Positive Torque Angle) 3:49 - Zero Real Power Flow (Zero Torque Angle) 4:17 - Negative Real Power Flow (NegativeTorque Angle) 5:31 - Direction of Reactive Power Flow (VARs) 7:11 - Positive Reactive Power Flow 8:08 - Zero Reactive Power Flow 9:24 - Negative Reactive Power Flow 11:23 - Video Outro
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
📖 Video Contents: 0:00 - Video Introduction 0:38 - Step 1: Complex Power Transfer Formula 1:26 - Step 2: Real Power vs Complex Power 1:42 - Step 3: Apply the Real Component 2:37 - Step 4: Simplify Using Trigonometry Identities 3:50 - Step 5: Simplify Using Sine Identity 4:32 - Real Receiving Power Transfer Formula (P, Watts) 6:10 - Step 1: Reactive Receiving Power (Q, VARs) 7:30 - Step 2: Reactive Power vs Complex Power 7:50 - Step 3: Apply the Imaginary Component 8:39 - Step 4: Simplify Using Trigonometry Identities 9:19 - Step 5: Simplify Using Cosine Identity 9:43 - Step 6: Factor Out Vr/X 10:03 - Reactive Receiving Power Transfer Formula (Q, VARs) 10:20 - Video Outro
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
📖 Video Contents: 0:00 - Video Introduction 0:41 - Seminar Introduction 1:41 - Speaking Agenda 3:27 - Speaker Biography 5:51 - Seminar Learning Objectives 6:29 - What is Power Flow Between Buses? 10:36 - Step 1: Deriving the Complex Power Flow Transfer Formula 12:29 - Step 2: Ohm's Law and the Receiving Current 13:22 - Step 3: Sending and Receiving Voltage 13:53 - Step 4: Applying the Conjugate 15:09 - Step 5: Distributing Receiving Voltage 16:11 - Step 6: Multiplying Receiving Voltage 17:06 - Step 7: Simplifying Angles 18:50 - Step 8: Simplifying the j operator 19:51 - Step 9: Apply the j operator 21:20 - Video Outro
@somosayid27022 ай бұрын
Why don't you guys just use the metric system , what's up with all the feet 🤦♀️
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
The USA uses mostly U.S. customary units (sometimes referred to as imperial units). This video for the PE exam which is a USA based licensing exam. I guess you could say we like our feet 🦶😀
@kylecatman77382 ай бұрын
What's "Engery" LOLOLOLOLOL
@sidneychotalal78072 ай бұрын
Love this
@hongxiawu63652 ай бұрын
Wrong for period T at 4 min
@electricalpereview2 ай бұрын
would you mind clarifying? The period does not occur @ 4:00 in the video but the period shown in the video is correct.
@CaioAbe-r6e3 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing this video. At the end, you mention that the same problem was going to be solved via the pu method. Could you please share the link tor that video? Thanks!
@electricalpereview3 ай бұрын
glad you enjoyed it. I'm not sure if that particular video is on our KZbin channel it most likely follows this video in our online course at www.electricalpereview.com
@kasunsalu57923 ай бұрын
Sir❤
@georgeszabo29274 ай бұрын
The breakdown of how you go from a typical single phase transformer to this is fantastic. Haven't found a better explanation of it. Thank you Zach!
@electricalpereview4 ай бұрын
My pleasure. Glad you found it helpful
@lenafd5 ай бұрын
I have a question. is the GMR radius the real radius?
@electricalpereview5 ай бұрын
It's a theoretical value that helps to simplify the calculation of inductance since current does not flow uniformly throughout the conductor due to the skin effect (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect).
@jmnunnelee6 ай бұрын
Good way to solve this problem, however not so useful for the actual PE exam. We aren't given that power equation in the handout.
@electricalpereview6 ай бұрын
It is unfortuante that this particular formula is not included in the NCEES Reference Handbook, however, you'll need to be familiar with it in order to solve two wattmeter method questions on the PE exam. For example, take a look at problem #49 in the official NCEES Practice Exam. It's a two wattmeter method problem that is solved using the formula in this video.
@arzvak6 ай бұрын
Too late to the party, but damn good job
@electricalpereview6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@moo26126 ай бұрын
May I ask how mang passed total in this major(Power PE) in the world every year?
@electricalpereview6 ай бұрын
Current official passr rates from ncees.org: PE Exam - Electrical and Computer: Power 1st Time Pass: 59% Repeat Pass: 37%
@moo26126 ай бұрын
@@electricalpereview Many thx,In China the rate is 10% around ,I‘m a instructor of Registered Electrical Engineer Exam in China。
@FM-uo4rv7 ай бұрын
I can still hear Zach's voice in my head whenever I am doing electrical calculations. When I took his class he would always say "Be careful and Do not make this mistake..." This guy is a master of his trade. Thank you for what you do for the engineering community.
@electricalpereview7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind words.
@jmnunnelee7 ай бұрын
How are you determining that Va(1) is 72.5kv and then Va(2) is a negative value. Shouldn't they all be negative or positive? In your initial simplified diagram, you show the polarity as + to -.
@electricalpereview7 ай бұрын
When a complex number is "negative" it really just means that it is ±180 degrees out of phase. For example: For voltage, just swap the positive and negative voltage polarity references (the "+" and "-" signs trade places), and for current, change the direction from forward to backward (or vice versa). Va(1) is positive due to KVL, since the voltage drop across Z(1) is smaller than Vp(1): Va(1) = Vp(1) - Vz1 Va(1) = Vp(1) - Ia(1)•Z(1) [see 7:14 for these steps]. Va(2) and Va(0) are "negative" due to where these are located on the circuit and their polarity direction. They appear across each sequence impedance Z(2) and Z(0), however, they are in the opposite polarity compared to the actual voltage drop across each of these sequence impedances (for a load, the voltage drop is positive where the current enters, and negative where the current exists). [See 8:47 for Va(2) and 11:28 for Va(0)]. The reason why these sequence voltages are "negative" is because during fault conditions they act as a temporary voltage source that delivers fault current. A voltage source has opposite polarity compared to a load, the voltage polarity is negative where the current enters and positive where the current leaves.
@DavidOwen-fq7ly8 ай бұрын
The diagrams are hard to red because of the colour choices and I can barely hear you.
@electricalpereview7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback. This is about an 8 year video, all of our new videos are very clear, but I keep the old ones up because people still find them helpful🙂
@Boldaslove718 ай бұрын
I remember testing a very old CO relay about 25 years ago. Right on the nameplate, it said Type Circuit Opening relay, or something similar. I remember this because of all the CO's I've tested over the years, I now understood the name. The old one had a heavy glass cover, similar to a Pyrex baking dish. The nameplate also had the TCC right on it.
@electricalpereview8 ай бұрын
that's really neat, thanks for the share!
@KAFKUBA8 ай бұрын
Why didn't you voltage transform zone 2?
@electricalpereview8 ай бұрын
No need to since transformer 2's ratings were chosen as the new base values in this system. That makes the new base voltage in zone 2 equal to the transformer 2's primary rated voltage.
@KAFKUBA8 ай бұрын
@@electricalpereview thanks
@TheSensation199 ай бұрын
You need graphics
@electricalpereview9 ай бұрын
Agreed. Will be picking these shorts back up soon. Hard to fit it all in just 60 seconds 😀
@abdullahnajjar27279 ай бұрын
After 13 years away from books and theories, I am afraid I might need to brush up on my electrical engineering knowledge or it is normal? How long do courses in FE and PE last? and what is the price?
@electricalpereview8 ай бұрын
Very normal. You can find more about our class for the NCEES Power PE Exam (and FE) at www.electricalpereview.com
@kaihannoman9 ай бұрын
Great video as usual
@electricalpereview9 ай бұрын
Video Table of Contents: 0:00 - Full wave rectifier circuit 2:14 - How to add a voltage scope of the AC input signal 3:19 - Full wave rectified output voltage signal without the shunt filter capacitor 4:46 - Output voltage signal with to the shunt filter capacitor 5:46 - AC current signal 6:44 - AC current signal: explanation of why it is non-sinusoidal and non-linear 8:08 - AC current signal: explanation on positive and negative peaks 9:39 - Capacitor charging vs discharging cycles 4:14 - AC current signal vs AC voltage input signal comparison This is a response video to a student question on our online community about the NCEES Practice Exam problem #59. View the rest of the discussion about this practice problem here: community.electricalpereview.com/c/third-party-practice-exams/ncees-58 Link to the circuit simulator used in this video: www.falstad.com/circuit/
@kavandave39719 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video!!
@kavandave39719 ай бұрын
how to do -10+j30? If I follow this tutorial, I am getting syntax error
@electricalpereview9 ай бұрын
On your calculator, make sure you are using the negative sign to the left of the enter button, not the minus sign below the multiplication sign.
@kavandave39719 ай бұрын
@@electricalpereview yes, it works!! thank you so much
@FemboyEngineer10 ай бұрын
2:54 also what’s typical is a centrifugal switch?
@FemboyEngineer10 ай бұрын
Failure mode philosophy for this would be metal fatigue
@electricalpereview10 ай бұрын
@@FemboyEngineer personally I've only ever seen timer auxiliary contacts or a timer bit from PLC used to bypass the autotransformer to apply full voltage once the motor is close to rated speed but I'm sure a centrifugal switch would work just the same but it would need to be already built into the motor which means you'd need to purchase a specialty motor as opposed to using a timer contact with any existing standard induction motor.
@nzeakonkeiru680610 ай бұрын
Thanks bro
@sauravkadel28410 ай бұрын
Hi, I have a similar background but more so in the Solar performance Engineering. I think it’s more or less electrical based than Mechanical. I have a FE mechanical and was unsure if i should go for PE Mechanical or PE Electrical power. My direct supervisor isn’t a PE either. Kind of a unique situation. Do you have any suggestions on how i should proceed with this? Thanks
@electricalpereview10 ай бұрын
You are going to be spending a lot of time learning about either mechanical engineering or electrical power engineering. Choose the exam that most fits your job the most since what you will learn while you are studying will help you in the future.
@savannaobregon382310 ай бұрын
How does the calculation change if the gradient starts later in the project lifespan, say around year 3?
@electricalpereview10 ай бұрын
If the gradient started at N = 3 (where the first $0 of the gradient starts) instead of N = 1 like in this video, then using the P given G formula (P/G) would transform the gradient to a single present worth value at N = 2. From there you could use a P given F formula (P/F) to move that single payment to the true N = 0 present worth value.
@wickedpawn543710 ай бұрын
You didn't refer the equivalent circuit to the primary as the problem stated.
@electricalpereview10 ай бұрын
The circuit parameters solved for in the video are already referred to primary, no other step is needed since they were solved for using the open circuit and short circuit test values that were applied and measured at the primary terminals.
@wickedpawn543710 ай бұрын
Thanks for the clarification. I missed that the primary is 120V and the secondary is 240V. You tend to think that the primary is always the high voltage side.
@dopeFr3shinc11 ай бұрын
What is a good place for FE exam prep?
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
Our sister website, www.electricalfereview.com. It's a 100% free forever online course for the FE exam that I am currently working on that you can study from.
@germanaleyva812811 ай бұрын
Thank you for the tutorial high leg 4 wire delta transformers
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
glad it helped!
@bertalev201011 ай бұрын
This is my new favorite explanation video. How simple you make things is beyond me!
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment, glad it helped!
@duarterodrigues55211 ай бұрын
Obrigado! Deu mesmo bue jeito
@duarterodrigues55211 ай бұрын
Insano
@kozaTG11 ай бұрын
the 3 phase line inductance video is unavailable or is that just me?
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
Which video? Link it here and I can check it
@kozaTG11 ай бұрын
check for the video titled "How to Solve Transmission Line Inductance and Reactance Problems (Electrical Power PE Exam)". i can't link it because it says unavailable@@electricalpereview
@kozaTG11 ай бұрын
inductance for 3 phase@@electricalpereview
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
@@kozaTG I was only able to locate single-phase transmission line inductance and inductive reactance: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpamiKyvbsSXb68 Can you tell me where you are seeing the link for three-phase that will not open?
@kozaTG11 ай бұрын
yeah that's what i mean where's the 3 phase one?@@electricalpereview
@dremckenzie579711 ай бұрын
Excellent group of questions. Just wondering though for the final question (VIII) are you solving for R2 or R2/s? If R2/s, then if the slip was not =1 then the value at the end would be multiplied by s (s*0.061 ohms) vs being divided by s (0.061 ohms/s) as you stated at the end. Thanks again for the content.
@electricalpereview11 ай бұрын
Solving for just the rotor resistance R2, and not the rotor slip resistance R2/s