General Hodges is the best

Hello Dear, I have analyzed your KZbin channel and found some issues for which properly view and subscriber are not growingYour channel is not customized. If you are free, we can discuss this problem?

Your video overview is not optimized perfectly. Social engagement is not identified. Video does not have SEO friendly Title, Description, High volume rank tags according to your niche. Overall your video SEO score is not up to the mark. If you can fix these problems your channel will grow very fast & definitely your videos will get more views.

We salute you

Served in USAFSS 1971-1979, then when the command became Electronic Security Command (USAFESC) served 1979-1991.

good stuff, keep uploading... first viewer... haha i feel special... haha

1) If the US Army War College is adopting presentism as the over arching framework to handle history that's not only misguided, it's dangerous. Establish a separate discipline if need be, but don't distort or pollute the past with present lenses or frames. 2) The podcast's topic was to be writing history, yet the first 17 minutes and 10 seconds were off topic - 56 per cent of the 30:25. If you want to have a discussion about the book or Ukraine or China, have that discussion, but don't mislead the listener with an incorrect title. Treat the subject and the listener with respect by delivering what was billed. 3) _'To bring it back to writing...'_ Hallelujah! The question about how the book might have been written differently in the context of Russia's invasion was a good one. We learn what was omitted. This could have brought forth more questions about editorial decisions, publisher's constraints, what the author deems less or unimportant, and perhaps even an examination of what's being omitted from history books. This didn't happen. Instead we're off topic again and talking about what Johnson is researching now for his next book and Nato's intra-alliance tension re balancing China. Fortunately @24:20 there's a second question about actual writing and we are given an account of how he had to rewrite his PhD thesis for _Faustian Bargain_ . 4) The discussion about the two different audiences that begins @26:10 and goes to @29:35 meets the billing. But given so much time was squandered earlier, too much meat was left on the bone. Thinking about what Johnson said, I would have enjoyed a discussion about how 5 pages of content for an academic audience was whittled down to sentence for the layman. Five pages seems meaty. Is it a disservice to the public being provided the chicken nugget of one sentence? Cut a few more words and you've made a bumper sticker. Re writing style differences for the two different audiences, should the academe and the publishers sit down and figure out ways to bridge the gap? Does the fixation on 'the narrative' serve the reader poorly? Should publishing drop the physical book and shift to digital where the constraints of number of pages, size, and weight matter much less? Looking at Hollywood, we see the studios often distribute director's cuts of films. Would an author's cut in digital form allow the author to present material completely and as s/he wants?

For Great Britain, the messier the continent, the better. (around 1907)

Most Eastern Europeans saw this coming. We were about to partially mobilise right before Minsk. The poles and baltics had been yelling, rightly so, for years about Russia's projected aggressiveness. What's infuriating is that a country with a GDP at the size of Italy could not be kept in check by the great European powers, even without American aid.

'Promosm' 😂

քʀօʍօֆʍ 🎉

Knew of a Person of Congolese origin, from my unit in the Desert Shield/Storm days. Seemed pretty cool. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIKodaqeg81mnrc